• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:04
CEST 16:04
KST 23:04
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy9[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple2BSL Season 238Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
BSL Season 23 Bot on ladder screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[IPSL] IPSL is Back With Winter 26-27! [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague [ASL22] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8049 users

North Korea says/does surprising and alarming thing - Page…

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 187 188 189 190 Next
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24361 Posts
June 13 2018 02:11 GMT
#3761
On June 13 2018 10:51 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 06:21 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 06:16 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 05:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 04:14 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 03:03 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:51 oBlade wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:21 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 01:44 Aveng3r wrote:
On June 12 2018 22:01 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
Why? If anything, the US is the worse party here. I also doubt they will ever apologize for what they have done to NK because, hey, they are the "good guys".

Would you care to explain this statement?


On June 13 2018 01:56 Zaros wrote:
On June 12 2018 22:01 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
Why? If anything, the US is the worse party here. I also doubt they will ever apologize for what they have done to NK because, hey, they are the "good guys".


What the US has done? Communism and brutal dictatorship has reduced North Korea to what it is. The US just garuntees the independence of the south and sanctions the north as it would any country going for nukes

Apart from this partly being a general statement and putting all of the other US stuff aside (ranging from concentration camps over human experimentation to intentionally destabilizing entire regions)...you do know why North Korea hates the US, right? You know, the war crimes they committed...completely obliterating civilian towns, destroying dams, reservoirs (and thus farmland) etc which led to mass starvation. If you really don't know that, you have to be pretty ignorant in this day and age, considering that knowledge is openly available.

North Korea hates the US because they are indoctrinated from birth into an ideology by a regime trying to cling to relevance while its neighbor is prospering. North Korea's GDP is comparable to the annual GDP growth of South Korea. The US is not the reason North Korea is poor and starving now. Your flippant mention of concentration camps which I assume is about Japanese internment in WW2, which if I were to guess your age with an average number ended at least two or almost three of your lifetimes ago, when 1% of the DPRK population at this very moment is in camps, it's a little tone-deaf, is that also the US's fault?

I think you're unknowingly trying to transplant a Vietnam mindset to the Korean peninsula which is out of place, and as far as I know Vietnam doesn't hate the US or anyway not to the degree North Korea does. Despite the larger and longer extent of US intervention in Vietnam. So something else is going on.

Which is what I just wrote in my post. GDP and being poor etc has nothing to do with anything I wrote. Well, you guessed mostly wrong. And what NK has or doesn't have is not relevant to the discussion as it's about this statement:

On June 12 2018 15:09 Zaros wrote:
Am I the only one who finds it repulsive that the so called leader of the free world will not only make a deal but a public deal and talk about their great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity?

If you want to argue that the US is in any way better than NK or even not worse, then we can continue. Otherwise, there is no point.

On June 13 2018 02:59 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:55 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:35 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:32 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
Or how about you actually inform yourself instead of being some lazy ignorant? The human experimentation stuff is well documented, as is the Korean. Same with concentration camps ranging from the more tame ones in WW2 to the ones used in the US-Philippine war. As for the destabilizing part...leaks help, as that is information you only get via that (the Syria Files are a good example for that).

Okay. Wow. So this is happening. Burden of proof is on you. You can't make a claim such as those and not have the proof to back it up.

I mentioned everything you need to know, so that it's even easier for you to look it up. If anything, if you are American, you should already know about all these things.

On June 13 2018 02:40 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:32 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
Or how about you actually inform yourself instead of being some lazy ignorant? The human experimentation stuff is well documented, as is the Korean. Same with concentration camps ranging from the more tame ones in WW2 to the ones used in the US-Philippine war. As for the destabilizing part...leaks help, as that is information you only get via that (the Syria Files are a good example for that).

So wait, are you saying that NK hates the US because of every bad thing the US did in modern history? Or all of our history? Not because we back South Korea after a Chinese backed North Korea nearly drove South Korea's army into the ocean? And we could have pushed all the way into North Korea at the time, but didn't because we knew China would become directly involved. And what it cost the president at the time to stop the war from continuing.

The modern stuff is separate from the relationship between both countries. If you look at my first reply, the first sentence refers to the US in general. The second one wonders about the relationship part. The more modern stuff is mostly irrelevant to what NK thinks/uses.
I'm not going to post something more lengthy here, seeing as some users seem to be pretty...eh. It's actually pretty simple. The US gives the premise and basis by committing tons of atrocities, the NK regime builds on that, uses it. The US does more bad stuff elsewhere which can also be used, hence "mostly". So the hate has a solid ground and is well-justified but the regime keeps it alive (it has been quite some time after all) and tries to fuel it as that also supports them.

Your argument is nonsensical as it relates to this discussion. What the US has done throughout its short history is well documented and those who care to know, know. What does this have to do with anything US-NK related as of this moment? You can supplant US for Britain and have the same argument. Or interject Japan and Nanking. What is your point alluding to?

You seem to also ignore the original statement Zaros made to which I replied. I pointed out that in "the great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity", the US is, if anything, actually the worse party.

Also, I got warned because I used "lazy ignorant". Interesting.


I'm Sorry but how is the US worse than a Slave state regime that locks you up and your entire family in a labour/concentration camp for speaking out in anyway different from the Regime way of thinking. A regime that starves its people to feed its military, a regime that will kill anyone who tries to leave, that has essentially brainwashed millions of people.

I don't understand what kind of warped world view you have to have to think North Korea is in any way or measure better than the US.


They have so much less money and resources than us but they still make sure everyone has somewhere to live. Meanwhile we have billionaires complaining about $50m/yr to help so people don't sleep under bridges and on the street. (that one meets your restrictions)

People repeat the propaganda about the camps, but they seem to forget the US has prisons full of prisoners where they just took things like cannabis and used it to justify their political imprisonment. The war on drugs was the US's way to crack down on political dissidents, then lock them up, and work em until they break.

A lot of the "America is Better" is just us spending more money on the whole thing to make it more palatable. No question the US has killed more civilians than NK. Especially when you count the ones we kill around the world.

I am positive NK is better than most here perceive it and the US worse than they want to believe.

Every country has prisons. The US has more and the reasons people go are multifaceted. The War on Drugs was racially motivated and carried out by closet racists to break the PoC family and keep them from moving economically forward. A lot of broken homes were created and continue to be, because of it. Whereas, NK will lock you up for disagreeing with their views and whatever else they have going on in there.

The billionaires are free to do with their money as they feel. The US government cannot compel them to. The only way that gets fixed is to fix the tax code, which we both know will never happen. The US government can reduce aide to foreign nations and reduce the MIC, but we also know that won't happen any time soon.

The US is taken off of the world stage, how many civilians are killed? This is a sticky topic because it takes into account a lot of what-if statements or this-then-that statements. I would tread carefully.

