• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:35
CEST 21:35
KST 04:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On8Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists4Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High15
Community News
PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition185.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)91$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 151Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada11Weekly Cups (Sept 22-28): MaxPax double, Zerg wins, PTR12
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version) PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition ZvT - Army Composition - Slow Lings + Fast Banes Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada Had to smile :)
Tourneys
$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 15 Stellar Fest Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LANified! 37: Groundswell, BYOC LAN, Nov 28-30 2025 Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight
Brood War
General
Question regarding recent ASL Bisu vs Larva game BarrackS' ASL S20 Ro.8 Review&Power of Friendship BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Thoughts on rarely used units RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro8 Day 4 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro8 Day 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art Current Meta I am doing this better than progamers do. Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Liquipedia App: Now Covering SC2 and Brood War!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts The Automated Ban List BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final
Blogs
[AI] From Comfort Women to …
Peanutsc
Mental Health In Esports: Wo…
TrAiDoS
Try to reverse getting fired …
Garnet
[ASL20] Players bad at pi…
pullarius1
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1499 users

European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread - Page 574

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 572 573 574 575 576 1415 Next
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18072 Posts
October 25 2016 08:18 GMT
#11461
On October 25 2016 16:52 RvB wrote:
The ceta agreement is made publicly available on the internet if you want to read it. There's nothing backroom about it.

Process, not outcome. And I am on the fence. I actually (1) don't think closed negotiations happen more than they did ever before, and (2) they are sometimes necessary.

However, in the case of far-reaching legislation, such as the European Constitution (oh wait, sorry, its name was changed, I meant the Treaty of Lisbon), large trade deals (CETA, TTIP), and in hindsight the introduction of the Euro, require the consent of the people. At local, and national, politics levels, that is obtained by involving those people in the process. At the European level, that involvement simply doesn't happen, probably because there are too many layers of bureaucracy in between.

Lets say NL decides to enter negotiations about a trade deal with consequences for most of the Dutch population with Canada. Before even starting, the government would tell the parliament what is happening and why it is happening. This would be covered in the national news. Then there would be some kind of schedule for updating the parliament (and the population) about the process of the negotiations, and there would be debates about the more contentious points, perhaps sending the minister back to the negotiation table with a mandate to continue, or reeling him in and making certain points non-negotiable. At the end of the process, there would be a trade deal that was negotiated with the full knowledge of the Dutch parliament and people. That whole process was completely missing in CETA. We got presented with the final deal and told "take it or leave it". I'm sure national governments were involved, but it never went past the executive branch until the very end, and now people are (rightfully) pissed off about this.

Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9129 Posts
October 25 2016 08:21 GMT
#11462
On October 25 2016 16:21 Laurens wrote:
The guy who keeps saying no to the deal (Paul Magnette) is doing so to protect the farmers in Wallonia. (I was looking for an adjective here.. Wallonian farmers? Walloon farmers? lol.)

He is getting quite a bit of support from some organisations, but in general people are embarrassed and annoyed.

Fact is that if CETA does go through, our farmers will suffer. I agree with opisska that it is weird no one else is protesting this deal. Makes us look super bad.

How will Wallonian farmers suffer from CETA? I'm not finding anything remotely useful on this topic
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 11:23:38
October 25 2016 09:00 GMT
#11463
the main contention point in CETA was the ISDS (Investor-State Dispute Settlement). fearing that it could make CETA fail, EU and Canada replaced it this year, in some renegotiations, with ISC (Investment Court System).
the fear was that american firms using subsidiaries in Canada could sue EU states; american firms were seen as really good at winning or really good at stalling in court, things which would increase the pressure on tax payers.

no one really cared about locally generated complaints: fisheries, farmers, pharmaceutical regulations, mandatory privatization ... etc.
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6236 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 09:03:15
October 25 2016 09:00 GMT
#11464
On October 25 2016 17:18 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2016 16:52 RvB wrote:
The ceta agreement is made publicly available on the internet if you want to read it. There's nothing backroom about it.

Process, not outcome. And I am on the fence. I actually (1) don't think closed negotiations happen more than they did ever before, and (2) they are sometimes necessary.

However, in the case of far-reaching legislation, such as the European Constitution (oh wait, sorry, its name was changed, I meant the Treaty of Lisbon), large trade deals (CETA, TTIP), and in hindsight the introduction of the Euro, require the consent of the people. At local, and national, politics levels, that is obtained by involving those people in the process. At the European level, that involvement simply doesn't happen, probably because there are too many layers of bureaucracy in between.

Lets say NL decides to enter negotiations about a trade deal with consequences for most of the Dutch population with Canada. Before even starting, the government would tell the parliament what is happening and why it is happening. This would be covered in the national news. Then there would be some kind of schedule for updating the parliament (and the population) about the process of the negotiations, and there would be debates about the more contentious points, perhaps sending the minister back to the negotiation table with a mandate to continue, or reeling him in and making certain points non-negotiable. At the end of the process, there would be a trade deal that was negotiated with the full knowledge of the Dutch parliament and people. That whole process was completely missing in CETA. We got presented with the final deal and told "take it or leave it". I'm sure national governments were involved, but it never went past the executive branch until the very end, and now people are (rightfully) pissed off about this.


The negotiators get a mandate of what and how they can negotiate before the negotiating starts from the national parliaments. Ideally you'd have the parliamentary discussion in advance. The problem with too frequent updates is that it gets hijacked by special interest groups and negotiations will never end. I'd agree that an update once or twice might be better in the end. Anyway a lot of the critique against FTA's like the arbitration panel already got addressed with CETA.

I can't comment on the Lisbon treaty and euro I was too young when that passed and don't really know how that came to be. I'm pretty sure most people in the EU still prefer the euro over the system of national currencies we had though.

On October 25 2016 17:21 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2016 16:21 Laurens wrote:
The guy who keeps saying no to the deal (Paul Magnette) is doing so to protect the farmers in Wallonia. (I was looking for an adjective here.. Wallonian farmers? Walloon farmers? lol.)

