|
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. |
On October 15 2023 18:18 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On October 15 2023 16:43 CuddlyCuteKitten wrote: Arguing that jews have been favoured through history or even today above other people is a weird stance to take. The leftist worldview where everything is viewed through a lens of skin colour and every problem can be traced back to colonialism is truly amazing. I know I've been there myself 20 years ago.
I don't think the skin colour in Gaza would matter even the sligthest bit if everything else was unchanged.
Actually if the arab side had decided to stop selling land instead of the arab riots in 1936 it's not unlikely we would be reading about the jewish riots of 1938-40 instead. Take that that through it's logical course in history and we could well be looking at a complete role reversal and it's unlikely the rest of the world would react differently. Do you legit think that if the situations between Palestinians and Israel were reversed today, the world would stand in solidarity and support of Palestine as they committed genocide on the Israeli masses strapped in Gaza? I think its an incredibly safe bet that if it were anyone other then a Jewish Israel in this situation these attacks would not go uncondemned.
Is the world "standing in solidarity in support of Israel" regarding the current siege on Gaza? The pro-Palestinian demonstrations around the world have far outnumbered the pro-Israel ones, at least from what I have seen. The UN often condemns Israel which is often vetoed by the United States.
|
On October 15 2023 15:08 Salazarz wrote:The notion that this conflict cannot be resolved without complete extermination of one of the sides or similarly unrealistic complete demilitarization of both sides is laughable. People aren't werewolves, and radical extremism in Gaza doesn't happen because of 'cultural incompatibilities' or 'religious conflict', it happens because of an ever-growing list of slights committed against the people living there, both real and made up, and because people living there have pretty much nothing to lose. You don't have to go far for proof of this -- even the similarly mistreated West Bank is far more peaceful and less prone to radicalization than the Gaza strip is. If Israel truly and genuinely wished for violence to end, they'd start investing into building a way for Palestinians to live in a way that makes violent suicide attacks a less attractive option, and give them a way of life that actually makes life worth living. Unfortunately, violent attacks from Hamas are useful to keep attention away from their continued settlement expansion and general lack of any desire whatsoever to solve the territorial disputes with Palestine, so they're quite okay with the status quo, even if the said status quo involves Israelis dying now and then. Show nested quote + Ask Ukraine how much value is contributed by promises and prayers. Or ask a million other groups throughout history. Since you are bringing history up, how many examples are there in history where violence and oppression has ever solved conflicts such as this? Going back as far as recorded history goes, vast majority of rulers and conquerors understood the necessity of allowing minorities / rebellious groups to live in peace and relative prosperity, to enjoy reasonable rights and have something to lose if they were to rebel. Ancient Persians understood this, the Romans understood this, the Arab Sheikhs and Caliphs understood this, even the fucking Mongols understood this -- but somehow today bombing millions of people into submission is presented as viable method of pacifying terrorists and 'self defense'? That's just ridiculous.
And how do you suppose Israel is going to improve Palestinian's living conditions? First of all they're pretty much occupying their country and they are also trying to expand and settle on more of the Palestinian land.
Do you really believe that even if they improved the infrastructure or poured money into the Gaza Strip or West Bank it would suddenly make Palestinians happy and forget about all of this?
You also can't dismiss religion here since Jerusalem is an important city for both religions.
|
On October 15 2023 20:18 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On October 15 2023 18:18 Gorsameth wrote:On October 15 2023 16:43 CuddlyCuteKitten wrote: Arguing that jews have been favoured through history or even today above other people is a weird stance to take. The leftist worldview where everything is viewed through a lens of skin colour and every problem can be traced back to colonialism is truly amazing. I know I've been there myself 20 years ago.
I don't think the skin colour in Gaza would matter even the sligthest bit if everything else was unchanged.
