• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:55
CEST 17:55
KST 00:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 27981 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1595

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 5024 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 27 2019 03:05 GMT
#31881
On June 27 2019 12:02 Introvert wrote:
Clearly the moderators heard the complaints about giving Warren too much, they did let her finish though.

She was ok, Booker prob was the best considering expectations and plausibility of getting the nomination. Although Delaney telling Maddow to stuff it was great lol.

Beto and de Blasio were just...

I disagree with you on De Blasio. He had a good night. He owned who he is and got his message out with command. Warren had the best night. Booker did okay as well. Of the irrelevant tier of candidates, Julian Castro was probably the most impressive, but I doubt it will matter. Beto and Ryan had disastrous performances.
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-27 03:10:29
June 27 2019 03:08 GMT
#31882
The most positive thing about Beto I mentioned before continues to be. He did not do well. His answered certainly lacked substance. He's getting wrecked on Twitter right now. Most of the Democrat supporters I follow on there have been dunking on him a lot.
On June 27 2019 09:06 Ben... wrote:
I do wonder which person will drop out of the primaries first after these debates. I could see Beto and a couple others doing so if polling doesn't turn around for them. The most positive thing I've seen said about Beto recently is that it would be much better for him to drop out of the presidential race and instead go for Senate again.

"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4718 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-27 03:13:50
June 27 2019 03:10 GMT
#31883
On June 27 2019 12:05 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 27 2019 12:02 Introvert wrote:
Clearly the moderators heard the complaints about giving Warren too much, they did let her finish though.

She was ok, Booker prob was the best considering expectations and plausibility of getting the nomination. Although Delaney telling Maddow to stuff it was great lol.

Beto and de Blasio were just...

I disagree with you on De Blasio. He had a good night. He owned who he is and got his message out with command. Warren had the best night. Booker did okay as well. Of the irrelevant tier of candidates, Julian Castro was probably the most impressive, but I doubt it will matter. Beto and Ryan had disastrous performances.


Warren might have won in the sense that she was strong out of the gate and didn't get into the clown car. And she closed ok.

To be clear, I don't think Beto and de Blasio were bad in the same way, you are right that the mayor of NYC is just letting it fly. But he was annoying, idk that it was a good performance. Castro annoyed me in the same way as de Blasio, but yes, Beto was garbage I think from an objective-based performance point of view.

Also, we NEED Bernie v. Warren. None of this random assignment crap.
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-27 03:19:16
June 27 2019 03:16 GMT
#31884
Yeah, we need to get the main contenders on one stage. Bernie, Biden, Harris, Warren, and Booker should not be broken up anymore.
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-27 03:23:31
June 27 2019 03:18 GMT
#31885
On June 27 2019 12:10 Introvert wrote:but yes, Beto was garbage I think from an objective-based performance point of view.
All the left-leaning folks I know in other communities I'm in and on Twitter were shitting on him just as much as you guys were. He was very clearly out of his league.

Also, we NEED Bernie v. Warren. None of this random assignment crap.
Agreed. I'd favour Warren in that debate because she seems much more put together than Bernie normally is, but I'd still like to see it non-the-less.

edit: If you want some good entertainment, search "beto" on Twitter right now. It's savage.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
ShambhalaWar
Profile Joined August 2013
United States930 Posts
June 27 2019 03:19 GMT
#31886
On June 27 2019 08:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Is anyone even planning on watching the debate tonight or just waiting for the main card tomorrow?


Is Inslee your man based on his prioritization of the climate change issue?
ShambhalaWar
Profile Joined August 2013
United States930 Posts
June 27 2019 03:35 GMT
#31887
On June 27 2019 10:28 xDaunt wrote:
That argument about Medicare having lower overhead than insurance companies is such bullshit. The reason why it seems lower is that Medicare pays out far more in benefits as a consequence of its risk pool (expensive old and dying people).


If it did have a lower overhead, would you be for it?
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 27 2019 03:39 GMT
#31888
On June 27 2019 12:35 ShambhalaWar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 27 2019 10:28 xDaunt wrote:
That argument about Medicare having lower overhead than insurance companies is such bullshit. The reason why it seems lower is that Medicare pays out far more in benefits as a consequence of its risk pool (expensive old and dying people).


If it did have a lower overhead, would you be for it?