He is getting quite a bit of support from some organisations, but in general people are embarrassed and annoyed.

Fact is that if CETA does go through, our farmers will suffer. I agree with opisska that it is weird no one else is protesting this deal. Makes us look super bad.

How will Wallonian farmers suffer from CETA? I'm not finding anything remotely useful on this topic


Wallonia boasts one cow for every three humans and its lavishly subsidised farmers are wary of cheap Canadian competition. Erwin Schöpges, a Walloon dairy farmer who joined the protests outside parliament, says he already faces milk prices below his production costs. “We want to trade with Canada, but we would rather not abolish tariffs,” he says.

www.economist.com
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9129 Posts
October 25 2016 10:28 GMT
#11465
On October 25 2016 18:00 RvB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2016 17:21 Dan HH wrote:
On October 25 2016 16:21 Laurens wrote:
The guy who keeps saying no to the deal (Paul Magnette) is doing so to protect the farmers in Wallonia. (I was looking for an adjective here.. Wallonian farmers? Walloon farmers? lol.)

He is getting quite a bit of support from some organisations, but in general people are embarrassed and annoyed.

Fact is that if CETA does go through, our farmers will suffer. I agree with opisska that it is weird no one else is protesting this deal. Makes us look super bad.

How will Wallonian farmers suffer from CETA? I'm not finding anything remotely useful on this topic


Show nested quote +
Wallonia boasts one cow for every three humans and its lavishly subsidised farmers are wary of cheap Canadian competition. Erwin Schöpges, a Walloon dairy farmer who joined the protests outside parliament, says he already faces milk prices below his production costs. “We want to trade with Canada, but we would rather not abolish tariffs,” he says.

www.economist.com

That's the extent of what I could find, but milk being the issue made no sense to me. How can subsidized dirt cheap milk in an already over-saturated market be encroached on by milk that would have to cross the Atlantic? Even under the assumption that the producer price would be similar it made no sense, but googling turned out that farmgate price of milk in Canada is way higher than in the EU.
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6236 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 10:40:30
October 25 2016 10:40 GMT
#11466
According to the Guardian it's about beef and pork not milk although other sources say it's indeed about milk. I dunno honestly.

Mr. Magnette’s Socialist Party is under growing political pressure within Wallonia, an economically depressed rust-belt region. The Marxist party has been steadily gaining ground in recent polls, pushing the Socialists further to the left on issues such as trade.

Contributing to Mr. Magnette’s intransigence is Wallonia’s ailing economy and growing angst among his supporters about globalization and trade. It is the poorest of Belgium’s three geographic regions, and unemployment, at about 16 per cent, is twice as high as elsewhere in the country.

This seems to be the real explanation to me though.
www.theglobeandmail.com

Apparently the texts were also available since 2014.
Belgian politicians who support Ceta questioned why Walloon critics raised their concerns so late in the day. “We have had the texts since April 2014,” said Geert Bourgeois, the minister-president of Flanders.

www.theguardian.com
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
October 25 2016 11:03 GMT
#11467
Marxist party ! After all, there's some hope in Belgium.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
October 25 2016 11:27 GMT
#11468
On October 25 2016 16:21 Laurens wrote:
The guy who keeps saying no to the deal (Paul Magnette) is doing so to protect the farmers in Wallonia. (I was looking for an adjective here.. Wallonian farmers? Walloon farmers? lol.)

He is getting quite a bit of support from some organisations, but in general people are embarrassed and annoyed.

Fact is that if CETA does go through, our farmers will suffer. I agree with opisska that it is weird no one else is protesting this deal. Makes us look super bad.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


There are lots of protests against the CETA... but not among governments.
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
October 25 2016 14:12 GMT
#11469
A lot of people opposing CETA are operating under the assumption that if CETA fails then TTIP will inevitably fail, too. For some - possibly a majority of those who object - it's more about principle than specifics.
Nakajin
Profile Blog Joined September 2014
Canada8989 Posts
October 25 2016 15:32 GMT
#11470
http://mobile.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2016/10/25/hollande-une-impopularite-record_5019914_823448.html

4% of satisfaction for Hollande, 1% of the population who is very satisfied. Seriously I know French tend to be pessimistic and whine about themself and the country but still that is less then a bloodthirsty dictator would do almost anywhere else in the world.
Writerhttp://i.imgur.com/9p6ufcB.jpg
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6236 Posts
October 25 2016 16:07 GMT
#11471
On October 25 2016 20:27 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2016 16:21 Laurens wrote:
The guy who keeps saying no to the deal (Paul Magnette) is doing so to protect the farmers in Wallonia. (I was looking for an adjective here.. Wallonian farmers? Walloon farmers? lol.)

He is getting quite a bit of support from some organisations, but in general people are embarrassed and annoyed.

Fact is that if CETA does go through, our farmers will suffer. I agree with opisska that it is weird no one else is protesting this deal. Makes us look super bad.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


There are lots of protests against the CETA... but not among governments.

What does that actually show? The dots where there have been protests? And what about the red regions whaf does that mean?
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
October 25 2016 16:54 GMT
#11472
On October 26 2016 00:32 Nakajin wrote:
http://mobile.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2016/10/25/hollande-une-impopularite-record_5019914_823448.html

4% of satisfaction for Hollande, 1% of the population who is very satisfied. Seriously I know French tend to be pessimistic and whine about themself and the country but still that is less then a bloodthirsty dictator would do almost anywhere else in the world.

The price of betrayal.

On October 26 2016 01:07 RvB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2016 20:27 TheDwf wrote:
On October 25 2016 16:21 Laurens wrote:
The guy who keeps saying no to the deal (Paul Magnette) is doing so to protect the farmers in Wallonia. (I was looking for an adjective here.. Wallonian farmers? Walloon farmers? lol.)

