• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:39
CEST 10:39
KST 17:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon57Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?167Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism
Tourneys
RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 KSL Week #92 IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly 2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Broodwar Prediction Market Practice Partners (Official) [D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group B [ASL22] Ro16 Group A Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Diablo IV EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Diablo Animated Series on Netflix Movie Discussion!
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5552 users

Does Snowden deserve the Nobel Peace Prize? - Page 23

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 30 Next All
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
July 17 2013 21:59 GMT
#441
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.

You are presumptious.
Germany did it once. Read up on WW1 before making claims like this.
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
theking1
Profile Joined June 2013
Romania658 Posts
July 17 2013 22:01 GMT
#442
Snowden deserves the prize for human rights.he fought for the freedom of his own people.I dunno if there is any prize for human rights but if there is Snowden definetly deserves it.He is a hero in an age where the USA fails to be that beacon and democracy that it once was.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
July 17 2013 22:03 GMT
#443
On July 18 2013 06:59 Mataza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.

You are presumptious.
Germany did it once. Read up on WW1 before making claims like this.

By "did it" I mean "tried to take over Europe." It's reasonable to be suspicious of a country after that.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Pimpmuckl
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany528 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-17 22:07:43
July 17 2013 22:06 GMT
#444
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.


You have to be kidding me. A federal Republic with an extremly strong democratic base, in the European Nation AND the NATO (where the US is, too) and a rotating Member of the UN-Security Council should be met with suspicion? And in case you didn't notice yet: The Germany now is completely different to the Germany back then.

He does not deserve a peace price but a worldwide recognition for human rights, guy is a hero.
twitter.com/pimpmuckl
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
July 17 2013 22:09 GMT
#445
On July 18 2013 07:03 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:59 Mataza wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.

You are presumptious.
Germany did it once. Read up on WW1 before making claims like this.

By "did it" I mean "tried to take over Europe." It's reasonable to be suspicious of a country after that.

When do we get to talk about all the shitty things the US has done in the past century? Or any country, for that matter? There's scarcely a country in Europe that hasn't ruled a large part of it at some point in history.
theking1
Profile Joined June 2013
Romania658 Posts
July 17 2013 22:17 GMT
#446
On July 18 2013 07:06 Pimpmuckl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.


You have to be kidding me. A federal Republic with an extremly strong democratic base, in the European Nation AND the NATO (where the US is, too) and a rotating Member of the UN-Security Council should be met with suspicion? And in case you didn't notice yet: The Germany now is completely different to the Germany back then.

He does not deserve a peace price but a worldwide recognition for human rights, guy is a hero.


A lot of americans in this forum confuse America with leaders such as George W Bush and think that country can do no wrong.They have strayed away form the principles of their own founding fathers and the amendments of their own constitution.Nowadays they follow principles such as "Guilty until proven innocent" aka "Germany most surely spies on the USA.we do not have any evidence but hey that did not stop us from invading Iraq and causing a war with about 1 million human lives lost'.remember Saddams mass destruction weapons?it is a very dangerous mentality when warmongering groups take power especially in a world superpower such as the USA and manage to manipulate the masses into renouncing even their most basic democratic principles.Obama had the image of a democratic leader,a nobel prize winner, who wanted to change things.After two warrants although doing positive things he still hasn't manage to tackle the problem of USA insecurities after September 11. Fearmongering is a common thing thing this days in the US and groups such as NSA rely on that to accumulate even more dictatorial power and do whatever they want.when the NSA files will be open to the public I think watergate will seem like childsplay
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-17 22:22:15
July 17 2013 22:21 GMT
#447
On July 18 2013 07:06 Pimpmuckl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.


You have to be kidding me. A federal Republic with an extremly strong democratic base, in the European Nation AND the NATO (where the US is, too) and a rotating Member of the UN-Security Council should be met with suspicion? And in case you didn't notice yet: The Germany now is completely different to the Germany back then.