I have never been to NK but from reports, the quality of life is about par for a mid-size city for the entire country of NK. When you're using human feces as fertilizer, it can't be all that great.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say now?

It seems you understand how people can think the gap between the two morally and ethically isn't that large even if you swallow the western propaganda about NK whole without any thought.

On June 13 2018 06:19 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 05:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 04:14 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 03:03 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:51 oBlade wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:21 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 01:44 Aveng3r wrote:
On June 12 2018 22:01 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
Why? If anything, the US is the worse party here. I also doubt they will ever apologize for what they have done to NK because, hey, they are the "good guys".

Would you care to explain this statement?


On June 13 2018 01:56 Zaros wrote:
On June 12 2018 22:01 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
Why? If anything, the US is the worse party here. I also doubt they will ever apologize for what they have done to NK because, hey, they are the "good guys".


What the US has done? Communism and brutal dictatorship has reduced North Korea to what it is. The US just garuntees the independence of the south and sanctions the north as it would any country going for nukes

Apart from this partly being a general statement and putting all of the other US stuff aside (ranging from concentration camps over human experimentation to intentionally destabilizing entire regions)...you do know why North Korea hates the US, right? You know, the war crimes they committed...completely obliterating civilian towns, destroying dams, reservoirs (and thus farmland) etc which led to mass starvation. If you really don't know that, you have to be pretty ignorant in this day and age, considering that knowledge is openly available.

North Korea hates the US because they are indoctrinated from birth into an ideology by a regime trying to cling to relevance while its neighbor is prospering. North Korea's GDP is comparable to the annual GDP growth of South Korea. The US is not the reason North Korea is poor and starving now. Your flippant mention of concentration camps which I assume is about Japanese internment in WW2, which if I were to guess your age with an average number ended at least two or almost three of your lifetimes ago, when 1% of the DPRK population at this very moment is in camps, it's a little tone-deaf, is that also the US's fault?

I think you're unknowingly trying to transplant a Vietnam mindset to the Korean peninsula which is out of place, and as far as I know Vietnam doesn't hate the US or anyway not to the degree North Korea does. Despite the larger and longer extent of US intervention in Vietnam. So something else is going on.

Which is what I just wrote in my post. GDP and being poor etc has nothing to do with anything I wrote. Well, you guessed mostly wrong. And what NK has or doesn't have is not relevant to the discussion as it's about this statement:

On June 12 2018 15:09 Zaros wrote:
Am I the only one who finds it repulsive that the so called leader of the free world will not only make a deal but a public deal and talk about their great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity?

If you want to argue that the US is in any way better than NK or even not worse, then we can continue. Otherwise, there is no point.

On June 13 2018 02:59 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:55 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:35 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:32 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
Or how about you actually inform yourself instead of being some lazy ignorant? The human experimentation stuff is well documented, as is the Korean. Same with concentration camps ranging from the more tame ones in WW2 to the ones used in the US-Philippine war. As for the destabilizing part...leaks help, as that is information you only get via that (the Syria Files are a good example for that).

Okay. Wow. So this is happening. Burden of proof is on you. You can't make a claim such as those and not have the proof to back it up.

I mentioned everything you need to know, so that it's even easier for you to look it up. If anything, if you are American, you should already know about all these things.

On June 13 2018 02:40 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:32 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
Or how about you actually inform yourself instead of being some lazy ignorant? The human experimentation stuff is well documented, as is the Korean. Same with concentration camps ranging from the more tame ones in WW2 to the ones used in the US-Philippine war. As for the destabilizing part...leaks help, as that is information you only get via that (the Syria Files are a good example for that).

So wait, are you saying that NK hates the US because of every bad thing the US did in modern history? Or all of our history? Not because we back South Korea after a Chinese backed North Korea nearly drove South Korea's army into the ocean? And we could have pushed all the way into North Korea at the time, but didn't because we knew China would become directly involved. And what it cost the president at the time to stop the war from continuing.

The modern stuff is separate from the relationship between both countries. If you look at my first reply, the first sentence refers to the US in general. The second one wonders about the relationship part. The more modern stuff is mostly irrelevant to what NK thinks/uses.
I'm not going to post something more lengthy here, seeing as some users seem to be pretty...eh. It's actually pretty simple. The US gives the premise and basis by committing tons of atrocities, the NK regime builds on that, uses it. The US does more bad stuff elsewhere which can also be used, hence "mostly". So the hate has a solid ground and is well-justified but the regime keeps it alive (it has been quite some time after all) and tries to fuel it as that also supports them.

Your argument is nonsensical as it relates to this discussion. What the US has done throughout its short history is well documented and those who care to know, know. What does this have to do with anything US-NK related as of this moment? You can supplant US for Britain and have the same argument. Or interject Japan and Nanking. What is your point alluding to?

You seem to also ignore the original statement Zaros made to which I replied. I pointed out that in "the great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity", the US is, if anything, actually the worse party.

Also, I got warned because I used "lazy ignorant". Interesting.


I'm Sorry but how is the US worse than a Slave state regime that locks you up and your entire family in a labour/concentration camp for speaking out in anyway different from the Regime way of thinking. A regime that starves its people to feed its military, a regime that will kill anyone who tries to leave, that has essentially brainwashed millions of people.

I don't understand what kind of warped world view you have to have to think North Korea is in any way or measure better than the US.


They have so much less money and resources than us but they still make sure everyone has somewhere to live. Meanwhile we have billionaires complaining about $50m/yr to help so people don't sleep under bridges and on the street. (that one meets your restrictions)

People repeat the propaganda about the camps, but they seem to forget the US has prisons full of prisoners where they just took things like cannabis and used it to justify their political imprisonment. The war on drugs was the US's way to crack down on political dissidents, then lock them up, and work em until they break.

A lot of the "America is Better" is just us spending more money on the whole thing to make it more palatable. No question the US has killed more civilians than NK. Especially when you count the ones we kill around the world.

I am positive NK is better than most here perceive it and the US worse than they want to believe.


While North Korea is probably never going to be as rich as the US the reason its poor is because its a communist/facist state before the Kims took over the North was more prosperous than the South now its the complete opposite.Trying to compare the US welfare system (or lack there of in your view) to North Korea is just sick its not propoganda read the UN report https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/CoIDPRK/Pages/ReportoftheCommissionofInquiryDPRK.aspx


It's poor because it's an enemy of capitalism with little natural resources to utilize and western imperialist powers have long been united in depriving them of everything they could.

Sorry GH but this isn't true. It's poor because it's a corrupt dictatorship with an inefficient command economy focused around massive and constant military exertions. NK has a shitton of raw materials and used to be pretty rich. They've also had access to Chinese/Russian/Soviet imports for their entire history.


You're right that it's very much a combination of factors. It's just not as if it doesn't have countless examples of what happens if your a nation in opposition of the US without sufficient military deterrents.

