|
You guys are overthinking way too much.
Just have one set of bad guys murdering the guy off screen. The gang found out and exact revenge upon the bad guys. That's it! No hard feelings, people won't even know that he died in real life.
Beside FFs needs to get back to actual racing and no an action flick that occasionally features car chases.
Hey isn't that asian guy dead too?
Yeah have Connor die too and then the gang separates, perfect ending to the franchise.
It will feel more authentic because it doesn't follow the good ol Deux Ex Machina that the heroes always live. It will be a nice change of pace for once in hollywood movies.
|
I like the Lucas black idea.
just give Paul walker's character a happily ever after ending. then have Lucas black come in to avenge Han. Han was black's mentor anyway. and they in Tokyo again.
|
On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened
Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going.
|
I hope that they filmed the final scenes where all his stories are resolved and he is just laying back in a house with his wife and kid, so they put that at the beginning and end Bryan story like that, maybe plugging him in for one or two short scenes where he helps the gang from behind the scenes, but I kinda want them to not use Paul character in this movie, not because it would be disrespectful, but because if they use Bryan, they won't get any time to developp his replacement and the movie will suck.
The best way to honor Walker isn't to use his material, but to keep Fast and Furious franchise going on without him, or to end it totally and start something new, in his honor acknowleding that there can t really be F&F without Bryan, since he was the centerpiece.
|
On December 06 2013 02:21 Xiphos wrote:
You guys are overthinking way too much.
Just have one set of bad guys murdering the guy off screen. The gang found out and exact revenge upon the bad guys. That's it! No hard feelings, people won't even know that he died in real life.
Beside FFs needs to get back to actual racing and no an action flick that occasionally features car chases.
Hey isn't that asian guy dead too?
Yeah have Connor die too and then the gang separates, perfect ending to the franchise.
It will feel more authentic because it doesn't follow the good ol Deux Ex Machina that the heroes always live. It will be a nice change of pace for once in hollywood movies.
All things considered, it'd be pretty distasteful to have a character killed off because he died in real life. It'd feel like they'd basically be discarding him and moving on like he never really mattered.
|
On December 07 2013 05:08 killa_robot wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2013 02:21 Xiphos wrote:
You guys are overthinking way too much.
Just have one set of bad guys murdering the guy off screen. The gang found out and exact revenge upon the bad guys. That's it! No hard feelings, people won't even know that he died in real life.
Beside FFs needs to get back to actual racing and no an action flick that occasionally features car chases.
Hey isn't that asian guy dead too?
Yeah have Connor die too and then the gang separates, perfect ending to the franchise.
It will feel more authentic because it doesn't follow the good ol Deux Ex Machina that the heroes always live. It will be a nice change of pace for once in hollywood movies. All things considered, it'd be pretty distasteful to have a character killed off because he died in real life. It'd feel like they'd basically be discarding him and moving on like he never really mattered.
Storywise, him dying in the movie sets up an even bigger revenge plot. But yeah you'd have to be heartless to force the whole studio and its cast to go through that. Not to mention his fans. No way they can try this. I'd also like them to use whatever they had filmed and I guess work it so him and his family goes into hiding. But really, whatever his friends and family think is "appropriate" is fine by me. I'll see the movie regardless of what they do.
It's disgusting to see some of the comments in this thread. He's still a human being with family, friends and millions of fans. Not his fault the world worships celebrities. And who are they to judge the value of a life?
|
According to Vin Disel's Facebook, he said the movie is scheduled for April 10th, 2015, so about a year delay from the summer 2014 release
|
Guttered to hear this. I know this is late but only just seen the thread. I loved the fast & furious series man, 
R.I.P
|
On December 06 2013 03:03 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going.
