• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:37
CEST 08:37
KST 15:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure4Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho2Code S RO8 Preview: ByuN, Rogue, herO, Cure5[ASL19] Ro4 Preview: Storied Rivals7Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12
Community News
Code S Season 1 - RO8 Group B Results (2025)4[BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET6herO & Cure GSL RO8 Interviews: "I also think that all the practice I put in when Protoss wasn’t doing as well is paying off"0Code S Season 1 - herO & Cure advance to RO4 (2025)0Dark to begin military service on May 13th (2025)21
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Preview: ByuN, Rogue, herO, Cure Is there a place to provide feedback for maps? Code S Season 1 - RO8 Group B Results (2025) 2024/25 Off-Season Roster Moves Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure
Tourneys
¿Cómo contactar a KLM Chile? Teléfono ¿Cómo contactar al telefono british airways españa [GSL 2025] Code S Season 1 - RO4 and Grand Finals [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO8 - Group B SOOP Starcraft Global #20
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games Battlenet Game Lobby Simulator
Tourneys
[ASL19] Semifinal B [ASL19] Semifinal A [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET [ASL19] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Grand Theft Auto VI Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Elon Musk's lies, propaganda, etc. Ask and answer stupid questions here!
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey
Sports
NHL Playoffs 2024 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Why 5v5 Games Keep Us Hooked…
TrAiDoS
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
ASL S19 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10284 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 501

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 499 500 501 502 503 4966 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7028 Posts
July 18 2018 20:30 GMT
#10001
Before I quit twitter, I would get all my news from there. If all of a sudden they decided to remove anything with “editorial bias” there would be hardly anything left but links to NYT articles.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
July 18 2018 20:30 GMT
#10002
Sanders said that when Trump said "no" in response to the question about whether Russia was still attacking us (contradicting his own intelligence officials), that he was actually saying "no, no more questions." Ofc this ignores the fact he took another question after that.

It's as blatant of lying as the "Kelly was mad about the breakfast" BS last week. That woman is a national disgrace.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 20:46:05
July 18 2018 20:37 GMT
#10003
On July 19 2018 05:30 Grumbels wrote:
Before I quit twitter, I would get all my news from there. If all of a sudden they decided to remove anything with “editorial bias” there would be hardly anything left but links to NYT articles.

would you prefer your news with more or less "editorial bias"?
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Tachion
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada8573 Posts
July 18 2018 20:39 GMT
#10004
On July 19 2018 04:50 Plansix wrote:
Trump and Putin discussed extraditing Bill Browder to Russia? And now the White House won’t say we are absolutely not going to give him to the Russians? Are you fucking kidding me?

Are we going to give Preet Bharara to Turkey next? This White House is a joke that can't even defend American citizens.

This has been clear as day to me ever since their disgracefully timid response to Erdogan's bodyguards attacking protestors in D.C., but I don't think Bill Browder is actually a US citizen. Still terrible nevertheless.
i was driving down the road this november eve and spotted a hitchhiker walking down the street. i pulled over and saw that it was only a tree. i uprooted it and put it in my trunk. do trees like marshmallow peeps? cause that's all i have and will have.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 20:49:21
July 18 2018 20:47 GMT
#10005
On July 19 2018 05:30 Grumbels wrote:
Before I quit twitter, I would get all my news from there. If all of a sudden they decided to remove anything with “editorial bias” there would be hardly anything left but links to NYT articles.

All news is biased, that is the nature of reporting. But these websites have made this myth about being neutral to protect themselves from having to give a shit about what claims to be news on their site. And they do so with a lot of legal protection from laws written in the 1990s. They should just grow up and get an editorial staff, or verify what they want to label as news, rather than pumping this myth that software will somehow remove human bias from the equation.

On July 19 2018 05:39 Tachion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2018 04:50 Plansix wrote:
Trump and Putin discussed extraditing Bill Browder to Russia? And now the White House won’t say we are absolutely not going to give him to the Russians? Are you fucking kidding me?

Are we going to give Preet Bharara to Turkey next? This White House is a joke that can't even defend American citizens.

