EPTBlizzCon 2014 - Day 1 General Discussion - Page 13
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
SixStrings
Germany2046 Posts
| ||
|
Talron
Germany7651 Posts
| ||
|
jubil
United States2602 Posts
On November 08 2014 04:52 chipmonklord17 wrote: I'm pretty sure they have nothing to do with eachother. Titan was an MMO I dunno. According to Kotaku Titan was gonna be part The Sims, part Second Life, part TF2; I feel like they probably took the most fun part of the gameplay from Titan (deathmatches) and turned it into a stand-alone game (Overwatch). | ||
|
imJealous
United States1382 Posts
| ||
|
Draconicfire
Canada2562 Posts
Heroes of the Storm new heroes, features, maps. Hearthstone new expansions. Legacy of the Void confirmed. New IP, Overwatch. Kinda wanted a bit more, but still worth waking up for! | ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
On November 08 2014 04:51 fezvez wrote: Interesting, I think this is what they decided on : We are going to remove the need for precision that FPS requires, because it's not fun to miss by one pixel. The skill will come from using the skills at the right time Yea. Fuck this game. Ill stick to csgo. | ||
|
paralleluniverse
4065 Posts
On November 08 2014 04:51 fezvez wrote: Interesting, I think this is what they decided on : We are going to remove the need for precision that FPS requires, because it's not fun to miss by one pixel. The skill will come from using the skills at the right time That sounds good. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51485 Posts
| ||
|
paralleluniverse
4065 Posts
On November 08 2014 04:56 jubil wrote: I dunno. According to Kotaku Titan was gonna be part The Sims, part Second Life, part TF2; I feel like they probably took the most fun part of the gameplay from Titan (deathmatches) and turned it into a stand-alone game (Overwatch). The setting is the same, the game director is the same: So what was Titan? For starters, according to three people I spoke with, it would have taken place on a near-future version of Earth, in a science-fiction depiction of the world where mankind has successfully fought off an alien invasion. Players would join one of three factions waging a cold war over control of the planet, and zones planned for the game ranged from the west coast of the United States to Europe, South America, and Australia, according to a source. Blizzard's plan was to make the game world huge, and to keep adding areas with expansions in the years after launch. As you noted, they just removed all the MMO elements and kept the PvP. | ||
|
westpfelia
United States38 Posts
On November 08 2014 05:01 Pandemona wrote: If you cant get on www.playoverwatch.com which is obviously down. You can log into battle net and click beta profile settings and click "future betas" and tick that button and you will get into the beta. Well the chance too I dont think they have added a specific beta profile for it yet. so just make sure you have "future betas" selected. | ||
|
KrazyTrumpet
United States2520 Posts
On November 08 2014 04:57 Draconicfire wrote: So.. Heroes of the Storm new heroes, features, maps. Hearthstone new expansions. Legacy of the Void confirmed. New IP, Overwatch. Kinda wanted a bit more, but still worth waking up for! Well, it's just the opening ceremony. The real info is gonna be out over all the panels and stuff. | ||
|
Skithiryx
Australia648 Posts
On November 08 2014 05:18 westpfelia wrote: I dont think they have added a specific beta profile for it yet. so just make sure you have "future betas" selected. The website is up now as well, hit the beta button and it said I was already signed up so I'd say Future Betas is definitely it. | ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
I believe that on release WoL cost €60, with Hots at €40, basically the €100 I spent on the game will go to waste since once Lotv comes out no one will play Hots? Since it's a standalone game it might even cost the full price of €60 instead of the price of an expansion? I don't know how I feel about this. | ||
|
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
On November 08 2014 05:46 Incognoto wrote: LOTV will be standalone? I believe that on release WoL cost €60, with Hots at €40, basically the €100 I spent on the game will go to waste since once Lotv comes out no one will play Hots? Since it's a standalone game it might even cost the full price of €60 instead of the price of an expansion? I don't know how I feel about this. how is it going to waste ? didnt you play the game ? -.-' | ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
Next to that you can get ridiculously good games for next to nothing if you look out for sales. €100 for WoL / Hots €5 for Witcher 2 less than €4 for skyrim €10 for il-2 cliffs of dover lol / dota 2 / HS - €0 blizzard is selling its brand more than the actual product. if any gaming company released an rts of the quality of sc2 it would not sell as well. no, i'm not a big fan of blizzard. i respect them as a company but i'm not a blind fanboi, so if their stuff is overpriced i'm going to say it. but i'll be forced to buy it since it's one of the 2 or 3 rts games that has an active community behind it. | ||
|
iKill[ShocK]
Vietnam3530 Posts
| ||
|
themartinez
Sweden254 Posts
On November 08 2014 06:12 Incognoto wrote: That's €100 for a game that I will never touch again. That's kind of steep given that's essentially the price of laddering (since you get almost everything else for free). As I said as well, Lotv being standalone means it'll probably be more expensive than an expansion, which is basically milking the people who already bought the first two titles. Next to that you can get ridiculously good games for next to nothing if you look out for sales. €100 for WoL / Hots €5 for Witcher 2 less than €4 for skyrim €10 for il-2 cliffs of dover lol / dota 2 / HS - €0 blizzard is selling its brand more than the actual product. if any gaming company released an rts of the quality of sc2 it would not sell as well. no, i'm not a big fan of blizzard. i respect them as a company but i'm not a blind fanboi, so if their stuff is overpriced i'm going to say it. but i'll be forced to buy it since it's one of the 2 or 3 rts games that has an active community behind it. Yeah great logic. €5 for Witcher 2 when it released sound about right. | ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
well, i wouldn't even mind since you get a lot of re playability in those kinds of games. i would say the same thing for wol / hots, except that i'll literally never play those games ever again since the multiplayer will transfer entirely to lotv. if the witcher 2 sucked i simply would not have bought it because there are other good single player games out there. sc2 has that semi-monopoly in the rts scene. so yeah, i think it sucks to have €100 go down the drain. unfortunately i am not a blind blizzard fan boi. i respect the games they have made and i respect them as a company but they are not a perfect company nor do they make that are particularly fun compared to what i played as a kid. | ||
|
KrazyTrumpet
United States2520 Posts
On November 08 2014 05:46 Incognoto wrote: LOTV will be standalone? I believe that on release WoL cost €60, with Hots at €40, basically the €100 I spent on the game will go to waste since once Lotv comes out no one will play Hots? Since it's a standalone game it might even cost the full price of €60 instead of the price of an expansion? I don't know how I feel about this. If they're smart, and Blizzard is or they wouldn't be where they are, they will have a heavily discounted price for those of us that have already bought WoL/HotS. Anyway, I'm sure someone will ask this question at a panel. We'll get clarification soon. | ||
|
ACrow
Germany6583 Posts
I imagine that they'll greatly reduce the price of the first two SC2 parts, because it will essentially be only the single player campaigns going forward. | ||
| ||
