• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:28
CEST 20:28
KST 03:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy3uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event14Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple5SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event Rogue Talks: "Koreans could dominate again" Lambo Talks: The Future of SC2 and more... RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo) ByuN vs TaeJa Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Global Tourney for College Students in September RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL20 Pre-season Tier List ranking! BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups
Tourneys
KCM 2025 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 652 users

Boston Mayor vows to ban Chick-Fil-A from his city - Page 55

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 53 54 55 56 57 69 Next
HTOMario
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States439 Posts
July 28 2012 02:36 GMT
#1081
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.
GM Mech T
sinii
Profile Joined August 2010
England989 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-28 02:39:09
July 28 2012 02:38 GMT
#1082
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


My logic is fine, your the one with the 'limited mind'.
HTOMario
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States439 Posts
July 28 2012 02:38 GMT
#1083
On July 28 2012 11:35 overt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


Having bad eye sight is not good for evolution either. Doesn't mean we should kill off or subjugate or oppress everyone who has poor eye sight.

Evolution seeks to transmit the best traits to the next generation. This happens because the creatures with the bad traits do not survive as well as the creatures with the good traits and as such creatures with good traits reproduce more and the species is kept alive by bad traits going away and good traits flourishing.

Being gay isn't a negative trait though. It doesn't effect an individuals chances of survival in the wild nearly as much as poor eye sight does.

edit:
And, because I think I missed my point, humans don't even live in the wild. Most of us live in what might as well be described as a controlled environment. Being gay or bad eye sight or brown hair isn't going to make us prey nor is it going to shorten our lives.



I don't recalling asking the world to off the head from anyone whom is gay or blind. I merely said that there are a lot of genetic deficiencies that I don't believe should be able to have the same rights as other humans. I never stated that being homosexual was one of these, just that being gay could be a deficiency as we don't know enough information about it to clearly say for or otherwise.
GM Mech T
HTOMario
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States439 Posts
July 28 2012 02:39 GMT
#1084
On July 28 2012 11:38 sinii wrote:
My logic is fine, your the one with the 'limited mind'.


I can't respond to you if you aren't contributing to the conversation. I stated my thoughts and explained as to why they were my thoughts, could you do the same without trying to just insult me? ^^
GM Mech T
overt
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States9006 Posts
July 28 2012 02:40 GMT
#1085
On July 28 2012 11:38 HTOMario wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:35 overt wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


Having bad eye sight is not good for evolution either. Doesn't mean we should kill off or subjugate or oppress everyone who has poor eye sight.

Evolution seeks to transmit the best traits to the next generation. This happens because the creatures with the bad traits do not survive as well as the creatures with the good traits and as such creatures with good traits reproduce more and the species is kept alive by bad traits going away and good traits flourishing.

Being gay isn't a negative trait though. It doesn't effect an individuals chances of survival in the wild nearly as much as poor eye sight does.

edit:
And, because I think I missed my point, humans don't even live in the wild. Most of us live in what might as well be described as a controlled environment. Being gay or bad eye sight or brown hair isn't going to make us prey nor is it going to shorten our lives.



I don't recalling asking the world to off the head from anyone whom is gay or blind. I merely said that there are a lot of genetic deficiencies that I don't believe should be able to have the same rights as other humans. I never stated that being homosexual was one of these, just that being gay could be a deficiency as we don't know enough information about it to clearly say for or otherwise.


Then your guess is merely a guess lol. I haven't seen any scientist offer sound proof as to how homosexuality occurs yet. As of yet, all we know is that homosexuality happens among anywhere from 500 to 1500 species. Ours being one of them. Until we know more there's no logical or scientific reason to deny homosexuals the same rights as heterosexuals.
sinii
Profile Joined August 2010
England989 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-28 02:46:19
July 28 2012 02:44 GMT
#1086
Ok how about this, we started as this:

[image loading]


and have ended up as this:

[image loading]


All through the process of natural selection, including your 'defect genes' playing a pivotal role in it all, I'm not about to question it's methods and neither should you.
HTOMario
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States439 Posts
July 28 2012 02:44 GMT
#1087
On July 28 2012 11:40 overt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:38 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:35 overt wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


Having bad eye sight is not good for evolution either. Doesn't mean we should kill off or subjugate or oppress everyone who has poor eye sight.

