|
In order to maintain some kind of respectable thread quality and to show some respect for those who lost friends in this tragedy, we're forced to enact a hard line policy for this thread. Any posts holding an opinion on who is responsible or making an accusation that is not held by neutral media will be banned. Policy is in effect from page 27 onwards. Specifically, citing a Ukrainian or Russian source for your claims is going to get you banned. Opinions/facts/accusations arising from neutral media sources (i.e. media whose country of origin is not Ukraine, Russia or one of its puppet states) will be permitted. This policy extends to all forms of media; if a youtube video or picture has not come through a neutral media source then don't post it or you'll be banned. If you wish to discuss this policy please use this website feedback thread. Updated policy on aggressive posting and insults. |
On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane.
|
Northern Ireland22207 Posts
On July 18 2014 01:39 Pandemona wrote: And WW3 confirmed. Holy shite, wtf you do that for Ukraine, thats justs totally stupid. Shooting down a plane thinking its Russian basically
That tweet is not Ukraine admitting it did it....
The rebels have no functioning air force as far as is known.
|
On July 18 2014 01:45 Nyxisto wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane. No it doesn't.
edit: the anti-government forces simply do not have the hardware capable of taking down a plane at that altitude.
|
I'll wait for more concrete reporting before updating the OP, but the smoking gun has turned towards the pro-Russia militants:
Apparently Strelkov took credit for downing a ``cargo plane'' today.
What did they use?
|
Northern Ireland22207 Posts
On July 18 2014 01:46 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:45 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane. No it doesn't. Ok I guess it was a #conspiracy by Ukraine to shoot down the plane to blame it on the rebels, right?
|
A terrible tragedy My thoughts go out to everyone who's died or lost someone.
This is almost certainly going to get worse before it gets better x.x
|
No chance of survivors at all...
![[image loading]](https://pp.vk.me/c616525/v616525687/17daf/SFYAkmqz14c.jpg) RIP.
|
On July 18 2014 01:46 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:45 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane. No it doesn't. Only rebels have shot down planes. Ukraine army haven't. Why? Becoz rebels don't have airforces. How then suddenly ukraine shoots big plane down from 10km height when it flew long time in ukraine airspace? (Plane came from west ukraine)
|
Crash site.. God.
|
On July 18 2014 01:46 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:45 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane. No it doesn't. edit: the anti-government forces simply do not have the hardware capable of taking down a plane at that altitude. So what about the cargo plane they claim they shot down earlier today? Or was that a different plane? Also, its not out of the question that they "acquired" weapons that are capable of shooting down a plane at that altitude.
|
Don't interpret this politically guys. Whichever side shot it down will simply deny it.
|
A properly stomach-churning LifeNews video of the crash site. Be warned, not for the faint of heart.
|
Bodies and wreckage found near Grabovo
Dozens of bodies and broken pieces of wing with MH17 colors have been found near the town of Grabovo, according to a Reuters correspondent.
Dozens of bodies were scattered around the smouldering wreckage of a passenger jet that crashed in eastern Ukraine on Thursday, a Reuters reporter said.
An emergency services rescue worker said at least 100 bodies had so far been found at the scene, near the village of Grabovo, and that debris from the wreckage was scattered across an area up to about 15km (nine miles) in diameter.
Broken pieces of the wings were marked with blue and red paint – the same colours as the emblem of the Malaysian airline which lost track of a flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur that was carrying almost 300 people.
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/489813136862887936/photo/1
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/17/malaysia-airlines-plane-crashes-ukraine-live
|
On July 18 2014 01:48 ahswtini wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:46 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:45 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane. No it doesn't. Ok I guess it was a #conspiracy by Ukraine to shoot down the plane to blame it on the rebels, right? We just don't know, jumping to conclusions does not help. Saying that you know one side is to blame 5 min after the fact is silly.
|
On July 18 2014 01:04 Steveling wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 00:57 ahswtini wrote: Sources from the Ukrainian Interior ministry say it was a Buk missile fired by Ukrainian rebels. As for why, most likely an accidental downing, they probably thought it was a Ukrainian military cargo plane I don't trust their propaganda. I'll wait for Putin to say something.
Because you trust Putin's propaganda? He has a dog in this fight too.
|
On July 18 2014 01:46 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:45 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane. No it doesn't. edit: the anti-government forces simply do not have the hardware capable of taking down a plane at that altitude. Didnt they boast having such capabilities? Plus they did report shooting down a plane. And the kiev has no interest shooting at any plane, which can only be their own or russian (which they really have no interest in shooting down).
|
On July 18 2014 01:35 fixed_point wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:33 Steveling wrote:On July 18 2014 01:31 Daralii wrote:On July 18 2014 01:26 Warlock40 wrote: Why are they even flying over a war zone? I know nothing about aviation procedures, but surely flights over any conflict are strictly avoided at all costs? If it was considered an active warzone, NATO would've designated it a no-fly zone. It, unfortunately, wasn't. Ukraine's saying it was hit by a Buk SAM system. The rebels obtained one two days ago. It's not a no-fly zone? What are they smoking, damn. Feel so sorry for these poor people. It's probably a no-fly zone at lower altitudes, pretty sure no one expects a commercial airliner to get hit 10km in the air.
Most likely it was the rebels with the captured SAM system from Ukraine military forces. In order to operate a SA-11 you need special training. Beside that its very likely it had radar support for target acquisition and tracking. Somebody shouted orders into a telephone to make this happen. If only these people checked the aircraft IFF (Identification friend or foe) they could have known.
|
Northern Ireland22207 Posts
On July 18 2014 01:51 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:48 ahswtini wrote:On July 18 2014 01:46 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:45 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane. No it doesn't. Ok I guess it was a #conspiracy by Ukraine to shoot down the plane to blame it on the rebels, right? We just don't know, jumping to conclusions does not help. Saying that you know one side is to blame 5 min after the fact is silly. I guess the separatists boasting they had downed a "Ukranian AN-26" are now regretting it
|
On July 18 2014 01:46 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:45 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:42 Plansix wrote:On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff. More importantly it explains who shot down this plane. No it doesn't. edit: the anti-government forces simply do not have the hardware capable of taking down a plane at that altitude.
Buks are more than capable of shooting planes at altitude 14000 m, to range of 30 km.
|
and nothing will be done. grats world politics.
|
|
|
|