This has been clear as day to me ever since their disgracefully timid response to Erdogan's bodyguards attacking protestors in D.C., but I don't think Bill Browder is actually a US citizen. Still terrible nevertheless.

I forgot he gave up his citizenship to avoid US taxes. Not a great look, but we shouldn't even be talking about that with Putin. He is the reason we know about the depth of Russia's abuse of their own citizens and why we sanctioned them.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7028 Posts
July 18 2018 20:47 GMT
#10006
On July 19 2018 05:37 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2018 05:30 Grumbels wrote:
Before I quit twitter, I would get all my news from there. If all of a sudden they decided to remove anything with “editorial bias” there would be hardly anything left but links to NYT articles.

would you prefer your news with more or less editorial bias?

I followed journalists and they would link articles they agreed with. I don’t really see the distinction between news and editorials at that point, since it is in the context of these people on twitter who have their own biases in how they frame articles and what they select from it.

And frankly, I don’t want to consume “raw news”, I think that is for academics or enthusiasts. I can be informed by editorials even if the author has their own bias.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 18 2018 20:51 GMT
#10007
An editorial is from the editorial department of the news outlet. Reporters work for the news section. They are two completely separate teams that do not overlap in any way. They even have separate chief editors.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States22991 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 20:58:12
July 18 2018 20:57 GMT
#10008
On July 19 2018 05:51 Plansix wrote:
An editorial is from the editorial department of the news outlet. Reporters work for the news section. They are two completely separate teams that do not overlap in any way. They even have separate chief editors.


What are some publications where the editorial staff have significantly different positions/outlooks than the reporting staff?

I mean the only thing that comes to mind is the NYT being heralded as a liberal point of light but it's editorials mostly being right of center.

I think this idea that the editorial staff is totally different bias than the reporting staff is overplayed.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 21:04:51
July 18 2018 21:03 GMT
#10009
The loyalty purge has arrived at the VA. We have reached personality cult status it seems like, that and the GOP seem it is going for the full privatization route of all of the VA under the radar.

+ Show Spoiler +
Ahead of Robert Wilkie’s likely confirmation to lead the Department of Veterans Affairs, Trump loyalists at the agency are taking aggressive steps to purge or reassign staff perceived to be disloyal to President Trump and his agenda for veterans, according to multiple people familiar with the moves.

The transfers include more than a dozen career civil servants who have been moved from the leadership suite at VA headquarters and reassigned to lower-visibility roles. The employees served agency leaders, some dating back more than two decades, in crucial support roles that help a new secretary.

None say they were given reasons for their reassignments.

The moves are being carried out by a small cadre of political appointees led by Acting Secretary Peter O’Rourke who have consolidated power in the four months since they helped oust former Secretary David Shulkin.

The reshuffling marks a new stage in a long estrangement between civil servants and Trump loyalists at VA, where staff upheaval and sinking morale threatens to derail service to one of the president’s key constituencies, according to current and former employees.

Among those reassigned is an experienced scheduler who Wilkie told colleagues he wanted to work for him once he is confirmed by the Senate, according to former and current employees.

Other career senior executives with institutional knowledge of VA’s troubled benefits operation also have been sidelined, some to other cities, according to multiple people who asked not to be identified because of the issue’s sensitivity. A high-ranking executive appointed during the Obama administration to a six-year term quit last week after clashing with Trump aides. Even some Trump appointees have been pushed out for challenging the leadership group.

VA officials say the reassignments will help their efforts to improve the agency’s overall culture and performance. Still, it is highly unusual for a leader in an acting, caretaker role — which began for O’Rourke on May 30 — to make such dramatic changes before a permanent leader arrives.

“Under President Trump, VA won’t wait to take necessary action when it comes to improving the department and its service to Veterans,” spokesman Curt Cashour said in an email. Wilkie, according to Cashour and a spokeswoman for the nominee, has had no hand in the changes as he awaits Senate confirmation.

Current and former employees — and now alarmed members of Congress — call the reshuffling a loyalty purge that is targeting the alleged political sympathies of many career civil servants whose jobs are, by definition, nonpartisan.