Evolution seeks to transmit the best traits to the next generation. This happens because the creatures with the bad traits do not survive as well as the creatures with the good traits and as such creatures with good traits reproduce more and the species is kept alive by bad traits going away and good traits flourishing.

Being gay isn't a negative trait though. It doesn't effect an individuals chances of survival in the wild nearly as much as poor eye sight does.

edit:
And, because I think I missed my point, humans don't even live in the wild. Most of us live in what might as well be described as a controlled environment. Being gay or bad eye sight or brown hair isn't going to make us prey nor is it going to shorten our lives.



I don't recalling asking the world to off the head from anyone whom is gay or blind. I merely said that there are a lot of genetic deficiencies that I don't believe should be able to have the same rights as other humans. I never stated that being homosexual was one of these, just that being gay could be a deficiency as we don't know enough information about it to clearly say for or otherwise.


Then your guess is merely a guess lol. I haven't seen any scientist offer sound proof as to how homosexuality occurs yet. As of yet, all we know is that homosexuality happens among anywhere from 500 to 1500 species. Ours being one of them. Until we know more there's no logical or scientific reason to deny homosexuals the same rights as heterosexuals.


Minority groups have always been targeted by the majority groups, being gay is no different. People are afraid of what they don't understand or what is different, until proven one way or another there will always be discrimination to some sorts. You still see racism to this day.
GM Mech T
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
July 28 2012 02:47 GMT
#1088
On July 28 2012 11:44 sinii wrote:
All through the process of natural selection, including your 'defect genes' playing a pivotal role in it all, I'm not about to question it's methods and neither should you.

Our local adepts of eugenics respectfully disagree!
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
HTOMario
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States439 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-28 02:50:30
July 28 2012 02:48 GMT
#1089
[QUOTE]On July 28 2012 11:44 sinii wrote:
[QUOTE]On July 28 2012 11:39 HTOMario wrote:
[QUOTE]On July 28 2012 11:38 sinii wrote:
My logic is fine, your the one with the 'limited mind'.[/QUOTE]

Ok how about this, we started as this:

[img]http://www.google.com/url?source=imglanding&ct=img&q=http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/imgs/homo%20sapien%20male2.jpg&sa=X&ei=U1ETUM7LOeet0QW954HwAw&ved=0CAkQ8wc&usg=AFQjCNEOacUyZNhzy9e3RflgdL2TqcYIMw[/img]

and have ended up as this:

[img]http://www.google.com/url?source=imglanding&ct=img&q=http://www.gosugamers.net/warcraft/images/people/flash_rolster_proleague2010.jpg&sa=X&ei=0lETUOa0Fu6r0AXUhoHIAg&ved=0CAkQ8wc&usg=AFQjCNGFH9X69tNy0YNlc3N6011Q4MMj9w[/img]

All through the process of natural selection, including your 'defect genes' playing a pivotal role in it all, I'm not about to question it's methods and neither should you.[/QUOTE]

There are people born without eye sights, hearing, limbs, comprehension every single day. People born with genetic defects that cause the inability to live. We try to fix those? We try to play god in these? We certainly have the technology to do it in a lot of areas this in my view is just another category being homosexual "can" reside in if not proven otherwise.

Do we give blind men drivers licences?
Do we endorse people cutting themselves because it feels right to them?
Do we endorse people running around naked in the streets because they feel they should have the same rights based on their believes and choices?

More food for thought.
GM Mech T
TwoToneTerran
Profile Joined March 2009
United States8841 Posts
July 28 2012 02:48 GMT
#1090
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.
Remember Violet.
HTOMario
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States439 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-28 02:51:58
July 28 2012 02:51 GMT
#1091
On July 28 2012 11:48 TwoToneTerran wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.