So when he builds a missile and demonstrates it works it's not for nothing. It's deliberately to demonstrate that they in fact, despite decades of abuse, have the capacity to defend themselves in a way that makes forcing regime change an unacceptable outcome (though Trump's rhetoric got us pretty close).

When you say their poor because of resources devoted to military endeavors you're doing it in a way that neglects the real threat they face.

We could berate a poor isolated nation for it's resource management, but we'd be better served paying a bit more attention to the plank in our own eye.

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 02:15:41
June 13 2018 02:12 GMT
#3762
Just watching the dear leaders birth celebration gives an idea of how they manage their money.

Edit: the threat they face? They never declared peace with South Korea. They have been acting like they are still at war for +60 years. For the entire time they have been push for regime change, in South Korea. Which China would think was pretty good.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24361 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 02:18:35
June 13 2018 02:17 GMT
#3763
On June 13 2018 11:12 Plansix wrote:
Just watching the dear leaders birth celebration gives an idea of how they manage their money.


You really want to compare wasteful spending? Especially wasteful military or pageantry spending? Like does it not occur to you what an oppressive argument that is. How it's similar to "look at how those people are spending their food stamps" type arguments?

This is a common problem. Lot's of people's progressive values also stop at the border of their neighborhood or country.

On June 13 2018 11:12 Plansix wrote:
Just watching the dear leaders birth celebration gives an idea of how they manage their money.

Edit: the threat they face? They never declared peace with South Korea. They have been acting like they are still at war for +60 years. For the entire time they have been push for regime change, in South Korea. Which China would think was pretty good.


Yeah the whole US wanting regime change is kinda a deal breaker. It's up to them not the US.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 02:22:05
June 13 2018 02:21 GMT
#3764
On June 13 2018 11:11 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 10:51 KwarK wrote:
On June 13 2018 06:21 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 06:16 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 05:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 04:14 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 03:03 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:51 oBlade wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:21 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 01:44 Aveng3r wrote:
[quote]
Would you care to explain this statement?


On June 13 2018 01:56 Zaros wrote:
[quote]

What the US has done? Communism and brutal dictatorship has reduced North Korea to what it is. The US just garuntees the independence of the south and sanctions the north as it would any country going for nukes

Apart from this partly being a general statement and putting all of the other US stuff aside (ranging from concentration camps over human experimentation to intentionally destabilizing entire regions)...you do know why North Korea hates the US, right? You know, the war crimes they committed...completely obliterating civilian towns, destroying dams, reservoirs (and thus farmland) etc which led to mass starvation. If you really don't know that, you have to be pretty ignorant in this day and age, considering that knowledge is openly available.

North Korea hates the US because they are indoctrinated from birth into an ideology by a regime trying to cling to relevance while its neighbor is prospering. North Korea's GDP is comparable to the annual GDP growth of South Korea. The US is not the reason North Korea is poor and starving now. Your flippant mention of concentration camps which I assume is about Japanese internment in WW2, which if I were to guess your age with an average number ended at least two or almost three of your lifetimes ago, when 1% of the DPRK population at this very moment is in camps, it's a little tone-deaf, is that also the US's fault?

I think you're unknowingly trying to transplant a Vietnam mindset to the Korean peninsula which is out of place, and as far as I know Vietnam doesn't hate the US or anyway not to the degree North Korea does. Despite the larger and longer extent of US intervention in Vietnam. So something else is going on.

Which is what I just wrote in my post. GDP and being poor etc has nothing to do with anything I wrote. Well, you guessed mostly wrong. And what NK has or doesn't have is not relevant to the discussion as it's about this statement:

On June 12 2018 15:09 Zaros wrote:
Am I the only one who finds it repulsive that the so called leader of the free world will not only make a deal but a public deal and talk about their great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity?

If you want to argue that the US is in any way better than NK or even not worse, then we can continue. Otherwise, there is no point.

On June 13 2018 02:59 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:55 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:35 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
[quote]
Okay. Wow. So this is happening. Burden of proof is on you. You can't make a claim such as those and not have the proof to back it up.

I mentioned everything you need to know, so that it's even easier for you to look it up. If anything, if you are American, you should already know about all these things.

On June 13 2018 02:40 Plansix wrote:
[quote]
So wait, are you saying that NK hates the US because of every bad thing the US did in modern history? Or all of our history? Not because we back South Korea after a Chinese backed North Korea nearly drove South Korea's army into the ocean? And we could have pushed all the way into North Korea at the time, but didn't because we knew China would become directly involved. And what it cost the president at the time to stop the war from continuing.

The modern stuff is separate from the relationship between both countries. If you look at my first reply, the first sentence refers to the US in general. The second one wonders about the relationship part. The more modern stuff is mostly irrelevant to what NK thinks/uses.
I'm not going to post something more lengthy here, seeing as some users seem to be pretty...eh. It's actually pretty simple. The US gives the premise and basis by committing tons of atrocities, the NK regime builds on that, uses it. The US does more bad stuff elsewhere which can also be used, hence "mostly". So the hate has a solid ground and is well-justified but the regime keeps it alive (it has been quite some time after all) and tries to fuel it as that also supports them.

Your argument is nonsensical as it relates to this discussion. What the US has done throughout its short history is well documented and those who care to know, know. What does this have to do with anything US-NK related as of this moment? You can supplant US for Britain and have the same argument. Or interject Japan and Nanking. What is your point alluding to?

You seem to also ignore the original statement Zaros made to which I replied. I pointed out that in "the great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity", the US is, if anything, actually the worse party.

Also, I got warned because I used "lazy ignorant". Interesting.


I'm Sorry but how is the US worse than a Slave state regime that locks you up and your entire family in a labour/concentration camp for speaking out in anyway different from the Regime way of thinking. A regime that starves its people to feed its military, a regime that will kill anyone who tries to leave, that has essentially brainwashed millions of people.

I don't understand what kind of warped world view you have to have to think North Korea is in any way or measure better than the US.


They have so much less money and resources than us but they still make sure everyone has somewhere to live. Meanwhile we have billionaires complaining about $50m/yr to help so people don't sleep under bridges and on the street. (that one meets your restrictions)

People repeat the propaganda about the camps, but they seem to forget the US has prisons full of prisoners where they just took things like cannabis and used it to justify their political imprisonment. The war on drugs was the US's way to crack down on political dissidents, then lock them up, and work em until they break.

A lot of the "America is Better" is just us spending more money on the whole thing to make it more palatable. No question the US has killed more civilians than NK. Especially when you count the ones we kill around the world.

I am positive NK is better than most here perceive it and the US worse than they want to believe.

Every country has prisons. The US has more and the reasons people go are multifaceted. The War on Drugs was racially motivated and carried out by closet racists to break the PoC family and keep them from moving economically forward. A lot of broken homes were created and continue to be, because of it. Whereas, NK will lock you up for disagreeing with their views and whatever else they have going on in there.