“These are people who served multiple administrations,” said one employee who was moved, “but they only want them to serve the Trump administration. You can’t run a department like that.”

At a House hearing on Tuesday, a visibly irritated Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn.) pressed O’Rourke to explain why he has “removed, demoted or reassigned” a “significant number of career employees.”

O’Rourke called his actions “well-planned and designed moves” to improve “efficiency and effectiveness.” He acknowledged changes were not based on poor performance.

He said he is encouraging other VA leaders to follow suit.

Esty countered that she suspects “loyalty concerns”are behind the transfers.

“To be clearing out that many people during the time of an acting secretary is disturbing,” she said. “You’re going to lose institutional knowledge.”

Presidential loyalty also has been a factor in staff changes at other agencies. The State Department sidelined or pushed out dozens of career diplomats who questioned the agency’s diminished role in the Trump administration.

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke reassigned dozens of senior executives in two shuffles. Critics said the mass transfers amounted to retaliation against career staffers who spoke out against his policies, and Zinke himself said publicly he has “30 percent of the crew that’s not loyal to the flag.”

The VA moves come at an agency Trump has called a top priority. A bright spot early in the administration, in recent months it has lost dozens of senior leaders who were pushed out or quit in alarm at the chaos in a long bipartisan corner of the government.

O’Rourke, a Trump campaign staffer who served as VA’s chief of staff and led a new office designed to protect whistleblowers, was appointed acting secretary after Wilkie, who had served in the role after Shulkin’s firing and the failed nomination of White House physician Ronny L. Jackson, won the nod for permanent secretary. Wilkie returned to his job as head of military personnel at the Defense Department to await confirmation.

“Any decisions made following Mr. Wilkie’s departure as acting [secretary] were made by the current VA leadership and Mr. Wilkie was not aware, nor a part of those decisions,” Wilkie spokeswoman Carla Gleason said in an email.

A Navy and Air Force veteran, O’Rourke has shown a willingness to exert power in his caretaker role. With his framed photograph now hanging in VA headquarters, he consults regularly with Trump political appointees, excluding career senior leaders from some meetings.

He quickly drew criticism from both parties on Capitol Hill for an ongoing dispute with VA’s inspector general, who is seeking records for an investigation of the whistleblower office. The Senate intervened, voting unanimously in June to tell O’Rourke he does not have the right to block the watchdog’s efforts.

Mid-level employees who worked for years in VA’s seat of power supporting secretaries and their deputies found themselves called in by O’Rourke’s staff, where they were informed of their departures, according to multiple employees.

One was told she needed to find another job in the agency but not offered one.

Another, Debi Bevins, whose role as director of client relations ensures emails and phone calls to the secretary’s office receive responses, was moved to another department doing the same job — but she no longer has direct access to the secretary.

Tonia Bock, executive secretary to the agency, and her deputy, Jennifer Jessup, who had access to sensitive correspondence with Congress, were also moved.

A VA official said Bock’s office “had struggled with tracking and responding to congressional inquiries accurately and in a timely fashion.”

A well-regarded staff assistant hired during the Obama administration as a political appointee was fired. So were some staff assistants in the office of Thomas Bowman, the agency’s second-in-command, who was pushed to retire in June after falling from favor at the end of Shulkin’s tenure.

The shake-up is now reaching another top Trump appointee, the assistant secretary for operations, security and preparedness who refused to sign a resignation letter O’Rourke’s team gave him after clashing with them and is now negotiating his departure.

Don Loren, a retired rear Navy Admiral, had questioned the group’s management style. He also refused to suspend normal security protocol to allow O’Rourke’s wife to bypass building security at VA headquarters, according to someone with knowledge of the matter. He refused a request to move up O’Rourke in the line of succession behind the deputy secretary, this person said. Cashour denied these events happened.

At the Veterans Benefits Administration, which has struggled for years to speed up its processing of disability claims, a new team of appointees in charge has transferred at least a half dozen senior career staffers to less prominent roles, some in other cities.

The culled leadership positions appear to be part of a restructuring designed to streamline the department, according to an internal memo obtained by disabledveterans.org.