He is getting quite a bit of support from some organisations, but in general people are embarrassed and annoyed.

Fact is that if CETA does go through, our farmers will suffer. I agree with opisska that it is weird no one else is protesting this deal. Makes us look super bad.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


There are lots of protests against the CETA... but not among governments.

What does that actually show? The dots where there have been protests? And what about the red regions whaf does that mean?

Cities/regions which voted a symbolic motion against the CETA.
lord_nibbler
Profile Joined March 2004
Germany591 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 22:49:37
October 25 2016 21:00 GMT
#11473
On October 25 2016 18:00 RvB wrote:
The negotiators get a mandate of what and how they can negotiate before the negotiating starts from the national parliaments. Ideally you'd have the parliamentary discussion in advance. The problem with too frequent updates is that it gets hijacked by special interest groups and negotiations will never end.

That is such a misinterpretation of what actually happens.
Members of parliament (EU and local) were first completely shut out of the process. They could not get even one look at the EU negotiation position or already agreed parts or even the names of the negotiators!
After month of struggle they were finally able to read part of the contracts but only in a special room and they could not make any notes or copies. And after they had entered that room, they were not allowed to speak about what they had read in public anymore. We are talking about elected officials (remember 'our representatives') here.

The answer was always "but they will see the written contracts at the end anyway". Sure, but afterwards they can only say "yes or no" to the whole thing. And the amount of pressure to quickly accept is so enormous just look at how they treat Wallonia now (and this is only because they did not want to sign today but study the consequences of the treaty for 2 weeks longer).

And here comes the kicker, while all this "you can not have public influence during the negotiations or it would never get to an end" was going on, hundreds of lobbying and interest groups had access to the papers and could directly draft phrasing all this time! While people complained about the lack of transparency of the process, for a select few it was positively lucent.


Anyway a lot of the critique against FTA's like the arbitration panel already got addressed with CETA.

"Got addressed". That's funny.
Yea, while it used to be that 3 lawyers in a room (!!!) could impose fines in the billions circumventing laws of any country. They now want to polish up this farce by making it a semi-official court. Still ignoring local law and annulling the very core of democracy but hey "they addressed the problem".


Oh, and because is point gets mentioned too little, I would like to emphasize that the goal of the treaty is to set the minimum standards of service and production in place forever!
Countries will never get to raise these standards ever again without heavy backlash (fines in the billions). Consumer rights, health concerns, environment issues and so much more will be set in stone from here on out!

So in conclusion, obviously it is all just a little 'free trade agreement' and big-headed Wallonia is embarrassing the EU in the world because of pig farmer votes...
MyLovelyLurker
Profile Joined April 2007
France756 Posts
October 26 2016 01:46 GMT
#11474
On October 26 2016 00:32 Nakajin wrote:
http://mobile.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2016/10/25/hollande-une-impopularite-record_5019914_823448.html

4% of satisfaction for Hollande, 1% of the population who is very satisfied. Seriously I know French tend to be pessimistic and whine about themself and the country but still that is less then a bloodthirsty dictator would do almost anywhere else in the world.


You have to take it in context, he's only down 7% from his 11% ( ! ) approval rating last year.

The tell-all book he had released recently hasn't done him any favours. The guy clearly is amateur league. It's fine to whack everyone and cash out on a scandalous book, but totally unpresidential to do so while in office. On top of it, he destroyed even his close allies. Impossible to comprehend as he was due to leave in around six months.

Also, many of his woes are self-inflicted and due to a brutal lack of economic understanding. He asked to be judged on his lowering the unemployment rate, and rather unsurprisingly, has failed at that. Perfect example of shooting himself in the foot.
"I just say, it doesn't matter win or lose, I just love Starcraft 2, I love this game, I love this stage, just play like in practice" - TIME/Oliveira
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 11:09:41
October 26 2016 10:30 GMT
#11475
On October 26 2016 10:46 MyLovelyLurker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2016 00:32 Nakajin wrote:
http://mobile.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2016/10/25/hollande-une-impopularite-record_5019914_823448.html

4% of satisfaction for Hollande, 1% of the population who is very satisfied. Seriously I know French tend to be pessimistic and whine about themself and the country but still that is less then a bloodthirsty dictator would do almost anywhere else in the world.


You have to take it in context, he's only down 7% from his 11% ( ! ) approval rating last year.

Should also note that the methodology is different from the usual polls. In that one the possible answers were: satisfied / neither satisfied nor dissatisfied / dissatisfied. Usually indecision/“neutrality” isn't part of the answers.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
October 26 2016 18:58 GMT
#11476
I hope Magnette kills CETA (for now, I guess), so that European politicians may start to understand that you cannot unite a continent based on economic policy alone and that maybe, just maybe that the people of Europe start to understand that the European project has some huge structural issues that make it a lobby for neoliberalism. But then again, it seems like these people will rather turn to facists then to understand that what is taking away their money and democracy is a downwards spiral of conservative sell-out politics.
mahrgell
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Germany3943 Posts
October 26 2016 19:53 GMT
#11477
As I'm seeing rather frequent updates about the french personal developments (and I consider them to be probably the most interesting part of this thread), I thought I could also chime in with some German updates.

There are actually two big political events next year in Germany on a national scale. One is the well known General election, so new Bundestag will be elected, and this also leads to a new (or reelected) chancellor.
But before that, a new President has to be chosen.
And for both positions there are a lot of rumors, discussions and media trial balloons going around.

