Hearthstone QQ Therapy - Page 43
Forum Index > Hearthstone General |
serum321
United States606 Posts
| ||
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
On December 17 2013 03:27 Drazerk wrote: Instant quit vs mages since they take way too long to win against. Turn 5 blood lust win every other game (quit if you can't get it) Wins per hour is only thing that really matters in constructed so drafting a none rush deck that can't win in the quickest time isn't worth it until you have every card. You can speed run any game. This includes Hearthstone. If I ever needed to turn a game into a job, I would just spend money on it from my real job. Working for $.50/hr is pretty shit. | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On December 17 2013 05:06 serum321 wrote: Time for queing/mullinganing/and getting to turn 5 is about 5 minutes, averaging in queing for mages and insta leaving, I'd say 5 minutes on average a game is a conservative number on my part. You said every other game so that is 60 games = 5 hours. But please tell us more how you win 30 games in 2 hours. Not counting in other people instant leaving which speeds up the process. 2 hours is a low estimate i'll admit but its doable on a good day once your MMR is low enough and people are only interested in the quick wins. On December 17 2013 05:10 willoc wrote: If I ever needed to turn a game into a job, I would just spend money on it from my real job. Working for $.50/hr is pretty shit. In comparison to speed running FF9 or chain of memories this is the most fun I've had trying to beat a game as quickly as possible ![]() | ||
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
On December 17 2013 05:18 Drazerk wrote: Not counting in other people instant leaving which speeds up the process. 2 hours is a low estimate i'll admit but its doable on a good day once your MMR is low enough and people are only interested in the quick wins. In comparison to speed running FF9 or chain of memories this is the most fun I've had trying to beat a game as quickly as possible ![]() Your posts talk about stuff like "Wins per hour is only thing that really matters in constructed" as objective points but now I see your real goal is a complete card collection with no real money spent. I guess this is what it means to beat the game for you (and most likely only for you and a small number of individuals). If this is the case, fair enough but I doubt insta-quitting half your games would be considered to be "playing the game" for most individuals and the designers of the game. Not trying to tell you to play the game in any way (choose for yourself) but I just wanted to clarify for everyone else who isn't looking down the seemingly strange narrow view you are. | ||
Provocateur
Sweden1665 Posts
| ||
emythrel
United Kingdom2599 Posts
On December 17 2013 10:36 Provocateur wrote: EU servers down for two days straight now, saad! I need my hearthstone fix! I got in for like 2 secs then error message. Now I just get a message that says "Closed blah blah blah, relog" which is atleast progress over the last 36 hours of not even being able to hit the play button in the Bnet app | ||
Markwerf
Netherlands3728 Posts
Arena it's doable to go a bit more than a pack + 20ish dust + 0.5-1 gold card per two hours. Assuming 70% win rate you play 10 games average, taking 10 minutes per game and take 20 minutes to draft, open your stuff etc. At 70% you almost go infinite and should sustain relatively easily if you grab the daily quest as well, probably while doing arena even if you just reroll the quest when you're not so favorite classes pop up. It's impossible to match that speed playing constructed and buying packs with your gold, even if you're some quick winning machine. | ||
Provocateur
Sweden1665 Posts
On December 17 2013 11:00 emythrel wrote: I got in for like 2 secs then error message. Now I just get a message that says "Closed blah blah blah, relog" which is atleast progress over the last 36 hours of not even being able to hit the play button in the Bnet app Well what do you know, suddenly now it's working :s whining works yay! | ||
caelym
United States6421 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
"In a post in the General Closed Beta Discussion forum made last week, we've acknowledged an issue currently ongoing with the Arena will require a client patch unfortunately. We're working to get it resolved as quickly as possible but there isn't an ETA yet as to when that will be." | ||
Inschato
Canada1349 Posts
| ||
Steelavocado
United States2123 Posts
On December 17 2013 14:27 WaveofShadow wrote: Welp. "In a post in the General Closed Beta Discussion forum made last week, we've acknowledged an issue currently ongoing with the Arena will require a client patch unfortunately. We're working to get it resolved as quickly as possible but there isn't an ETA yet as to when that will be." If it isn't here by thursday... | ||
RuskiPanda
United States2906 Posts
Well at least i saved up quite a bit of gold from quests+constructed for some arena spam.. still sucks its been locked for like a week. | ||
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
| ||
Steelavocado
United States2123 Posts
On December 17 2013 21:11 RuskiPanda wrote: Well at least i saved up quite a bit of gold from quests+constructed for some arena spam.. still sucks its been locked for like a week. Yea that's true. Just sucks that the most fun mechanic for a player like me who is decent but lacking the good cards for constructed has been down for a whole week. Arena will be a blast when it gets back though | ||
Crownlol
United States3726 Posts
On December 17 2013 21:24 GizmoPT wrote: just played vs a guy with full legendary deck -.-' There's no way that's true. | ||
FetTerBender
Germany1393 Posts
Should be a pretty easy kill, then? TB did this for the lulz and got (not surprisingly) killed super early / often, for the legendaries cost too much mana to provide early game. | ||
Crownlol
United States3726 Posts
On December 18 2013 00:33 FetTerBender wrote: Should be a pretty easy kill, then? TB did this for the lulz and got (not surprisingly) killed super early / often, for the legendaries cost too much mana to provide early game. An all-legendary deck would be atrocious! | ||
Hondelul
1999 Posts
28 legendaries + 2 faceless manipulators. Funny to watch | ||
S1eth
Austria221 Posts
On December 18 2013 00:55 Hondelul wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyJ-v5fSH5I&feature=c4-overview&list=UUy1Ms_5qBTawC-k7PVjHXKQ 28 legendaries + 2 faceless manipulators. Funny to watch I wish he'd try using Far Sight instead of Faceless Manipulators since most of those cards cost 5-6 or more. | ||
| ||