Actually if the arab side had decided to stop selling land instead of the arab riots in 1936 it's not unlikely we would be reading about the jewish riots of 1938-40 instead. Take that that through it's logical course in history and we could well be looking at a complete role reversal and it's unlikely the rest of the world would react differently. Do you legit think that if the situations between Palestinians and Israel were reversed today, the world would stand in solidarity and support of Palestine as they committed genocide on the Israeli masses strapped in Gaza? I think its an incredibly safe bet that if it were anyone other then a Jewish Israel in this situation these attacks would not go uncondemned. Is the world "standing in solidarity in support of Israel" regarding the current siege on Gaza? The pro-Palestinian demonstrations around the world have far outnumbered the pro-Israel ones, at least from what I have seen. The UN often condemns Israel which is often vetoed by the United States. This hot-take is beyond ridiculous even for you. Firstly, there was a massive outcry of public support when Hamas violently broke out and slaughtered, raped and pillaged their way through kibbutzes and festivals. But more to the point, every single western government has put out a statement saying something along the lines of that they condemn the attack and stand by Israel and whatever it needs to defend its citizens. So why protest? Why would you take to the streets to march in protest if you support Israel? You protest if your government is doing things you don't, not when they're making moves you like. So of course in the west there will be fewer pro-Israel protests: there is no need to protest when the government is pro-Israel.
As for UN resolutions... what are you trying to say with that?
|
On October 15 2023 22:43 Manit0u wrote:.
Do you really believe that even if they improved the infrastructure or poured money into the Gaza Strip or West Bank it would suddenly make Palestinians happy and forget about all of this?
You also can't dismiss religion here since Jerusalem is an important city for both religions. Suddenly? No. Over time? I believe yes, although research isn't as clear cut on the topic as I personally thought beforehand, in fact it seems at least if we look at research 5-10 years prior the link between poverty and radical extremism is not empirically proven. See, e.g., www.files.ethz.ch, www.brookings.edu, www.aeaweb.org.
But, here taken from www.undp.org, improving conditions for Palestinians will certainly in the long term address some of the drivers behind extremism:
Growing horizontal inequalities are one of the consistently cited drivers of violent extremism. Critically, unemployment or poverty alone is not the only push factor inciting violence and extremism: perceptions of injustice, human-rights violations, social-political exclusion, widespread corruption or sustained mistreatment of certain groups, are also considered important push factors. When all these horizontal inequalities come together for a particular group, radical movements and violence are more likely to erupt.
|
On October 15 2023 19:16 Nebuchad wrote: If the roles were reversed things would be way different for sure, but the thing that is perhaps the most important is that if the roles were reversed and somehow everything else happened in the same way I have zero doubt that all of the people posting propalestinian content in this thread would be on the side of the israeli Jews getting ethnically cleansed and dehumanized. It's a bit weird that you, among perhaps others, would switch. One does not need to be Arab or Muslim to recognize that Palestine is pretty much the worst humanitarian crisis in the world right now. If Arabs or Muslims are performing war crimes on a disenfranchised group that's fucked up, and they need to be held accountable. This isn't that complicated.
|
"International law" simply doesn't and wont apply to the US and anyone it chooses whenever it chooses.
Whether it would work/help or not, to have any semblance of legitimacy the "rules-based international order" should be sanctioning Israel into the ground right now. They aren't/wont so they don't/wont.
|
The responses from the Arab world recently have further confirmed what I described previously: Palestinian dehumanization is a means to an end for various factions for various reasons.
In any other situation, non-combatants are encouraged to evacuate, find shelter away from the fighting, and hope for a chance to return to their homes after their homes are defended. But what if non-combatant lives can be used as a tool to positively impact your position in an ancient rivalry?
"This is the cause of all causes, the cause of all Arabs," Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said on Thursday. "It is important that the (Palestinian) people remain steadfast and present on their land."
Gotta stick to your guns! Why leave when you could instead die?
"Hold on to your homes. Hold on to your land," was the message broadcast from mosques in Gaza, as tens of thousands of people headed south. Others vowed to stay. "Death is better than leaving," said Mohammad, 20, outside a bombed Gaza building.