Let's start with the President. I spoiler some general description for those not familiar with the German President, as it gets way less coverage than our chancellor.
+ Show Spoiler +
The President of Germany is officially the highest position in Germany and head of state. Currently the position is held by Joachim Gauck, who could go for another 5 years, but refused to do so for age reasons. But the position is mostly for representative tasks, even though the President has some minor political powers. (constitution fanatics will lynch me for calling those powers minor, but let's go with what is their effect in reality) The President is chosen by the Bundesversammlung. Now for those not familar with the German system, the Bundesversammlung is the union of Bundestag and Bundesrat. The Bundestag is basically the parliament (what is elected later in 2017 and also elects the chancellor), while the Bundesrat is the representation of the states (like Saxony, Bavaria, Berlin, etc).
The Bundesversammlung is rarely used in the political process and so it's majority constellations are quite unusual. Also there is in general way less party discipline in the Bundesrat than in the Bundestag, even though usually party discipline is mostly kept for Presidential elections.

The Bundesversammlung has 1260 seats, and currently they are distributed as follows:
CDU/CSU 542–543 (conservative)
SPD 386–388 (social democrat)
Grüne 145–146 (Greens)
Die Linke 94 (left)
AfD 35 (right populist)
FDP 33 (liberal)
Piraten 12 (pirate party, wild mix of open democracy, free internet and similar stuff)
Freie Wähler 10 (a lose connection of not party affiliated)
SSW 1 (danish minority party)
To become president you need a majority of the votes (631), if all candidates fail the election is repeated. If it fails again, a third round happens and whoever gets most votes wins.
Current president Gauck was elected by a broad majority across all major parties. And his favorability ratings are insanely high. This is a rather high bar to pass.
So there were several ideas how the president could be elected:
1) Another candidate with broad shared support. There are multiple reasons for this.
a) in a time of social tensions and a rising AfD the other parties don't wan't to fight each other too much and with the President being a representative figure he should have a uniting touch. Also the president has to be unpartisan anyway.
b) the General elections coming up later this year. Basically it is not worth fighting over the president and burning political capital on the presidential election, with the politically way more General election coming soon after.
But the problem is: All the names floating around already said they would not be available. There is simply nobody willing to do the job, who would be broadly accepted.
2) a red-red-green candidate.
Now this was argued for some time, but here we can look at 1b). This idea has been buried for now, as the parties don't want to commit to a red-red-green alliance, something which has never been tried on federal level. This would be considered a strong sign towards the General elections, but the SPD does not want to be tied to the Linke, and the Greens want to keep their options with the CDU open. And the Linke are afraid for their more extreme wings abandoning them. Their were some names dropped, but in the end nothing came from it.
3) and CDU/green candidate
This idea floated around too, but was buried even faster. Again, neither party wants to commit here, and both want to leave their coalition options open for the General election. Also there seemed to be no candidate both parties could agree on.
4) a CDU candidate
If the rest can not agree on a candidate, the CDU could try to simply push their own candidate through in the 3rd round. The problem again is... There seems to be no candidate. Two names were dropped. The more frequent one was Norbert Lammert, president of the Bundestag. But he already publicly stated that he wont be available and will retire. The second name, but more well known outside Germany, is Wolfgang Schäuble. But with him there are several issues. First of all, he is too old. He is only 1 year younger than Gauck, who is retiring due to age reasons. And the second issue is, that there are a lot of burned bridges left behind in Schäubles career, in- and outside of Germany, which would probably be detrimental to the position. So this option is also not really viable.

5) a CDU/SPD candidate
okay, so if you can't get a super broad cnadidate, how about the current government just pushes through a candidate. Again, there are problems. The biggest one: neither party is really willing to vote for someone strongly tied to the other party. And there is no available independent person to choose, as we noticed earlier.
So people still thought about Lammert (as mentioned before) who has a reasonable track record in working with the other parties in his current function or Franz Walter Steinmeier, current foreign minister, from the SPD. Now orginally the debate was like: "well... if one party would maybe be able to vote for the other candidate... amybe... maybe we could work together" - "yeah, but you want us to vote for your guy, not that you will vote for our guy" - "uhm... yeah"
You can assign sides as you want to this conversation. Now this conversation was shot down with Lammert refusing the job. So now it is only Steinmeier left. But... CDU can't convince themselves to vote for him right now.

6) SPD+ IDKWHO
So the latest development is, that the SPD is pushing the idea of Steinmeier, and is looking for allies. But... there are none. The SPD is going with the idea: "we vote for a good candidate, and so far the only candidate is Steinmeier. Bring someone similarly qualified and we drop him and vote for your guy" (This statement was made only after Lammert refused the job...) Now this position is actually sensible. The problem is. There are still no allies. The left are blaming Steinmeier for the Agenda2010 under Schröder and call him unelectable. The Greens now, that they alone wont provide the majority the SPD needs, so they wont commit now. (but i'm 100% sure they would ump on the train, if it brings a majority and no other candidate is in sight) The CDU doesn't want to vote for an SPD guy, but have no idea themselves... And the SPD? Well... even in the SPD there is opposition to this. Why? Well... Steinmeier is the most liked and probably also most competent SPD politician among the leading circle of the SPD. He is valued rather highly as foreign minister. Putting him as president would be considered a waste. Basically you don't put your best guy on a retirement position.


So yeah... Nobody knows what will happen. In case you know someone able to fill the position, you may email the German parties and tell them about it. I'm sure they are interested.

-------

General election:
Now here there are 2 topics to talk about:
a) possible coalitions
b) chancellor candidates

