|
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. |
Russian Federation605 Posts
On September 28 2023 00:19 KwarK wrote:You can’t buy new ones, they’re not in active production. By museum piece I don’t mean useless or inactive, I mean that it’s a relic of the last generation, left over, inherited. If Britain were to enter a serious peer war today we would spend our inheritance of storm shadows but it’s not what we would rearm ourselves with. It’s not what we would manufacture to fight a current war against, for example, Germany with. It’s like the Russian T-80s. They have them, the cannon still works, you’re no less dead for being shot with a round launched from a T-80. But nobody in Russia is building new production lines for new T-80s.
You only have a few years after something goes out of production to restart before restarting is materially no cheaper than making a new line from scratch. Skilled workers move away. The floppy discs get lost. People retire or die. The industrial infrastructure decays. You don't say: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/09/24/the-russians-are-making-their-first-new-tank-turbines-in-30-years-likely-signaling-a-very-long-war/?sh=54838e1650c7 "Alexander Potapov, CEO of Uralvagonzavod, announced his firm would resume producing 46-ton, three-person T-80s “from scratch.”
Also what about SS not being in active production? https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/uk-news/2023/05/10/britain-requests-deadly-cruise-missiles-for-ukraine/ "He added that MBDA, an Anglo-French company, would have to step up production of the missile at its factories because it was unlikely the British military would donate Storm Shadow from its own war stocks and that was why it issued the tender." https://t.me/boris_rozhin/98344 SS produced in May 2022.
|
MBDA also still offers them as a "solution" on their website: https://www.mbda-systems.com/product/storm-shadow-scalp/
I'm no expert, but if I had to guess I'd say they're still being produced by MBDA. Of course, that's a part-French company, so.you can't really blame the Brits for disavowing the whole thing
|
On September 27 2023 22:32 sertas wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2023 21:46 zeo wrote:On September 27 2023 20:57 sertas wrote:On September 27 2023 18:56 zeo wrote:On September 27 2023 17:24 hexhaven wrote: Not sure that Russia being unable to finish a week long anti-terrorist operation or a three day long special military operation paints the country in the best light. How is the two day counteroffencive going by the way? Hasnt been mentioned in this thread for quite some time, weird isnt it? It's going great thank you for asking, 2 more villages being cleared of russians, let's hope ukraine gets f16 before they win as i said so ukraine has more time to demilitarize russia Damn thats crazy, didnt know that. What are the names of these villages? I just saw these tweets: 27 vechicles in one direction. Crazy, like they were being funneled in and picked off near Verbove on purpose. https://twitter.com/1_plus_1equals3/status/1706900312672354425?t=1fq2VuJt6Pr5mW8Un76Blg&s=1924 counted here and geolocated in the Andreevka direction. These vids and pictures are just from the last day impossible to keep up. Which two villages? Any Russian armor collums destroyed? Post them here Yeah and russia is losing way more. Verbove and that other town with weird name will be in ukranian hands in a few weeks is my guess, you want to bet against? Your evidence for Russia losing way more in this case is 'dude trust me'. In reality Kiev is taking extreme casualties for gains measured in meters, 'megavillages' with one dirt road and 5 houses without plumbing. Tens of thousands of casualties on the UKR government side with Russians being able to sit back and funnel the human waves into killzones as we can all see buy the massive amounts of footage combing in.
The Russians took these kinds of machine and manpower losses during the first months while they were hard pushing. Thats the kind of reality of modern warfare between peer armies. Even if the attackers completely exhausts all of their attacking potential with this offensive they can sit back and I doubt the Russians can push back into them without taking a lot of losses. Maybe take back the few km captured by the Ukrainians in the last 100+days but more than that is going to be a slog
On September 27 2023 23:04 sertas wrote: Obviously hard to tell with any russian source if they're reusing old footage or posting their own losses as ukrainan losses, but if you give the benefit that it's true its kinda funny, ukraine destroyed like 20 command posts this week in big booms for evreone to see and then you see 1 ukrainian command post get blown up and its somehow news?