The billionaires are free to do with their money as they feel. The US government cannot compel them to. The only way that gets fixed is to fix the tax code, which we both know will never happen. The US government can reduce aide to foreign nations and reduce the MIC, but we also know that won't happen any time soon.

The US is taken off of the world stage, how many civilians are killed? This is a sticky topic because it takes into account a lot of what-if statements or this-then-that statements. I would tread carefully.

I have never been to NK but from reports, the quality of life is about par for a mid-size city for the entire country of NK. When you're using human feces as fertilizer, it can't be all that great.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say now?

It seems you understand how people can think the gap between the two morally and ethically isn't that large even if you swallow the western propaganda about NK whole without any thought.

On June 13 2018 06:19 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 05:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 04:14 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 03:03 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:51 oBlade wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:21 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 01:44 Aveng3r wrote:
[quote]
Would you care to explain this statement?


On June 13 2018 01:56 Zaros wrote:
[quote]

What the US has done? Communism and brutal dictatorship has reduced North Korea to what it is. The US just garuntees the independence of the south and sanctions the north as it would any country going for nukes

Apart from this partly being a general statement and putting all of the other US stuff aside (ranging from concentration camps over human experimentation to intentionally destabilizing entire regions)...you do know why North Korea hates the US, right? You know, the war crimes they committed...completely obliterating civilian towns, destroying dams, reservoirs (and thus farmland) etc which led to mass starvation. If you really don't know that, you have to be pretty ignorant in this day and age, considering that knowledge is openly available.

North Korea hates the US because they are indoctrinated from birth into an ideology by a regime trying to cling to relevance while its neighbor is prospering. North Korea's GDP is comparable to the annual GDP growth of South Korea. The US is not the reason North Korea is poor and starving now. Your flippant mention of concentration camps which I assume is about Japanese internment in WW2, which if I were to guess your age with an average number ended at least two or almost three of your lifetimes ago, when 1% of the DPRK population at this very moment is in camps, it's a little tone-deaf, is that also the US's fault?

I think you're unknowingly trying to transplant a Vietnam mindset to the Korean peninsula which is out of place, and as far as I know Vietnam doesn't hate the US or anyway not to the degree North Korea does. Despite the larger and longer extent of US intervention in Vietnam. So something else is going on.

Which is what I just wrote in my post. GDP and being poor etc has nothing to do with anything I wrote. Well, you guessed mostly wrong. And what NK has or doesn't have is not relevant to the discussion as it's about this statement:

On June 12 2018 15:09 Zaros wrote:
Am I the only one who finds it repulsive that the so called leader of the free world will not only make a deal but a public deal and talk about their great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity?

If you want to argue that the US is in any way better than NK or even not worse, then we can continue. Otherwise, there is no point.

On June 13 2018 02:59 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:55 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:35 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
[quote]
Okay. Wow. So this is happening. Burden of proof is on you. You can't make a claim such as those and not have the proof to back it up.

I mentioned everything you need to know, so that it's even easier for you to look it up. If anything, if you are American, you should already know about all these things.

On June 13 2018 02:40 Plansix wrote:
[quote]
So wait, are you saying that NK hates the US because of every bad thing the US did in modern history? Or all of our history? Not because we back South Korea after a Chinese backed North Korea nearly drove South Korea's army into the ocean? And we could have pushed all the way into North Korea at the time, but didn't because we knew China would become directly involved. And what it cost the president at the time to stop the war from continuing.

The modern stuff is separate from the relationship between both countries. If you look at my first reply, the first sentence refers to the US in general. The second one wonders about the relationship part. The more modern stuff is mostly irrelevant to what NK thinks/uses.
I'm not going to post something more lengthy here, seeing as some users seem to be pretty...eh. It's actually pretty simple. The US gives the premise and basis by committing tons of atrocities, the NK regime builds on that, uses it. The US does more bad stuff elsewhere which can also be used, hence "mostly". So the hate has a solid ground and is well-justified but the regime keeps it alive (it has been quite some time after all) and tries to fuel it as that also supports them.

Your argument is nonsensical as it relates to this discussion. What the US has done throughout its short history is well documented and those who care to know, know. What does this have to do with anything US-NK related as of this moment? You can supplant US for Britain and have the same argument. Or interject Japan and Nanking. What is your point alluding to?

You seem to also ignore the original statement Zaros made to which I replied. I pointed out that in "the great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity", the US is, if anything, actually the worse party.

Also, I got warned because I used "lazy ignorant". Interesting.


I'm Sorry but how is the US worse than a Slave state regime that locks you up and your entire family in a labour/concentration camp for speaking out in anyway different from the Regime way of thinking. A regime that starves its people to feed its military, a regime that will kill anyone who tries to leave, that has essentially brainwashed millions of people.

I don't understand what kind of warped world view you have to have to think North Korea is in any way or measure better than the US.


They have so much less money and resources than us but they still make sure everyone has somewhere to live. Meanwhile we have billionaires complaining about $50m/yr to help so people don't sleep under bridges and on the street. (that one meets your restrictions)

People repeat the propaganda about the camps, but they seem to forget the US has prisons full of prisoners where they just took things like cannabis and used it to justify their political imprisonment. The war on drugs was the US's way to crack down on political dissidents, then lock them up, and work em until they break.

A lot of the "America is Better" is just us spending more money on the whole thing to make it more palatable. No question the US has killed more civilians than NK. Especially when you count the ones we kill around the world.

I am positive NK is better than most here perceive it and the US worse than they want to believe.


While North Korea is probably never going to be as rich as the US the reason its poor is because its a communist/facist state before the Kims took over the North was more prosperous than the South now its the complete opposite.Trying to compare the US welfare system (or lack there of in your view) to North Korea is just sick its not propoganda read the UN report https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/CoIDPRK/Pages/ReportoftheCommissionofInquiryDPRK.aspx


It's poor because it's an enemy of capitalism with little natural resources to utilize and western imperialist powers have long been united in depriving them of everything they could.

Sorry GH but this isn't true. It's poor because it's a corrupt dictatorship with an inefficient command economy focused around massive and constant military exertions. NK has a shitton of raw materials and used to be pretty rich. They've also had access to Chinese/Russian/Soviet imports for their entire history.


You're right that it's very much a combination of factors. It's just not as if it doesn't have countless examples of what happens if your a nation in opposition of the US without sufficient military deterrents.

So when he builds a missile and demonstrates it works it's not for nothing. It's deliberately to demonstrate that they in fact, despite decades of abuse, have the capacity to defend themselves in a way that makes forcing regime change an unacceptable outcome (though Trump's rhetoric got us pretty close).

When you say their poor because of resources devoted to military endeavors you're doing it in a way that neglects the real threat they face.

We could berate a poor isolated nation for it's resource management, but we'd be better served paying a bit more attention to the plank in our own eye.