a)
Currently polls (who are way more accurate in Germany than elsewhere, like in the US) are as follows:
CDU/CSU 34%
SPD: 22%
Green: 12%
FDP: 6%
Left: 10%
AfD: 13%
You can be assured, that the AfD won't be part of any coalition. Also it should be noted, that you will not gt any seats, if you are below 5%. The FDP is at risk here. so them dropping out with 4.8% could effect coalition options strongly! So considering that those poll numbers will change over the years, there are about 4 possible coalitions.
1) CDU+FDP
This is an often tried coalition, and probably the dream scenario of the CDU. Now this coalition burned horribly last time it happened, but back then the FDP was mostly blamed for that, and they are much weaker now and probably learned from their mistakes. In any case, current poll numbers consider this option to be out of reach. And I don't see any event possible to change that.
2) CDU+Green
This has been tried on state level, but has never happened on federal level before. Still, bot parties signalled that they would be willing to discuss this option. It doesn't need much to give this combo a majority (FDP falling out is the easiest way), but the question is, if coalition talks would be successful. This coalition is dangerous for both parties in the longterm, as they would have to sacrifice core values to make this happen. On the other hand widening your range of possible partners is always desirable. It could be mentioned, that there has been the idea to make a CDU+Green+FDP coalition. Let's consider this an emergency extension of this coalition. But even if it has a majority... I don't see it happen on federal level right now. That would be too many compromises for each party to sell to their own voters.
3) CDU+SPD
We just continue what we are doing. Even though with much less seats than last election. I consider this the most likely outcome. This will happen, when none of the other options work out (with current polls none do) or if coalition talks among the other possibilities break down, which is also not that unlikely. In the end this is the fallback solution for both parties. And currently I think it is their only solution. Still, neither party will actively promote this idea, as they have to try to sharpen their contrast after years of closing down on each other. And there is really a lack of difference so they will spin quite a lot to find some.
4) SPD+Green+Left
Now the SPD can't argue against the CDU without proposing an alternative. So red-red-green is always talked about. There has been SPD+Green on federal level (Schröder) and SPD+Left (and Left+SPD) has been tried on state level. The difficult part here is to ingrate the Left on federal level in a working coalition. They have never been part of the government, but even amongst their own ranks people are demanding them to step up, while people also demand the other parties(mainly towards the SPD) to finally consider the left as coalition mate. But neither side wants to fully commit. Everyone just keeps saying they are open to talking about it, but there is no clear message: "THIS is the coalition we want." In the end, it will need a lot of things to happen.
First: There need to be enough votes. That isn't the case right now.
Second: The SPD needs a chancellor candidate acceptable to the Left (we talk about this in a moment).
Third: Somehow they all have to decide, that this is the time to try it. The Left has to decide they are ready to take responsibility and sacrifice some of their more radical base. The SPD has to decide to stop hugging CDU positions. And the Greens have to decide to jump into a boat with two parties who may go at each others throat when things go wrong and potentially sink it.
In the end, I believe this won't happen. I don't believe there will be the votes for it. And if there will be, the question is if all 3 parties can agree. The only thing that could potentially sweeten this deal is: It is the only option in which the chancellor is not from the CDU. So if the voters and parties are really out to prevent a CDU chancellor... maybe...

And with that... we come to our last point:
the chancellor candidates:
Here we only look at the 2 major parties, because honestly, nobody cares about the rest, they wont happen anyway.
CDU/CSU: Yeah, guess what will happen? Who will become their candidate (and most likely chancellor 2017-2021) Yeah, you guessed it, Andrea Merkel. Unless she decides she is really tired of this and starts to rage, there is no way around here. Even the CSU, who threatened for a moment to not support her gave up on that. And when you now want to interrupt with: BUT HER RATINGS ARE SO LOW. Well... yes... they are lower than they were before. They are still far above pretty much any other contender. So if she wants it, she gets it. And trust me... Everyone in the CDU hopes she does it. Because while she may seem very calm and peaceful, she has done everything to establish her power in the party. There is no other viable candidate for the CDU. There is simply no one in position to follow her. There were ideas about a CSU candidate, but nah... I doubt the CDU would allow this again to happen, and I doubt the voters would really like this idea. This would steal some AfD voters, but at the same time scare voters from the CDU away to the other central parties. So Merkel it is.
SPD: This is way more interesting to follow. Let's start with those who most likely won't be it. Steinmeier. But I said he was so popular? Yes. But he simply is not a chancellor. Also he lost to Merkel 2 terms ago. And he won't be available for the job. Also the fact that he is promoted for the President pretty much shows that he is not considered. Oh, and as mentioned, the Left hates him. So this would shut down the potential coalition. Next one... Sigmar Gabriel. Party leader, vice chancellor, party clown. No seriously... He is entirely unelectable. If he was candidate, the SPD would probably lose half of their own voters and not gain any voters elsewhere. And he knows it. If he becomes the candidate, it will be because they are giving the election as lost, concede that they won't send the chancellor anyway and want to spare more valuable personal from the defeat. So who else is there? Similar to the CDU, the SPD has a leadership profile issue. There are simply no big names on top, who really are able to bring in voters. People speculated about Olaf Scholz, mayor of Hamburg and minister during the first Merkel term. He would actually be considered a reasonably strong candidate. But... it is unlikely to see him this election. The chances to become chancellor are low, and he may be spared for 2021, when Merkel will probably not be up again. He won't burn himself losing this election. So... there has been a somehow surprising name, who seems more and more likely to actually become the candidate. Martin Schulz. Yes, the Martin Schulz from the EU. It is unexpected, because he was never connected to federal politics, but always to the EU. But looking at him in more detail, he actually makes sense.
- He is comparably well liked. (not difficult when compared to Gabriel, but whatever)
- Many say that he is gonna drop from his EU positions anyway next year
- He would be accepted by the Left and the Greens
- Nominating him would send a very strong signal. While there is a large anti-EU shift among the voters, all the parties try to grab some of those voters by going more nationalistic. But when all the parties do it, nominating a strong center-proEU candidate, with a long track record, could grab a lot of center voters feeling left alone. The antiEU crowd may be loud. But there are still a lot of believers in the EU, and Schulz would be most suited to grab those votes with his track record. It requires some bravery to go against the loud trend. But this may work out here.

But... Schulz hasn't yet said if he is willing to candidate or not. Also Gabriel would be pushed out of party leadership to make this happen. But then again... he knows he is done for anyway. So if Schulz comes out and says yes... Expect him to run.



so, tdlr:
Next President of Germany: JOB VACANT, APPLY NOW. Steinmeier is the only candidate, but no support.
Chancellor duel: Merkel vs. Schulz
Coalition 2017-2021: CDU/CSU + SPD
Chancellor: Merkel




schaf
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany1326 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 20:19:50
October 26 2016 20:16 GMT
#11478
On October 27 2016 04:53 mahrgell wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

As I'm seeing rather frequent updates about the french personal developments (and I consider them to be probably the most interesting part of this thread), I thought I could also chime in with some German updates.