It was mentioned all over the news and it was pretty damn obvious by most people. Also now it's confirmed that they drove at 100mph, more than twice the allowed speed thus I don't give a crap about two guys risking the life of innocent people
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/03/showbiz/paul-walker-report/index.html
|
On January 04 2014 04:29 pellejohnson wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2013 03:03 Excludos wrote:On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going. It was mentioned all over the news and it was pretty damn obvious by most people. Also now it's confirmed that they drove at 100mph, more than twice the allowed speed thus I don't give a crap about two guys risking the life of innocent people http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/03/showbiz/paul-walker-report/index.html
Good of you to link to an article published today to prove wrong my one month old post. I said don't "presume". At the time of writing, nothing was obvious, nothing was proven, and we don't need you to be captain hindsight about it.
|
On the bright side, supposedly Justin Bieber will continue in his stead, making his legacy live on instead of letting the franchise die.
|
On January 04 2014 04:33 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2014 04:29 pellejohnson wrote:On December 06 2013 03:03 Excludos wrote:On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going. It was mentioned all over the news and it was pretty damn obvious by most people. Also now it's confirmed that they drove at 100mph, more than twice the allowed speed thus I don't give a crap about two guys risking the life of innocent people http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/03/showbiz/paul-walker-report/index.html Good of you to link to an article published today to prove wrong my one month old post. I said don't "presume". At the time of writing, nothing was obvious, nothing was proven, and we don't need you to be captain hindsight about it.
It was pretty damn obvious to most people or are you honestly saying that you believed them to drive at 45? Also yes the link i posted today was the confirmation of it but most news were already mentioning that people had seen them drive what seemed way faster than the 45
|
On January 04 2014 04:51 pellejohnson wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2014 04:33 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 04:29 pellejohnson wrote:On December 06 2013 03:03 Excludos wrote:On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going. It was mentioned all over the news and it was pretty damn obvious by most people. Also now it's confirmed that they drove at 100mph, more than twice the allowed speed thus I don't give a crap about two guys risking the life of innocent people http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/03/showbiz/paul-walker-report/index.html Good of you to link to an article published today to prove wrong my one month old post. I said don't "presume". At the time of writing, nothing was obvious, nothing was proven, and we don't need you to be captain hindsight about it. It was pretty damn obvious to most people or are you honestly saying that you believed them to drive at 45? Also yes the link i posted today was the confirmation of it but most news were already mentioning that people had seen them drive what seemed way faster than the 45
I think you need to look up the word "assume" in the dictionary. I'm done feeding troll baits.
|
On January 04 2014 08:28 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2014 04:51 pellejohnson wrote:On January 04 2014 04:33 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 04:29 pellejohnson wrote:On December 06 2013 03:03 Excludos wrote:On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going. It was mentioned all over the news and it was pretty damn obvious by most people. Also now it's confirmed that they drove at 100mph, more than twice the allowed speed thus I don't give a crap about two guys risking the life of innocent people http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/03/showbiz/paul-walker-report/index.html Good of you to link to an article published today to prove wrong my one month old post. I said don't "presume". At the time of writing, nothing was obvious, nothing was proven, and we don't need you to be captain hindsight about it. It was pretty damn obvious to most people or are you honestly saying that you believed them to drive at 45? Also yes the link i posted today was the confirmation of it but most news were already mentioning that people had seen them drive what seemed way faster than the 45 I think you need to look up the word "assume" in the dictionary. I'm done feeding troll baits.
You've come off as a much bigger troll in this exchange.
Stop crossing pity with ignorance.
|
On January 04 2014 08:48 ch33psh33p wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2014 08:28 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 04:51 pellejohnson wrote:On January 04 2014 04:33 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 04:29 pellejohnson wrote:On December 06 2013 03:03 Excludos wrote:On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going. It was mentioned all over the news and it was pretty damn obvious by most people. Also now it's confirmed that they drove at 100mph, more than twice the allowed speed thus I don't give a crap about two guys risking the life of innocent people http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/03/showbiz/paul-walker-report/index.html Good of you to link to an article published today to prove wrong my one month old post. I said don't "presume". At the time of writing, nothing was obvious, nothing was proven, and we don't need you to be captain hindsight about it. It was pretty damn obvious to most people or are you honestly saying that you believed them to drive at 45? Also yes the link i posted today was the confirmation of it but most news were already mentioning that people had seen them drive what seemed way faster than the 45 I think you need to look up the word "assume" in the dictionary. I'm done feeding troll baits. You've come off as a much bigger troll in this exchange. Stop crossing pity with ignorance.