Ukraine destroys 20+ ifv many days and it's not even mentioned, it's just a normal day Most of these things only happen on Twitter in walls of text with no evidence to back up the claims
On September 27 2023 22:52 0x64 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2023 21:46 zeo wrote:On September 27 2023 20:57 sertas wrote:On September 27 2023 18:56 zeo wrote:On September 27 2023 17:24 hexhaven wrote: Not sure that Russia being unable to finish a week long anti-terrorist operation or a three day long special military operation paints the country in the best light. How is the two day counteroffencive going by the way? Hasnt been mentioned in this thread for quite some time, weird isnt it? It's going great thank you for asking, 2 more villages being cleared of russians, let's hope ukraine gets f16 before they win as i said so ukraine has more time to demilitarize russia Damn thats crazy, didnt know that. What are the names of these villages? I just saw these tweets: https://twitter.com/Ghost132607472/status/170666275208818738127 vechicles in one direction. Crazy, like they were being funneled in and picked off near Verbove on purpose. https://twitter.com/1_plus_1equals3/status/1706900312672354425?t=1fq2VuJt6Pr5mW8Un76Blg&s=1924 counted here and geolocated in the Andreevka direction. These vids and pictures are just from the last day impossible to keep up. Which two villages? Any Russian armor collums destroyed? Post them here Twitter is a horrible source, almost as bad as telegram. Drone video footage is evidence though. Geolocation is evidence. Texts claiming something happened is not though.;
Again, do not take anyones word for it. Why should you. Just read the subtext of what is being posted here:
- The offensive is going great! Trust me guys! What do you mean it hasn't moved anywhere in a month after non-stop attacks? Its going great! Well... no, I don't have any evidence but its going faster than expected, in three more weeks we will capture that outhouse 500m away from the lines today! I don't care if it costs 10.000 lives its the outhouse of freedom and those 10k are actually Russians lol, who cares? Those mobilizations are not real, the piles of bodies and tanks are not real lol
- Did you see the 50 articles about the hundreds of command centers, tanks and planes destroyed and one million dead generals? What do you mean if 10% of that was real we would be at Moscow by now? We will take that outhouse 500 meters away in a month or so, just 100 more command centers to go lol
It must be getting exhausting doing these mental gymnastics day in and day out but its easier if done in groups.
|
For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured.
|
On September 28 2023 02:27 zeo wrote: Your evidence for Russia losing way more in this case is 'dude trust me'
This is you for literally anything. You constantly tell us how much we're being brainwashed by propaganda, ignore any third party sources, and then take all Russian claims at their face value. Then, just as a beautiful cherry on top, you have the balls to claim someone else is doing mental gymnastics.
|
On September 28 2023 02:27 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2023 22:32 sertas wrote:On September 27 2023 21:46 zeo wrote:On September 27 2023 20:57 sertas wrote:On September 27 2023 18:56 zeo wrote:On September 27 2023 17:24 hexhaven wrote: Not sure that Russia being unable to finish a week long anti-terrorist operation or a three day long special military operation paints the country in the best light. How is the two day counteroffencive going by the way? Hasnt been mentioned in this thread for quite some time, weird isnt it? It's going great thank you for asking, 2 more villages being cleared of russians, let's hope ukraine gets f16 before they win as i said so ukraine has more time to demilitarize russia Damn thats crazy, didnt know that. What are the names of these villages? I just saw these tweets: https://twitter.com/Ghost132607472/status/170666275208818738127 vechicles in one direction. Crazy, like they were being funneled in and picked off near Verbove on purpose. https://twitter.com/1_plus_1equals3/status/1706900312672354425?t=1fq2VuJt6Pr5mW8Un76Blg&s=1924 counted here and geolocated in the Andreevka direction. These vids and pictures are just from the last day impossible to keep up. Which two villages? Any Russian armor collums destroyed? Post them here Yeah and russia is losing way more. Verbove and that other town with weird name will be in ukranian hands in a few weeks is my guess, you want to bet against? Your evidence for Russia losing way more in this case is 'dude trust me'. In reality Kiev is taking extreme casualties for gains measured in meters, 'megavillages' with one dirt road and 5 houses without plumbing. Tens of thousands of casualties on the UKR government side with Russians being able to sit back and funnel the human waves into killzones as we can all see buy the massive amounts of footage combing in. The Russians took these kinds of machine and manpower losses during the first months while they were hard pushing. Thats the kind of reality of modern warfare between peer armies. Even if the attackers completely exhausts all of their attacking potential with this offensive they can sit back and I doubt the Russians can push back into them without taking a lot of losses. Maybe take back the few km captured by the Ukrainians in the last 100+days but more than that is going to be a slog Show nested quote +On September 27 2023 23:04 sertas wrote: Obviously hard to tell with any russian source if they're reusing old footage or posting their own losses as ukrainan losses, but if you give the benefit that it's true its kinda funny, ukraine destroyed like 20 command posts this week in big booms for evreone to see and then you see 1 ukrainian command post get blown up and its somehow news?
Ukraine destroys 20+ ifv many days and it's not even mentioned, it's just a normal day Most of these things only happen on Twitter in walls of text with no evidence to back up the claims Show nested quote +On September 27 2023 22:52 0x64 wrote:On September 27 2023 21:46 zeo wrote:On September 27 2023 20:57 sertas wrote:On September 27 2023 18:56 zeo wrote:On September 27 2023 17:24 hexhaven wrote: Not sure that Russia being unable to finish a week long anti-terrorist operation or a three day long special military operation paints the country in the best light. How is the two day counteroffencive going by the way? Hasnt been mentioned in this thread for quite some time, weird isnt it? It's going great thank you for asking, 2 more villages being cleared of russians, let's hope ukraine gets f16 before they win as i said so ukraine has more time to demilitarize russia Damn thats crazy, didnt know that. What are the names of these villages? I just saw these tweets: https://twitter.com/Ghost132607472/status/170666275208818738127 vechicles in one direction. Crazy, like they were being funneled in and picked off near Verbove on purpose. https://twitter.com/1_plus_1equals3/status/1706900312672354425?t=1fq2VuJt6Pr5mW8Un76Blg&s=1924 counted here and geolocated in the Andreevka direction. These vids and pictures are just from the last day impossible to keep up. Which two villages? Any Russian armor collums destroyed? Post them here Twitter is a horrible source, almost as bad as telegram. Drone video footage is evidence though. Geolocation is evidence. Texts claiming something happened is not though.; Again, do not take anyones word for it. Why should you. Just read the subtext of what is being posted here: - The offensive is going great! Trust me guys! What do you mean it hasn't moved anywhere in a month after non-stop attacks? Its going great! Well... no, I don't have any evidence but its going faster than expected, in three more weeks we will capture that outhouse 500m away from the lines today! I don't care if it costs 10.000 lives its the outhouse of freedom and those 10k are actually Russians lol, who cares? Those mobilizations are not real, the piles of bodies and tanks are not real lol - Did you see the 50 articles about the hundreds of command centers, tanks and planes destroyed and one million dead generals? What do you mean if 10% of that was real we would be at Moscow by now? We will take that outhouse 500 meters away in a month or so, just 100 more command centers to go lol It must be getting exhausting doing these mental gymnastics day in and day out but its easier if done in groups.
