Settle this Fight Debate - Page 17

On December 06 2006 09:09 ToT)Testie( wrote:
pro knife

On December 06 2006 09:09 ToT)Testie( wrote:
Those who choose the knife think to dance around their opponent and take shots when necessary. Real fights may not work like that? They can, even for regular people. They are correct. You know who uses bats as a weapon other than poor people? Dumb people from the ghetto. If they all carried knives they'd be much more dangerous.

The knife would win. You would simply have to temper how you move and not be a dumbass while you fight. If he makes a strike the odds of you being able to dodge are much higher than if you make a strike. You could throw your whole body into a quick lunge if one of his strikes miss, and bounce back rather easily. He cannot do the same unless he is using it to jab. Because he's weilding a cumbersome weapon.

A man cannot charge you after a mistake in a fight with a bat. Go to your garage, pick up your bat and think of how you would fight with it. With a bat you're much slower unless you're a major leaguer. Which we aren't.

I'd choose the knife. The bat could be used well, but the knife can go for the kill within 1 good shot, or 2-3 good ones. Despite the distance advantage, when you rush someone with a knife you can get in there within the bats range if he ever goes for a power swing, taking the brunt of it on your back while you are already in short range and can inflict multiple stab wounds, fast. You could either keep the close range distance, or retreat and wait until he bleeds to death.

If someone wacks you hard with a bat, unless it is in the temple, you're probably not going down.

On December 06 2006 07:09 lykk wrote:
ok knife vs bat...

there's no need to imagine what happens in this mu, it has happend countless number of times throughout history.

in the STONEAGE ppl used wooden clubs (sometimes with a stone head attached making it a mace) as the main weapon, but when the art of bronze making was discovered, ppl were able to make short bronze swords of approx 1 feet long. all over the world, new armies equipped with the swords dominated armies with the old weapons, and won battle after battle. soon enough every army used swords, and human kind entered the BRONZEAGE.

(note: although called swords, these early bronze weapons were really just long knives, also bronze is quite soft and bends easily, it's far inferior than morden iron/steel/alloy knives.)

so there... no more arguing pls, bat is a much less effective weapon. hitting an moving opponent critically is similar to hitting a sweet shot, imagine your first time playing baseball, was it easy even to hit the ball? and you only get one chance, if you miss it's gg. too many ppl here are influenced by american culture, iconizing the bat as a badass weapon, no one i know in china would choose the bat

On December 06 2006 09:07 AmirOssanloo wrote:
Wow you sure think people stab in slowmotion?

With the speed that the bats comes towards you, there is no way you would grab it (especially (as i say please try to think abit) you hold the knife in your MAIN HAND...right)?

Most likely you will either try to parray with your main hand, or if you had some training you would use your secondary hand to AVOID it, but no...not grab it..

Even if you grab a bat with one hand I can with my both hand and the power from my bat make you out of balance and force you to let go, or i could just while you hold it take my left hand...

put it at the bottom of the bat, with my right hands force swing it towards your face...now this does not even take a split second, and since you are consentrated on the bat during this time, dont tell my "I WOULD STABB YOU"!!!

also, if you grabb my bat, i could just make a kick towards your groin or a puschkick in the stomach....

On December 06 2006 08:40 AmirOssanloo wrote:
Why do you think you all have to use a bat like how they use it in the sport?

First of all you dont SWING with a bat in a fight, what are you stupid?!? You use it like a spear...Fast hits like a snake attack. You go for the throath, the nose, the knees.

If you now decide to do something else then going for snake attacks. As far as thoes bats I held in my hands, you have a very good grip on the top of the bat, as well as the bottom of it.

Just turn it around! Light side towards enemy = a fast weapon. 1, 2, 3 medium light hits, turn it around, and swing it...Geez, Now I practise and compete in martial arts, bat is the choise...

The End~~

On December 06 2006 09:52 exalted wrote:


Don't take his post too seriously, Testie is pro-knife more because he would rather his opponent have the bat. This is because he is not worried about bat swings to the head, since his hair provides +3 infantry armor against head-related attacks...

On December 06 2006 10:26 NewbSaibot wrote:
sweet, now we can argue about which is better, gun or knife. I cant wait to see the retards take that one up.

On December 06 2006 10:08 Sadist wrote:


thats the dumbest arguement ever, of course a fucking sword is better than a club lol, its basically just a sharp club.

A LITTLE ASS KNIFE vs a Bat though youd be retarded to try to fight. Lol no one in china would choose a baseball bat? Are you retarded? I guarantee you no average punk is robbing me if its just him with a knife and me with my bat already out. Hed die and id get arrested on murder charges. And contrary to popular belief, not many people even like baseball in america anymore so this has absolutely nothing to do with that, it has to do with common sense. No one in their right mind tries to attack someone who has a baseball bat unless they are some 10 lb skinny geek who cant swing at all. Id take Putter or My wedge vs a knife too, yodu be fucking dead if you got hit with that moreso than a bat