There are actually two big political events next year in Germany on a national scale. One is the well known General election, so new Bundestag will be elected, and this also leads to a new (or reelected) chancellor.
But before that, a new President has to be chosen.
And for both positions there are a lot of rumors, discussions and media trial balloons going around.

Let's start with the President. I spoiler some general description for those not familiar with the German President, as it gets way less coverage than our chancellor.
+ Show Spoiler +
The President of Germany is officially the highest position in Germany and head of state. Currently the position is held by Joachim Gauck, who could go for another 5 years, but refused to do so for age reasons. But the position is mostly for representative tasks, even though the President has some minor political powers. (constitution fanatics will lynch me for calling those powers minor, but let's go with what is their effect in reality) The President is chosen by the Bundesversammlung. Now for those not familar with the German system, the Bundesversammlung is the union of Bundestag and Bundesrat. The Bundestag is basically the parliament (what is elected later in 2017 and also elects the chancellor), while the Bundesrat is the representation of the states (like Saxony, Bavaria, Berlin, etc).
The Bundesversammlung is rarely used in the political process and so it's majority constellations are quite unusual. Also there is in general way less party discipline in the Bundesrat than in the Bundestag, even though usually party discipline is mostly kept for Presidential elections.

The Bundesversammlung has 1260 seats, and currently they are distributed as follows:
CDU/CSU 542–543 (conservative)
SPD 386–388 (social democrat)
Grüne 145–146 (Greens)
Die Linke 94 (left)
AfD 35 (right populist)
FDP 33 (liberal)
Piraten 12 (pirate party, wild mix of open democracy, free internet and similar stuff)
Freie Wähler 10 (a lose connection of not party affiliated)
SSW 1 (danish minority party)
To become president you need a majority of the votes (631), if all candidates fail the election is repeated. If it fails again, a third round happens and whoever gets most votes wins.
Current president Gauck was elected by a broad majority across all major parties. And his favorability ratings are insanely high. This is a rather high bar to pass.
So there were several ideas how the president could be elected:
1) Another candidate with broad shared support. There are multiple reasons for this.
a) in a time of social tensions and a rising AfD the other parties don't wan't to fight each other too much and with the President being a representative figure he should have a uniting touch. Also the president has to be unpartisan anyway.
b) the General elections coming up later this year. Basically it is not worth fighting over the president and burning political capital on the presidential election, with the politically way more General election coming soon after.
But the problem is: All the names floating around already said they would not be available. There is simply nobody willing to do the job, who would be broadly accepted.
2) a red-red-green candidate.
Now this was argued for some time, but here we can look at 1b). This idea has been buried for now, as the parties don't want to commit to a red-red-green alliance, something which has never been tried on federal level. This would be considered a strong sign towards the General elections, but the SPD does not want to be tied to the Linke, and the Greens want to keep their options with the CDU open. And the Linke are afraid for their more extreme wings abandoning them. Their were some names dropped, but in the end nothing came from it.
3) and CDU/green candidate
This idea floated around too, but was buried even faster. Again, neither party wants to commit here, and both want to leave their coalition options open for the General election. Also there seemed to be no candidate both parties could agree on.
4) a CDU candidate
If the rest can not agree on a candidate, the CDU could try to simply push their own candidate through in the 3rd round. The problem again is... There seems to be no candidate. Two names were dropped. The more frequent one was Norbert Lammert, president of the Bundestag. But he already publicly stated that he wont be available and will retire. The second name, but more well known outside Germany, is Wolfgang Schäuble. But with him there are several issues. First of all, he is too old. He is only 1 year younger than Gauck, who is retiring due to age reasons. And the second issue is, that there are a lot of burned bridges left behind in Schäubles career, in- and outside of Germany, which would probably be detrimental to the position. So this option is also not really viable.

5) a CDU/SPD candidate
okay, so if you can't get a super broad cnadidate, how about the current government just pushes through a candidate. Again, there are problems. The biggest one: neither party is really willing to vote for someone strongly tied to the other party. And there is no available independent person to choose, as we noticed earlier.
So people still thought about Lammert (as mentioned before) who has a reasonable track record in working with the other parties in his current function or Franz Walter Steinmeier, current foreign minister, from the SPD. Now orginally the debate was like: "well... if one party would maybe be able to vote for the other candidate... amybe... maybe we could work together" - "yeah, but you want us to vote for your guy, not that you will vote for our guy" - "uhm... yeah"
You can assign sides as you want to this conversation. Now this conversation was shot down with Lammert refusing the job. So now it is only Steinmeier left. But... CDU can't convince themselves to vote for him right now.

6) SPD+ IDKWHO
So the latest development is, that the SPD is pushing the idea of Steinmeier, and is looking for allies. But... there are none. The SPD is going with the idea: "we vote for a good candidate, and so far the only candidate is Steinmeier. Bring someone similarly qualified and we drop him and vote for your guy" (This statement was made only after Lammert refused the job...) Now this position is actually sensible. The problem is. There are still no allies. The left are blaming Steinmeier for the Agenda2010 under Schröder and call him unelectable. The Greens now, that they alone wont provide the majority the SPD needs, so they wont commit now. (but i'm 100% sure they would ump on the train, if it brings a majority and no other candidate is in sight) The CDU doesn't want to vote for an SPD guy, but have no idea themselves... And the SPD? Well... even in the SPD there is opposition to this. Why? Well... Steinmeier is the most liked and probably also most competent SPD politician among the leading circle of the SPD. He is valued rather highly as foreign minister. Putting him as president would be considered a waste. Basically you don't put your best guy on a retirement position.