Oh i'm sorry that the counter attack is going so well, it must hurt for you, your sources tell that evrething is going great for russia and any day now ukraine will run out of material (aka fantasy reality)
|
United States42008 Posts
On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”.
The line is being pushed back.
|
On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back.
And if ukraine would lose a million men it would be easily worth it if it fucks over russia. (They won't lose a million men, they will if they have too but they're not even close, they lost maybe 70k and russia 130k)
|
Yeah Ukraine is steadily making progress. Right now, the situation on the southern front is hard to make any definitive judgements on but it has been confirmed that Ukraine has reached the edges of both Novoprokopivka and Verbove. Ukraine claims they had a tactical breakthrough in Verbove and a source in Russia's VDV claims Ukraine has taken half of the city while Russian MoD claims Russia has resisted Ukrainian efforts to push into the city. Around Bahkmut Ukraine is taking land at a slower pace but they are gradually chipping away. The forces around Bahkmut aren't meant to be the main counteroffensive though. They're there to tie up troops Russia would rather redeploy to the southern front. It is worth pointing out Russia has had tiny gains on the western front but nothing near large enough to make up for what Ukraine has taken in this current counteroffensive.
If you want daily updates about the counteroffensive (and the war in general), the Institute for the Study of War has been pretty informative.
https://www.understandingwar.org/
|
United States42008 Posts
On September 28 2023 01:17 Ardias wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 00:19 KwarK wrote:You can’t buy new ones, they’re not in active production. By museum piece I don’t mean useless or inactive, I mean that it’s a relic of the last generation, left over, inherited. If Britain were to enter a serious peer war today we would spend our inheritance of storm shadows but it’s not what we would rearm ourselves with. It’s not what we would manufacture to fight a current war against, for example, Germany with. It’s like the Russian T-80s. They have them, the cannon still works, you’re no less dead for being shot with a round launched from a T-80. But nobody in Russia is building new production lines for new T-80s.
You only have a few years after something goes out of production to restart before restarting is materially no cheaper than making a new line from scratch. Skilled workers move away. The floppy discs get lost. People retire or die. The industrial infrastructure decays. You don't say: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/09/24/the-russians-are-making-their-first-new-tank-turbines-in-30-years-likely-signaling-a-very-long-war/?sh=54838e1650c7"Alexander Potapov, CEO of Uralvagonzavod, announced his firm would resume producing 46-ton, three-person T-80s “from scratch.” Also what about SS not being in active production? https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/uk-news/2023/05/10/britain-requests-deadly-cruise-missiles-for-ukraine/"He added that MBDA, an Anglo-French company, would have to step up production of the missile at its factories because it was unlikely the British military would donate Storm Shadow from its own war stocks and that was why it issued the tender." https://t.me/boris_rozhin/98344SS produced in May 2022. Factories for the T-80 being built is like an anti goal. It means things are going even worse. Where are the T-14 Armata factories?
As for the storm shadow being in production, take a look at the dates here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_Shadow#Operators
All the main European nations wanted some bought some twenty years ago when they were built. They didn’t tend to fire them and so they didn’t really need more.
A handful have been sold outside of Europe since then but the only operator listed in the last 7 years is an unspecified number for Greece, although they already had some from 2003.
Your own link says as much. Britain didn’t place an order for more storm shadows, Britain made a RFP for new cruise missiles. The author notes that storm shadow is a cruise missile and that this could be for replenishment of stocks after they were supplied to Ukraine. What it does not say is that there is an active production line churning them out which makes sense if you look at the order history.
In the early 2000s they made and sold thousands. In the early 2010s they made and sold hundreds. In the late 2010s they sold none. In the early 2020s Greece asked for some.
I flatter myself that I know quite a lot about the economics of manufacturing as I have previously worked as a plant controller for a defence contractor before my current position. No orders = no production line.
MBDA may have bid on Britain’s RFP. I don’t know. But they won’t have spent the last decade building cruise missiles non stop in the hope that demand might suddenly come back. No contract, no production. These are made to order weapons.
|
On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. Every few weeks I come in here and in that time the 'relentless forward movement by the all conquering NATO equipped army' in that time is a distance that I can walk at a leisurely pace in 15-20min at the cost of thousands of casualties and staggering amounts of equipment contained to tiny area of fields with scattered houses here and there.
