|
Russian Federation748 Posts
Technically he was saying that male sexuality is all about domination and power.
You're right indeed. What I was thinking was that,you see, it may please some males to think they "dominate" women but that's only their point of view. Between males, the two partners may have whichever role they chose, and exert all their domination power as they please to obtain their favourite one, if they have one (they can also not mind I guess, I wouldn't know at all). If you're keen on women, there's no imposing any role to anyone, everything is already set out.
What useless musing, really.
|
United States41958 Posts
On June 10 2012 04:20 Kyrillion wrote:Show nested quote +Technically he was saying that male sexuality is all about domination and power. You're right indeed. What I was thinking was that,you see, it may please some males to think they "dominate" women but that's only their point of view. Between males, the two partners may have whichever role they chose, and exert all their domination power as they please to obtain their favourite one, if they have one (they can also not mind I guess, I wouldn't know at all). If you're keen on women, there's no imposing any role to anyone, everything is already set out. What useless musing, really.
It was a joke.
|
Russian Federation748 Posts
As I thought. But I must say, you're a brilliant troll, and you got me reflecting a bit.
|
Wait, atheists aren't allowed? Good thing I never told anyone when I was a kid.
|
How are 25% of all people voting no on this?
|
Russian Federation748 Posts
If I believe in Allah, can I join ?
|
On June 10 2012 04:58 Kyrillion wrote:
If I believe in Allah, can I join ?
A person of any region can join according to the scouting by laws, but be careful around the parents, in my experience they tend to be the bigoted ones, not the scouts or the leaders.
Sorry for the necro, but i though this question should be answered.
|
Private organizations should be allowed to have whatever membership rules they want.
If you don't agree with them, then don't join them or support them. A lot of people don't support the boy scouts anymore because of their membership rules.
That's freedom.
|
On June 12 2012 05:59 Zaqwert wrote:
Private organizations should be allowed to have whatever membership rules they want.
If you don't agree with them, then don't join them or support them. A lot of people don't support the boy scouts anymore because of their membership rules.
That's freedom.
I agree with this. Whether it's right or wrong to allow gay people to join doesn't matter. The Boy Scouts are a private organization and I believe that if they don't want to allow gay people that's their right.
|
On June 12 2012 09:36 OxyFuel wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 05:59 Zaqwert wrote:
Private organizations should be allowed to have whatever membership rules they want.
If you don't agree with them, then don't join them or support them. A lot of people don't support the boy scouts anymore because of their membership rules.
That's freedom. I agree with this. Whether it's right or wrong to allow gay people to join doesn't matter. The Boy Scouts are a private organization and I believe that if they don't want to allow gay people that's their right.
Then they shouldn't get federal funding.
|
On June 12 2012 09:38 Klondikebar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:36 OxyFuel wrote:On June 12 2012 05:59 Zaqwert wrote:
Private organizations should be allowed to have whatever membership rules they want.
If you don't agree with them, then don't join them or support them. A lot of people don't support the boy scouts anymore because of their membership rules.
That's freedom. I agree with this. Whether it's right or wrong to allow gay people to join doesn't matter. The Boy Scouts are a private organization and I believe that if they don't want to allow gay people that's their right. Then they shouldn't get federal funding.
why not? why should the government tell a private organization what to do and what rules to have just because they help fund them? federal funding went to planned parenthood, an organization i don't support, for a long time and continues to go to them. the Boy Scouts should be able to have their own rules and autonomy from the government, i don't care how much money they get from the feds.
|
Some people don't like the government giving money to the boy scouts, ok.
Well some people don't like the government using their money for wars they don't agree with. Or cutting welfare checks to people. Or paying for birth control, etc.
|
On June 07 2012 11:40 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 11:36 ThePiedPiper wrote:
As long as no raping occurs, im fine with anything. Second that stuff occurs, kick them out You don't have to be gay to rape someone of the same sex...
Thats hard to believe. Is this proven?
|
On June 12 2012 09:51 WightyCity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 11:40 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On June 07 2012 11:36 ThePiedPiper wrote:
As long as no raping occurs, im fine with anything. Second that stuff occurs, kick them out You don't have to be gay to rape someone of the same sex... Thats hard to believe. Is this proven?
