|
In order to maintain some kind of respectable thread quality and to show some respect for those who lost friends in this tragedy, we're forced to enact a hard line policy for this thread. Any posts holding an opinion on who is responsible or making an accusation that is not held by neutral media will be banned. Policy is in effect from page 27 onwards. Specifically, citing a Ukrainian or Russian source for your claims is going to get you banned. Opinions/facts/accusations arising from neutral media sources (i.e. media whose country of origin is not Ukraine, Russia or one of its puppet states) will be permitted. This policy extends to all forms of media; if a youtube video or picture has not come through a neutral media source then don't post it or you'll be banned. If you wish to discuss this policy please use this website feedback thread. Updated policy on aggressive posting and insults. |
On July 18 2014 01:18 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Ofc there must be consequences. You simply don't shoot down civilian airliner and expect nothing will happen.
There has been many shootdowns and many without consequences. Its fucked up.
|
On July 18 2014 01:26 Warlock40 wrote: Why are they even flying over a war zone? I know nothing about aviation procedures, but surely flights over any conflict are strictly avoided at all costs? If it was considered an active warzone, NATO would've designated it a no-fly zone. It, unfortunately, wasn't.
Ukraine's saying it was hit by a Buk SAM system. The rebels obtained one two days ago.
|
On July 18 2014 01:31 Daralii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:26 Warlock40 wrote: Why are they even flying over a war zone? I know nothing about aviation procedures, but surely flights over any conflict are strictly avoided at all costs? If it was considered an active warzone, NATO would've designated it a no-fly zone. It, unfortunately, wasn't. Ukraine's saying it was hit by a Buk SAM system. The rebels obtained one two days ago.
It's not a no-fly zone? What are they smoking, damn. Feel so sorry for these poor people.
|
You see how much planes was going to flying over that area? But not anymore...
|
|
On July 18 2014 01:33 Steveling wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:31 Daralii wrote:On July 18 2014 01:26 Warlock40 wrote: Why are they even flying over a war zone? I know nothing about aviation procedures, but surely flights over any conflict are strictly avoided at all costs? If it was considered an active warzone, NATO would've designated it a no-fly zone. It, unfortunately, wasn't. Ukraine's saying it was hit by a Buk SAM system. The rebels obtained one two days ago. It's not a no-fly zone? What are they smoking, damn. Feel so sorry for these poor people. If it was a no fly zone like Russia was pushing for it to be Kiev wouldn't be able to bomb cities in the east.
|
On July 18 2014 01:33 Steveling wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:31 Daralii wrote:On July 18 2014 01:26 Warlock40 wrote: Why are they even flying over a war zone? I know nothing about aviation procedures, but surely flights over any conflict are strictly avoided at all costs? If it was considered an active warzone, NATO would've designated it a no-fly zone. It, unfortunately, wasn't. Ukraine's saying it was hit by a Buk SAM system. The rebels obtained one two days ago. It's not a no-fly zone? What are they smoking, damn. Feel so sorry for these poor people. It's probably a no-fly zone at lower altitudes, pretty sure no one expects a commercial airliner to get hit 10km in the air.
|
Northern Ireland22208 Posts
Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit
|
|
On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit Please ignore those videos we released on social media earlier today, that was just a joke.
|
On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit
Not surprising both parties are blaming each other..
|
On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there...
|
On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Rebels confirmed that they shot down plane in same area. Still Malaysian airplane is only one shot down. Isn't that quite weird?
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51485 Posts
And WW3 confirmed. Holy shite, wtf you do that for Ukraine, thats justs totally stupid. Shooting down a plane thinking its Russian basically
|
Nice, fly over a warzone where several Ukranian planes have been shot down already, just to save some gas
|
On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Well the rebels did sort of claim they shot down a cargo plane right before it was reported a commercial airliner was missing.
I mean, it is possible they did a two planes crashed at the same time. Maybe?
|
On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months?
|
On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Wait, your telling me the rebels don't have a functional airforce? Thats totally weird. I guess that explains why only one side has been shooting down flying stuff.
|
On July 18 2014 01:40 Nyxisto wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Can you remind me which of the two parties has been shooting down planes and helicopters for the last few months? Rebels
|
On July 18 2014 01:39 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2014 01:37 zeo wrote:On July 18 2014 01:35 ahswtini wrote: Ukrainian rebels claim it was Ukrainian forces, they deny having such high-tech weaponry.
what a load of shit I'm sure you know exactly what happened because you were there... Rebels confirmed that they shot down plane in same area. Still Malaysian airplane is only one shot down. Isn't that quite weird? They claim a lot of things and no one believes them. Wait until we have more information other than 'source: Kiev military'
edit: In the last week there has been at least 5 'full Russian invasions'
|
|
|
|