If this turns out to be the case and we would die if we don't under populate. Don't we already have the tools for that?

Again, I'm not against gay's. I'm simply stating reasons as to why I don't fully agree with their side of the argument.
GM Mech T
TwoToneTerran
Profile Joined March 2009
United States8841 Posts
July 28 2012 02:52 GMT
#1092
On July 28 2012 11:51 HTOMario wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:48 TwoToneTerran wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.



If this turns out to be the case and we would die if we don't under populate. Don't we already have the tools for that?

Again, I'm not against gay's. I'm simply stating reasons as to why I don't fully agree with their side of the argument.


The tools for lowering population are mass murder and less reproducing. One's a bit less messy.
Remember Violet.
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
July 28 2012 02:53 GMT
#1093
On July 28 2012 11:51 HTOMario wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:48 TwoToneTerran wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.



If this turns out to be the case and we would die if we don't under populate. Don't we already have the tools for that?

We have the tools to bring the world pop to 0 in an oopsie right now. Bad things are going to happen when you decide to forcibly reduce the world population for resources.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
sinii
Profile Joined August 2010
England989 Posts
July 28 2012 02:55 GMT
#1094
On July 28 2012 11:51 HTOMario wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:48 TwoToneTerran wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.



If this turns out to be the case and we would die if we don't under populate. Don't we already have the tools for that?

Again, I'm not against gay's. I'm simply stating reasons as to why I don't fully agree with their side of the argument.


OK so what are these tools? A repeat of the holocaust?

That sounds much more humane then the method nature employs.
HTOMario
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States439 Posts
July 28 2012 02:57 GMT
#1095
On July 28 2012 11:55 sinii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:51 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:48 TwoToneTerran wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.



If this turns out to be the case and we would die if we don't under populate. Don't we already have the tools for that?

Again, I'm not against gay's. I'm simply stating reasons as to why I don't fully agree with their side of the argument.


OK so what are these tools? A repeat of the holocaust?

That sounds much more humane then the method nature employs.


There must be reasons as to why humans are so hell bent on killing each other through wars for as far back as history goes? Maybe that is natures way of reducing the population?
GM Mech T
catabowl
Profile Joined November 2009
United States815 Posts
July 28 2012 02:59 GMT
#1096
http://www.dennyburk.com/two-lies-about-chick-fil-a-perpetuated-in-the-media/

Pretty solid claim imo.
Jung! Myung! Hoooooooooooooooooon! #TeamPolt
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
July 28 2012 02:59 GMT
#1097
On July 28 2012 11:57 HTOMario wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:55 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:51 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:48 TwoToneTerran wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.



If this turns out to be the case and we would die if we don't under populate. Don't we already have the tools for that?

Again, I'm not against gay's. I'm simply stating reasons as to why I don't fully agree with their side of the argument.


OK so what are these tools? A repeat of the holocaust?

That sounds much more humane then the method nature employs.


There must be reasons as to why humans are so hell bent on killing each other through wars for as far back as history goes? Maybe that is natures way of reducing the population?

Alternatively not at all and the various reasons for killing each other are quite obvious.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
sinii
Profile Joined August 2010
England989 Posts
July 28 2012 02:59 GMT
#1098
On July 28 2012 11:57 HTOMario wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:55 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:51 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:48 TwoToneTerran wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.



If this turns out to be the case and we would die if we don't under populate. Don't we already have the tools for that?

Again, I'm not against gay's. I'm simply stating reasons as to why I don't fully agree with their side of the argument.


OK so what are these tools? A repeat of the holocaust?

That sounds much more humane then the method nature employs.


There must be reasons as to why humans are so hell bent on killing each other through wars for as far back as history goes? Maybe that is natures way of reducing the population?