On September 28 2023 02:51 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 02:27 zeo wrote: Your evidence for Russia losing way more in this case is 'dude trust me' This is you for literally anything. You constantly tell us how much we're being brainwashed by propaganda, ignore any third party sources, and then take all Russian claims at their face value. Then, just as a beautiful cherry on top, you have the balls to claim someone else is doing mental gymnastics. Nope, I have to have actual evidence for my claims because it gets gone through with a fine toothpick comb by a lot of people. While here we have a daily flood of shitpost sources that prove Brandolini's law right. Even if there was enough manpower to just call out every piece of propaganda the answers would still be the same and the same lies will be posted over and over.
On September 28 2023 04:17 sertas wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. And if ukraine would lose a million men it would be easily worth it if it fucks over russia. (They won't lose a million men, they will if they have too but they're not even close, they lost maybe 70k and russia 130k) To the last Ukrainian indeed. Yikes
|
United States42008 Posts
On September 28 2023 04:29 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. Every few weeks I come in here and in that time the 'relentless forward movement by the all conquering NATO equipped army' in that time is a distance that I can walk at a leisurely pace in 15-20min at the cost of thousands of casualties and staggering amounts of equipment contained to tiny area of fields with scattered houses here and there. Yep, exactly like this. Sure, they’re pushing forwards but what about the casualties. And anyway, it was just fields and scattered houses.
|
On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back.
I hate to disagree, but in recent days and even weeks there hasn't been meaningful territorial progress for Ukraine. The pace has been reduced so much that it's hardly recognizable on a map anymore. The pace is no longer creeping, currently it's non-existent.
That's not to say that Russia isn't losing a lot - they're still very significantly outperforming Ukraine in that aspect, losing troops and hardware in very significant quantities, while Ukraine only really matches them in drone losses (for obvious reasons).
I don't think Ukraine's strategy is ideal. The reports of them getting pushed back every time they advance are disappointing. It indicates that there's something seriously wrong with the command. It makes little sense to clear an area over and over, only to hand it back to the enemy every time. An outpost has to be established that can be used to continue pushing further and create more threats in various directions. That's what the US has been proposing and Zelensky has been rejecting it.
|
On September 28 2023 04:29 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. Every few weeks I come in here and in that time the 'relentless forward movement by the all conquering NATO equipped army' in that time is a distance that I can walk at a leisurely pace in 15-20min at the cost of thousands of casualties and staggering amounts of equipment contained to tiny area of fields with scattered houses here and there. Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 02:51 Excludos wrote:On September 28 2023 02:27 zeo wrote: Your evidence for Russia losing way more in this case is 'dude trust me' This is you for literally anything. You constantly tell us how much we're being brainwashed by propaganda, ignore any third party sources, and then take all Russian claims at their face value. Then, just as a beautiful cherry on top, you have the balls to claim someone else is doing mental gymnastics. Nope, I have to have actual evidence for my claims because it gets gone through with a fine toothpick comb by a lot of people. While here we have a daily flood of shitpost sources that prove Brandolini's law right. Even if there was enough manpower to just call out every piece of propaganda the answers would still be the same and the same lies will be posted over and over. Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 04:17 sertas wrote:On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. And if ukraine would lose a million men it would be easily worth it if it fucks over russia. (They won't lose a million men, they will if they have too but they're not even close, they lost maybe 70k and russia 130k) To the last Ukrainian indeed. Yikes
We remember very well what you said about Russian progress in Bahmut
|
United States42008 Posts
On September 28 2023 04:35 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. I hate to disagree, but in recent days and even weeks there hasn't been meaningful territorial progress for Ukraine. The pace has been reduced so much that it's hardly recognizable on a map anymore. The pace is no longer creeping, currently it's non-existent. That's not to say that Russia isn't losing a lot - they're still very significantly outperforming Ukraine in that aspect, losing troops and hardware in very significant quantities, while Ukraine only really matches them in drone losses (for obvious reasons). I don't think Ukraine's strategy is ideal. The reports of them getting pushed back every time they advance are disappointing. It indicates that there's something seriously wrong with the command. It makes little sense to clear an area over and over, only to hand it back to the enemy every time. An outpost has to be established that can be used to continue pushing further and create more threats in various directions. That's what the US has been proposing and Zelensky has been rejecting it. This week in the east they secured control of Andriivka and Klishchiivka against very stubborn resistance.
In the south they have come off their victory in Robotyne and are already in the next settlement, Novoprokopivka. Again against very stubborn resistance.
You’re welcome to make the argument that you’d like them to take ground faster but they are taking ground, and in multiple directions at once. The Russians keep picking settlements and declaring that this is where they will make their stand as they pour reserves and matériel into contesting every inch. And they keep losing those settlements. The advance may be slow but it’s inexorable.
