• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:47
CEST 16:47
KST 23:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues23LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers? SC4ALL: A North American StarCraft LAN
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia LANified! 37: Groundswell, BYOC LAN, Nov 28-30 2025 LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ alas... i aint gon' lie to u bruh... BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro16 Group B Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Ro16 Group A
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Borderlands 3 The PlayStation 5 Iron Harvest: 1920+
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1548 users

Does Snowden deserve the Nobel Peace Prize? - Page 23

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 30 Next All
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
July 17 2013 21:59 GMT
#441
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.

You are presumptious.
Germany did it once. Read up on WW1 before making claims like this.
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
theking1
Profile Joined June 2013
Romania658 Posts
July 17 2013 22:01 GMT
#442
Snowden deserves the prize for human rights.he fought for the freedom of his own people.I dunno if there is any prize for human rights but if there is Snowden definetly deserves it.He is a hero in an age where the USA fails to be that beacon and democracy that it once was.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
July 17 2013 22:03 GMT
#443
On July 18 2013 06:59 Mataza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.

You are presumptious.
Germany did it once. Read up on WW1 before making claims like this.

By "did it" I mean "tried to take over Europe." It's reasonable to be suspicious of a country after that.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Pimpmuckl
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany528 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-17 22:07:43
July 17 2013 22:06 GMT
#444
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.


You have to be kidding me. A federal Republic with an extremly strong democratic base, in the European Nation AND the NATO (where the US is, too) and a rotating Member of the UN-Security Council should be met with suspicion? And in case you didn't notice yet: The Germany now is completely different to the Germany back then.

He does not deserve a peace price but a worldwide recognition for human rights, guy is a hero.
twitter.com/pimpmuckl
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
July 17 2013 22:09 GMT
#445
On July 18 2013 07:03 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:59 Mataza wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.

You are presumptious.
Germany did it once. Read up on WW1 before making claims like this.

By "did it" I mean "tried to take over Europe." It's reasonable to be suspicious of a country after that.

When do we get to talk about all the shitty things the US has done in the past century? Or any country, for that matter? There's scarcely a country in Europe that hasn't ruled a large part of it at some point in history.
theking1
Profile Joined June 2013
Romania658 Posts
July 17 2013 22:17 GMT
#446
On July 18 2013 07:06 Pimpmuckl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.


You have to be kidding me. A federal Republic with an extremly strong democratic base, in the European Nation AND the NATO (where the US is, too) and a rotating Member of the UN-Security Council should be met with suspicion? And in case you didn't notice yet: The Germany now is completely different to the Germany back then.

He does not deserve a peace price but a worldwide recognition for human rights, guy is a hero.


A lot of americans in this forum confuse America with leaders such as George W Bush and think that country can do no wrong.They have strayed away form the principles of their own founding fathers and the amendments of their own constitution.Nowadays they follow principles such as "Guilty until proven innocent" aka "Germany most surely spies on the USA.we do not have any evidence but hey that did not stop us from invading Iraq and causing a war with about 1 million human lives lost'.remember Saddams mass destruction weapons?it is a very dangerous mentality when warmongering groups take power especially in a world superpower such as the USA and manage to manipulate the masses into renouncing even their most basic democratic principles.Obama had the image of a democratic leader,a nobel prize winner, who wanted to change things.After two warrants although doing positive things he still hasn't manage to tackle the problem of USA insecurities after September 11. Fearmongering is a common thing thing this days in the US and groups such as NSA rely on that to accumulate even more dictatorial power and do whatever they want.when the NSA files will be open to the public I think watergate will seem like childsplay
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-17 22:22:15
July 17 2013 22:21 GMT
#447
On July 18 2013 07:06 Pimpmuckl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.


You have to be kidding me. A federal Republic with an extremly strong democratic base, in the European Nation AND the NATO (where the US is, too) and a rotating Member of the UN-Security Council should be met with suspicion? And in case you didn't notice yet: The Germany now is completely different to the Germany back then.

