I know that as audio recording was first being invented some company got Rachmaninov to test it and after hearing his piano roll recording he said "Gentlemen, I have just heard myself play". Which would suggest he could to me.
On November 17 2006 21:42 Kwark wrote: I know that as audio recording was first being invented some company got Rachmaninov to test it and after hearing his piano roll recording he said "Gentlemen, I have just heard myself play". Which would suggest he could to me.
Some composers, especially in the 20th century, wrote things they couldn't play. People did actually write stuff, from what I've been told, sometimes for the sake of difficulty. Honestly, IMHO, once you get past a certain point, it's hard to defend having so many damn notes at the same time in terms of contributing to any musical idea. It's just busy crap.
All of the (edit: major) significant composers to history that wrote keyboard music, like Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, Liszt, Schumann, Rachmaninoff, etc., etc., could obviously play their music. Well, except Schumann.
GI, do you mean "classical" as everything pre-modern or Western art music in general?
Its piano not keyboard, they are differente things.
Anyway, arent there any piano playing programs? A pc doesnt have hands so in theory you could compose imposible music and be able to actually hear it...
On November 17 2006 23:36 skindzer wrote: Its piano not keyboard, they are differente things.
Anyway, arent there any piano playing programs? A pc doesnt have hands so in theory you could compose imposible music and be able to actually hear it...
Ah, I should've probably been less possibly misleading. "Keyboard" in English generally means electronic keyboard, but there is a second meaning that (within the context of classical music repertoire) means the body of instruments that are played with the hands that have keys set up in chromatic fashion--namely, the piano, harsichord, clavichord, organ, etc. Keyboard music thus refers to works written by Bach and others before the piano was invented as well as those written for the piano itself.
But yeah, you could input anything into any number of computers/devices (MIDI, although digital music samples would often sound better) and get it to play back any music at all. The limitations of electronics should be far beyond those of humans. However, it's not really a performance, and you'd be very hard-pressed to get a decent imitation of a good piano's sonority and any specific articulation at all, so it wouldn't sound near to real.
edit: Haji, the majority of Chopin's music is very pianistic (fitting the hand), at least in my experience playing and hearing it.
On November 17 2006 23:36 skindzer wrote: Its piano not keyboard, they are differente things.
Anyway, arent there any piano playing programs? A pc doesnt have hands so in theory you could compose imposible music and be able to actually hear it...
Ah, I should've probably been less possibly misleading. "Keyboard" in English generally means electronic keyboard, but there is a second meaning that (within the context of classical music repertoire) means the body of instruments that are played with the hands that have keys set up in chromatic fashion--namely, the piano, harsichord, clavichord, organ, etc. Keyboard music thus refers to works written by Bach and others before the piano was invented as well as those written for the piano itself.it.
On November 17 2006 23:05 GrandInquisitor wrote: All classical composers could play their music. What, they write it and then say "Guess that'll sound good."?
What you don't udnerstand was that these guys were usually among the very best pianists of their time. Cf. Chopin, Rachmaninoff, Mozart
Yeah, I know that and respect the genius composers like the ones you listed. Liszt could probably sight read half the classical music written before his time. I'm referring to composers such as Sorabji(sp?) who composed the measure shown in the picture in the first post. The piece is something like 4 hours long and the picture shows one of the easier measures. The score is supposedly 7 inches thick, which is another thing that makes me wonder if the guy could actually play it.
Not really hard to play if you know how to read music, then i'll tell you most of that stuff is chords ;p chords are when you play more then one note at a time. The top two lines are the right hand, this is for piano, then the bottom line is the left hand.
Dude, of course they can play what they write. I mean, think about it, OTHER PEOPLE can play that shit.
Just because it doesn't look easy to sight-read doesn't mean that people can''t practice and learn a piece.