Literally saying the quiet part out loud. This is why modern cultural sensitivities being applied to this conflict is not reasonable. All of the progress regarding reducing the tragedy of war flies out the window when the losing side glorifies dying.
Jordan's King Abdullah warned "against any attempt to forcibly displace Palestinians from all Palestinian territories or cause their internal displacement, calling for preventing a spillover of the crisis into neighbouring countries and the exacerbation of the refugee issue."
Jordan basically says "bro we have enough refugees as-is. Can you not make this worse? I hate this, its super annoying to deal with. All you women and children need to chill and stop trying to survive and whatnot"
Egypt faced an Islamist insurgency in northern Sinai that peaked after 2013 before security forces re-established control, and security sources and analysts say it wants to prevent infiltration by militants from Hamas - which shares an ideology with the Muslim Brotherhood, a group outlawed in Egypt.
Egypt says the Rafah crossing is open and they are trying to secure the delivery of humanitarian relief into Gaza, although this has been hampered by Israeli bombardments close to the border. Cairo has also indicated that the resolution of the issue through any mass exodus of Palestinians is unacceptable.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/arab-states-say-palestinians-must-stay-their-land-war-escalates-2023-10-13/
So Egypt doesn't trust the Palestinians because of an actual insurgency. And also, they must sit and die because they are carrying the Arab world on their shoulders.
In summary:
1) Death is encouraged and glorified by the government of these 1 million people. Not just combatants, the whole thing. All of them. They are specifically saying the land is more important than the lives. It is actual lunacy.
2) Neighboring countries join in and support this view, saying Palestinians are fighting "the cause of all Arabs". They are reinforcing the idea that their lives being sacrificed for this is worthwhile because the land is just soooo soooo soooooo important. Please do not lose track of the fact that holding the land is very well understood to be the primary concern and that saving lives is secondary. The land is said to be critical for "all Arabs".
3) Neighboring countries say there is already enough of a refugee crisis and they'd rather these women and children stay where they are at, because its already a difficult situation
4) Neighboring countries openly do not trust the people living in Gaza
5) There is no "we will do what we can, but we can't solve this on our own" messaging. No one is doing the best they can while trying to bring in more power and resources to help reduce non-combatant lives from being lost. They are just saying no and also saying it is important for them to take one for the team because they are some kinda spearhead of Arab purpose. There are like 10 separate nations and 4 separate factions that are all making a conscious decision to not improve the situation in any way.
Is there any group of people on Earth who have more people rooting against them? I think its basically just the UN who is actively trying to save Palestinian lives.
|
Norway28554 Posts
You do realize that 'the UN' has largely been 'the world except Israel+the US', right? It's just that without the US, the UN is neutered.
Not that I am defending those statements you've quoted, I just want to clarify that 'the world' has largely supported Palestinians over the past decades, it just hasn't meant anything because the US hasn't and the countries allied with the US are more powerful than the ones that aren't.
|
This thread has brought up a lot of interesting points and angles on the conflict. I appreciate that.
There has been a lot of digital ink spilled here over "what should Israel do?" It's interesting as a philosophical question, but I think the conclusion made clear in this thread is that there is no choice they can make at this juncture that will lead to a fairy tale ending.
The flip side, which has not been addressed much though is "what should Gaza do?" And I ask you to consider that.
I think it's an important question to ask because there is a real tendency to infantilize the Palestinians. We treat Israel as if it has free will (perhaps because we relate to them more), but Palestinian actions are often tacitly assumed to be a given. As if they just can't make real choices for themselves.
The regular statistics about the high percent of kids in the country gears our brains to think that way, but I highly doubt every person in Gaza is either a child or a completely unreasonable fantic.
If you were made into the leader of Hamas tomorrow, what could you do to stop the Palestinians from dying?
|
On October 16 2023 02:37 Cerebrate1 wrote: This thread has brought up a lot of interesting points and angles on the conflict. I appreciate that.
