Settle this Fight Debate - Page 18
Forum Index > General Forum |
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
| ||
![]()
Smurg
Australia3818 Posts
On December 06 2006 19:03 fusionsdf wrote: bat>gun Wow, after 18 pages it's finally been solved! But what if the gun was > the bat? Shit..a new dilemma. | ||
lykk
China38 Posts
On December 06 2006 19:03 fusionsdf wrote: bat>gun haha that's right 1on1 bat>rine, we are talking about average micro, no sick boxer micro pls | ||
We Are Here
Australia1810 Posts
| ||
infinity21
![]()
Canada6683 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Ok, it's a fight to the death. I (original) throw the knife directly in between my clone's eyes. However, being my clone, it throws the bat in the knife's path. The two collide mightily in mid-air and the bat splits in half. Both the knife and the bat fall to the ground. It is time for hand-to-hand combat! I close in, as does my clone. We stare each other in the eyes, as the sun sets. The moon rises. We are still staring at each other. Although there is no movement, we are battling in our minds, constantly trying to overpower each other. There is no physical opening. As the moon rises up above our heads, my clone strikes! I do a jumping reverse roundhouse kick to his face. Seeing this, my clone stops abruptly and does a back flip while rotating in mid-air and kicks at my face. But I am just as good. I block quickly with my left palm and then kick his right foot in mid air. My clone loses his balance momentarily. However, he manages to balance by doing a one-hand handstand. I sweep to take him down. My clone utilizes my sweeping leg's momentum to stand up-right again. The fight is dead even. We both launch an attack at the same time. Who's going to win? + Show Spoiler + But seriously, I believe I (knife) would win because I have more maneuverability. If the bat is swung too hard, the motion would be obvious and easy to dodge/block. However, if the bat is swung with as little motion as possible, then it wouldn't have enough strength to do sufficient damage. Since I am agile and have quick reflexes, a knife would suit me better. On December 06 2006 19:15 lykk wrote: haha that's right 1on1 bat>rine, we are talking about average micro, no sick boxer micro pls Wait, what if both the bat and the rine had a DROPSHIP!?! | ||
infinity21
![]()
Canada6683 Posts
| ||
Dexxus
United States329 Posts
| ||
NewbSaibot
3849 Posts
On December 06 2006 19:25 Dexxus wrote: Yes, thats the problem. Everyone here saying knife, even the ones challenging us to pick up a bat and try it, havent even picked up a bat themselves. Theyre just assuming they know how weak it's going to be. My company has a softball team and I posed this question to a couple of them, having a bat readily available they each took hold of it and in about 2 seconds said "the bat, definitely the bat". I could go on and list all the examples they gave, ones much more realistic than here, about how the bat is superior, but it would fall on deaf ears because the anti-bat users have never even picked up a bat, and are so convinced they are right, they never will. Ok after being on the fence I have now been fully converted to bat after testing one in my garage... Anyone who knows what they're doing with a bat could dish out serious one sided ownage to a butterfly knife user. | ||
lykk
China38 Posts
On December 06 2006 19:25 Dexxus wrote: Ok after being on the fence I have now been fully converted to bat after testing one in my garage... Anyone who knows what they're doing with a bat could dish out serious one sided ownage to a butterfly knife user. what did you hit in your garage? something moving? we are not talking about some zombie as your opponent. and yes bat is better vs zombie as proven in shaun of the dead and diablo2 ![]() | ||
lykk
China38 Posts
| ||
Sadist
United States7225 Posts
On December 06 2006 18:51 lykk wrote: lmao a bronze sword is a sharp club?? do you know why iron age comes after bronze age? because iron is a much better material than bronze. bronze swords are SHORT because any longer they'll bend and break, plus it's edge is not very sharp, it's not very easy to pierce hides with it, still the bronze sword wielding armies raped bigger club wielding ones ALL OVER THE WORLD. you are just imagining what would happen in the mu, it's all trash talk, the experiment has already been carried out. and yes, it was a fight to the death. you are a fucking moron if you think that some bronze age swords apply to a butterfly knife vs a baseball bat at all. First of all i dont know how their clubs were but a bat ahs a smaller handle and is top heavy so you get more force when you swing it. Either you A)are an amazing knife user B) are collosus or C) A little skinny nerd with no coordination at all, because if you have ever played baseball and didnts wing like a girl youd be able to kill someoen with a baseball bat | ||
We Are Here
Australia1810 Posts
| ||
_PulSe_
United States541 Posts
| ||
lykk
China38 Posts
On December 06 2006 19:44 Sadist wrote: you are a fucking moron if you think that some bronze age swords apply to a butterfly knife vs a baseball bat at all. First of all i dont know how their clubs were but a bat ahs a smaller handle and is top heavy so you get more force when you swing it. Either you A)are an amazing knife user B) are collosus or C) A little skinny nerd with no coordination at all, because if you have ever played baseball and didnts wing like a girl youd be able to kill someoen with a baseball bat the only moron is the one who gets upset and start calling other morons, and pls don't try so hard explaining how a baseball bat is made and what it looks like. so you think the stonage club was a stick and the bronze sword a katana... fine i'll just knife your guts to shit then | ||
Sadist
United States7225 Posts
GO take your jackie chan shit somewhere else | ||
infinity21
![]()
Canada6683 Posts
On December 06 2006 19:54 Sadist wrote: a sword and a knife isnt the same thing, and if you think bronze knives/sword apply to a butterfly knife discussion you are retarded. GO take your jackie chan shit somewhere else WHOA man. Don't insult Jackie Chan. O_o; | ||
lykk
China38 Posts
| ||
lykk
China38 Posts
![]() | ||
Wysp
Canada2299 Posts
Weird. NewbSabiot is saying what me and few others have been saying this entire thread and perhaps made better examples. Pick up well built wooden bat and think how you'd ever get near a guy your size wielding it. Seriously. Go to a goddamned sports shop. Even try a aluminum bat, its just as light and stronger. i hate this thread. | ||
ToT)Testie(
Canada723 Posts
You can't take someone down with one swing with a bat unless it connects to their head. It's blunt. You can shatter a bone. But where are you planning on hitting them? It's life or death situation, no ones just gonna curl up because extreme pain wacked them somewhere on the body. Guys in the major leagues have recovery time after they've swung a bat, after all. And their forearms are like tree trunks and they're built to run the second they swing. But you still see them follow through. And it's not about having strength to stop the weight of the bat. It's about having strength to stop the momentum, efficiently and in time. And once a guy is between your arms, the hell are you going to do with a bat? Hit him on the back of the head at an awkward angle with 1 arm? The guy with the knife would leave injured, but once you're stabbed twice or more you're very likely going to be a lot worse off from a guy who can then bide his time and retreat until your wounds are too much. Any guy with a knife can be quick and agile. Even a straight and quick lunge with the body is easier & faster to bounce back than with the momentum of swinging a heavy object. And regardless of how strong you are, do you think you can swing a bat twice by the time someone stabs 3 times? Kick? As Richard Pryor said, people in life stab awkwardly. You'd probably get your leg cut as he avoids a clumsy kick because you just swung a fucking bat and are already off balance. Edit: Those that say bat are bad strategically at bw. I'm calling it. | ||
| ||