The small Center for Women Veterans has been a flash point for loyalty questions. Director Kayla Williams quit last week to take another job after clashes with the Trump administration about making the agency’s mission statement more gender neutral.

“As both a veteran and the spouse of a 100 percent disabled combat wounded veteran, I was deeply committed to the VA mission of serving all veterans,” Williams said.

However a civil servant on her staff, Danielle Corazza, was fired after sending a tweet from the center’s account that praised the large number of female veterans running for office this year. The tweet linked to an article showing most are Democrats.

VA officials said Corazza sent multiple tweets from the account that tracked other campaign successes of women veterans who are Democrats.

The senior VA official said the Center for Women Veterans “was recently involved in repeated, clear and unequivocal violations of the Hatch Act” and as a result the agency “is implementing staffing changes” there.

Corazza said she never received training in the law, which prohibits on duty political activity. “My training was to post about female veterans, which I did,” she said.

Several high level White House staff also have been found in violation of the Hatch Act, although none appear to have been punished.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 21:06:42
July 18 2018 21:04 GMT
#10010
On July 19 2018 05:57 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2018 05:51 Plansix wrote:
An editorial is from the editorial department of the news outlet. Reporters work for the news section. They are two completely separate teams that do not overlap in any way. They even have separate chief editors.


What are some publications where the editorial staff have significantly different positions/outlooks than the reporting staff?

I mean the only thing that comes to mind is the NYT being heralded as a liberal point of light but it's editorials mostly being right of center.

I think this idea that the editorial staff is totally different bias than the reporting staff is overplayed.

The NYT is the poster child for an editorial team that runs in conflict with the reporting team. That that conflict exists within the paper itself. As someone who subscribes to the Times, I have write them an email about 2-4 times a year telling them their editorial department is terrible and their reporting teams are the only think keeping me from canceling. I get some nice replies and like to feel I helped make sure they didn’t hire that terrible woman who was buddy buddy with a nazi.

But it is more common that people think. Reporters don’t like having their stories undercut by skeptical editorials. And editorials writers don’t like that their think pieces get blasted because they have an alternative view to a reporting in the field.

On July 19 2018 06:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
The loyalty purge has arrived at the VA. We have reached personality cult status it seems like, that and the GOP seem it is going for the full privatization roue of all of the VA under the radar.

+ Show Spoiler +
Ahead of Robert Wilkie’s likely confirmation to lead the Department of Veterans Affairs, Trump loyalists at the agency are taking aggressive steps to purge or reassign staff perceived to be disloyal to President Trump and his agenda for veterans, according to multiple people familiar with the moves.

The transfers include more than a dozen career civil servants who have been moved from the leadership suite at VA headquarters and reassigned to lower-visibility roles. The employees served agency leaders, some dating back more than two decades, in crucial support roles that help a new secretary.

None say they were given reasons for their reassignments.

The moves are being carried out by a small cadre of political appointees led by Acting Secretary Peter O’Rourke who have consolidated power in the four months since they helped oust former Secretary David Shulkin.

The reshuffling marks a new stage in a long estrangement between civil servants and Trump loyalists at VA, where staff upheaval and sinking morale threatens to derail service to one of the president’s key constituencies, according to current and former employees.

Among those reassigned is an experienced scheduler who Wilkie told colleagues he wanted to work for him once he is confirmed by the Senate, according to former and current employees.

Other career senior executives with institutional knowledge of VA’s troubled benefits operation also have been sidelined, some to other cities, according to multiple people who asked not to be identified because of the issue’s sensitivity. A high-ranking executive appointed during the Obama administration to a six-year term quit last week after clashing with Trump aides. Even some Trump appointees have been pushed out for challenging the leadership group.

VA officials say the reassignments will help their efforts to improve the agency’s overall culture and performance. Still, it is highly unusual for a leader in an acting, caretaker role — which began for O’Rourke on May 30 — to make such dramatic changes before a permanent leader arrives.