So yeah... Nobody knows what will happen. In case you know someone able to fill the position, you may email the German parties and tell them about it. I'm sure they are interested.

-------

General election:
Now here there are 2 topics to talk about:
a) possible coalitions
b) chancellor candidates

a)
Currently polls (who are way more accurate in Germany than elsewhere, like in the US) are as follows:
CDU/CSU 34%
SPD: 22%
Green: 12%
FDP: 6%
Left: 10%
AfD: 13%
You can be assured, that the AfD won't be part of any coalition. Also it should be noted, that you will not gt any seats, if you are below 5%. The FDP is at risk here. so them dropping out with 4.8% could effect coalition options strongly! So considering that those poll numbers will change over the years, there are about 4 possible coalitions.
1) CDU+FDP
This is an often tried coalition, and probably the dream scenario of the CDU. Now this coalition burned horribly last time it happened, but back then the FDP was mostly blamed for that, and they are much weaker now and probably learned from their mistakes. In any case, current poll numbers consider this option to be out of reach. And I don't see any event possible to change that.
2) CDU+Green
This has been tried on state level, but has never happened on federal level before. Still, bot parties signalled that they would be willing to discuss this option. It doesn't need much to give this combo a majority (FDP falling out is the easiest way), but the question is, if coalition talks would be successful. This coalition is dangerous for both parties in the longterm, as they would have to sacrifice core values to make this happen. On the other hand widening your range of possible partners is always desirable. It could be mentioned, that there has been the idea to make a CDU+Green+FDP coalition. Let's consider this an emergency extension of this coalition. But even if it has a majority... I don't see it happen on federal level right now. That would be too many compromises for each party to sell to their own voters.
3) CDU+SPD
We just continue what we are doing. Even though with much less seats than last election. I consider this the most likely outcome. This will happen, when none of the other options work out (with current polls none do) or if coalition talks among the other possibilities break down, which is also not that unlikely. In the end this is the fallback solution for both parties. And currently I think it is their only solution. Still, neither party will actively promote this idea, as they have to try to sharpen their contrast after years of closing down on each other. And there is really a lack of difference so they will spin quite a lot to find some.
4) SPD+Green+Left
Now the SPD can't argue against the CDU without proposing an alternative. So red-red-green is always talked about. There has been SPD+Green on federal level (Schröder) and SPD+Left (and Left+SPD) has been tried on state level. The difficult part here is to ingrate the Left on federal level in a working coalition. They have never been part of the government, but even amongst their own ranks people are demanding them to step up, while people also demand the other parties(mainly towards the SPD) to finally consider the left as coalition mate. But neither side wants to fully commit. Everyone just keeps saying they are open to talking about it, but there is no clear message: "THIS is the coalition we want." In the end, it will need a lot of things to happen.
First: There need to be enough votes. That isn't the case right now.
Second: The SPD needs a chancellor candidate acceptable to the Left (we talk about this in a moment).
Third: Somehow they all have to decide, that this is the time to try it. The Left has to decide they are ready to take responsibility and sacrifice some of their more radical base. The SPD has to decide to stop hugging CDU positions. And the Greens have to decide to jump into a boat with two parties who may go at each others throat when things go wrong and potentially sink it.
In the end, I believe this won't happen. I don't believe there will be the votes for it. And if there will be, the question is if all 3 parties can agree. The only thing that could potentially sweeten this deal is: It is the only option in which the chancellor is not from the CDU. So if the voters and parties are really out to prevent a CDU chancellor... maybe...

And with that... we come to our last point:
the chancellor candidates:
Here we only look at the 2 major parties, because honestly, nobody cares about the rest, they wont happen anyway.
CDU/CSU: Yeah, guess what will happen? Who will become their candidate (and most likely chancellor 2017-2021) Yeah, you guessed it, Andrea Merkel. Unless she decides she is really tired of this and starts to rage, there is no way around here. Even the CSU, who threatened for a moment to not support her gave up on that. And when you now want to interrupt with: BUT HER RATINGS ARE SO LOW. Well... yes... they are lower than they were before. They are still far above pretty much any other contender. So if she wants it, she gets it. And trust me... Everyone in the CDU hopes she does it. Because while she may seem very calm and peaceful, she has done everything to establish her power in the party. There is no other viable candidate for the CDU. There is simply no one in position to follow her. There were ideas about a CSU candidate, but nah... I doubt the CDU would allow this again to happen, and I doubt the voters would really like this idea. This would steal some AfD voters, but at the same time scare voters from the CDU away to the other central parties. So Merkel it is.
SPD: This is way more interesting to follow. Let's start with those who most likely won't be it. Steinmeier. But I said he was so popular? Yes. But he simply is not a chancellor. Also he lost to Merkel 2 terms ago. And he won't be available for the job. Also the fact that he is promoted for the President pretty much shows that he is not considered. Oh, and as mentioned, the Left hates him. So this would shut down the potential coalition. Next one... Sigmar Gabriel. Party leader, vice chancellor, party clown. No seriously... He is entirely unelectable. If he was candidate, the SPD would probably lose half of their own voters and not gain any voters elsewhere. And he knows it. If he becomes the candidate, it will be because they are giving the election as lost, concede that they won't send the chancellor anyway and want to spare more valuable personal from the defeat. So who else is there? Similar to the CDU, the SPD has a leadership profile issue. There are simply no big names on top, who really are able to bring in voters. People speculated about Olaf Scholz, mayor of Hamburg and minister during the first Merkel term. He would actually be considered a reasonably strong candidate. But... it is unlikely to see him this election. The chances to become chancellor are low, and he may be spared for 2021, when Merkel will probably not be up again. He won't burn himself losing this election. So... there has been a somehow surprising name, who seems more and more likely to actually become the candidate. Martin Schulz. Yes, the Martin Schulz from the EU. It is unexpected, because he was never connected to federal politics, but always to the EU. But looking at him in more detail, he actually makes sense.
- He is comparably well liked. (not difficult when compared to Gabriel, but whatever)
- Many say that he is gonna drop from his EU positions anyway next year
- He would be accepted by the Left and the Greens
- Nominating him would send a very strong signal. While there is a large anti-EU shift among the voters, all the parties try to grab some of those voters by going more nationalistic. But when all the parties do it, nominating a strong center-proEU candidate, with a long track record, could grab a lot of center voters feeling left alone. The antiEU crowd may be loud. But there are still a lot of believers in the EU, and Schulz would be most suited to grab those votes with his track record. It requires some bravery to go against the loud trend. But this may work out here.