And there are some guys out there with perfect pitch, who can tell you what frequency of vibration a car engine is at ("That buick is running at an F#"). Once they learn an instrument, they usually are able to play it REALLY well, because they can "see" pitches like we see color, and more than just that, remember and play them.
this is not close to complicated, just have a look at Lizst, two hands on different style and beat, that is when I say WTF is he thinking. Going to the replies, Chopins does have some pretty gay fingering technique which I think will be easier to play without following his suggestion and I hate his chords in polonaises, it just makes my hand feel small
The actual answer is no. Tchaikovsky was not a violinist though he knew how to play. He wrote a VERY difficult piece when he wrote his violin concerto. A lot of times it feels very awkward to play in the concerto for the violinist. Tchaikovsky himself did not play the music he wrote, he was paid to write it for a soloist.
But Rachmaninoff, Wieniawski, the virtuoustic composers played what they wrote.
it is possible to write a piece of music that would be impossible to play. but what is the point of that?
good music was never based on the number of notes that flood out. so i dont think any good musicians would write music just for the sake of writing an impossible bit to play. if they DID do this then theyre pretty lousy musicians imo.
boxer can play that with his two index fingers and blindfolded. (just kidding)
if someone can play a difficult piece of music, good for them. its just like drummers who say that lol i can smack 37 drums in a second well yea good for you thats awesome but it sounds like shit.
back on topic, whether he can or cannot play the music he writes himself does not really matter, what matters most is that the music is beautiful, and if no one on earth can play it then maybe two ppl on a piano? but then the music had DAMN better be good.
Frank Zappa wrote The Black Page as a challenge to his drummer at the time. Zappa doesn't play the drums as far as I know. I think composers have a good idea of the ability of the people they're writing the music for. They may write music that takes months of practice but is surely capable of being played.
On November 17 2006 23:45 thedeadhaji wrote: hmm, Chopin's music fitting the hand? I thought that because he was self-taught, some of his hand positions were really really weird.
but "natural".
On November 20 2006 08:36 pyrogenetix wrote: back on topic, whether he can or cannot play the music he writes himself does not really matter, what matters most is that the music is beautiful, and if no one on earth can play it then maybe two ppl on a piano? but then the music had DAMN better be good.
most of it isnt. and right now it doesnt even matter, he wants to know wether those people write stuff they cant play or not.
i bet it does happen, but mostly they ll try to write shit they can play, or someone else can.
On November 20 2006 08:33 jkillashark wrote: The actual answer is no. Tchaikovsky was not a violinist though he knew how to play. He wrote a VERY difficult piece when he wrote his violin concerto. A lot of times it feels very awkward to play in the concerto for the violinist. Tchaikovsky himself did not play the music he wrote, he was paid to write it for a soloist.
But Rachmaninoff, Wieniawski, the virtuoustic composers played what they wrote.
...the actual answer is some can, some can't.
More like, most can, few can't. Those few who can't are those who have probably composed many pieces for an instrument they CAN play and have continued on to orchestral, solo, etc, pieces.
On November 17 2006 21:34 iamke55 wrote: I think they just compose stuff for the sake of having written the hardest music ever.
wtf would Rachmaninoff and Mozart do if they saw this?
Horowitz supposedly gave up on learning a Godowsky study, which makes me wonder if Godowsky could play half the stuff he wrote.
Are 20th century composers insane? I can't see this crap becoming classics like Chopin and Beethoven.
Most of them can, I'm not sure about younger ones. I mean, if you're a qualified "professional" musician, you should be able to play several instruments ... I remember my teacher who was in his 50s, he played like 30 instruments -__- (I didn't even know that many existed T_T)
On November 17 2006 21:34 iamke55 wrote: I think they just compose stuff for the sake of having written the hardest music ever.
wtf would Rachmaninoff and Mozart do if they saw this?
Horowitz supposedly gave up on learning a Godowsky study, which makes me wonder if Godowsky could play half the stuff he wrote.
Are 20th century composers insane? I can't see this crap becoming classics like Chopin and Beethoven.
Most of them can, I'm not sure about younger ones. I mean, if you're a qualified "professional" musician, you should be able to play several instruments ... I remember my teacher who was in his 50s, he played like 30 instruments -__- (I didn't even know that many existed T_T)
As a professional you'd spend your life on one instrument, for classical music.
Ok im gonna make a crappy starcraft referation : composing hard music that the composer cant play, is like creating a starcraft strategy, without the skills to perfectly manage it in a game... <----- rofl