I would allow a very basic level of government-provided healthcare and then let people buy their own insurance private policies or other care beyond that.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-27 03:45:42
June 27 2019 03:44 GMT
#31889
I guess this one is more directed at xDaunt and Introvert,

but on the health care questions, you had to wonder if the prior Democratic President actually made any signature health insurance policy changes. You wouldn't hear it at the debate. They're all running against it. They're not going to say they're the ones that will fix Obamacare, because Republicans refuse to do it. They're not even going to frame their policy changes from what their party's predecessor did on that very issue in the executive chair.

They're running against something that they might well pretend didn't even happen, and now the only questions are between another change that's too ambitious or not ambitious enough. + Show Spoiler +
We need medicare for all, with or without banning private insurance, because Obamacare failed to deliver on its promise
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
ShambhalaWar
Profile Joined August 2013
United States930 Posts
June 27 2019 03:45 GMT
#31890
On June 27 2019 12:39 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 27 2019 12:35 ShambhalaWar wrote:
On June 27 2019 10:28 xDaunt wrote:
That argument about Medicare having lower overhead than insurance companies is such bullshit. The reason why it seems lower is that Medicare pays out far more in benefits as a consequence of its risk pool (expensive old and dying people).


If it did have a lower overhead, would you be for it?

I would allow a very basic level of government-provided healthcare and then let people buy their own insurance private policies or other care beyond that.


Why that (if there was a lower overhead, why only allow for a "basic" level of care, if it really was cheaper)?
ShambhalaWar
Profile Joined August 2013
United States930 Posts
June 27 2019 03:47 GMT
#31891
On June 27 2019 12:44 Danglars wrote:
I guess this one is more directed at xDaunt and Introvert,

but on the health care questions, you had to wonder if the prior Democratic President actually made any signature health insurance policy changes. You wouldn't hear it at the debate. They're all running against it. They're not going to say they're the ones that will fix Obamacare, because Republicans refuse to do it. They're not even going to frame their policy changes from what their party's predecessor did on that very issue in the executive chair.

They're running against something that they might well pretend didn't even happen, and now the only questions are between another change that's too ambitious or not ambitious enough. + Show Spoiler +
We need medicare for all, with or without banning private insurance, because Obamacare failed to deliver on its promise


The ACA was killed in it's crib by republicans. There was never any intention of seeing how well it worked.
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4718 Posts
June 27 2019 03:47 GMT
#31892
On June 27 2019 12:44 Danglars wrote:
I guess this one is more directed at xDaunt and Introvert,

but on the health care questions, you had to wonder if the prior Democratic President actually made any signature health insurance policy changes. You wouldn't hear it at the debate. They're all running against it. They're not going to say they're the ones that will fix Obamacare, because Republicans refuse to do it. They're not even going to frame their policy changes from what their party's predecessor did on that very issue in the executive chair.

They're running against something that they might well pretend didn't even happen, and now the only questions are between another change that's too ambitious or not ambitious enough. + Show Spoiler +
We need medicare for all, with or without banning private insurance, because Obamacare failed to deliver on its promise


Yes, that was pretty funny. I thought the Democrats had fixed healthcare! Maybe I didn't catch them, but I heard barely any mentions of Obama at all tonight. Not on healthcare, the border, Iran, you name it. I suspect that will change tomorrow.
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
June 27 2019 03:55 GMT
#31893
On June 27 2019 12:47 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 27 2019 12:44 Danglars wrote:
I guess this one is more directed at xDaunt and Introvert,

but on the health care questions, you had to wonder if the prior Democratic President actually made any signature health insurance policy changes. You wouldn't hear it at the debate. They're all running against it. They're not going to say they're the ones that will fix Obamacare, because Republicans refuse to do it. They're not even going to frame their policy changes from what their party's predecessor did on that very issue in the executive chair.

They're running against something that they might well pretend didn't even happen, and now the only questions are between another change that's too ambitious or not ambitious enough. + Show Spoiler +
We need medicare for all, with or without banning private insurance, because Obamacare failed to deliver on its promise


Yes, that was pretty funny. I thought the Democrats had fixed healthcare! Maybe I didn't catch them, but I heard barely any mentions of Obama at all tonight. Not on healthcare, the border, Iran, you name it. I suspect that will change tomorrow.

It cost them the midterms and they're all implicitly running against it. It's right there in the middle of the Democratic party.