This kind of trench by trench warfare is very dynamic. You fight in a grey zone that you can’t simply move into and occupy because it puts you in range of artillery and helicopters without your counterbattery and anti air being able to move in to deny the enemy. They’re not taking and then giving up ground taken for laughs, you’re misunderstanding what it means to secure territory. The victory in the mud is just one of many victories needed to secure a grey zone.
|
On September 28 2023 04:58 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 04:35 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. I hate to disagree, but in recent days and even weeks there hasn't been meaningful territorial progress for Ukraine. The pace has been reduced so much that it's hardly recognizable on a map anymore. The pace is no longer creeping, currently it's non-existent. That's not to say that Russia isn't losing a lot - they're still very significantly outperforming Ukraine in that aspect, losing troops and hardware in very significant quantities, while Ukraine only really matches them in drone losses (for obvious reasons). I don't think Ukraine's strategy is ideal. The reports of them getting pushed back every time they advance are disappointing. It indicates that there's something seriously wrong with the command. It makes little sense to clear an area over and over, only to hand it back to the enemy every time. An outpost has to be established that can be used to continue pushing further and create more threats in various directions. That's what the US has been proposing and Zelensky has been rejecting it. This week in the east they secured control of Andriivka and Klishchiivka against very stubborn resistance. In the south they have come off their victory in Robotyne and are already in the next settlement, Novoprokopivka. Again against very stubborn resistance. You’re welcome to make the argument that you’d like them to take ground faster but they are taking ground, and in multiple directions at once. The Russians keep picking settlements and declaring that this is where they will make their stand as they pour reserves and matériel into contesting every inch. And they keep losing those settlements. The advance may be slow but it’s inexorable. This kind of trench by trench warfare is very dynamic. You fight in a grey zone that you can’t simply move into and occupy because it puts you in range of artillery and helicopters without your counterbattery and anti air being able to move in to deny the enemy. They’re not taking and then giving up ground taken for laughs, you’re misunderstanding what it means to secure territory. The victory in the mud is just one of many victories needed to secure a grey zone.
I understand that progress is progress, but meaningful progress is different. Currently Ukraine isn't making territorial progress, and the last few weeks have generally been extremely slow. At this rate the war would last for a century, and I'm not exaggerating. We have to look at other indicators for success if we want to argue that Ukraine is still making progress. Territorial gains don't cut it. We can compare casualties and things like that, but otherwise we only have speculation.
I'm not impressed by Kyiv's approach. The loss of life will be staggering if this continues. I think they should listen more to the US and take a much more aggressive approach somewhere in Zaporizhzhia, as that would minimize casualties on both sides and it'd more likely promise to end the war in a reasonable timeframe.
|
United States42008 Posts
On September 28 2023 05:19 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 04:58 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 04:35 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. I hate to disagree, but in recent days and even weeks there hasn't been meaningful territorial progress for Ukraine. The pace has been reduced so much that it's hardly recognizable on a map anymore. The pace is no longer creeping, currently it's non-existent. That's not to say that Russia isn't losing a lot - they're still very significantly outperforming Ukraine in that aspect, losing troops and hardware in very significant quantities, while Ukraine only really matches them in drone losses (for obvious reasons). I don't think Ukraine's strategy is ideal. The reports of them getting pushed back every time they advance are disappointing. It indicates that there's something seriously wrong with the command. It makes little sense to clear an area over and over, only to hand it back to the enemy every time. An outpost has to be established that can be used to continue pushing further and create more threats in various directions. That's what the US has been proposing and Zelensky has been rejecting it. This week in the east they secured control of Andriivka and Klishchiivka against very stubborn resistance. In the south they have come off their victory in Robotyne and are already in the next settlement, Novoprokopivka. Again against very stubborn resistance. You’re welcome to make the argument that you’d like them to take ground faster but they are taking ground, and in multiple directions at once. The Russians keep picking settlements and declaring that this is where they will make their stand as they pour reserves and matériel into contesting every inch. And they keep losing those settlements. The advance may be slow but it’s inexorable. This kind of trench by trench warfare is very dynamic. You fight in a grey zone that you can’t simply move into and occupy because it puts you in range of artillery and helicopters without your counterbattery and anti air being able to move in to deny the enemy. They’re not taking and then giving up ground taken for laughs, you’re misunderstanding what it means to secure territory. The victory in the mud is just one of many victories needed to secure a grey zone. I understand that progress is progress, but meaningful progress is different. Currently Ukraine isn't making territorial progress, and the last few weeks have generally been extremely slow. At this rate the war would last for a century, and I'm not exaggerating. We have to look at other indicators for success if we want to argue that Ukraine is still making progress. Territorial gains don't cut it. We can compare casualties and things like that, but otherwise we only have speculation. I'm not impressed by Kyiv's approach. The loss of life will be staggering if this continues. I think they should listen more to the US and take a much more aggressive approach somewhere in Zaporizhzhia, as that would minimize casualties on both sides and it'd more likely promise to end the war in a reasonable timeframe. If the US wanted Ukraine to fight the war their way they could have trained Ukraine on an overwhelming air force and provided it. The US has been reluctant to give Ukraine half the things Ukraine says it needs. I have a lot of trouble with the idea that there’s some great way of simply breaking through and winning that Ukraine knows about but isn’t doing. Not least because I can’t possibly conceive of what that might be against a wall of anti tank obstacles, mines, and presighted artillery backed up by attack helicopters capable of devastating armour from a safe distance.