“Under President Trump, VA won’t wait to take necessary action when it comes to improving the department and its service to Veterans,” spokesman Curt Cashour said in an email. Wilkie, according to Cashour and a spokeswoman for the nominee, has had no hand in the changes as he awaits Senate confirmation.

Current and former employees — and now alarmed members of Congress — call the reshuffling a loyalty purge that is targeting the alleged political sympathies of many career civil servants whose jobs are, by definition, nonpartisan.

“These are people who served multiple administrations,” said one employee who was moved, “but they only want them to serve the Trump administration. You can’t run a department like that.”

At a House hearing on Tuesday, a visibly irritated Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn.) pressed O’Rourke to explain why he has “removed, demoted or reassigned” a “significant number of career employees.”

O’Rourke called his actions “well-planned and designed moves” to improve “efficiency and effectiveness.” He acknowledged changes were not based on poor performance.

He said he is encouraging other VA leaders to follow suit.

Esty countered that she suspects “loyalty concerns”are behind the transfers.

“To be clearing out that many people during the time of an acting secretary is disturbing,” she said. “You’re going to lose institutional knowledge.”

Presidential loyalty also has been a factor in staff changes at other agencies. The State Department sidelined or pushed out dozens of career diplomats who questioned the agency’s diminished role in the Trump administration.

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke reassigned dozens of senior executives in two shuffles. Critics said the mass transfers amounted to retaliation against career staffers who spoke out against his policies, and Zinke himself said publicly he has “30 percent of the crew that’s not loyal to the flag.”

The VA moves come at an agency Trump has called a top priority. A bright spot early in the administration, in recent months it has lost dozens of senior leaders who were pushed out or quit in alarm at the chaos in a long bipartisan corner of the government.

O’Rourke, a Trump campaign staffer who served as VA’s chief of staff and led a new office designed to protect whistleblowers, was appointed acting secretary after Wilkie, who had served in the role after Shulkin’s firing and the failed nomination of White House physician Ronny L. Jackson, won the nod for permanent secretary. Wilkie returned to his job as head of military personnel at the Defense Department to await confirmation.

“Any decisions made following Mr. Wilkie’s departure as acting [secretary] were made by the current VA leadership and Mr. Wilkie was not aware, nor a part of those decisions,” Wilkie spokeswoman Carla Gleason said in an email.

A Navy and Air Force veteran, O’Rourke has shown a willingness to exert power in his caretaker role. With his framed photograph now hanging in VA headquarters, he consults regularly with Trump political appointees, excluding career senior leaders from some meetings.

He quickly drew criticism from both parties on Capitol Hill for an ongoing dispute with VA’s inspector general, who is seeking records for an investigation of the whistleblower office. The Senate intervened, voting unanimously in June to tell O’Rourke he does not have the right to block the watchdog’s efforts.

Mid-level employees who worked for years in VA’s seat of power supporting secretaries and their deputies found themselves called in by O’Rourke’s staff, where they were informed of their departures, according to multiple employees.

One was told she needed to find another job in the agency but not offered one.

Another, Debi Bevins, whose role as director of client relations ensures emails and phone calls to the secretary’s office receive responses, was moved to another department doing the same job — but she no longer has direct access to the secretary.

Tonia Bock, executive secretary to the agency, and her deputy, Jennifer Jessup, who had access to sensitive correspondence with Congress, were also moved.

A VA official said Bock’s office “had struggled with tracking and responding to congressional inquiries accurately and in a timely fashion.”

A well-regarded staff assistant hired during the Obama administration as a political appointee was fired. So were some staff assistants in the office of Thomas Bowman, the agency’s second-in-command, who was pushed to retire in June after falling from favor at the end of Shulkin’s tenure.

The shake-up is now reaching another top Trump appointee, the assistant secretary for operations, security and preparedness who refused to sign a resignation letter O’Rourke’s team gave him after clashing with them and is now negotiating his departure.

Don Loren, a retired rear Navy Admiral, had questioned the group’s management style. He also refused to suspend normal security protocol to allow O’Rourke’s wife to bypass building security at VA headquarters, according to someone with knowledge of the matter. He refused a request to move up O’Rourke in the line of succession behind the deputy secretary, this person said. Cashour denied these events happened.