"We saved you money, kept your doctor, expanded coverage, provided for the uninsurable, and did it all with Republican carrot-and-stick ideas" or if you like "The perfidous McConnell and Greatest Threat Facing America Donald Trump + Show Spoiler +
from answers from the last question
" robbed Obama of health insurance paradise to please corporate interests, but I'm restoring it as it's meant to be!"

I swear, if they dropped you in on that debate, you'd think the economy sucks and Republicans have held the White House for the last 12 years. If Democrats controlled the executive in recent memory, it certainly was not some guy that got anything done with health insurance or Iran.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
ShambhalaWar
Profile Joined August 2013
United States930 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-27 03:56:25
June 27 2019 03:55 GMT
#31894
As someone who was really interested in seeing how the debate panned out, I really happy with the candidates. I forgot what it was like to listen to actual leaders speak. If any of these people were elected president I would be infinitely happier and I can imagine even gaining some sense of pride (rather than shame) to admit I'm American.

I want to see tomorrow as I've always been for Bernie, but Warren has the fighting spirit. I would take her as president any day and be equally happy. I loved how she said no matter what happens in the congressional election, the fight is on no matter what... That's the kind of candidate I want!

As for everyone else, I have higher opinions of almost all of them after hearing them speak. My opinions of no candidate went down after tonight, only up. Warren I think stood out, but she always has imo.

On a different note, in the last republican debate I remember my opinions shifting even more between people after they spoke. I wanted to link this clip so we could have some contrast for those that don't remember.

+ Show Spoiler +


User was temp banned for this post.
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-27 04:02:54
June 27 2019 04:01 GMT
#31895
On June 27 2019 12:47 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 27 2019 12:44 Danglars wrote:
I guess this one is more directed at xDaunt and Introvert,

but on the health care questions, you had to wonder if the prior Democratic President actually made any signature health insurance policy changes. You wouldn't hear it at the debate. They're all running against it. They're not going to say they're the ones that will fix Obamacare, because Republicans refuse to do it. They're not even going to frame their policy changes from what their party's predecessor did on that very issue in the executive chair.

They're running against something that they might well pretend didn't even happen, and now the only questions are between another change that's too ambitious or not ambitious enough. + Show Spoiler +
We need medicare for all, with or without banning private insurance, because Obamacare failed to deliver on its promise


Yes, that was pretty funny. I thought the Democrats had fixed healthcare! Maybe I didn't catch them, but I heard barely any mentions of Obama at all tonight. Not on healthcare, the border, Iran, you name it. I suspect that will change tomorrow.


It's almost as if the Republicans did everything in their power to undermine the PPACA. Oh wait, that's exactly what they did.

Even this gutted system the Dems put forward is better than the Republicans plan of literally doing nothing, or worse, doing things that dont make sense like forcing the coverage of pre existing conditions without the individual mandate.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42431 Posts
June 27 2019 04:02 GMT
#31896
I'm still curious to get an answer from xDaunt about how freeing Iran from both the restrictions of the deal and the international sanctions coalition after having returned their frozen assets is a masterstroke that has their nuts in a vice. Do Persians hate getting money for nothing? Maybe it's a cultural thing.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4329 Posts
June 27 2019 05:09 GMT
#31897
On June 27 2019 12:18 Ben... wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 27 2019 12:10 Introvert wrote:but yes, Beto was garbage I think from an objective-based performance point of view.
All the left-leaning folks I know in other communities I'm in and on Twitter were shitting on him just as much as you guys were. He was very clearly out of his league.

I think Buttigieg will be shown up in the next debate for the same thing.

First debate was full of nobodies and no hopers.Gabbard has no hope but I hope she sticks around a while to deliver her message, like Paul in 08,12. I watched 10-15 mins then turned it off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15513 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-27 05:51:10
June 27 2019 05:46 GMT
#31898
Super stoked for this debate. This is like 10x as progressive as 2016. It feels like our only actual bad choices are Beto, Delaney, Ryan, Biden and Klobuchar.
Starlightsun
Profile Blog Joined June 2016
United States1405 Posts
June 27 2019 08:24 GMT
#31899
What do you guys think of Kushner's Palestine proposal in Bahrain? Looking for investors to pour in 60 billion or something into Palestinian economy. No talk of the political situation - that will supposedly be unveiled in "part two". Palestinians seem to view it as an insulting bribe at best. I'm inclined to agree, it smells like a turd.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17955 Posts
June 27 2019 09:02 GMT
#31900
On June 27 2019 09:50 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 27 2019 09:46 IgnE wrote:
On June 27 2019 08:45 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:
On June 27 2019 02:37 IgnE wrote:
On June 27 2019 02:09 Doodsmack wrote:
Here's Trump saying that hes glad McCain is dead, and he hopes McCain went to hell. I'm confused why this isn't garnering headlines.