Ukraine is incentivized more than anyone to minimize the Ukrainian blood spent. There is no non attritional way of doing this. They’ve asked for the tool that can bypass trenches and the US has refused.
|
On September 28 2023 05:28 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 05:19 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 04:58 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 04:35 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. I hate to disagree, but in recent days and even weeks there hasn't been meaningful territorial progress for Ukraine. The pace has been reduced so much that it's hardly recognizable on a map anymore. The pace is no longer creeping, currently it's non-existent. That's not to say that Russia isn't losing a lot - they're still very significantly outperforming Ukraine in that aspect, losing troops and hardware in very significant quantities, while Ukraine only really matches them in drone losses (for obvious reasons). I don't think Ukraine's strategy is ideal. The reports of them getting pushed back every time they advance are disappointing. It indicates that there's something seriously wrong with the command. It makes little sense to clear an area over and over, only to hand it back to the enemy every time. An outpost has to be established that can be used to continue pushing further and create more threats in various directions. That's what the US has been proposing and Zelensky has been rejecting it. This week in the east they secured control of Andriivka and Klishchiivka against very stubborn resistance. In the south they have come off their victory in Robotyne and are already in the next settlement, Novoprokopivka. Again against very stubborn resistance. You’re welcome to make the argument that you’d like them to take ground faster but they are taking ground, and in multiple directions at once. The Russians keep picking settlements and declaring that this is where they will make their stand as they pour reserves and matériel into contesting every inch. And they keep losing those settlements. The advance may be slow but it’s inexorable. This kind of trench by trench warfare is very dynamic. You fight in a grey zone that you can’t simply move into and occupy because it puts you in range of artillery and helicopters without your counterbattery and anti air being able to move in to deny the enemy. They’re not taking and then giving up ground taken for laughs, you’re misunderstanding what it means to secure territory. The victory in the mud is just one of many victories needed to secure a grey zone. I understand that progress is progress, but meaningful progress is different. Currently Ukraine isn't making territorial progress, and the last few weeks have generally been extremely slow. At this rate the war would last for a century, and I'm not exaggerating. We have to look at other indicators for success if we want to argue that Ukraine is still making progress. Territorial gains don't cut it. We can compare casualties and things like that, but otherwise we only have speculation. I'm not impressed by Kyiv's approach. The loss of life will be staggering if this continues. I think they should listen more to the US and take a much more aggressive approach somewhere in Zaporizhzhia, as that would minimize casualties on both sides and it'd more likely promise to end the war in a reasonable timeframe. If the US wanted Ukraine to fight the war their way they could have trained Ukraine on an overwhelming air force and provided it. The US has been reluctant to give Ukraine half the things Ukraine says it needs. I have a lot of trouble with the idea that there’s some great way of simply breaking through and winning that Ukraine knows about but isn’t doing. Not least because I can’t possibly conceive of what that might be against a wall of anti tank obstacles, mines, and presighted artillery backed up by attack helicopters capable of devastating armour from a safe distance. Ukraine is incentivized more than anyone to minimize the Ukrainian blood spent. There is no non attritional way of doing this. They’ve asked for the tool that can bypass trenches and the US has refused.
Russia is hardly losing aircraft or tanks anymore because they're hardly using them. They don't need them in this defensive stance, as they'd get destroyed in much larger quantities if they used them at leisure. What this shows to me is that Russian troops are too comfortable. They're not forced to turn up the heat to hold off Ukrainian assaults, they can just recapture lost ground with artillery fire over and over again. That's extremely lazy, and it's been working well enough. Emphasis on "well enough", because this is Putin's war, not Russia's. He doesn't care about any of this per se, he only cares about his seat in power, and thus indirectly he cares about the outcome of the war. His ideal scenario is a forever war, and that's exactly what he's currently getting.
You can't argue with the numbers, Ukrainian advance has slowed down over time and it keeps slowing down, and right now as we speak it's even stopped completely. The numbers clearly show that this war will continue forever if there's not a huge change in the strategy at some point. That would ruin not only Russia, but also Ukraine. Because it's not just about persevering, it's about life and it's about living.
I'm never going to side with zeo morally speaking, but I'm starting to understand where his argument is coming from. Objectively speaking he has a point. Ukraine is not winning this war right now with the current methods.