At the Veterans Benefits Administration, which has struggled for years to speed up its processing of disability claims, a new team of appointees in charge has transferred at least a half dozen senior career staffers to less prominent roles, some in other cities.

The culled leadership positions appear to be part of a restructuring designed to streamline the department, according to an internal memo obtained by disabledveterans.org.

The small Center for Women Veterans has been a flash point for loyalty questions. Director Kayla Williams quit last week to take another job after clashes with the Trump administration about making the agency’s mission statement more gender neutral.

“As both a veteran and the spouse of a 100 percent disabled combat wounded veteran, I was deeply committed to the VA mission of serving all veterans,” Williams said.

However a civil servant on her staff, Danielle Corazza, was fired after sending a tweet from the center’s account that praised the large number of female veterans running for office this year. The tweet linked to an article showing most are Democrats.

VA officials said Corazza sent multiple tweets from the account that tracked other campaign successes of women veterans who are Democrats.

The senior VA official said the Center for Women Veterans “was recently involved in repeated, clear and unequivocal violations of the Hatch Act” and as a result the agency “is implementing staffing changes” there.

Corazza said she never received training in the law, which prohibits on duty political activity. “My training was to post about female veterans, which I did,” she said.

Several high level White House staff also have been found in violation of the Hatch Act, although none appear to have been punished.


Source

Democrats need to run on this and the word out to the public about what is going on. There are few things less popular that privatizing the VA and Vets the idea. If they want to attack Republicans on supporting the military without having to agree to huge military budget increases, this is how Democrats get those votes.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
sc-darkness
Profile Joined August 2017
856 Posts
July 18 2018 21:09 GMT
#10011
On July 19 2018 05:30 On_Slaught wrote:
Sanders said that when Trump said "no" in response to the question about whether Russia was still attacking us (contradicting his own intelligence officials), that he was actually saying "no, no more questions." Ofc this ignores the fact he took another question after that.

It's as blatant of lying as the "Kelly was mad about the breakfast" BS last week. That woman is a national disgrace.


Let's agree that it was fake news and Trump was right from the beginning. It's just media... fucking media. :D
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7028 Posts
July 18 2018 21:11 GMT
#10012
@plansix, I’ll just say that there is a difference between an editorial board with the specific task of writing opinion pieces, the editorial stance of a newspaper’s reporting, and the degree to which reporting is editorialized. I was tslking about the last two, whereas you seem to be talking about the first one.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States22991 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 21:13:00
July 18 2018 21:11 GMT
#10013
On July 19 2018 06:04 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2018 05:57 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 19 2018 05:51 Plansix wrote:
An editorial is from the editorial department of the news outlet. Reporters work for the news section. They are two completely separate teams that do not overlap in any way. They even have separate chief editors.


What are some publications where the editorial staff have significantly different positions/outlooks than the reporting staff?

I mean the only thing that comes to mind is the NYT being heralded as a liberal point of light but it's editorials mostly being right of center.

I think this idea that the editorial staff is totally different bias than the reporting staff is overplayed.

The NYT is the poster child for an editorial team that runs in conflict with the reporting team. That that conflict exists within the paper itself. As someone who subscribes to the Times, I have write them an email about 2-4 times a year telling them their editorial department is terrible and their reporting teams are the only think keeping me from canceling. I get some nice replies and like to feel I helped make sure they didn’t hire that terrible woman who was buddy buddy with a nazi.

But it is more common that people think. Reporters don’t like having their stories undercut by skeptical editorials. And editorials writers don’t like that their think pieces get blasted because they have an alternative view to a reporting in the field.


I think the NYT makes my own point if that's poster child for the chasm between editorial and reporting staff. The editorial staff are just free to be more right wing than the reporters who are supposed to be "unbiased" and focus on the facts.

also this

On July 19 2018 06:11 Grumbels wrote:
@plansix, I’ll just say that there is a difference between an editorial board with the specific task of writing opinion pieces, the editorial stance of a newspaper’s reporting, and the degree to which reporting is editorialized. I was tslking about the last two, whereas you seem to be talking about the first one.