I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.

On July 18 2013 07:09 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 07:03 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:59 Mataza wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:54 LegalLord wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:06 Hryul wrote:
On July 18 2013 06:04 Plansix wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:52 kmillz wrote:
On July 18 2013 05:39 DeepElemBlues wrote:
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.


What's the problem with that?

They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...

committing even worse atrocities.


I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...

What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?


That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.


Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..

Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.

so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?

Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.

You are presumptious.
Germany did it once. Read up on WW1 before making claims like this.

By "did it" I mean "tried to take over Europe." It's reasonable to be suspicious of a country after that.

When do we get to talk about all the shitty things the US has done in the past century? Or any country, for that matter? There's scarcely a country in Europe that hasn't ruled a large part of it at some point in history.

And that's why we need spies.

User was temp banned for this post.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Gijian
Profile Joined February 2011
United States273 Posts
July 17 2013 22:28 GMT
#448
Some heroic award...maybe. Nobel Peace Prize? No. What Alfred Nobel had in mind was for someone that "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Also, I'm totally not sure of how Snowden's action actually promoted peace. Controversies, suspicions, and hatred, yes. Peace? No...at least not at the moment.
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
July 17 2013 22:28 GMT
#449
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


Wait...you think that WWII was because of some problem with the German people themselves (transmitted genetically, I guess?) rather than with a party of ideologues who took advantage of widespread unrest to scapegoat the rest of Europe/minorities and gain power????

What you're saying is so blatantly fucking racist that it's disturbing. In what way are the Germans of today not "different" enough from those of WWII? In what way do you believe that the average German citizen in 1940 was different from one in America/Britain? In what way do you think the conscripted armies differed?

And that's why we need spies.

Korean War, Vietnam, Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq, and the general theme of the Cold War dominated the last 50 years of American foreign politics, and you're saying that we need to worry about the fucking descendants Germans who happened to be ruled by the Nazis???? LMAO. Some people...

amaDeus
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany205 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-17 22:33:23
July 17 2013 22:29 GMT
#450
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

Some heroic award...maybe. Nobel Peace Prize? No. What Alfred Nobel had in mind was for someone that "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Also, I'm totally not sure of how Snowden's action actually promoted peace. Controversies, suspicions, and hatred, yes. Peace? No...at least not at the moment.


imo it's a step towards peace. Can you call it peace if nations mistrust each other? I'd describe it as fake peace. It's a time of cyberwar; war's aren't won by spears and shields anymore, they are won through the internet.
i'd give him the nobel peace prize. he deserves it. too bad it won't happen.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
July 17 2013 22:33 GMT
#451
On July 18 2013 07:29 amaDeus wrote:
Show nested quote +
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

I wouldn't say that that's certainly the case, but to rule that possibility out is just naive.

However, I will end it at this, because pursuing this point can only devolve into a flame war: keeping allies in check is good measure, and that's what espionage is for.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Gijian
Profile Joined February 2011
United States273 Posts
July 17 2013 22:37 GMT
#452
imo it's a step towards peace. Can you call it peace if nations mistrust each other? I'd describe it as fake peace. It's a time of cyberwar; war's aren't won by spears and shields anymore, they are won through the internet.
i'd give him the nobel peace prize. he deserves it. too bad it won't happen.


You think exposing the inconvenience truth will generate less mistrust? Okay...
If you caught your significant other cheating on you, would you ever trust him/her again? His action will generate a FAKE peace because now everyone is suspicious of one another even more.
theking1
Profile Joined June 2013
Romania658 Posts
July 17 2013 22:42 GMT
#453
On July 18 2013 07:29 amaDeus wrote:
Show nested quote +
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

Show nested quote +
Some heroic award...maybe. Nobel Peace Prize? No. What Alfred Nobel had in mind was for someone that "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Also, I'm totally not sure of how Snowden's action actually promoted peace. Controversies, suspicions, and hatred, yes. Peace? No...at least not at the moment.


imo it's a step towards peace. Can you call it peace if nations mistrust each other? I'd describe it as fake peace. It's a time of cyberwar; war's aren't won by spears and shields anymore, they are won through the internet.
i'd give him the nobel peace prize. he deserves it. too bad it won't happen.