|
On September 28 2023 05:48 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 05:28 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 05:19 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 04:58 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 04:35 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. I hate to disagree, but in recent days and even weeks there hasn't been meaningful territorial progress for Ukraine. The pace has been reduced so much that it's hardly recognizable on a map anymore. The pace is no longer creeping, currently it's non-existent. That's not to say that Russia isn't losing a lot - they're still very significantly outperforming Ukraine in that aspect, losing troops and hardware in very significant quantities, while Ukraine only really matches them in drone losses (for obvious reasons). I don't think Ukraine's strategy is ideal. The reports of them getting pushed back every time they advance are disappointing. It indicates that there's something seriously wrong with the command. It makes little sense to clear an area over and over, only to hand it back to the enemy every time. An outpost has to be established that can be used to continue pushing further and create more threats in various directions. That's what the US has been proposing and Zelensky has been rejecting it. This week in the east they secured control of Andriivka and Klishchiivka against very stubborn resistance. In the south they have come off their victory in Robotyne and are already in the next settlement, Novoprokopivka. Again against very stubborn resistance. You’re welcome to make the argument that you’d like them to take ground faster but they are taking ground, and in multiple directions at once. The Russians keep picking settlements and declaring that this is where they will make their stand as they pour reserves and matériel into contesting every inch. And they keep losing those settlements. The advance may be slow but it’s inexorable. This kind of trench by trench warfare is very dynamic. You fight in a grey zone that you can’t simply move into and occupy because it puts you in range of artillery and helicopters without your counterbattery and anti air being able to move in to deny the enemy. They’re not taking and then giving up ground taken for laughs, you’re misunderstanding what it means to secure territory. The victory in the mud is just one of many victories needed to secure a grey zone. I understand that progress is progress, but meaningful progress is different. Currently Ukraine isn't making territorial progress, and the last few weeks have generally been extremely slow. At this rate the war would last for a century, and I'm not exaggerating. We have to look at other indicators for success if we want to argue that Ukraine is still making progress. Territorial gains don't cut it. We can compare casualties and things like that, but otherwise we only have speculation. I'm not impressed by Kyiv's approach. The loss of life will be staggering if this continues. I think they should listen more to the US and take a much more aggressive approach somewhere in Zaporizhzhia, as that would minimize casualties on both sides and it'd more likely promise to end the war in a reasonable timeframe. If the US wanted Ukraine to fight the war their way they could have trained Ukraine on an overwhelming air force and provided it. The US has been reluctant to give Ukraine half the things Ukraine says it needs. I have a lot of trouble with the idea that there’s some great way of simply breaking through and winning that Ukraine knows about but isn’t doing. Not least because I can’t possibly conceive of what that might be against a wall of anti tank obstacles, mines, and presighted artillery backed up by attack helicopters capable of devastating armour from a safe distance. Ukraine is incentivized more than anyone to minimize the Ukrainian blood spent. There is no non attritional way of doing this. They’ve asked for the tool that can bypass trenches and the US has refused. Russia is hardly losing aircraft or tanks anymore because they're hardly using them. They don't need them in this defensive stance, as they'd get destroyed in much larger quantities if they used them at leisure. What this shows to me is that Russian troops are too comfortable. They're not forced to turn up the heat to hold off Ukrainian assaults, they can just recapture lost ground with artillery fire over and over again. That's extremely lazy, and it's been working well enough. Emphasis on "well enough", because this is Putin's war, not Russia's. He doesn't care about any of this per se, he only cares about his seat in power, and thus indirectly he cares about the outcome of the war. His ideal scenario is a forever war, and that's exactly what he's currently getting. You can't argue with the numbers, Ukrainian advance has slowed down over time and it keeps slowing down, and right now as we speak it's even stopped completely. The numbers clearly show that this war will continue forever if there's not a huge change in the strategy at some point. That would ruin not only Russia, but also Ukraine. Because it's not just about persevering, it's about life and it's about living. I'm never going to side with zeo morally speaking, but I'm starting to understand where his argument is coming from. Objectively speaking he has a point. Ukraine is not winning this war right now with the current methods.
I'd argue that we don't know.
Realistically the terrain barely matters. It matters in the sense that it is a way to force fights, and bad things could happen if a lot of terrain gets lost.
But currently, this is about attrition. It is not about this village or that road. The question is which sides loses more stuff, and which side can keep it up for longer before some important category of stuff is just no longer available in the necessary quantities.
It would be nice if Ukraine could just end this end recover all their territory quickly, and maybe that will happen. A breakthrough can be fast and hard. But i assume that this will be an attrition thing for a while, until one side runs out of people or stuff.
|
On September 28 2023 06:04 Simberto wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2023 05:48 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 05:28 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 05:19 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 04:58 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 04:35 Magic Powers wrote:On September 28 2023 04:10 KwarK wrote:On September 28 2023 02:47 Magic Powers wrote: For the last few weeks I've not seen many people here claim that Ukraine is celebrating victory after victory. Would be somewhat outrageous to do so because there aren't too many obvious signs of that.
From my observation the Ukrainian advances have all but halted. Reports have been coming in that progress is usually being negated quite swiftly.