I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.

On July 18 2013 07:09 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 07:03 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:59 Mataza wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.

You are presumptious.
Germany did it once. Read up on WW1 before making claims like this.

By "did it" I mean "tried to take over Europe." It's reasonable to be suspicious of a country after that.

When do we get to talk about all the shitty things the US has done in the past century? Or any country, for that matter? There's scarcely a country in Europe that hasn't ruled a large part of it at some point in history.

And that's why we need spies.

User was temp banned for this post.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Gijian
Profile Joined February 2011
United States273 Posts
July 17 2013 22:28 GMT
#448
Some heroic award...maybe. Nobel Peace Prize? No. What Alfred Nobel had in mind was for someone that "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Also, I'm totally not sure of how Snowden's action actually promoted peace. Controversies, suspicions, and hatred, yes. Peace? No...at least not at the moment.
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
July 17 2013 22:28 GMT
#449
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


Wait...you think that WWII was because of some problem with the German people themselves (transmitted genetically, I guess?) rather than with a party of ideologues who took advantage of widespread unrest to scapegoat the rest of Europe/minorities and gain power????

What you're saying is so blatantly fucking racist that it's disturbing. In what way are the Germans of today not "different" enough from those of WWII? In what way do you believe that the average German citizen in 1940 was different from one in America/Britain? In what way do you think the conscripted armies differed?

And that's why we need spies.

Korean War, Vietnam, Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq, and the general theme of the Cold War dominated the last 50 years of American foreign politics, and you're saying that we need to worry about the fucking descendants Germans who happened to be ruled by the Nazis???? LMAO. Some people...

amaDeus
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany205 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-17 22:33:23
July 17 2013 22:29 GMT
#450
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

Some heroic award...maybe. Nobel Peace Prize? No. What Alfred Nobel had in mind was for someone that "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Also, I'm totally not sure of how Snowden's action actually promoted peace. Controversies, suspicions, and hatred, yes. Peace? No...at least not at the moment.


imo it's a step towards peace. Can you call it peace if nations mistrust each other? I'd describe it as fake peace. It's a time of cyberwar; war's aren't won by spears and shields anymore, they are won through the internet.
i'd give him the nobel peace prize. he deserves it. too bad it won't happen.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
July 17 2013 22:33 GMT
#451
On July 18 2013 07:29 amaDeus wrote:
Show nested quote +
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

I wouldn't say that that's certainly the case, but to rule that possibility out is just naive.

However, I will end it at this, because pursuing this point can only devolve into a flame war: keeping allies in check is good measure, and that's what espionage is for.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Gijian
Profile Joined February 2011
United States273 Posts
July 17 2013 22:37 GMT
#452
imo it's a step towards peace. Can you call it peace if nations mistrust each other? I'd describe it as fake peace. It's a time of cyberwar; war's aren't won by spears and shields anymore, they are won through the internet.
i'd give him the nobel peace prize. he deserves it. too bad it won't happen.


You think exposing the inconvenience truth will generate less mistrust? Okay...
If you caught your significant other cheating on you, would you ever trust him/her again? His action will generate a FAKE peace because now everyone is suspicious of one another even more.
theking1
Profile Joined June 2013
Romania658 Posts
July 17 2013 22:42 GMT
#453
On July 18 2013 07:29 amaDeus wrote:
Show nested quote +
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

Show nested quote +
Some heroic award...maybe. Nobel Peace Prize? No. What Alfred Nobel had in mind was for someone that "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Also, I'm totally not sure of how Snowden's action actually promoted peace. Controversies, suspicions, and hatred, yes. Peace? No...at least not at the moment.


imo it's a step towards peace. Can you call it peace if nations mistrust each other? I'd describe it as fake peace. It's a time of cyberwar; war's aren't won by spears and shields anymore, they are won through the internet.
i'd give him the nobel peace prize. he deserves it. too bad it won't happen.