He is dead serious, probably a hardcore conservative loony/foxnews watcher/glen back fan.it is quite common to hear this reccurent theme propagated to give the american conservatives a sense of accomplishement,you will find that motos such as"USA is the land of the free home of the brave,germans are nazis,europeans are communists,russians and chinesse are enemies" are used to instill fearmongering.If you really wanna know how deep the manipulation goes check out this fearmongering clip regarding the netherlands form fox news:



They are mad and rely on lies to manipulate their people.
amaDeus
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany205 Posts
July 17 2013 22:49 GMT
#454
On July 18 2013 07:37 Gijian wrote:
Show nested quote +
imo it's a step towards peace. Can you call it peace if nations mistrust each other? I'd describe it as fake peace. It's a time of cyberwar; war's aren't won by spears and shields anymore, they are won through the internet.
i'd give him the nobel peace prize. he deserves it. too bad it won't happen.


You think exposing the inconvenience truth will generate less mistrust? Okay...
If you caught your significant other cheating on you, would you ever trust him/her again? His action will generate a FAKE peace because now everyone is suspicious of one another even more.



At the end of the day it may generate less mistrust. i think it does - but that's my opinion, how said.
the trust is mostly gone the moment the other is cheating on you (/how much depends on whatever is the equivalent of cheating), but it can be rebuilt.
i'd rather live in a honest world with a bit of mistrust left than in a world with fake peace.
i define fake peace not by being suspicious, but by being able to get rid of it because nations actually listen to each other more than they do now.
(happy lil dream world)

oh well and i just don't want any organisation spying on personal matters without me knowing or not able to do sth about it. facebook google and all that i know about, the things NSA did - i did not know until there was snowden.
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
July 17 2013 22:54 GMT
#455
On July 18 2013 07:33 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 07:29 amaDeus wrote:
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

I wouldn't say that that's certainly the case, but to rule that possibility out is just naive.

However, I will end it at this, because pursuing this point can only devolve into a flame war: keeping allies in check is good measure, and that's what espionage is for.

How the hell can someone inherit Nazism? It's a political system and ideology, not a genetic trait. What's more, Nazism is illegal in Germany. So in what way could it actually be inherited?!

Like your argument is actually eerily similar to the logic employed by Nazis to emphasize their "racial purity."
tokinho
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States792 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-17 23:18:17
July 17 2013 23:14 GMT
#456
On July 18 2013 01:27 sc2superfan101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 00:54 Shiori wrote:
On July 18 2013 00:38 sc2superfan101 wrote:
On July 18 2013 00:30 Shiori wrote:
I imagine that people are pleased Obama was elected because the alternative was a member of the Republican Party (a group that, as a whole, tends to have serious debates about shit like whether gay people should be allowed to get married or whether poor people are lazy) and not because Obama was the second coming of Christ.

Yeah, I don't really give a shit about the Republican vs Democrat crap in this thread. To be honest, this has nothing to do with any of that. The point had nothing to do with Republicans being for or against gay marriage (wtf are you even bringing that up for?). The point was that how the fuck could you not be anti-Obama if you actually think he's going to have goons kidnap, murder, and then dispose of a man for releasing some state secrets?

Way to totally miss the point. People were happy Obama got elected because the alternative was part of a party that has all the problems Obama does plus actually is crazy on some issues. That doesn't mean people think Obama is a saint or even a good leader; it just means he wasn't as bad as the other one.

No, see you're missing the point. I don't give a fuck about Republican vs Democrat. Stop bringing it up. It's irrelevant.