But... Schulz hasn't yet said if he is willing to candidate or not. Also Gabriel would be pushed out of party leadership to make this happen. But then again... he knows he is done for anyway. So if Schulz comes out and says yes... Expect him to run.



so, tdlr:
Next President of Germany: JOB VACANT, APPLY NOW. Steinmeier is the only candidate, but no support.
Chancellor duel: Merkel vs. Schulz
Coalition 2017-2021: CDU/CSU + SPD
Chancellor: Merkel






Really good writeup! apart from Andrea Merkel :D
I hope Schulz will run, just to make things interesting (probably still wouldn't vote SPD but I'm tired of the calm, silent Merkel style).

Small detail: I cannot apply for president, sadly, since the candidate has to be at least 40 years of age. maybe some day...
Axiom wins more than it loses. Most viewers don't. - <3 TB
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-26 20:27:52
October 26 2016 20:26 GMT
#11479
Very nice write-up!

But the position is mostly for representative tasks, even though the President has some minor political powers. (constitution fanatics will lynch me for calling those powers minor, but let's go with what is their effect in reality).


I know you didn't want to cover that too much, but out of curiosity, does it involve powers that the president can execute at will and that could actually overrule the chancelor/parliament or even dismiss them? Because in Austria we have a similar role for the president in practice, yet now the far-right candidate has said that he wants to make use of never-used presidential powers to dismiss the whole government, if they do not work in his interest.
So would there be a chance of a German president just saying "fuck this shit" and actually starting to do something meaningful?
mahrgell
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Germany3943 Posts
October 26 2016 20:47 GMT
#11480
On October 27 2016 05:26 Big J wrote:
Very nice write-up!

Show nested quote +
But the position is mostly for representative tasks, even though the President has some minor political powers. (constitution fanatics will lynch me for calling those powers minor, but let's go with what is their effect in reality).


I know you didn't want to cover that too much, but out of curiosity, does it involve powers that the president can execute at will and that could actually overrule the chancelor/parliament or even dismiss them? Because in Austria we have a similar role for the president in practice, yet now the far-right candidate has said that he wants to make use of never-used presidential powers to dismiss the whole government, if they do not work in his interest.
So would there be a chance of a German president just saying "fuck this shit" and actually starting to do something meaningful?


In short: Pretty much all his powers are tied to conditions. There are some possibilities to "apply pressure" or make a statement. But besides that... nah, pure representation.
His powers/tasks:
- represents Germany in international law
- pardon individuals who have been trialed by a federal court (individuals!!!, he is not allowed to amnesty groups! only individuals)
- signs laws after they have been passed. Only his signing makes them into real laws. (he has to check if they are not conflicting existing law/constitution, but basically he has to sign them, there is not much choice involved here. If there is an argument here, it would end in front of the constitutional court.)
- involved in proposing/announcing chancellor/ministers/federal judges/officers/federal clerks, but again there is strict protocol to follow, no choice involved
- dismisses parliament after election of chancellor failed 3 times or a confidence vote failing. (again, tied to those conditions, so different from Austria)
- declares Verteidigungsfall (state of defense), so he is the only power able to formally declare war! (Offensive wars are not foreseen in the German constitution, you may figure out why)
- some more formal tasks
Prev 1 572 573 574 575 576 1415 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Safe House 2
18:00
Qualifier #1
ZombieGrub226
EnkiAlexander 73
LiquipediaDiscussion
[BSL 2025] Weekly
18:00
#16
ZZZero.O63
LiquipediaDiscussion
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
14:55
FSL TeamLeague: PTBvsIC, CNvRR
Freeedom30
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub226
Livibee 106
BRAT_OK 77
SpeCial 52
Nathanias 2
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 22736
Rain 6683
Larva 175
Dewaltoss 128
ZZZero.O 63
HiyA 36
sas.Sziky 28
sSak 27
Rock 26
NaDa 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever286
capcasts12
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1762
fl0m1545
flusha94
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu523
Khaldor513
Other Games
FrodaN5075
Grubby3908
Mlord792
RotterdaM425
B2W.Neo349
XaKoH 135
ArmadaUGS95
UpATreeSC58
Mew2King44
rGuardiaN43
JuggernautJason11
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1344
gamesdonequick885
StarCraft 2
angryscii 11
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• printf 60
• Hupsaiya 39
• davetesta34
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3727
• masondota2825
• Ler51
League of Legends
• Nemesis2648
• Jankos2241
Other Games
• imaqtpie1438
• Shiphtur239
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
14h 26m
BSL Team Wars
23h 26m
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
Dewalt vs kogeT
JDConan vs Tarson
RaNgeD vs DragOn
StRyKeR vs Bonyth
Aeternum vs Hejek
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Map Test Tournament
2 days
Map Test Tournament
3 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Map Test Tournament
4 days
Map Test Tournament
5 days
OSC
5 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Map Test Tournament
6 days
OSC
6 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
6 days
Safe House 2
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
Maestros of the Game
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Acropolis #4 - TS2
EC S1
ESL Pro League S22
Frag Blocktober 2025
Urban Riga Open #1
FERJEE Rush 2025
Birch Cup 2025
DraculaN #2
LanDaLan #3
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
WardiTV TLMC #15
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.