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
TheLordofAwesome
Profile Joined May 2014
Korea (South)2616 Posts
July 18 2018 21:15 GMT
#10014
On July 19 2018 05:47 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2018 05:30 Grumbels wrote:
Before I quit twitter, I would get all my news from there. If all of a sudden they decided to remove anything with “editorial bias” there would be hardly anything left but links to NYT articles.

All news is biased, that is the nature of reporting. But these websites have made this myth about being neutral to protect themselves from having to give a shit about what claims to be news on their site. And they do so with a lot of legal protection from laws written in the 1990s. They should just grow up and get an editorial staff, or verify what they want to label as news, rather than pumping this myth that software will somehow remove human bias from the equation.

Show nested quote +
On July 19 2018 05:39 Tachion wrote:
On July 19 2018 04:50 Plansix wrote:
Trump and Putin discussed extraditing Bill Browder to Russia? And now the White House won’t say we are absolutely not going to give him to the Russians? Are you fucking kidding me?

Are we going to give Preet Bharara to Turkey next? This White House is a joke that can't even defend American citizens.

This has been clear as day to me ever since their disgracefully timid response to Erdogan's bodyguards attacking protestors in D.C., but I don't think Bill Browder is actually a US citizen. Still terrible nevertheless.

I forgot he gave up his citizenship to avoid US taxes. Not a great look, but we shouldn't even be talking about that with Putin. He is the reason we know about the depth of Russia's abuse of their own citizens and why we sanctioned them.

What is even nuttier than the demand for Browder (who isn't even a US citizen any more lol) is the demand for former Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul. This is crazy. McFaul was a Senate-confirmed US Ambassador who the Russians are now demanding be handed over for completely made-up financial crimes. (Seriously, the Russians claimed McFaul helped Browder steal over 400 million dollars out of Russia.) The only response from the WH to this kind of nonsense should be an unequivocal "NO." Instead, the WH has said that they are considering Putin's request for McFaul and Browder.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 21:19:52
July 18 2018 21:18 GMT
#10015
On July 19 2018 05:47 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2018 05:37 zlefin wrote:
On July 19 2018 05:30 Grumbels wrote:
Before I quit twitter, I would get all my news from there. If all of a sudden they decided to remove anything with “editorial bias” there would be hardly anything left but links to NYT articles.

would you prefer your news with more or less editorial bias?

I followed journalists and they would link articles they agreed with. I don’t really see the distinction between news and editorials at that point, since it is in the context of these people on twitter who have their own biases in how they frame articles and what they select from it.

And frankly, I don’t want to consume “raw news”, I think that is for academics or enthusiasts. I can be informed by editorials even if the author has their own bias.

I agree there's not so much news/editorial distinction if you're gettin gstuff in that way.

how do you account for reporting bias affecting your understanding of the world then? using a mix of journalists you follow?

have you ever tried consuming "raw news"?

Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 21:39:12
July 18 2018 21:29 GMT
#10016
On July 19 2018 06:11 Grumbels wrote:
@plansix, I’ll just say that there is a difference between an editorial board with the specific task of writing opinion pieces, the editorial stance of a newspaper’s reporting, and the degree to which reporting is editorialized. I was tslking about the last two, whereas you seem to be talking about the first one.

Bias in reporting, or editorializing if you prefer, is just part of the reporting process. All reporters have to decide which information is relevant and which isn’t. All they can be is transparent about the nature of the article they are writing. The burden is on us, the reader, to make ourselves better informed by reading up on a subject, rather than just trusting one news source.

We need to discard the term “unbiased” because it is a fiction. No outlet is unbiased. They just try to report on the news that they feel is relevant and be honest about what point of view the reporting is presenting.

On July 19 2018 06:15 TheLordofAwesome wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2018 05:47 Plansix wrote:
On July 19 2018 05:30 Grumbels wrote:
Before I quit twitter, I would get all my news from there. If all of a sudden they decided to remove anything with “editorial bias” there would be hardly anything left but links to NYT articles.