He is dead serious, probably a hardcore conservative loony/foxnews watcher/glen back fan.it is quite common to hear this reccurent theme propagated to give the american conservatives a sense of accomplishement,you will find that motos such as"USA is the land of the free home of the brave,germans are nazis,europeans are communists,russians and chinesse are enemies" are used to instill fearmongering.If you really wanna know how deep the manipulation goes check out this fearmongering clip regarding the netherlands form fox news:



They are mad and rely on lies to manipulate their people.
amaDeus
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany205 Posts
July 17 2013 22:49 GMT
#454
On July 18 2013 07:37 Gijian wrote:
Show nested quote +
imo it's a step towards peace. Can you call it peace if nations mistrust each other? I'd describe it as fake peace. It's a time of cyberwar; war's aren't won by spears and shields anymore, they are won through the internet.
i'd give him the nobel peace prize. he deserves it. too bad it won't happen.


You think exposing the inconvenience truth will generate less mistrust? Okay...
If you caught your significant other cheating on you, would you ever trust him/her again? His action will generate a FAKE peace because now everyone is suspicious of one another even more.



At the end of the day it may generate less mistrust. i think it does - but that's my opinion, how said.
the trust is mostly gone the moment the other is cheating on you (/how much depends on whatever is the equivalent of cheating), but it can be rebuilt.
i'd rather live in a honest world with a bit of mistrust left than in a world with fake peace.
i define fake peace not by being suspicious, but by being able to get rid of it because nations actually listen to each other more than they do now.
(happy lil dream world)

oh well and i just don't want any organisation spying on personal matters without me knowing or not able to do sth about it. facebook google and all that i know about, the things NSA did - i did not know until there was snowden.
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
July 17 2013 22:54 GMT
#455
On July 18 2013 07:33 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 07:29 amaDeus wrote:
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

I wouldn't say that that's certainly the case, but to rule that possibility out is just naive.

However, I will end it at this, because pursuing this point can only devolve into a flame war: keeping allies in check is good measure, and that's what espionage is for.

How the hell can someone inherit Nazism? It's a political system and ideology, not a genetic trait. What's more, Nazism is illegal in Germany. So in what way could it actually be inherited?!

Like your argument is actually eerily similar to the logic employed by Nazis to emphasize their "racial purity."
tokinho
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States792 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-17 23:18:17
July 17 2013 23:14 GMT
#456
On July 18 2013 01:27 sc2superfan101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 00:54 Shiori wrote:
On July 18 2013 00:38 sc2superfan101 wrote:
On July 18 2013 00:30 Shiori wrote:
I imagine that people are pleased Obama was elected because the alternative was a member of the Republican Party (a group that, as a whole, tends to have serious debates about shit like whether gay people should be allowed to get married or whether poor people are lazy) and not because Obama was the second coming of Christ.

Yeah, I don't really give a shit about the Republican vs Democrat crap in this thread. To be honest, this has nothing to do with any of that. The point had nothing to do with Republicans being for or against gay marriage (wtf are you even bringing that up for?). The point was that how the fuck could you not be anti-Obama if you actually think he's going to have goons kidnap, murder, and then dispose of a man for releasing some state secrets?

Way to totally miss the point. People were happy Obama got elected because the alternative was part of a party that has all the problems Obama does plus actually is crazy on some issues. That doesn't mean people think Obama is a saint or even a good leader; it just means he wasn't as bad as the other one.

No, see you're missing the point. I don't give a fuck about Republican vs Democrat. Stop bringing it up. It's irrelevant.

I repeat my question: How could you not be anti-Obama if you actually think he will murder a man for posting classified information?


Easy, Did he make that decision? Or did he decide that its not worth his time and is letting his party work it out. (Notice how he has been relatively quiet about Snowden for some time, other than firing his advisor that wanted to arrest Snowden badly) If you believe that everything that is done that is high profile is decided by the president, I think that you don't really understand politics.

