|
Right....I just figured I'd post this...because...well...I believe vaccinations are a good thing. Lol...I mean, preventing diseases and basically destroying them, how can you be against that? But apparently this organization is...so I wanted to know how TL.net felt...
http://thinktwice.com/
Poll: Vaccinations: Good or Bad? (Vote): Good (Vote): Bad
Edit:
I saw it on some bumper sticker at my friends baby sitter's house when I dropped her kid off...and I was wondering what the site was about...
Yes...I randomly go to websites I see on bumper stickers.
|
basically, any vaccine carries a certain risk because the purpose of one is to stimulate the immune system in a highly specific manner. this can only be accomplished by subjecting the patient to either the pathogen itself, an attenuated, mutated, or partial version, or the pathogen's DNA. besides the possibility of overstimulating or causing a hyper-allergic reaction, there is a risk that the organisms being used in the vaccine can become re-activated. for example, this was especially common for the smallpox vaccine, in which 1 out of 1000 recipients actually got the disease after receiving the vaccine (off the top of my head).
|
Well, the site really doesn't offer a substantial argument against vaccines in any way from how I read it. While it cites some studies, a fair amount of them are related to vaccination only tangentially...I mean, the effects of a specific vaccine on malnurished children? An rather isolated scenario that the medicine community can work against. Really, unless they have some method of proving that vaccines would actually cause greater harm than good, all that they are achieving is to call attention toward a wantant use of vaccination, which I believe doctors are more than aware of.
In short, vaccinations are good.
EDIT - Yeah, there were concerns of that nature over the smallpox vaccine when the US government began to have production runs of smallpox vaccines made right after 9/11. However, most vaccines with a higher general risk aren't exactly meant for the administration to the public, but a specific sphere of personnels likely to be exposed to it.
|
Vaccinations are good for people, but people should have the right to not have one, UNLESS by doing so they endanger the livelihoods of other people. Like, a tetanus shot vs. a smallpox shot.
|
vaccination against stuff like small pox is a good thing. vaccination against some minor stuff can b a bad thing.(ie flu)
|
Yeah, but should parents have the right to reject their children proper medical treatment? The child can't stand up for itself.
I didn't see any reasons why they said it's bad. It's probably a site for religious people. Look at the FAQ.
|
Vaccination for "minor" stuff like flu is vastly more important than vaccination against smallpox, whereas smallpox has a small chance of being unleashed at best, flu is a very real and active threat against the elderly and those with certain conditions.
|
GrandInquisitor
New York City13113 Posts
I can't believe the kind of stupidity society can create sometimes. First Ron Paul, and now anti-vaccination?
=\
|
A friend's family has a kid who has autism, they had video's of him doing things he had isn't currently able to do before he some kind of vaccination, (3 in 1 I think) and now he has autism, not saying they are directly related, but putting lots of (weakened) diseases into a fragile child's immune system can't always be good.
BTW: Hasn't the amount of people who have autism much higher than it was before?
Oh, and my cousin also may have autism, and she also took the vaccinations.
EDIT: Yes, I checked the wikipedia page, there is a chart saying that from 1996-2005 the amount of people affected with autism (U.S) has more than quadrupled. Something has to be causing it, right?
|
Reversing vaccine damage
There's a list to some homeopathic clinics and other hocus pocus on that page. So luckily everyone who has got vaccinated can be cured! Halleluja!
|
im guessing the only person voting bad is you?
|
Ecael,
Small pox can kill you, flu generally can not. Of course, small pox is extinct by now, so its not a concern. Last I recall, flu vaccine is only necessary for elderly, children or people with sensitive illnesses.
It is not a necessity for the general masses.
|
Of course theyre good. Theyre only bad when people abuse them, or dont finish up on their vaccinations, allowing whatever theyre supposed to protect against mutate and become resistant.
|
On March 17 2008 07:58 Slayer91 wrote: A friend's family has a kid who has autism, they had video's of him doing things he had isn't currently able to do before he some kind of vaccination, (3 in 1 I think) and now he has autism, not saying they are directly related, but putting lots of (weakened) diseases into a fragile child's immune system can't always be good.
BTW: Hasn't the amount of people who have autism much higher than it was before?
Oh, and my cousin also may have autism, and she also took the vaccinations.
EDIT: Yes, I checked the wikipedia page, there is a chart saying that from 1996-2005 the amount of people affected with autism (U.S) has more than quadrupled. Something has to be causing it, right?