I repeat my question: How could you not be anti-Obama if you actually think he will murder a man for posting classified information?


Easy, Did he make that decision? Or did he decide that its not worth his time and is letting his party work it out. (Notice how he has been relatively quiet about Snowden for some time, other than firing his advisor that wanted to arrest Snowden badly) If you believe that everything that is done that is high profile is decided by the president, I think that you don't really understand politics.

It is a party issue and issues of national security are only temporarily handled by the president, then they go to congress, unless they fight for the case. There is a national security council that the president presides, but in turn most decisions are made by ununanimous consensus including Joe Biden, John Kerry, Chuck Hagel, and advice from people like James Clapper, Tony Blinkin, Janet Napolitano, and Lisa Monaco. (Janet Napolitano resigned over this. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/07/15/who-will-replace-janet-napolitano-as-head-of-homeland-security/) If Obama views this as more of an important issue, (Catching Snowden) I think he would have put pressure on other countries, instead of firing one of his national security advisors who wanted to catch him. The politicians angry about snowden making statements generally aren't even these people, they are republicans who are mad that we aren't going after Snowden like Senator McCain.

I think that based off of recent information, Democrats are not going after him and republicans are stating its a bad idea in general. Snowden does not deserve a peace prize for his actions. If he stayed and was arrested, like Mikhail Khodorkovskky, I think that would show something. Other people deserve it more.
Smile
yOngKIN
Profile Joined May 2012
Korea (North)656 Posts
July 17 2013 23:18 GMT
#457
why not. Obama won it for nothing. At least Snowden has done something actually worthy.
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4783 Posts
July 17 2013 23:19 GMT
#458
On July 18 2013 07:33 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 07:29 amaDeus wrote:
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.


So basically you're saying I inherited the nazism of the older generations of this nation? Cause it's spreading from grandgrandfather to grandfather to father to son? Or like a cloud - nazism hanging over germany? I guess the denazification wasn't able to clear out all the evil spirits.

wat?

I wouldn't say that that's certainly the case, but to rule that possibility out is just naive.

However, I will end it at this, because pursuing this point can only devolve into a flame war: keeping allies in check is good measure, and that's what espionage is for.


In that case I think it would be prudent of the USA to scrap their entire nuclear arsenal being the only country in the world to have used one and thus who knows when they might do it again?!
tokinho
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States792 Posts
July 17 2013 23:21 GMT
#459
On July 18 2013 08:18 yOngKIN wrote:
why not. Obama won it for nothing. At least Snowden has done something actually worthy.


Yeah Obama's push for removing nuclear arsenals is not noteworthy person from North Korea.
Smile
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4783 Posts
July 17 2013 23:26 GMT
#460
On July 18 2013 08:21 tokinho wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2013 08:18 yOngKIN wrote:
why not. Obama won it for nothing. At least Snowden has done something actually worthy.


Yeah Obama's push for removing nuclear arsenals is not noteworthy person from North Korea.


All words, little progress...
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 30 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 21m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Trap 34
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 5923
actioN 320
firebathero 300
910 87
Aegong 64
Shinee 57
Larva 47
Sharp 19
yabsab 17
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Dota 2
ODPixel388
XcaliburYe349
Fuzer 70
Counter-Strike
byalli772
Other Games
summit1g14300
mouzStarbuck469
KnowMe204
Dewaltoss65
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV239
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 14
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 39
• LUISG 6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2199
League of Legends
• Jankos2089
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1h 21m
WardiTV Invitational
2h 21m
ByuN vs Percival
Cure vs Classic
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
6h 21m
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
7h 21m
Serral vs Rogue
BlizzCon
9h 51m
IdrA vs MC
Replay Cast
15h 21m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 1h
Light vs JyJ
Soulkey vs hero
WardiTV Weekly
1d 2h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 7h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Shinee
Shine vs EffOrt
[ Show More ]
GSL
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - TRS
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.