It is a party issue and issues of national security are only temporarily handled by the president, then they go to congress, unless they fight for the case. There is a national security council that the president presides, but in turn most decisions are made by ununanimous consensus including Joe Biden, John Kerry, Chuck Hagel, and advice from people like James Clapper, Tony Blinkin, Janet Napolitano, and Lisa Monaco. (Janet Napolitano resigned over this. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/07/15/who-will-replace-janet-napolitano-as-head-of-homeland-security/) If Obama views this as more of an important issue, (Catching Snowden) I think he would have put pressure on other countries, instead of firing one of his national security advisors who wanted to catch him. The politicians angry about snowden making statements generally aren't even these people, they are republicans who are mad that we aren't going after Snowden like Senator McCain.

I think that based off of recent information, Democrats are not going after him and republicans are stating its a bad idea in general. Snowden does not deserve a peace prize for his actions. If he stayed and was arrested, like Mikhail Khodorkovskky, I think that would show something. Other people deserve it more.
Smile
yOngKIN
Profile Joined May 2012
Korea (North)656 Posts
July 17 2013 23:18 GMT
#457
why not. Obama won it for nothing. At least Snowden has done something actually worthy.
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
July 17 2013 23:19 GMT
#458
On July 18 2013 07:33 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 07:29 amaDeus wrote:
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

I wouldn't say that that's certainly the case, but to rule that possibility out is just naive.

However, I will end it at this, because pursuing this point can only devolve into a flame war: keeping allies in check is good measure, and that's what espionage is for.


In that case I think it would be prudent of the USA to scrap their entire nuclear arsenal being the only country in the world to have used one and thus who knows when they might do it again?!
tokinho
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States792 Posts
July 17 2013 23:21 GMT
#459
On July 18 2013 08:18 yOngKIN wrote:
why not. Obama won it for nothing. At least Snowden has done something actually worthy.


Yeah Obama's push for removing nuclear arsenals is not noteworthy person from North Korea.
Smile
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
July 17 2013 23:26 GMT
#460
On July 18 2013 08:21 tokinho wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 08:18 yOngKIN wrote:
why not. Obama won it for nothing. At least Snowden has done something actually worthy.


Yeah Obama's push for removing nuclear arsenals is not noteworthy person from North Korea.


All words, little progress...
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 30 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
12:00
SC:EVO Monthly
SteadfastSC243
Rex104
IndyStarCraft 86
Liquipedia
Online Event
12:00
Galaxy Open Cup Season 2
CranKy Ducklings142
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 243
mouzHeroMarine 229
Rex 104
IndyStarCraft 86
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37996
Horang2 5165
Bisu 2911
EffOrt 1568
Mini 755
Larva 736
firebathero 418
BeSt 353
sSak 295
Soma 256
[ Show more ]
Light 252
Hyuk 235
Soulkey 186
Zeus 148
Rush 138
Mong 113
Aegong 75
Sharp 72
Sexy 64
Noble 55
ToSsGirL 49
Sea.KH 43
Yoon 31
zelot 31
Movie 27
Terrorterran 24
scan(afreeca) 20
NaDa 10
SilentControl 10
Icarus 9
IntoTheRainbow 8
sas.Sziky 6
Dota 2
The International126442
Gorgc9833
PGG 27
Counter-Strike
Foxcn561
flusha102
Other Games
gofns31446
tarik_tv24610
B2W.Neo783
DeMusliM322
Lowko315
crisheroes305
Hui .302
oskar143
Happy131
KnowMe116
Mew2King103
Liquid`VortiX98
ArmadaUGS58
RotterdaM48
FunKaTv 40
SortOf27
ToD26
QueenE21
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1019
StarCraft 2
WardiTV412
Other Games
BasetradeTV12
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 766
• Ler69
Other Games
• Shiphtur162
Upcoming Events
BSL Team Wars
4h 13m
RSL Revival
19h 13m
Maestros of the Game
23h 13m
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
1d 1h
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 3h
RSL Revival
1d 19h
Maestros of the Game
2 days
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
LiuLi Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Copa Latinoamericana 4
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.