All news is biased, that is the nature of reporting. But these websites have made this myth about being neutral to protect themselves from having to give a shit about what claims to be news on their site. And they do so with a lot of legal protection from laws written in the 1990s. They should just grow up and get an editorial staff, or verify what they want to label as news, rather than pumping this myth that software will somehow remove human bias from the equation.

On July 19 2018 05:39 Tachion wrote:
On July 19 2018 04:50 Plansix wrote:
Trump and Putin discussed extraditing Bill Browder to Russia? And now the White House won’t say we are absolutely not going to give him to the Russians? Are you fucking kidding me?

Are we going to give Preet Bharara to Turkey next? This White House is a joke that can't even defend American citizens.

This has been clear as day to me ever since their disgracefully timid response to Erdogan's bodyguards attacking protestors in D.C., but I don't think Bill Browder is actually a US citizen. Still terrible nevertheless.

I forgot he gave up his citizenship to avoid US taxes. Not a great look, but we shouldn't even be talking about that with Putin. He is the reason we know about the depth of Russia's abuse of their own citizens and why we sanctioned them.

What is even nuttier than the demand for Browder (who isn't even a US citizen any more lol) is the demand for former Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul. This is crazy. McFaul was a Senate-confirmed US Ambassador who the Russians are now demanding be handed over for completely made-up financial crimes. (Seriously, the Russians claimed McFaul helped Browder steal over 400 million dollars out of Russia.) The only response from the WH to this kind of nonsense should be an unequivocal "NO." Instead, the WH has said that they are considering Putin's request for McFaul and Browder.

Russia flagged Bill Browder with an false Interpol warrant, which froze his passport. If the US hadn’t stepped in, he might have been in some real shit. If forget if he was traveling at the time, but I would be scared shitless. They tortured his lawyer to death, for those who are not aware.

This is the clearest example of Trump’s inability to resist the flattery of strong men like Putin. He is in love with the concept of these dictators and takes them at face value. It is insanely dangerous given the power of the executive branch and how toothless congress is.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
July 18 2018 21:45 GMT
#10017
I think the fact that Russia is even brazen enough to demand these things says something about the US.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 18 2018 21:49 GMT
#10018
Congress is toothless and our President is a clueless reality TV star that picks fights with our allies. Why not shoot the moon?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-07-18 22:13:05
July 18 2018 22:12 GMT
#10019
More like Congress is petrified than anything else.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
July 18 2018 22:16 GMT
#10020
On July 19 2018 05:30 On_Slaught wrote:
Sanders said that when Trump said "no" in response to the question about whether Russia was still attacking us (contradicting his own intelligence officials), that he was actually saying "no, no more questions." Ofc this ignores the fact he took another question after that.

It's as blatant of lying as the "Kelly was mad about the breakfast" BS last week. That woman is a national disgrace.


Out of curiousity, how is Sanders viewed on the right? I never hear much about SHS so I genuinely don't know if they talk about her much or what they say.
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
Prev 1 499 500 501 502 503 4966 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 23m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 221
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 18830
Leta 632
Terrorterran 25
Dota 2
monkeys_forever614
League of Legends
JimRising 742
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K907
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King167
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor192
Other Games
summit1g9674
WinterStarcraft562
C9.Mang0165
PartinGtheBigBoy130
Trikslyr15
Liquid`Ken6
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1071
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv137
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH273
• practicex 52
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt520
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 23m
SOOP Global
8h 23m
Spirit vs SKillous
YoungYakov vs ShowTime
Anonymous
9h 23m
SOOP
10h 53m
HeRoMaRinE vs Astrea
BSL Season 20
11h 23m
UltrA vs Radley
spx vs RaNgeD
Online Event
21h 23m
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 3h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 4h
Percival vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Spirit
MaxPax vs Jumy
BSL Season 20
1d 8h
TerrOr vs HBO
Tarson vs Spine
RSL Revival
1d 10h
[ Show More ]
BSL Season 20
1d 11h
MadiNho vs dxtr13
Gypsy vs Dark
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Road to EWC
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-05-14
2025 GSL S1
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Heroes 10 EU
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

Rose Open S1
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.