Why am I even bothering? When I said, a month ago, don't judge until we know for SURE. You guys kept assuming and judging, and then you come back a month later and say "see? I told you so!". I never said he didn't drive fast, I said we don't KNOW, and we should fucking act like it. Is this kindergarten or what?
edit: Also, words like "its obvious", "everyone knew" and other ad hominem is not a good way to go about a discussion without turning it into an argument. You should look into that.
|
On January 04 2014 09:10 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2014 08:48 ch33psh33p wrote:On January 04 2014 08:28 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 04:51 pellejohnson wrote:On January 04 2014 04:33 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 04:29 pellejohnson wrote:On December 06 2013 03:03 Excludos wrote:On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going. It was mentioned all over the news and it was pretty damn obvious by most people. Also now it's confirmed that they drove at 100mph, more than twice the allowed speed thus I don't give a crap about two guys risking the life of innocent people http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/03/showbiz/paul-walker-report/index.html Good of you to link to an article published today to prove wrong my one month old post. I said don't "presume". At the time of writing, nothing was obvious, nothing was proven, and we don't need you to be captain hindsight about it. It was pretty damn obvious to most people or are you honestly saying that you believed them to drive at 45? Also yes the link i posted today was the confirmation of it but most news were already mentioning that people had seen them drive what seemed way faster than the 45 I think you need to look up the word "assume" in the dictionary. I'm done feeding troll baits. You've come off as a much bigger troll in this exchange. Stop crossing pity with ignorance. Why am I even bothering? When I said, a month ago, don't judge until we know for SURE. You guys kept assuming and judging, and then you come back a month later and say "see? I told you so!". I never said he didn't drive fast, I said we don't KNOW, and we should fucking act like it. Is this kindergarten or what? edit: Also, words like "its obvious", "everyone knew" and other ad hominem is not a good way to go about a discussion without turning it into an argument. You should look into that.
He may have been driving fast, but the real question, I think, is was he driving while furious? That certainly would be very ironic.
|
On January 04 2014 12:50 ninazerg wrote:Show nested quote +On January 04 2014 09:10 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 08:48 ch33psh33p wrote:On January 04 2014 08:28 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 04:51 pellejohnson wrote:On January 04 2014 04:33 Excludos wrote:On January 04 2014 04:29 pellejohnson wrote:On December 06 2013 03:03 Excludos wrote:On December 06 2013 02:11 pellejohnson wrote:
Personally I find it pretty hard to feel sorry about someone who died in a "self caused" accident. I know he wasn't the driver but they were driving way faster than the speed limit and was not only risking their own lives but also the one of innocent people.
If they would have stuck to the speed limit I doubt this accident would have happened Where did you read they where going "way faster than the speed limit"? I repeat: please stop assuming things. Accidents like this can happen at the speed limit too. Remember the car took fire and melted. Thats the remains you see. You have no way of discerning how fast they where going. It was mentioned all over the news and it was pretty damn obvious by most people. Also now it's confirmed that they drove at 100mph, more than twice the allowed speed thus I don't give a crap about two guys risking the life of innocent people http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/03/showbiz/paul-walker-report/index.html Good of you to link to an article published today to prove wrong my one month old post. I said don't "presume". At the time of writing, nothing was obvious, nothing was proven, and we don't need you to be captain hindsight about it. It was pretty damn obvious to most people or are you honestly saying that you believed them to drive at 45? Also yes the link i posted today was the confirmation of it but most news were already mentioning that people had seen them drive what seemed way faster than the 45 I think you need to look up the word "assume" in the dictionary. I'm done feeding troll baits. You've come off as a much bigger troll in this exchange. Stop crossing pity with ignorance. Why am I even bothering? When I said, a month ago, don't judge until we know for SURE. You guys kept assuming and judging, and then you come back a month later and say "see? I told you so!". I never said he didn't drive fast, I said we don't KNOW, and we should fucking act like it. Is this kindergarten or what? edit: Also, words like "its obvious", "everyone knew" and other ad hominem is not a good way to go about a discussion without turning it into an argument. You should look into that. He may have been driving fast, but the real question, I think, is was he driving while furious? That certainly would be very ironic.
You catch my drift!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