Oh no I don't question that at all, fighting is a vital tool in natural selection and has been forever, in the same way homosexuality has been as well.
HTOMario
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States439 Posts
July 28 2012 03:03 GMT
#1099
On July 28 2012 11:59 sinii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2012 11:57 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:55 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:51 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:48 TwoToneTerran wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:36 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:32 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:30 HTOMario wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:29 sinii wrote:
On July 28 2012 11:20 HTOMario wrote:
Now that I think on it more, here is how I feel. If being gay is defined by a gene. I would feel like we should work on correcting this in the future with science, just like diabetes. However until then they reserve the right to be happy as well. How many rights I would give them I would have to think on. If being gay was scientifically proven to be something we just believe we are. Frankly I would feel the person would need counseling. I am not pro gay, I am pro for people being happy but also improving themselves toward a definite perfection. I may be a dreamer in believing one day we might just create utopia instead of believing a god will send us there.


Hahah funny paragraph right here. Being gay isn't a defect it's a part of evolution the same thing that made us what we are today. There's nothing wrong with it at all.


I thought evolution was to help us survive? How does being gay help us reproduce?


How do you know widespread reproduction by 100% of the population is pivotal to the survival of our species and not the recipe for extinction?


I am pretty positive that the more humans there are on earth the more chance we have of geniuses being born that can help us survive past the earth.

I am also pretty positive that a widespread non reproduction by 100% would be extinction

Not to mention the only species that are alive today ARE reproducing.

I believe you to be mocking my view and posts with a limited mind. You clearly didn't acknowledge my anti religion statement either. You're very adamant about trying to argue with the homosexual paragraph. This and you're counter posts to mine are to be fair simplistic and don't hold much merit.


What if there is no amount of genius that can solve the overpopulation problem? What if the only solution to keep our species, as a whole, surviving longer is less reproduction due to the limited resources of the planet? You can't be pretty positive about something so hopeful and lacking any basis of proof it will happen.



If this turns out to be the case and we would die if we don't under populate. Don't we already have the tools for that?

Again, I'm not against gay's. I'm simply stating reasons as to why I don't fully agree with their side of the argument.


OK so what are these tools? A repeat of the holocaust?

That sounds much more humane then the method nature employs.


There must be reasons as to why humans are so hell bent on killing each other through wars for as far back as history goes? Maybe that is natures way of reducing the population?


Oh no I don't question that at all, fighting is a vital tool in natural selection and has been forever, in the same way homosexuality has been as well.


as such is being born with genetic defects. I however am now leaving this topic as it would seem the claims for the fast food chains are incorrect.
GM Mech T
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
July 28 2012 03:04 GMT
#1100
On July 28 2012 11:59 catabowl wrote:
http://www.dennyburk.com/two-lies-about-chick-fil-a-perpetuated-in-the-media/

Pretty solid claim imo.

The first one is true, the second one is outright false and the link is to some religious website (nice source Denny Burk).

"I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, 'We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage,' and I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to try to redefine what marriage is about," -Dan Cathy
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Prev 1 53 54 55 56 57 69 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
17:00
S2: Europe Server Qualifier
CranKy Ducklings512
iHatsuTV 16
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .231
BRAT_OK 125
ProTech81
Rex 75
MindelVK 46
Stormgate
TKL 160
UpATreeSC121
Dota 2
Gorgc8447
Dendi1358
420jenkins301
Counter-Strike
fl0m2069
qojqva1874
pashabiceps571
Foxcn209
Other Games
Grubby731
ceh9618
Beastyqt473
B2W.Neo372
XaKoH 166
C9.Mang0152
ArmadaUGS150
Trikslyr53
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta14
• Reevou 5
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 2
• HerbMon 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Nemesis4850
League of Legends
• Jankos1702
• TFBlade618
Other Games
• imaqtpie1442
• Shiphtur325
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
5h 33m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
16h 33m
The PondCast
1d 15h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
SC Evo League
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
CSO Contender
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
SC Evo League
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
5 days
RotterdaM Event
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

StarCon 2025 Philadelphia
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.