So what's your opinion on South Korea? Haven't seen you address them in any fashion yet.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 02:27:01
June 13 2018 02:25 GMT
#3765
You don’t seem to understand the history of North Korea. The US could have changed the regime during the Korean War(a war the US did not start and was asked to join by South Korea), but chose not to use the bomb on China to drive them out of North Korea. An unpopular move that angered the military and US public. North Korea could have declared peace at any time after that. They never did. North Korea has chosen to be like this.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24361 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 02:37:55
June 13 2018 02:31 GMT
#3766
On June 13 2018 11:21 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 11:11 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 10:51 KwarK wrote:
On June 13 2018 06:21 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 06:16 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 05:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 04:14 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 03:03 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:51 oBlade wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:21 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]

[quote]
Apart from this partly being a general statement and putting all of the other US stuff aside (ranging from concentration camps over human experimentation to intentionally destabilizing entire regions)...you do know why North Korea hates the US, right? You know, the war crimes they committed...completely obliterating civilian towns, destroying dams, reservoirs (and thus farmland) etc which led to mass starvation. If you really don't know that, you have to be pretty ignorant in this day and age, considering that knowledge is openly available.

North Korea hates the US because they are indoctrinated from birth into an ideology by a regime trying to cling to relevance while its neighbor is prospering. North Korea's GDP is comparable to the annual GDP growth of South Korea. The US is not the reason North Korea is poor and starving now. Your flippant mention of concentration camps which I assume is about Japanese internment in WW2, which if I were to guess your age with an average number ended at least two or almost three of your lifetimes ago, when 1% of the DPRK population at this very moment is in camps, it's a little tone-deaf, is that also the US's fault?

I think you're unknowingly trying to transplant a Vietnam mindset to the Korean peninsula which is out of place, and as far as I know Vietnam doesn't hate the US or anyway not to the degree North Korea does. Despite the larger and longer extent of US intervention in Vietnam. So something else is going on.

Which is what I just wrote in my post. GDP and being poor etc has nothing to do with anything I wrote. Well, you guessed mostly wrong. And what NK has or doesn't have is not relevant to the discussion as it's about this statement:

On June 12 2018 15:09 Zaros wrote:
Am I the only one who finds it repulsive that the so called leader of the free world will not only make a deal but a public deal and talk about their great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity?

If you want to argue that the US is in any way better than NK or even not worse, then we can continue. Otherwise, there is no point.

On June 13 2018 02:59 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:55 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
I mentioned everything you need to know, so that it's even easier for you to look it up. If anything, if you are American, you should already know about all these things.

[quote]
The modern stuff is separate from the relationship between both countries. If you look at my first reply, the first sentence refers to the US in general. The second one wonders about the relationship part. The more modern stuff is mostly irrelevant to what NK thinks/uses.
I'm not going to post something more lengthy here, seeing as some users seem to be pretty...eh. It's actually pretty simple. The US gives the premise and basis by committing tons of atrocities, the NK regime builds on that, uses it. The US does more bad stuff elsewhere which can also be used, hence "mostly". So the hate has a solid ground and is well-justified but the regime keeps it alive (it has been quite some time after all) and tries to fuel it as that also supports them.

Your argument is nonsensical as it relates to this discussion. What the US has done throughout its short history is well documented and those who care to know, know. What does this have to do with anything US-NK related as of this moment? You can supplant US for Britain and have the same argument. Or interject Japan and Nanking. What is your point alluding to?

You seem to also ignore the original statement Zaros made to which I replied. I pointed out that in "the great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity", the US is, if anything, actually the worse party.

Also, I got warned because I used "lazy ignorant". Interesting.


I'm Sorry but how is the US worse than a Slave state regime that locks you up and your entire family in a labour/concentration camp for speaking out in anyway different from the Regime way of thinking. A regime that starves its people to feed its military, a regime that will kill anyone who tries to leave, that has essentially brainwashed millions of people.

I don't understand what kind of warped world view you have to have to think North Korea is in any way or measure better than the US.


They have so much less money and resources than us but they still make sure everyone has somewhere to live. Meanwhile we have billionaires complaining about $50m/yr to help so people don't sleep under bridges and on the street. (that one meets your restrictions)

People repeat the propaganda about the camps, but they seem to forget the US has prisons full of prisoners where they just took things like cannabis and used it to justify their political imprisonment. The war on drugs was the US's way to crack down on political dissidents, then lock them up, and work em until they break.

A lot of the "America is Better" is just us spending more money on the whole thing to make it more palatable. No question the US has killed more civilians than NK. Especially when you count the ones we kill around the world.

I am positive NK is better than most here perceive it and the US worse than they want to believe.

Every country has prisons. The US has more and the reasons people go are multifaceted. The War on Drugs was racially motivated and carried out by closet racists to break the PoC family and keep them from moving economically forward. A lot of broken homes were created and continue to be, because of it. Whereas, NK will lock you up for disagreeing with their views and whatever else they have going on in there.

The billionaires are free to do with their money as they feel. The US government cannot compel them to. The only way that gets fixed is to fix the tax code, which we both know will never happen. The US government can reduce aide to foreign nations and reduce the MIC, but we also know that won't happen any time soon.

The US is taken off of the world stage, how many civilians are killed? This is a sticky topic because it takes into account a lot of what-if statements or this-then-that statements. I would tread carefully.

I have never been to NK but from reports, the quality of life is about par for a mid-size city for the entire country of NK. When you're using human feces as fertilizer, it can't be all that great.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say now?

It seems you understand how people can think the gap between the two morally and ethically isn't that large even if you swallow the western propaganda about NK whole without any thought.

On June 13 2018 06:19 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 05:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 04:14 Zaros wrote:
On June 13 2018 03:03 Lucumo wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:51 oBlade wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:21 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]

[quote]
Apart from this partly being a general statement and putting all of the other US stuff aside (ranging from concentration camps over human experimentation to intentionally destabilizing entire regions)...you do know why North Korea hates the US, right? You know, the war crimes they committed...completely obliterating civilian towns, destroying dams, reservoirs (and thus farmland) etc which led to mass starvation. If you really don't know that, you have to be pretty ignorant in this day and age, considering that knowledge is openly available.

North Korea hates the US because they are indoctrinated from birth into an ideology by a regime trying to cling to relevance while its neighbor is prospering. North Korea's GDP is comparable to the annual GDP growth of South Korea. The US is not the reason North Korea is poor and starving now. Your flippant mention of concentration camps which I assume is about Japanese internment in WW2, which if I were to guess your age with an average number ended at least two or almost three of your lifetimes ago, when 1% of the DPRK population at this very moment is in camps, it's a little tone-deaf, is that also the US's fault?

I think you're unknowingly trying to transplant a Vietnam mindset to the Korean peninsula which is out of place, and as far as I know Vietnam doesn't hate the US or anyway not to the degree North Korea does. Despite the larger and longer extent of US intervention in Vietnam. So something else is going on.