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?cat=36
|
lol, just logged in to say "Something about pirates and global warming...". Too late.
|
On March 17 2008 07:24 Caller wrote: Vaccinations are good for people, but people should have the right to not have one, UNLESS by doing so they endanger the livelihoods of other people. Like, a tetanus shot vs. a smallpox shot. how does not getting one endanger the lives of other people? isnt that what the vaccine is for?
|
To be against vaccination in this day and age is to be a plain ignorant.
|
United States22883 Posts
Blah blah blah yes it sucks that vaccinations can rarely cause damage and eventually they may lead to virii adaptation, but in the long run vaccines save far more lives than they harm.
|
On March 17 2008 08:28 dybydx wrote: Ecael,
Small pox can kill you, flu generally can not. Of course, small pox is extinct by now, so its not a concern. Last I recall, flu vaccine is only necessary for elderly, children or people with sensitive illnesses.
It is not a necessity for the general masses.
Then it simply depends on your interpretation of the situation then, given the realistic situation in the practical extinction of smallpox and other exotic diseases, I cannot agree to the concept that the vaccines of these diseases are more important in any way than a flu vaccine. Yes, flu vaccine is only 'necessary' for the listed population (and healthcare providers), but in that it has a demographic at all it far outweights the importance of smallpox vaccines. Thus my disagreement with your careless brushing aside of the basic vaccines like Flu and placing Smallpox before it in goodness.
|
|
|
On March 17 2008 07:58 Slayer91 wrote: A friend's family has a kid who has autism, they had video's of him doing things he had isn't currently able to do before he some kind of vaccination, (3 in 1 I think) and now he has autism, not saying they are directly related, but putting lots of (weakened) diseases into a fragile child's immune system can't always be good.
BTW: Hasn't the amount of people who have autism much higher than it was before?
Oh, and my cousin also may have autism, and she also took the vaccinations.
EDIT: Yes, I checked the wikipedia page, there is a chart saying that from 1996-2005 the amount of people affected with autism (U.S) has more than quadrupled. Something has to be causing it, right?
The amount of diagnosis for autism has increase due to doctors being more aware of it. Here, this graph should explain itself.
|
On March 17 2008 08:33 skindzer wrote:Show nested quote +On March 17 2008 07:58 Slayer91 wrote: A friend's family has a kid who has autism, they had video's of him doing things he had isn't currently able to do before he some kind of vaccination, (3 in 1 I think) and now he has autism, not saying they are directly related, but putting lots of (weakened) diseases into a fragile child's immune system can't always be good.
BTW: Hasn't the amount of people who have autism much higher than it was before?
Oh, and my cousin also may have autism, and she also took the vaccinations.
EDIT: Yes, I checked the wikipedia page, there is a chart saying that from 1996-2005 the amount of people affected with autism (U.S) has more than quadrupled. Something has to be causing it, right? http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?cat=36
LOL... absolutely LOVE that graph!
Increase in population... increase in population density.... increase in self-awareness... increse in detection methods... jeeez.. these could all be things "related" to more autism... you can't just look at two trends, "compare them" and draw a conclusion.
God knows perfect algebra and we're all just statisticians.
|
On March 17 2008 08:28 dybydx wrote: Ecael,
Small pox can kill you, flu generally can not. Of course, small pox is extinct by now, so its not a concern. Last I recall, flu vaccine is only necessary for elderly, children or people with sensitive illnesses.
It is not a necessity for the general masses. actually this is wrong. every flu season many colleges offer free, or cheap flu shots to their students. and giving flu shots to people with "sensitive illnesses" makes no sense. if by sensitive illnesses, you mean sensitive immune systems or problematic immune systems, then no, that is also wrong. vaccines should only be taken by people with healthy immune systems.
i think you confused - the flu is especially deadly for elderly, children, and people with weak body defenses, but the vaccine is recommended for everybody.
the efficacy of the flu vaccine is an example of one of the "negatives" of preventative medicine. because the virus is highly mutagenic, there is no practical way to combat it presently, and each season the CDC has to choose like five different vaccines to give - out of maybe 20+ possible strains.
edit - reread your post and realized i may have misinterpreted it. you are right about the vaccine being not "necessary" for everyone.
|
it can also turn out as bad as it did in sweden 1982. The government decided that every woman was to get vaccinated against rubella. The reason was that rubella can cause women to give birth to deformed kids if they get it at mid-age.
Rubella is basically a child disease, if you get it at a young age it wont give you any remaining symptoms and gives you a lot of red itchy rashes. Rubella is also pretty much harmless to men.
But what happened with this mass vaccination was, that since it is pretty much impossible to reach out to EVERY woman and give her the vaccine, the only thing that happened was that the disease became more rare, thus less women got infected in their early years and instead they picked up the disease from men who had the disease latent later on, around their 30's when they were about to give birth. Thus the entire point of the vaccination had the exact opposite effect.
Stuff like this require extensive research before action is taken.
|
Lol god you have to be such a fucking idiot to think vaccines are "bad".
The only thing bad about them is when they are not given out properly.
|
|
|
|
|
|