probably because that’s not what he said. he did not say he “hoped” mccain was in hell. we just had someone in this thread explicitly wish that Duncan Hunter fall into a volcano and now you are criticizing Trump for being “glad that [McCain is] gone.” it is possible to be glad someone is gone without being glad they are dead per se


I agree, the tweet did not have Trump saying that he hoped mccain, or anyone, was in hell (even though he did choose to explicitly mention the possibility).

Trump is an elected representative with a huge amount of power and influence, not a semi-anonymous person ranting on a web forum. It's a LITTLE different when he says something expressing happiness at someone's death.

I agree, it is possible to be glad someone is gone without being glad they are dead, in general. And it can even be possible to communicate this. What is emphatically not possible is that a tweet that basically reads They're gone. Dead. Possibly to hell. I'm so glad they're gone is not communicating happiness at the death thing. The whole death bit, and deliberate choice to mention the hell possibility, removes the possibility entirely. A kid who has just processed why their goldfish mysteriously changed shape and colour one morning could figure out that the death and happiness bits of the tweet were connected.
Unless you are just mentioning that last sentence of possibility for lulz. Like I'm sure Trump mentioned the less green pastures for lulz.

The whole pretending context doesn't matter shtick gets old really fast, and is not a good look.


ah well i hope you guys remember this conversation if Trump suddenly dies in office

“i’m glad he is gone good riddance . . . what? of course death is a tragedy”

May I refer you to my comments following the death of Scalia? I said I was glad he was gone. If you'd like clarification over whether I'd rather he were dead than stayed on the Supreme Court the answer is yes. If Trump left office I'd be glad. If it's due to his syphilis finally finishing him off, still glad.

Hm. Trump dying of syphilis might make me even gladder than if he just retired.

(1) it's such a stupid thing to die to, and it's an incredibly fitting end.
(2) his base will quiet down for a bit while they search for a new deplorable to adore. At least in NL there was quite some time between Pim Fortuyn getting shot and Wilders recapturing all that voter base.

PS. I think Fortuyn dying was a tragedy for Dutch politics, and abhor the shooter and his ideals. But Fortuyn was a far less despicable person than Trump is (or in fact, than Wilders is).

PS2. I am not the president of anything, nor does my opinion represent anything other than my own, personal opinion. Trump fans might think I am deplorable for having this opinion, but I am not their representative on the national stage.

I don't think it's a bad thing that Trump, personally, is happy McCain is dead. I do think it's a bad thing that the president gives this opinion a voice. Unsolicited.
Prev 1 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 5024 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 5m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
trigger 236
ProTech84
EnDerr 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 8146
Sea 3178
Hyuk 1753
Rain 1308
Snow 433
Soulkey 178
HiyA 136
PianO 118
Zeus 117
sorry 92
[ Show more ]
hero 46
Rush 46
TY 43
Terrorterran 32
Nal_rA 21
Noble 16
IntoTheRainbow 11
zelot 6
Barracks 0
Dota 2
Gorgc6298
qojqva3343
Fuzer 192
League of Legends
Dendi1413
Counter-Strike
fl0m5814
olofmeister2619
Foxcn252
rGuardiaN129
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude23
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor158
Other Games
singsing2730
FrodaN826
C9.Mang0628
Beastyqt485
Mlord449
crisheroes429
Hui .210
ArmadaUGS133
Mew2King113
elazer106
XaKoH 93
Trikslyr79
KnowMe60
Organizations
StarCraft 2
WardiTV719
Other Games
BasetradeTV28
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 10
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3589
• lizZardDota272
League of Legends
• Nemesis4390
• Jankos2847
• TFBlade1415
Upcoming Events
OSC
5h 5m
ArT vs ReBellioN
HonMonO vs Ziomek
Shameless vs LunaSea
MilkiCow vs GgMaChine
Moja vs HiGhDrA
Jumy vs TBD
Demi vs NightPhoenix
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
8h 5m
OSC
8h 5m
WardiTV Invitational
19h 5m
OSC
21h 5m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 11h
SOOP
1d 17h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
1d 18h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 19h
Cheesadelphia
1d 23h
[ Show More ]
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.