|
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. |
On December 08 2024 01:15 Nebuchad wrote:
I'm sure you all noticed as well so in that sense my post is not necessary, but I feel like it's worth pointing out how many of the public people who are horrified at the reaction to the death of one ghoul CEO are also people who continue to support Israel's genocidal campaign.
How dare people punch up, that's so messed up. There should only be down-punching because it's more government-approved.
|
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/02/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-bases-netzarim.html
A military base in gaza, planned since at the very least september.
In a sense, the israeli far right is a blessing to understand what's going and the israeli intent. While the so called centrists and progressive are always denying while keeping the black out, the far right is way more open about what they're doing. I forgot the name but it reminds me a documentary with a "progressive" israeli woman who was interviewing some colon in the west bank, one of the woman answered her that they had the same logic, the same approach, that she was trying to buy herself a respectability and damn she was right.
The veil of hypocrisy maintained by the biden administration which funded israel like no one before him will be shred in pieces by trump, of course, him and his crownies will never say they fund a genocide But at least, they won't pretend to be respectable and follow the rule of the law. Even better, they won't act as impartials like bill clinton and the centrists did at oslo, when the promise of palestinian state ended up with a collaborationnist failed one under the servile dictatorship of mahmoud abbas.
As for the palestinians, it won't change anything, they are condamned in the long run.
|
|
|
|
|
The only thing that was in the way of a ceasefire was Netanyahu. Now that he accepted it, my assumption is that he gets something pretty big in return, for example the West Bank since that's in line with a campaign promise to Miriam Adelson; but we're early for this, and in the meantime a ceasefire is good and needed. Optically Biden will be the guy who greenlighted the ethnic cleansing and Trump will be the one who put an end to it, and Dems will 100% deserve those optics.
|
|
|
Considering the previous info about Netanyahu blocking deals I see no reason to assume this time is any different.
Its kind of funny he is such a bad actor I trust a terrorist organisation over him.
|
On January 17 2025 01:13 Gorsameth wrote:
Considering the previous info about Netanyahu blocking deals I see no reason to assume this time is any different.
Its kind of funny he is such a bad actor I trust a terrorist organisation over him.
There is 0 chance Netanyahu doesn't violate it on the off chance he stops blocking it.
Not to mention they're still negotiating with Hamas. That means whatever deal they come to necessarily is impossible to reconcile with Israel's reasons for slaughtering so many innocent people in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