Which is what I just wrote in my post. GDP and being poor etc has nothing to do with anything I wrote. Well, you guessed mostly wrong. And what NK has or doesn't have is not relevant to the discussion as it's about this statement:

On June 12 2018 15:09 Zaros wrote:
Am I the only one who finds it repulsive that the so called leader of the free world will not only make a deal but a public deal and talk about their great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity?

If you want to argue that the US is in any way better than NK or even not worse, then we can continue. Otherwise, there is no point.

On June 13 2018 02:59 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On June 13 2018 02:55 Lucumo wrote:
[quote]
I mentioned everything you need to know, so that it's even easier for you to look it up. If anything, if you are American, you should already know about all these things.

[quote]
The modern stuff is separate from the relationship between both countries. If you look at my first reply, the first sentence refers to the US in general. The second one wonders about the relationship part. The more modern stuff is mostly irrelevant to what NK thinks/uses.
I'm not going to post something more lengthy here, seeing as some users seem to be pretty...eh. It's actually pretty simple. The US gives the premise and basis by committing tons of atrocities, the NK regime builds on that, uses it. The US does more bad stuff elsewhere which can also be used, hence "mostly". So the hate has a solid ground and is well-justified but the regime keeps it alive (it has been quite some time after all) and tries to fuel it as that also supports them.

Your argument is nonsensical as it relates to this discussion. What the US has done throughout its short history is well documented and those who care to know, know. What does this have to do with anything US-NK related as of this moment? You can supplant US for Britain and have the same argument. Or interject Japan and Nanking. What is your point alluding to?

You seem to also ignore the original statement Zaros made to which I replied. I pointed out that in "the great relationship with a mass murderer with crimes against humanity", the US is, if anything, actually the worse party.

Also, I got warned because I used "lazy ignorant". Interesting.


I'm Sorry but how is the US worse than a Slave state regime that locks you up and your entire family in a labour/concentration camp for speaking out in anyway different from the Regime way of thinking. A regime that starves its people to feed its military, a regime that will kill anyone who tries to leave, that has essentially brainwashed millions of people.

I don't understand what kind of warped world view you have to have to think North Korea is in any way or measure better than the US.


They have so much less money and resources than us but they still make sure everyone has somewhere to live. Meanwhile we have billionaires complaining about $50m/yr to help so people don't sleep under bridges and on the street. (that one meets your restrictions)

People repeat the propaganda about the camps, but they seem to forget the US has prisons full of prisoners where they just took things like cannabis and used it to justify their political imprisonment. The war on drugs was the US's way to crack down on political dissidents, then lock them up, and work em until they break.

A lot of the "America is Better" is just us spending more money on the whole thing to make it more palatable. No question the US has killed more civilians than NK. Especially when you count the ones we kill around the world.

I am positive NK is better than most here perceive it and the US worse than they want to believe.


While North Korea is probably never going to be as rich as the US the reason its poor is because its a communist/facist state before the Kims took over the North was more prosperous than the South now its the complete opposite.Trying to compare the US welfare system (or lack there of in your view) to North Korea is just sick its not propoganda read the UN report https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/CoIDPRK/Pages/ReportoftheCommissionofInquiryDPRK.aspx


It's poor because it's an enemy of capitalism with little natural resources to utilize and western imperialist powers have long been united in depriving them of everything they could.

Sorry GH but this isn't true. It's poor because it's a corrupt dictatorship with an inefficient command economy focused around massive and constant military exertions. NK has a shitton of raw materials and used to be pretty rich. They've also had access to Chinese/Russian/Soviet imports for their entire history.


You're right that it's very much a combination of factors. It's just not as if it doesn't have countless examples of what happens if your a nation in opposition of the US without sufficient military deterrents.

So when he builds a missile and demonstrates it works it's not for nothing. It's deliberately to demonstrate that they in fact, despite decades of abuse, have the capacity to defend themselves in a way that makes forcing regime change an unacceptable outcome (though Trump's rhetoric got us pretty close).

When you say their poor because of resources devoted to military endeavors you're doing it in a way that neglects the real threat they face.

We could berate a poor isolated nation for it's resource management, but we'd be better served paying a bit more attention to the plank in our own eye.


So what's your opinion on South Korea? Haven't seen you address them in any fashion yet.


I think they were critical in bringing about the positive changes we're moving toward, want to see a unified Korea, and are probably poisoned with capitalism to a degree that they will exploit the shit out of the North Koreans with our help.

I'm hoping not and instead Korea ends up with a Democratic socialist bend on a path toward more socialist "non-reformist reforms" across a unified Korea.

NK has been stubborn and shown unbreakable resolve for decades though so it's quite possible it goes the way I prefer even if it's up against what seems like impossible opposition.

On June 13 2018 11:25 Plansix wrote:
You don’t seem to understand the history of North Korea. The US could have changed the regime during the Korean War(a war the US did not start and was asked to join by South Korea), but chose not to use the bomb on China to drive them out of North Korea. An unpopular move that angered the military and US public. North Korea could have declared peace at any time after that. They never did. North Korea has chosen to be like this.


I'm familiar, I have elderly family members that tell the story what feels like every family gathering.

Simply "declaring peace" wasn't really an option considering the US would go on to assassinate leaders, fund coups, and just bomb the hell out of other countries which refused to bow to US imperialism. All the US wanted was them to let their guard down.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
June 13 2018 02:34 GMT
#3767
I feel like I'm getting some bizarro world history of the Korean peninsula.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24361 Posts
June 13 2018 02:40 GMT
#3768
On June 13 2018 11:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
I feel like I'm getting some bizarro world history of the Korean peninsula.


That's what you've been getting your whole life from western imperialist outlets that convinced you he's a mad man dictator that with no sensible reason to think the US wants to remove his government and replace it with a pro-US imperialist puppet regime and so on.

That's where Trump came in. He doesn't understand any of it either which is why it was so easy to get what they were after.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 02:44:22
June 13 2018 02:42 GMT
#3769
On June 13 2018 11:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
I feel like I'm getting some bizarro world history of the Korean peninsula.

I don’t think he knows the history of Korea or the political aims of the regime. That north and South Korea are a result of China backing some regime change in Korea. And the North Korea kept the war alive long after the DMZ was established to control its people and keep the hope alive of one day finishing the invasion. That South Korea willing placed land mines in their own country to protect themselves from potential invasion. That North Korea’s main goal for for 50 years has been to sit at a table with an American President as equals.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
June 13 2018 02:52 GMT
#3770
On June 13 2018 11:40 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 11:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
I feel like I'm getting some bizarro world history of the Korean peninsula.


That's what you've been getting your whole life from western imperialist outlets that convinced you he's a mad man dictator that with no sensible reason to think the US wants to remove his government and replace it with a pro-US imperialist puppet regime and so on.