There has been a lot of digital ink spilled here over "what should Israel do?" It's interesting as a philosophical question, but I think the conclusion made clear in this thread is that there is no choice they can make at this juncture that will lead to a fairy tale ending.
The flip side, which has not been addressed much though is "what should Gaza do?" And I ask you to consider that.
I think it's an important question to ask because there is a real tendency to infantilize the Palestinians. We treat Israel as if it has free will (perhaps because we relate to them more), but Palestinian actions are often tacitly assumed to be a given. As if they just can't make real choices for themselves.
The regular statistics about the high percent of kids in the country gears our brains to think that way, but I highly doubt every person in Gaza is either a child or a completely unreasonable fantic.
If you were made into the leader of Hamas tomorrow, what could you do to stop the Palestinians from dying? 52% of Palestinians are under 18. They can have their water and electricity cut off at will. Hamas commits acts of terror which embolden Western Media and the IDF. The PLO spends more time in its non-violent protest being asked to condemn Hamas. School, Hospitals and News Stations are regularly destroyed by Israeli missles. What do you want Palestinians to do?
|
On October 16 2023 02:37 Cerebrate1 wrote: This thread has brought up a lot of interesting points and angles on the conflict. I appreciate that.
There has been a lot of digital ink spilled here over "what should Israel do?" It's interesting as a philosophical question, but I think the conclusion made clear in this thread is that there is no choice they can make at this juncture that will lead to a fairy tale ending.
The flip side, which has not been addressed much though is "what should Gaza do?" And I ask you to consider that.
I think it's an important question to ask because there is a real tendency to infantilize the Palestinians. We treat Israel as if it has free will (perhaps because we relate to them more), but Palestinian actions are often tacitly assumed to be a given. As if they just can't make real choices for themselves.
The regular statistics about the high percent of kids in the country gears our brains to think that way, but I highly doubt every person in Gaza is either a child or a completely unreasonable fantic.
If you were made into the leader of Hamas tomorrow, what could you do to stop the Palestinians from dying?
Thanks for joining us! This is the friend I was quoting earlier, in case anyone’s wondering why someone would just jump in randomly.
|
Netherlands21350 Posts
What should Gaza do is ignored because Gaza has no agency.
Its nothing to do with the age of inhabitants or the colour of their skin but simply a fact of them living or dying by Israel's grace.
If Israel wants to cut of food, water and electricity they can and there is nothing anyone in Gaza can do about about that. If Israel wants to flatten every building there is nothing anyone in Gaza can do about that.
What would you do if you were leader of Hamas? Grab my bags and sneak out of the country by any means possible and go live literally anywhere else? This isn't a fight Hamas can ever win, they will never defeat Israel and reclaim what they perceive to be their land but desperate people do desperate things and hate can keep someone going even if the cause is hopeless.
|
On October 16 2023 02:31 Liquid`Drone wrote: You do realize that 'the UN' has largely been 'the world except Israel+the US', right? It's just that without the US, the UN is neutered.
Not that I am defending those statements you've quoted, I just want to clarify that 'the world' has largely supported Palestinians over the past decades, it just hasn't meant anything because the US hasn't and the countries allied with the US are more powerful than the ones that aren't. I disagree. “Support” as a term is not deserved by the UN or the world as a whole. And like I described above, I think we do Palestinians a huge disservice by granting factions circlejerking over “support” by allowing it to labeled as support. They are not doing enough and they are consciously deciding not to do more. They are weighing the pros and cons of doing more and saying it’s not worth it. The Palestinians are not being supported by anyone.
|
On October 16 2023 03:13 Mohdoo wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2023 02:31 Liquid`Drone wrote: You do realize that 'the UN' has largely been 'the world except Israel+the US', right? It's just that without the US, the UN is neutered.
