Now I haven't watched either of these for a long time. Maybe like 10 years or so, but I recall animal planet was... a nature channel.. they had documentaries about the rain forest and lions and stuff. That's a pretty far from star trek mermaiks. Mixing sci fi and documentaries only serves to give the network a bad rep I think.
Mermaids: The Bodies Found - Page 4
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Euronyme
Sweden3804 Posts
Now I haven't watched either of these for a long time. Maybe like 10 years or so, but I recall animal planet was... a nature channel.. they had documentaries about the rain forest and lions and stuff. That's a pretty far from star trek mermaiks. Mixing sci fi and documentaries only serves to give the network a bad rep I think. | ||
|
CajunMan
United States823 Posts
Amirite? | ||
|
Euronyme
Sweden3804 Posts
On August 13 2012 11:08 CajunMan wrote: Since man first laid eyes on the sea was it not his first dream to bang hot underwater chicks?!?! Amirite? I think you're fairly alone in the fetish of wanting to bang a girl who's a fish under the navel. | ||
|
omnic
United States188 Posts
On August 13 2012 11:08 CajunMan wrote: Since man first laid eyes on the sea was it not his first dream to bang hot underwater chicks?!?! Amirite? Maybe captain kirk went back in time in the star trek film to actually get some of that mermaid action and the whole "save the whales" thing was just an excuse? We'll find out in the next part of the documentary! | ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
Guys, don't waste your time here, everyone are paid actors. What a scam. | ||
|
Cornstyle
United States147 Posts
| ||
|
TALegion
United States1187 Posts
On August 13 2012 06:54 Euronyme wrote: Yeah one of my best friends started talking about aliens after watching the history channel shit.. I wish schools were better at teaching scepticism :/ I had to explain to a friend of mine why the idea that we're an alien-ape genetic hybrid is fucking stupid. The history channel shouldn't be allowed to be called that anymore... | ||
|
xwoGworwaTsx
United States984 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:31 Coagulation wrote: Not that I have any knowledge about the subject but I was always under the impression that our ancestors evolved from some form of aquatic type creature. doesnt that explain the webbed feet gene that pops up now and then in people today and the way our hands have webbings between the fingers? Go back to the monster thread and draw mermaid monsters! No time for you to linger here!! Give them a propeller at the end of the tail and torpedoes shooting out from docks in their chest. Better replace the arms with enormous crab-like clams as well. I leave the choice between shark-mouth or pretty girl face to you. Also, I don't believe in nonsense like mermaids, as they would swim under the ice at the end of the flat earth and fall off. | ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
| ||
|
Tewks44
United States2032 Posts
| ||
|
danbel1005
United States1319 Posts
On August 13 2012 05:15 Antisocialmunky wrote: I think it just failed all around. It is a bad fauxumentary, a silly subject matter, and has both crappy CGI and a terribad story. Atleast the dragon one had a freaking dragon fighting a T-Rex. I remember the dragon one, dunno about the t-rex tho. Still, this mermaid documentary thing was just silly and boring. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
| ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
On August 13 2012 14:17 Cascade wrote: Omg, first the dinosaurs series, then this entire story with the neanderthals and now mermaids... People will believe in any fictional being as long as it's presented as "science" it seems... No wonder the children of today grow up without proper values for right and wrong. I'm not familiar, what did they do to dinosaurs and neanderthals ? | ||
|
GrapeApe
1053 Posts
Also, 'the bloop.' Now, I don't know what the show said about it, but being big into Cryptozoology I've heard about 'the bloop' a lot. It's actually a pretty interesting topic, and a very curious noise, but I don't understand what it has to do with mermaids. The reason the bloop became famous because of this story (correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't brushed up on my bloop history in awhile.) US ship/sub picks up a sound, a "bloop" on their radio/sonar equipment. They analyze and and determine that it is biological in nature (produced by some sort of animal, similar to a whale I guess), only whatever animal created the sound would have to be the largest animal on the planet. And it came from the depths. So, I wrote all that and then went to wiki and realized I could just do this BLOOP BLOOP | ||
|
dudeman001
United States2412 Posts
Want me to respect you again, Animal Planet? Find some mermaid bodies... Come on, back your claim. | ||
|
AlphaWhale
Australia328 Posts
| ||
|
GrapeApe
1053 Posts
On August 13 2012 14:42 dudeman001 wrote: I thought spreading information was based upon evidence and concreteness, not a theory backed by no actual science. Especially with a title like "Mermaids: The Bodies Found." Which is the exact fucking opposite of what they have lol. Want me to respect you again, Animal Planet? Find some mermaid bodies... Come on, back your claim. All went down hill because of that goddamn sting ray, man. No Steve Irwin, no respect. | ||
|
Tewks44
United States2032 Posts
On August 13 2012 14:47 AlphaWhale wrote: Where's the third option that says "Sly way to build hype for the blu-ray re-release of "The Little Mermaid"? omg, is discovery communications owned by disney? that would be hilarious | ||
|
cydial
United States750 Posts
| ||
| ||