That's where Trump came in. He doesn't understand any of it either which is why it was so easy to get what they were after.

Which is why I asked you about South Korea, because apparently to you the entire peninsula just exists between the US and North Korea. Let alone the other country actually on the peninsula, and the three other major players who controlled it and shaped its current history.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24361 Posts
June 13 2018 02:55 GMT
#3771
On June 13 2018 11:42 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 11:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
I feel like I'm getting some bizarro world history of the Korean peninsula.

I don’t think he knows the history of Korea or the political aims of the regime. That north and South Korea are a result of China backing some regime change in Korea. And the North Korea kept the war alive long after the DMZ was established to control its people and keep the hope alive of one day finishing the invasion. That South Korea willing placed land mines in their own country to protect themselves from potential invasion. That North Korea’s main goal for for 50 years has been to sit at a table with an American President as equals.


I'm familiar. Probably more than I should be thanks to some peculiar interests as a younger person but I know this story.

It was one front among many in the 'cold war' that followed WWII. What the cold war was about is whole other ball of wax I don't think we're going to unpack here if we're already getting lost in the weeds by maybe feigning, maybe real, ignorance and condescending distractions like this.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
June 13 2018 03:20 GMT
#3772
So, like, the repeated assassination attempts on South Korean leaders was a joke or something? And the mandatory South Korean military enlistment is just for fun?

I'm legit interested to see how far down the rabbit hole the western propaganda explanation goes.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44313 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 03:33:28
June 13 2018 03:30 GMT
#3773
On June 13 2018 11:42 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 11:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
I feel like I'm getting some bizarro world history of the Korean peninsula.

I don’t think he knows the history of Korea or the political aims of the regime. That north and South Korea are a result of China backing some regime change in Korea. And the North Korea kept the war alive long after the DMZ was established to control its people and keep the hope alive of one day finishing the invasion. That South Korea willing placed land mines in their own country to protect themselves from potential invasion. That North Korea’s main goal for for 50 years has been to sit at a table with an American President as equals.

Soviet Union, not China. Chinese intervention came when the UN started winning the Korean war, but North Korea was a Soviet Stalinist proxy state, not Chinese Maoist. They invaded with tacit Soviet support. Actual Soviet intervention was off the table though because it's a Cold War, not a hot one.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44313 Posts
June 13 2018 03:32 GMT
#3774
On June 13 2018 11:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
Simply "declaring peace" wasn't really an option considering the US would go on to assassinate leaders, fund coups, and just bomb the hell out of other countries which refused to bow to US imperialism. All the US wanted was them to let their guard down.

Japan declared peace on the US. Italy declared peace on the US. Germany declared peace on the US. Austria too. Norway. The Vichy French. Declaring peace on the US has actually gone really well for the nations that have done it. Especially when compared with not declaring peace.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
June 13 2018 03:34 GMT
#3775
On June 13 2018 12:30 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 11:42 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2018 11:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
I feel like I'm getting some bizarro world history of the Korean peninsula.

I don’t think he knows the history of Korea or the political aims of the regime. That north and South Korea are a result of China backing some regime change in Korea. And the North Korea kept the war alive long after the DMZ was established to control its people and keep the hope alive of one day finishing the invasion. That South Korea willing placed land mines in their own country to protect themselves from potential invasion. That North Korea’s main goal for for 50 years has been to sit at a table with an American President as equals.

Soviet Union, not China. Chinese intervention came when the UN started winning the Korean war, but North Korea was a Soviet Stalinist proxy state, not Chinese Maoist. They invaded with tacit Soviet support. Actual Soviet intervention was off the table though because it's a Cold War, not a hot one.

China didn't directly intervene until later in the war, but they backed N. Korea at the start.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44313 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 03:51:17
June 13 2018 03:44 GMT
#3776
On June 13 2018 12:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 12:30 KwarK wrote:
On June 13 2018 11:42 Plansix wrote:
On June 13 2018 11:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
I feel like I'm getting some bizarro world history of the Korean peninsula.

I don’t think he knows the history of Korea or the political aims of the regime. That north and South Korea are a result of China backing some regime change in Korea. And the North Korea kept the war alive long after the DMZ was established to control its people and keep the hope alive of one day finishing the invasion. That South Korea willing placed land mines in their own country to protect themselves from potential invasion. That North Korea’s main goal for for 50 years has been to sit at a table with an American President as equals.

Soviet Union, not China. Chinese intervention came when the UN started winning the Korean war, but North Korea was a Soviet Stalinist proxy state, not Chinese Maoist. They invaded with tacit Soviet support. Actual Soviet intervention was off the table though because it's a Cold War, not a hot one.

China didn't directly intervene until later in the war, but they backed N. Korea at the start.

In the sense that China was an ally of the Soviet Union, sure. But the North was using MiG-15s with Russian pilots in them, not Chinese. The North was dancing to Moscow's tune.

If you go back to WWII, before PRC existed, NK was the land grabbed by the Soviet Union from the surrendering Japanese. North and South Korea, and the Korean war, can be laid at the feet of post WWII geopolitics and the Soviet Union pushing NK to make a power play. We have two Koreans because of the Soviets, we have a Korean war because of the Soviets, we still have two Koreas today because of the Chinese.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24361 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-13 04:00:10
June 13 2018 03:58 GMT
#3777
On June 13 2018 12:32 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 11:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
Simply "declaring peace" wasn't really an option considering the US would go on to assassinate leaders, fund coups, and just bomb the hell out of other countries which refused to bow to US imperialism. All the US wanted was them to let their guard down.

Japan declared peace on the US. Italy declared peace on the US. Germany declared peace on the US. Austria too. Norway. The Vichy French. Declaring peace on the US has actually gone really well for the nations that have done it. Especially when compared with not declaring peace.


I'd make a joke about how declaring peace on their masters worked out better for slaves than ones that didn't but I fear the humor would be mistranslated by far too many people.

So I'll just say, com'on Japan!? Like holy shit, we were burning 100's of thousands of their civilians alive. Vaporized and poisoned more with a weapon that could have ended the world. It's not like Japan had a real choice.

Granted attacking us was their own stupid mistake. We probably would have been content to split the world between Japan, Germany and ourselves.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44313 Posts
June 13 2018 04:12 GMT
#3778
On June 13 2018 12:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 12:32 KwarK wrote:
On June 13 2018 11:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
Simply "declaring peace" wasn't really an option considering the US would go on to assassinate leaders, fund coups, and just bomb the hell out of other countries which refused to bow to US imperialism. All the US wanted was them to let their guard down.

Japan declared peace on the US. Italy declared peace on the US. Germany declared peace on the US. Austria too. Norway. The Vichy French. Declaring peace on the US has actually gone really well for the nations that have done it. Especially when compared with not declaring peace.