Not that I am defending those statements you've quoted, I just want to clarify that 'the world' has largely supported Palestinians over the past decades, it just hasn't meant anything because the US hasn't and the countries allied with the US are more powerful than the ones that aren't. I disagree. “Support” as a term is not deserved by the UN or the world as a whole. And like I described above, I think we do Palestinians a huge disservice by granting factions circlejerking over “support” by allowing it to labeled as support. They are not doing enough and they are consciously deciding not to do more. They are weighing the pros and cons of doing more and saying it’s not worth it. The Palestinians are not being supported by anyone. The UN doesn’t speak for “what the world supports,” it’s intentionally designed to not be able to oppose any great powers because its whole job is to prevent war between great powers. Interpreting it as anything else is idiotic. Palestinians have plenty of support abroad.
Also, using a thing the enemy faction said as justification to target noncombatants is monstrous. The idea that laws of armed conflict can be applied to Nazis but not to Palestinians is incoherent, unless you don’t really view Palestinians as people. You haven’t given any reason to believe that IDF war crimes will shorten the conflict, or save (Israeli) lives, or bring about a “lasting solution.” You just think everybody hates Palestinians so why not go no holds barred.
|
On October 16 2023 02:18 Mohdoo wrote:The responses from the Arab world recently have further confirmed what I described previously: Palestinian dehumanization is a means to an end for various factions for various reasons. In any other situation, non-combatants are encouraged to evacuate, find shelter away from the fighting, and hope for a chance to return to their homes after their homes are defended. But what if non-combatant lives can be used as a tool to positively impact your position in an ancient rivalry? Show nested quote +"This is the cause of all causes, the cause of all Arabs," Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said on Thursday. "It is important that the (Palestinian) people remain steadfast and present on their land." Gotta stick to your guns! Why leave when you could instead die? Show nested quote +"Hold on to your homes. Hold on to your land," was the message broadcast from mosques in Gaza, as tens of thousands of people headed south. Others vowed to stay. "Death is better than leaving," said Mohammad, 20, outside a bombed Gaza building. Literally saying the quiet part out loud. This is why modern cultural sensitivities being applied to this conflict is not reasonable. All of the progress regarding reducing the tragedy of war flies out the window when the losing side glorifies dying. Show nested quote +Jordan's King Abdullah warned "against any attempt to forcibly displace Palestinians from all Palestinian territories or cause their internal displacement, calling for preventing a spillover of the crisis into neighbouring countries and the exacerbation of the refugee issue." Jordan basically says "bro we have enough refugees as-is. Can you not make this worse? I hate this, its super annoying to deal with. All you women and children need to chill and stop trying to survive and whatnot" Show nested quote +Egypt faced an Islamist insurgency in northern Sinai that peaked after 2013 before security forces re-established control, and security sources and analysts say it wants to prevent infiltration by militants from Hamas - which shares an ideology with the Muslim Brotherhood, a group outlawed in Egypt.
Egypt says the Rafah crossing is open and they are trying to secure the delivery of humanitarian relief into Gaza, although this has been hampered by Israeli bombardments close to the border. Cairo has also indicated that the resolution of the issue through any mass exodus of Palestinians is unacceptable. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/arab-states-say-palestinians-must-stay-their-land-war-escalates-2023-10-13/So Egypt doesn't trust the Palestinians because of an actual insurgency. And also, they must sit and die because they are carrying the Arab world on their shoulders. In summary: 1) Death is encouraged and glorified by the government of these 1 million people. Not just combatants, the whole thing. All of them. They are specifically saying the land is more important than the lives. It is actual lunacy. 2) Neighboring countries join in and support this view, saying Palestinians are fighting "the cause of all Arabs". They are reinforcing the idea that their lives being sacrificed for this is worthwhile because the land is just soooo soooo soooooo important. Please do not lose track of the fact that holding the land is very well understood to be the primary concern and that saving lives is secondary. The land is said to be critical for "all Arabs". 3) Neighboring countries say there is already enough of a refugee crisis and they'd rather these women and children stay where they are at, because its already a difficult situation 4) Neighboring countries openly do not trust the people living in Gaza 5) There is no "we will do what we can, but we can't solve this on our own" messaging. No one is doing the best they can while trying to bring in more power and resources to help reduce non-combatant lives from being lost. They are just saying no and also saying it is important for them to take one for the team because they are some kinda spearhead of Arab purpose. There are like 10 separate nations and 4 separate factions that are all making a conscious decision to not improve the situation in any way. Is there any group of people on Earth who have more people rooting against them? I think its basically just the UN who is actively trying to save Palestinian lives.