That doesn't mean the offensive is over. Russia is losing a lot, but these numbers are boring to people watching from the sidelines. Adding +100 on top of 10000 doesn't seem like much to people who aren't looking at the bigger picture. It's more interesting and more visually obvious when large regions are swiftly being captured. There is relentless forward movement by Ukraine. We can even see it here with zeo’s steady goalposts going from “Ukraine can’t even take X” to “Ukraine has lost a million men in futile attacks over X” to “Russia still materially controls X” and then finally “where is X? Never heard of it”. The line is being pushed back. I hate to disagree, but in recent days and even weeks there hasn't been meaningful territorial progress for Ukraine. The pace has been reduced so much that it's hardly recognizable on a map anymore. The pace is no longer creeping, currently it's non-existent. That's not to say that Russia isn't losing a lot - they're still very significantly outperforming Ukraine in that aspect, losing troops and hardware in very significant quantities, while Ukraine only really matches them in drone losses (for obvious reasons). I don't think Ukraine's strategy is ideal. The reports of them getting pushed back every time they advance are disappointing. It indicates that there's something seriously wrong with the command. It makes little sense to clear an area over and over, only to hand it back to the enemy every time. An outpost has to be established that can be used to continue pushing further and create more threats in various directions. That's what the US has been proposing and Zelensky has been rejecting it. This week in the east they secured control of Andriivka and Klishchiivka against very stubborn resistance. In the south they have come off their victory in Robotyne and are already in the next settlement, Novoprokopivka. Again against very stubborn resistance. You’re welcome to make the argument that you’d like them to take ground faster but they are taking ground, and in multiple directions at once. The Russians keep picking settlements and declaring that this is where they will make their stand as they pour reserves and matériel into contesting every inch. And they keep losing those settlements. The advance may be slow but it’s inexorable. This kind of trench by trench warfare is very dynamic. You fight in a grey zone that you can’t simply move into and occupy because it puts you in range of artillery and helicopters without your counterbattery and anti air being able to move in to deny the enemy. They’re not taking and then giving up ground taken for laughs, you’re misunderstanding what it means to secure territory. The victory in the mud is just one of many victories needed to secure a grey zone. I understand that progress is progress, but meaningful progress is different. Currently Ukraine isn't making territorial progress, and the last few weeks have generally been extremely slow. At this rate the war would last for a century, and I'm not exaggerating. We have to look at other indicators for success if we want to argue that Ukraine is still making progress. Territorial gains don't cut it. We can compare casualties and things like that, but otherwise we only have speculation. I'm not impressed by Kyiv's approach. The loss of life will be staggering if this continues. I think they should listen more to the US and take a much more aggressive approach somewhere in Zaporizhzhia, as that would minimize casualties on both sides and it'd more likely promise to end the war in a reasonable timeframe. If the US wanted Ukraine to fight the war their way they could have trained Ukraine on an overwhelming air force and provided it. The US has been reluctant to give Ukraine half the things Ukraine says it needs. I have a lot of trouble with the idea that there’s some great way of simply breaking through and winning that Ukraine knows about but isn’t doing. Not least because I can’t possibly conceive of what that might be against a wall of anti tank obstacles, mines, and presighted artillery backed up by attack helicopters capable of devastating armour from a safe distance. Ukraine is incentivized more than anyone to minimize the Ukrainian blood spent. There is no non attritional way of doing this. They’ve asked for the tool that can bypass trenches and the US has refused. Russia is hardly losing aircraft or tanks anymore because they're hardly using them. They don't need them in this defensive stance, as they'd get destroyed in much larger quantities if they used them at leisure. What this shows to me is that Russian troops are too comfortable. They're not forced to turn up the heat to hold off Ukrainian assaults, they can just recapture lost ground with artillery fire over and over again. That's extremely lazy, and it's been working well enough. Emphasis on "well enough", because this is Putin's war, not Russia's. He doesn't care about any of this per se, he only cares about his seat in power, and thus indirectly he cares about the outcome of the war. His ideal scenario is a forever war, and that's exactly what he's currently getting. You can't argue with the numbers, Ukrainian advance has slowed down over time and it keeps slowing down, and right now as we speak it's even stopped completely. The numbers clearly show that this war will continue forever if there's not a huge change in the strategy at some point. That would ruin not only Russia, but also Ukraine. Because it's not just about persevering, it's about life and it's about living. I'm never going to side with zeo morally speaking, but I'm starting to understand where his argument is coming from. Objectively speaking he has a point. Ukraine is not winning this war right now with the current methods. I'd argue that we don't know. Realistically the terrain barely matters. It matters in the sense that it is a way to force fights, and bad things could happen if a lot of terrain gets lost. But currently, this is about attrition. It is not about this village or that road. The question is which sides loses more stuff, and which side can keep it up for longer before some important category of stuff is just no longer available in the necessary quantities. It would be nice if Ukraine could just end this end recover all their territory quickly, and maybe that will happen. A breakthrough can be fast and hard. But i assume that this will be an attrition thing for a while, until one side runs out of people or stuff.
A "war of attrition" is the least favorable of all types of war. It's a term coined specifically for wars that have no clear direction and no end in sight. Such wars end typically when one side is more or less objectively forced to surrender. WW1 ended not through attrition, but when one side was forced to surrender due to overwhelming pressure. The attritional aspect lasted several years and it led nowhere. During WW2 both sides specifically avoided a war of attrition because they had learned from WW1 that attrition would only prolong the war instead of deciding it.
There's no objective reason why Ukrainian troops shouldn't push with as much force as they can right now instead of later. If they split Russia's defense lines, they can start bombarding their supply lines near the Sea for the rest of the winter, and that with little to no risk of a Russian offensive. If they let winter happen before the offensive is fruitful, that only gives Russia even more time to dig in. And that's the one thing Ukraine should avoid at great cost, because it'll only increase the cost for them later during the war.
|
|
|
|