Uhh what would constitute proof to you? Ever heard of what happens in prison? Ask some of those guys who rape people whether they consider themselves gay or not.
On June 12 2012 09:42 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:38 Klondikebar wrote:On June 12 2012 09:36 OxyFuel wrote:On June 12 2012 05:59 Zaqwert wrote:
Private organizations should be allowed to have whatever membership rules they want.
If you don't agree with them, then don't join them or support them. A lot of people don't support the boy scouts anymore because of their membership rules.
That's freedom. I agree with this. Whether it's right or wrong to allow gay people to join doesn't matter. The Boy Scouts are a private organization and I believe that if they don't want to allow gay people that's their right. Then they shouldn't get federal funding. why not? why should the government tell a private organization what to do and what rules to have just because they help fund them? federal funding went to planned parenthood, an organization i don't support, for a long time and continues to go to them. the Boy Scouts should be able to have their own rules and autonomy from the government, i don't care how much money they get from the feds.
The government can choose who it gives its money to. You can claim you "don't support" Planned Parenthood but the government stipulates none of the money is used for presumably the part you don't agree with, the abortions. Unless you don't support breast screening and general women's health issues. So actually the government is refusing to give its money to fund abortions.
|
On June 12 2012 09:51 WightyCity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2012 11:40 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On June 07 2012 11:36 ThePiedPiper wrote:
As long as no raping occurs, im fine with anything. Second that stuff occurs, kick them out You don't have to be gay to rape someone of the same sex... Thats hard to believe. Is this proven?
yes
|
On June 12 2012 09:54 diophan wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:51 WightyCity wrote:On June 07 2012 11:40 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On June 07 2012 11:36 ThePiedPiper wrote:
As long as no raping occurs, im fine with anything. Second that stuff occurs, kick them out You don't have to be gay to rape someone of the same sex... Thats hard to believe. Is this proven? Uhh what would constitute proof to you? Ever heard of what happens in prison? Ask some of those guys who rape people whether they consider themselves gay or not.
Rapists arent straight or gay then. they have theyr own catagorie named rapist.
thats pretty psychological
|
For a community that is subjected to harsh stereotypes by the mainstream of society day in and day out, the number of "no" votes is astonishing.
A federally funded institution may not discriminate on the grounds of sex, race, creed, gender, or sexual orientation.
Even if laws like Title IX don't cover every category above, the clause of non-discrimination is a fundamental American ideal since the 20th century. It's really that simple.
|
On June 12 2012 05:59 Zaqwert wrote:
Private organizations should be allowed to have whatever membership rules they want.
If you don't agree with them, then don't join them or support them. A lot of people don't support the boy scouts anymore because of their membership rules.
That's freedom.
By that logic it would be okay if the boy scouts did not allow black members.
|
On June 12 2012 10:08 hzflank wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 05:59 Zaqwert wrote:
Private organizations should be allowed to have whatever membership rules they want.
If you don't agree with them, then don't join them or support them. A lot of people don't support the boy scouts anymore because of their membership rules.
That's freedom. By that logic it would be okay if the boy scouts did not allow black members.
Yes for some people apparently freedom means an organization that receives a bunch of money from the federal government can be as bigoted as possible.
|
On June 12 2012 10:11 diophan wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 10:08 hzflank wrote:On June 12 2012 05:59 Zaqwert wrote:
Private organizations should be allowed to have whatever membership rules they want.
If you don't agree with them, then don't join them or support them. A lot of people don't support the boy scouts anymore because of their membership rules.
That's freedom. By that logic it would be okay if the boy scouts did not allow black members. Yes for some people apparently freedom means an organization that receives a bunch of money from the federal government can be as bigoted as possible.
Does it really matter if they receive money from the government?
I could setup my own business and it would be a private organisation (100% owned by me) and not receive any federal funding. I am not completely sure about the law regarding this is various US states, but here in the UK it would be illegal for my business to consider a person's sexuality (or race, etc) when hiring them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