I'd make a joke about how declaring peace on their masters worked out better for slaves than ones that didn't but I fear the humor would be mistranslated by far too many people.

So I'll just say, com'on Japan!? Like holy shit, we were burning 100's of thousands of their civilians alive. Vaporized and poisoned more with a weapon that could have ended the world. It's not like Japan had a real choice.

Granted attacking us was their own stupid mistake. We probably would have been content to split the world between Japan, Germany and ourselves.

Yeah, Japan. Making peace worked out pretty well for them.

You can't argue that the reason NK was unwilling to stop being a repressive dictatorship built around the worship of the descendants of the original despot for all these years is because of the sad fate of all the nations that stopped WWII era grudges against the US. There aren't any examples of that, only examples to the contrary. The leadership didn't want to stop being a military dictatorship because the leaders of military dictatorships generally like being leaders of military dictatorships. They weren't afraid that the US was going to slaughter the civilians and just needed a peace treaty to get away with it, they were afraid their civilians were going to slaughter them without the pretense of a 1984 style enemy.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24361 Posts
June 13 2018 04:24 GMT
#3779
On June 13 2018 13:12 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 12:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 12:32 KwarK wrote:
On June 13 2018 11:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
Simply "declaring peace" wasn't really an option considering the US would go on to assassinate leaders, fund coups, and just bomb the hell out of other countries which refused to bow to US imperialism. All the US wanted was them to let their guard down.

Japan declared peace on the US. Italy declared peace on the US. Germany declared peace on the US. Austria too. Norway. The Vichy French. Declaring peace on the US has actually gone really well for the nations that have done it. Especially when compared with not declaring peace.


I'd make a joke about how declaring peace on their masters worked out better for slaves than ones that didn't but I fear the humor would be mistranslated by far too many people.

So I'll just say, com'on Japan!? Like holy shit, we were burning 100's of thousands of their civilians alive. Vaporized and poisoned more with a weapon that could have ended the world. It's not like Japan had a real choice.

Granted attacking us was their own stupid mistake. We probably would have been content to split the world between Japan, Germany and ourselves.

Yeah, Japan. Making peace worked out pretty well for them.

You can't argue that the reason NK was unwilling to stop being a repressive dictatorship built around the worship of the descendants of the original despot for all these years is because of the sad fate of all the nations that stopped WWII era grudges against the US. There aren't any examples of that, only examples to the contrary. The leadership didn't want to stop being a military dictatorship because the leaders of military dictatorships generally like being leaders of military dictatorships. They weren't afraid that the US was going to slaughter the civilians and just needed a peace treaty to get away with it, they were afraid their civilians were going to slaughter them without the pretense of a 1984 style enemy.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say? My point was that they couldn't be allies with the US and maintain self-determination. The US demanded governments around the world abandon socialist/communist ideologies or face assassination, coup, or bombing. It wouldn't have mattered if they democratically decided to be communist or got there through civil war. So long as they were any shade of communist they were an enemy.

You say "1984 style enemy" like the US wasn't going around upending entire countries to oust communist political powers.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44313 Posts
June 13 2018 04:33 GMT
#3780
On June 13 2018 13:24 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2018 13:12 KwarK wrote:
On June 13 2018 12:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 13 2018 12:32 KwarK wrote:
On June 13 2018 11:31 GreenHorizons wrote:
Simply "declaring peace" wasn't really an option considering the US would go on to assassinate leaders, fund coups, and just bomb the hell out of other countries which refused to bow to US imperialism. All the US wanted was them to let their guard down.

Japan declared peace on the US. Italy declared peace on the US. Germany declared peace on the US. Austria too. Norway. The Vichy French. Declaring peace on the US has actually gone really well for the nations that have done it. Especially when compared with not declaring peace.


I'd make a joke about how declaring peace on their masters worked out better for slaves than ones that didn't but I fear the humor would be mistranslated by far too many people.

So I'll just say, com'on Japan!? Like holy shit, we were burning 100's of thousands of their civilians alive. Vaporized and poisoned more with a weapon that could have ended the world. It's not like Japan had a real choice.

Granted attacking us was their own stupid mistake. We probably would have been content to split the world between Japan, Germany and ourselves.

Yeah, Japan. Making peace worked out pretty well for them.

You can't argue that the reason NK was unwilling to stop being a repressive dictatorship built around the worship of the descendants of the original despot for all these years is because of the sad fate of all the nations that stopped WWII era grudges against the US. There aren't any examples of that, only examples to the contrary. The leadership didn't want to stop being a military dictatorship because the leaders of military dictatorships generally like being leaders of military dictatorships. They weren't afraid that the US was going to slaughter the civilians and just needed a peace treaty to get away with it, they were afraid their civilians were going to slaughter them without the pretense of a 1984 style enemy.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say? My point was that they couldn't be allies with the US and maintain self-determination. The US demanded governments around the world abandon socialist/communist ideologies or face assassination, coup, or bombing. It wouldn't have mattered if they democratically decided to be communist or got there through civil war. So long as they were any shade of communist they were an enemy.

You say "1984 style enemy" like the US wasn't going around upending entire countries to oust communist political powers.

Presumably the Philippines lacks self determination. Vietnam too. China obviously.

Again, the historical evidence is pretty clear. The US mostly just wants to open sweatshops in your country and use your natural resources. Beyond that they really don't give a shit. Hell, the UK was openly run by socialists for a few decades after WWII. Spain was run by fascists.

The idea that NK couldn't make peace because the US were dying to oppress them the moment the glorious people's army let their guard down is absurd. The only thing the US were dying to do is open McDonalds in there. That's how they get you.

How do you manage to fit China into your absurd "the US is driven by an ideological need to destroy all communist-in-name-only states" narrative?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Prev 1 187 188 189 190 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
11:00
WardiTV 10, Group B
IntoTheiNu 875
WardiTV866
ComeBackTV 367
Rex120
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Rex 120
BRAT_OK 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 44710
Mini 898
GuemChi 625
Shuttle 586
Light 512
Stork 307
Last 277
ggaemo 210
firebathero 112
HiyA 93
[ Show more ]
Barracks 56
sorry 35
soO 27
ToSsGirL 27
NaDa 22
JulyZerg 11
NotJumperer 10
Icarus 5
Dota 2
Gorgc6044
qojqva1254
BananaSlamJamma142
Counter-Strike
markeloff491
Other Games
B2W.Neo842
hiko609
Lowko367
crisheroes315
DeMusliM242
Mlord228
XBOCT181
Hui .170
Liquid`VortiX142
Mew2King64
QueenE54
Codebar1
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream11635
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 325
lovetv 12
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile18
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis2408
• Jankos2407
• TFBlade697
Other Games
• WagamamaTV227
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
9h 56m
WardiTV Invitational
20h 56m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 13h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 19h
GSL
2 days
Yamato Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.