EPThardly opinion when I could show you gay people who are not feminine.
Gay Scout Resolution - Page 18
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
hardly opinion when I could show you gay people who are not feminine. | ||
|
sertas
Sweden878 Posts
On June 08 2012 22:52 Undrass wrote: Why. Gay people aren't necessarily more feminine. Thats a stereotype. so your saying that they arent more feminine then straight people? ok thats why ive never seen straight people wear the stuff that gay people do. Women clothes and speaking in a very feminine voice. My english isnt good enough to explain how it sounds. In general they are definently more feminine then straight people thats for sure. | ||
|
Undrass
Norway381 Posts
On June 08 2012 22:56 sertas wrote: so your saying that they arent more feminine then straight people? ok thats why ive never seen straight people wear the stuff that gay people do. Women clothes and speaking in a very feminine voice. My english isnt good enough to explain how it sounds. In general they are definently more feminine then straight people thats for sure. I don't know about you, but my two gay friends are exactly like every other male, except for their sexual orientation. | ||
|
sertas
Sweden878 Posts
On June 08 2012 22:58 Undrass wrote: I don't know about you, but my two gay friends are exactly like every other male, except for their sexual orientation. for me its the opposite ive only seen gay people talk like girls and wear girly clothes. It varies a lot apparently. | ||
|
Starshaped
Sweden575 Posts
On June 08 2012 23:08 sertas wrote: for me its the opposite ive only seen gay people talk like girls and wear girly clothes. It varies a lot apparently. How many gay people do you know? How many exist in the world? Do you see how your argument is anecdotal? Don't make sweeping statements about an entire group of people based on a few of your own experiences. Also, I dare say you've passed by a lot of gay people without even noticing it. | ||
|
Zedders
Canada450 Posts
boy scouts exist. gay boy scouts should exist | ||
|
ErAsc2
Sweden256 Posts
On June 08 2012 22:41 sertas wrote: they are boys but they are feminine boys. So let them join girls scouts. User was temp banned for this post. I'm going to go ahead and call you a troll at this point. I don't think anybody could be this ignorant and homophobic. The only way I could see you not being a troll would be if you're from the westboro baptist church. | ||
|
Alay
United States660 Posts
On June 08 2012 15:04 actionbastrd wrote: Well, ommiting gays is wrong, but this fact comes reletively new overall i think. I mean, our taxes pay for many things and not all of those things, or people rather, support gays. It is no different i think. Eventually everyone will get over themselves and being gay wont matter to anyone at all (well hopefully), but we arent there yet. It is lame tho. The tax thing would be a better fit if everyone who pays for taxes was pro gay and that is just not the case. Again, its not right, but its just one of those things that will eventually change if not right now. Not just with scouts, but with everyone While that's true, I don't think it's something citizens should actively allow to happen--a government funded/subsidized organization that actively discriminates against anyone for any reason. While it will change in time, in the mean time everyone is still paying taxes. In this particular case, anyone that's anti-gay that wants to see money go to BSA for specifically their anti-gay policies can simply donate to them (much as any white supremacist can donate to a KKK chapter... wherever those sad things still exist.) I think any person can ultimately agree that they'd be against an organization that they had to pay to fund if it was discriminatory against THEM specifically (ie; their eye color, or their hair color, or whatever reason) | ||
|
CptCutter
United Kingdom370 Posts
On June 08 2012 04:13 Dekoth wrote: Except you clearly do have something against them. Your post is contradictory. You say you have no problem, but if that were true then you wouldn't care. So obviously you have a problem, but you are just in denial about it. Being gay doesn't make someone a potential pedophile. everyone is a potential to be a pedophile. but i would wager money on a higher percentage of gays being pedophiles in this sense, since well, you have to be gay to even do this? unless your saying that teenage boys are not considered male? | ||
|
blug
Australia623 Posts
| ||
|
Mordiford
4448 Posts
On June 10 2012 01:53 CptCutter wrote: everyone is a potential to be a pedophile. but i would wager money on a higher percentage of gays being pedophiles in this sense, since well, you have to be gay to even do this? unless your saying that teenage boys are not considered male? Alright... What? You realize pedophilia is gender independent right? It's simply an attraction to children. In that sense I don't understand why you would wager a higher percentage of gays are pedophiles. Why should anyone take that statement seriously? What do you mean, "You have to be gay to even do this?". Being gay has nothing to do with pedophilia. On June 10 2012 02:00 blug wrote: I think Americans have bigger fish to fry rather than worrying about gays... This isn't adding anything. Worrying about the gays doesn't automatically make the other issues less important or even take significant resources away from other issues. Just because there are bigger issues doesn't mean you neglect everything else. | ||
KwarK
United States41959 Posts
On June 08 2012 22:56 sertas wrote: so your saying that they arent more feminine then straight people? ok thats why ive never seen straight people wear the stuff that gay people do. Women clothes and speaking in a very feminine voice. My english isnt good enough to explain how it sounds. In general they are definently more feminine then straight people thats for sure. Any man can fuck a girl, girls are generally weaker and more submissive. That takes no real skill or manliness. To exert your sexual dominance over another man though, now there's an act of masculinity, power and dominance. Pussy is for pussies. Real men fuck men. | ||
|
Gummy
United States2180 Posts
 | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
| ||
|
Gummy
United States2180 Posts
On June 10 2012 02:46 flamewheel wrote: As a long-time scout, I knew several of my fellows were gay (both troop members and coworkers at camp). Lift the ban, I say. Also, why are the boy scouts still religiously affiliated. Is there something manly about believing in a certain faith at the age of 5? :/ | ||
|
fofa2000
Canada548 Posts
| ||
|
Kyrillion
Russian Federation748 Posts
On June 08 2012 23:36 Zedders wrote: gay people exist. boy scouts exist. gay boy scouts should exist Even though you're right on that, that's logically wrong. Female people exist Boy scouts exist Female boy scouts should exist Poplar trees exist Boy scouts exist Poplar tree boy scouts should exist Any man can fuck a girl, girls are generally weaker and more submissive. That takes no real skill or manliness. To exert your sexual dominance over another man though, now there's an act of masculinity, power and dominance. Pussy is for pussies. Real men fuck men. Wait, so gay sexuality is all about domination and power ? Surely you're not serious. | ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
On June 10 2012 03:15 Kyrillion wrote: Even though you're right on that, that's logically wrong. Female people exist Boy scouts exist Female boy scouts should exist Poplar trees exist Boy scouts exist Poplar tree boy scouts should exist Wait, so gay sexuality is all about domination and power ? Surely you're not serious. For some people it is  | ||
|
DoubleReed
United States4130 Posts
On June 10 2012 03:15 Kyrillion wrote: Even though you're right on that, that's logically wrong. Female people exist Boy scouts exist Female boy scouts should exist Poplar trees exist Boy scouts exist Poplar tree boy scouts should exist Wait, so gay sexuality is all about domination and power ? Surely you're not serious. Technically he was saying that male sexuality is all about domination and power. | ||
|
FailCow
United States49 Posts
On June 10 2012 02:51 Gummy wrote: Also, why are the boy scouts still religiously affiliated. Is there something manly about believing in a certain faith at the age of 5? :/ The boy scouts isn't about masculinity and manliness. Its founded on religious morals and becoming a good citizen. For example, the Scout Oath is: On my honor I will do my best To do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; To help other people at all times; To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight. The Scout Law is: A Scout is trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent. Clean includes not only physical attributes, but mental and sexual attributes. Reverent as quoted from the Official BSA website means: "A Scout is reverent toward God. He is faithful in his religious duties. He respects the beliefs of others." | ||
| ||