The way I see the Jordanian king's quote is as a warning to Israel not to cause another Palestinian nakba, this time of 2.5m people living in Gaza, which would cause a further refugee crisis in neighbouring countries (he's obviously mainly thinking of Jordan). He is clearly not telling Palestinians to stay in their homes if they get bombed/assaulted. But rather asking Israel not to bomb/assault them. This is similar to what the Arab league said.
As for al-Sisi, he's fairly obviously a raging asshole. Echoing Hamas and telling Palestinians to stay put and get bombed rather than fleeing into Egypt is pretty awful. But hey, al-Sisi is a raging asshole to his own population, I don't know why you'd expect better of him when addressing people from the neighbouring nation who he doesn't want to allow to cross the border.
|
On October 16 2023 02:44 Cricketer12 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2023 02:37 Cerebrate1 wrote: This
If you were made into the leader of Hamas tomorrow, what could you do to stop the Palestinians from dying? 52% of Palestinians are under 18. They can have their water and electricity cut off at will. Hamas commits acts of terror which embolden Western Media and the IDF. The PLO spends more time in its non-violent protest being asked to condemn Hamas. School, Hospitals and News Stations are regularly destroyed by Israeli missles. What do you want Palestinians to do?
To flip your statistic: 48% of Palestinians are over 18. That's over a million fully grown adults capable of making decisions.
Here is how I would answer my question. If I was made leader of Hamas today, I could save the most of my people by releasing all hostages and putting all terrorists involved in the October 7 attack on trial. I would show that I run a real respectable country that happens to have terrorists (who we deal with), rather than a terrorist state. Israel would no longer have casus belli and the US would pressure it to end the conflict if I could show this was a legitimate good will effort.
Sounds like a pretty simple end to the conflict right (at least the current fighting)? No moral ambiguity. Terrorists lose, everyone else wins.
That is, what should happen to solve the conflict is simple. We are merely stuck on the how.
The current Hamas leaders aren't doing that, so they are clearly the bad guys because they are the best ones who can end the bloodshed. But is anyone pressuring them to do it? If all of the Palestinians in Gaza demanded that they did that, would it affect their decision? Could some lieutenant kill the leader, take over, and free the hostages?
|
Are the current Hamas leaders alive? Who even are the current Hamas leaders? If a guy stood up right now, got in front of cameras, and said “As leader of Hamas I’m unconditionally surrendering to the IDF” would anyone even believe him?
Is Hamas even structured top-down like that? They seem like more of an “individual partisan cells intentionally kept in the dark about the rest of the organization” kinda group, but obviously I’m speaking from a position of ignorance.
|
The top leaders are known. They are basically a bunch of billionaires who live in a well secured location in Iran. Previously they lived in villas in Qatar, but that got to risky lately
|
Israel focuses on Hamas for obvious reasons, but they object to the right of Palestinian self-defense against Israel's illegal occupation/settlements regardless of tactics or the proportion of civilian to military casualties.
Israel regularly beats, imprisons without charge or trial, and kills Palestinians including women and children in the West Bank too.
As an aside, does anyone have Israel's/UN's official tally of the number of civilians killed by Hamas in the attacks?
|
Last time Hamas made Israel believe they're turning to economic growth and away from terrorism, it resulted in Hamas bombing a surprised Israel and getting themselves and much of Gaza bombed in return. Hamas are irredeemable and with this most recent attack they've made absolutely sure that Israel will never forget that.
|
|
|
|