EPTWomen That Like Men with Money, Why is it Bad? - Page 11
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
logikly
United States329 Posts
| ||
|
Kuni
Austria765 Posts
On February 22 2013 15:39 evanthebouncy! wrote: If you have no money, you are unfit to support a woman. Look at the animals, in order for male to get females, he needs to secure territory, it means food, and safety for bearing child. The great thing about the human brain is the fact, that it is so powerful, it can be used freely for things other than the basic needs and instincts, which evolve around survival and natural selection, despite it having evolved out of those needs. No other animal we know of has that kind of power. Denying it is a felony. | ||
|
Little-Chimp
Canada948 Posts
| ||
|
sunprince
United States2258 Posts
On February 22 2013 14:45 naastyOne wrote: Really? You mean they need hundreds of thousands of dollars that people have to pay because child "benefits" are % of you income reguardless of how much the child needs? Why is society stupid enought to insist to leave children with their generally poorer mothers, and forcing fathers to pay benefits instead of giving children to fathers? That would be due to the tender years doctrine (prior to this, men would generally be given both custody and the responsibility of providing for the child). Thanks feminists! Although it has technically been superseded by the "best interests of the child", it persists both in practice and socioculturally. | ||
|
sunprince
United States2258 Posts
On February 22 2013 15:39 evanthebouncy! wrote: If you have no money, you are unfit to support a woman. Look at the animals, in order for male to get females, he needs to secure territory, it means food, and safety for bearing child. "If a woman is fat, ugly, or old, she is unfit to get a man. Look at the animals, in order for a female to get a male, she needs to be young, healthy, and fertile to bear children." | ||
|
Shinta)
United States1716 Posts
On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote: But is superficiality a bad thing? I don't think so, it's simply biological. Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference. Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference. Once we realize every single one of us is guilty of superficiality, it no longer becomes a measure to judge people on. If you're thinking about personal preference, nothing is a bad thing because everyone enjoys themselves in their own way. If you're talking about if it's actually bad, as in provides either negative or no influence on society, then superficiality is a bad thing. More so gold diggers than anything in some ways. People who look for beautiful partners for the sake of their children are looking out for other people. Gold diggers are looking out for themselves. You say so "their children/lifestyle will be taken care of", but money doesn't take care of anybody, and it doesn't make anyone a successful person. Family does do that, and good personalities do too, but money does not. Superficiality is bad, but it's acceptable with limits. Gold diggers are worthless, they have no purpose. To know that you're superficial is part of the solution. Realize your personality and your faults, and choose to be better than them. That is the answer. Mix your superficiality in with limits to make yourself a happier person without making yourself an idiotic burden. | ||
|
aZealot
New Zealand5447 Posts
(I'll show myself out now...) | ||
|
XForce3
Canada45 Posts
| ||
|
MidnightZL
Sweden203 Posts
| ||
|
Psychobabas
2531 Posts
On February 22 2013 03:55 NotSorry wrote: I'm attracted to women with money. Same! | ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
| ||
|
eskashaborn
United States177 Posts
On a more serious note...uhh I think that it's fair to look for a certain threshold of sustainability (money), but if you are marrying to a large degree for the money in most circumstances this is not a good choice! | ||
|
M2
Bulgaria4116 Posts
 ) | ||
|
bOneSeven
Romania685 Posts
| ||
|
Kickboxer
Slovenia1308 Posts
Beauty, on the other hand, is an universal absolute. It might be superficial to seek a beautiful mate but there is nothing "ugly" or corrupt about aesthetic quality, the very existence of beauty brings an inspiring light to the world unless you're obsessing over your own inadequacy. | ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
If you're rich you can never be 100% sure that your woman isn't yours because of money rather than real love. Could also be both, which raises another question probably more relevant than the one in OP, "can money influence love ?" | ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
On February 22 2013 18:02 M2 wrote: Why liking rich man has to be bad? its not, I mean in my country women have this saying: "All men are the same", so if for them all are the same of course better take the rich one )The women of your country are wrong. Not all men are the same, and not all women are the same. In fact, there's a massive difference. "Oh man, that babe is so hot, all women are the same so I will marry her." * 2 years later * "Whoops, she's stupid and whines about crap all the time. She's also infertile. She's still hot though." * 10 years later * "Fuck my life." | ||
|
kyriores
Greece178 Posts
| ||
|
sc4k
United Kingdom5454 Posts
On February 22 2013 18:20 kyriores wrote: Usually they are attracted to money more than they are attracted to the man.. That's not a healthy relationship. Well it depends, if they are attracted to the man primarily because of his money...then that's okay. That's like being attracted to dimples or a 6-pack. You can lose the 6-pack and your face can be scarred, just like you can lose the money. But she still might stay attracted to you if she has developed feelings. If she is primarily attracted to the money, and the man happens to be incidental to her obtaining the money. THEN you got problems! In terms of who is more superficial, I am in absolutely no doubt whatsoever that it's men, BUT women aren't far behind! | ||
|
Maenander
Germany4926 Posts
On February 22 2013 17:06 XForce3 wrote: Women are attracted to wealthy men (or at least they think they are) because for a long time in society, if you had a lot of money it said a lot about who you are as a person. If you were wealthy chances are that you were a smart, driven, capable man that is she is able to depend on. Basically, all very masculine features that as a social female organism finds extremely desirable and attractive. Money was a indicator of good traits to be found in males, but with our culture nowadays people simply fall in love with the money instead of what the money pointed toward before, the person who was able to earn that money. Money is not just an indicator for good traits, it is a true advantage for the offspring. The game of reproduction is not restricted to biological factors. All that talk about superficiality is so wrong. It's not like good looks or humor are morally superior traits. | ||
| ||
