• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:55
CEST 19:55
KST 02:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall8HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL44Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Help: rep cant save Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 632 users

Hjernevask (Brainwash) Science Documentary - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 Next All
Deadlifter
Profile Joined September 2011
Norway68 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-07 22:26:56
April 07 2012 22:24 GMT
#21
I don't know of that many other countries that have laws requiring 40% of a board of a private company to be female. It's a pretty absurd hybrid of feminism and communism enforcing such laws on a company that isn't even owned by the state.

edit: and the salary level has also been explained with the fact that many women want to be in lower paid jobs such as hairdressers, clothing shop assistants etc.
Chromodoris
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden136 Posts
April 07 2012 22:28 GMT
#22
On April 08 2012 07:11 Pantythief wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2012 07:03 sunprince wrote:
On April 08 2012 06:44 ReturnStroke wrote:
This is far from an isolated case of ideology/personal gain/etc taking priority over actual science. Although it seems to be popping up in social science even more. It's too bad, but at least people are speaking up about it :/


I agree, there are many hypocritical ideologies which attempt to take over science. However, none are as powerful and socially accepted as much as feminism, barring the exception of religion in some places.

On April 08 2012 06:51 nymfaw wrote:
If they want things to be equal, everything should be equal right? Sorry for being semi-OT, just a thing I find really annoying.


Feminist ideology holds that we all live in an unjust patriarchy that oppresses women, and all men benefit from a unidirectional set of privileges solely due to being male. As a result, feminists will tell you that making things equal for men is definitely not a priority since women have it so much worse, and any advantages that women appear to have are more than outweight by the tons of advantages that men have.

On April 08 2012 06:57 Pantythief wrote:
On April 08 2012 06:00 sunprince wrote:
Considering that Norway is a feminist stronghold, I'm not surprised that social science there (particularly gender studies) is dominated by ideology rather than science.


I hope you're not serious.


I'm dead serious. If you disagree, feel free to voice a logical criticism rather than cowardly implying that I'm wrong.



"Cowardly implying that I'm wrong.", that's cute. No, thank you, though!

Answer him instead of calling what he said cute if you have to post a response.
I think Sunprince is right. Norway, and Sweden where I live, are feminist strongholds and I agree that some social sciences ("genusvetenskap" or gender studies in particular) are based of ideology rather than proof and science. I know plenty of girls that say that there is no difference between the genders other than the reproductive organs and they are actually supported by the gender studies. When you show them real scientific research proving them wrong they shrug it of and say that the research is biased just as it's shown in the first documentary. Sure the researchers might have a hypothesis at the start but if it is proven wrong it's acknowledged immediately.
♥ ThorZaIN.
Frigo
Profile Joined August 2009
Hungary1023 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-07 22:32:44
April 07 2012 22:29 GMT
#23
On April 08 2012 06:28 sunprince wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2012 06:16 JustPassingBy wrote:
I never understood why some people want everything to be equal on average.
At least I do not blame society for manipulating me into having "boyish" interestes (like gaming) or share some character traits that people with the same migrational background like me seem to have.


People who don't want responsibility for their actions. One of the central tenets of feminist ideology is that you can't blame women for anything whatsoever.

If women chose not to make as much money than men (e.g. working less, choosing easier/safer professions, etc.), then you would have to accept the wage gap or glass ceiling as legitimate. Same goes for other things like why there are more men in engineering. Feminists insist that society is to blame because it allows them to demand things like affirmative action for women, quotas for female politicians, etc. Not that this would be wrong if the idea of society's responsibility was based on empirical science, but feminists abandoned science long ago.

Ironically, the notion that women don't have the ability to make their own decisions but are instead purely the product of social conditioning is one of the most regressive, misogynistic notions I can possibly concieve of. It completely denies women their agency and feeds into the traditional script that men are the actors, while women are merely acted upon. Of course, feminist inconsistency and sexism against both men and women isn't exactly news.


This is an excellent post and sums up my views on the feminist idea of female (ir)responsibility.

When one half of the population is not responsible for their own mistakes and failures and the other half is blamed instead under the guise of misogyny, patriarchy, daddy issues; when one half enjoys freedom from any consequence and the other half is notoriously over-criminalized; when one half is not striving enough and the other half is dragged down instead; you have a fundamentally broken society.

On April 08 2012 06:21 sunprince wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2012 06:05 saynomore wrote:
On April 08 2012 06:00 sunprince wrote:
Considering that Norway is a feminist stronghold, I'm not surprised that social science there (particularly gender studies) is dominated by ideology rather than science.


I would not in any way say it is a feminist stronghold. But you can think what you will.


Reality begs to differ.

Hell, you require all companies to have at least 40% female board members, and shut down businesses which don't comply.

Of course, this runs counter to the feminist narrative of oppression and victimization, so they'll still insist that Norway is a horribly misogynistic patriarchy.


You gotta wonder when will they introduce a similar bill to have at least 40% female garbage collectors huh?
http://www.fimfiction.net/user/Treasure_Chest
Deadlifter
Profile Joined September 2011
Norway68 Posts
April 07 2012 22:43 GMT
#24
On April 08 2012 07:29 Frigo wrote:
You gotta wonder when will they introduce a similar bill to have at least 40% female garbage collectors huh?


This made me lol. Give us equality in all areas except the shitty ones!
gruff
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden2276 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-07 22:49:47
April 07 2012 22:47 GMT
#25
On April 08 2012 07:24 Deadlifter wrote:
I don't know of that many other countries that have laws requiring 40% of a board of a private company to be female. It's a pretty absurd hybrid of feminism and communism enforcing such laws on a company that isn't even owned by the state.

edit: and the salary level has also been explained with the fact that many women want to be in lower paid jobs such as hairdressers, clothing shop assistants etc.

Most sane feminist argues against salary inquality in the same profession and not in the large group of men and women all profession included. It's not secret women sometimes get lower salary for doing the same kind of job, often rationalized with the possibility of them getting pregnant and so on. Your and one of the poster earlier are strawmanning that issue a bit. I'm not saying I neccesarily argree with that point but at least address the real points.
goldendwarf
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada170 Posts
April 07 2012 22:47 GMT
#26
On April 08 2012 07:29 Frigo wrote:
You gotta wonder when will they introduce a similar bill to have at least 40% female garbage collectors huh?


This. also 40% women in military, and maybe make women face mandatory military service in countries that do it like south korea.
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
April 07 2012 22:53 GMT
#27
On April 08 2012 07:03 sunprince wrote:


Feminist ideology holds that we all live in an unjust patriarchy that oppresses women, and all men benefit from a unidirectional set of privileges solely due to being male. As a result, feminists will tell you that making things equal for men is definitely not a priority since women have it so much worse, and any advantages that women appear to have are more than outweight by the tons of advantages that men have.

This part actually makes a lot of sense. Although the one thing they do have is looks. I know plenty of women who merely get hired for low paying waitress-type jobs because they look good. The thing is conservatives love expanding groups to fit their agenda. They'll talk about feminist extremists that push for insane policies, and then when you say 'hey, maybe men do have an easier time in life' you're branded as supporting the insane policies. This is the case for feminism, as when you ask someone if they want equal opportunities for men and women, and no unjust discrimination against women, they'll assume that's feminism and say yes. Then conservatives talk about the reactionary ideas and brand the two together to make any decent conversation about the topic go out the window. So you're right, ideologies in the feminist debate have taken over any meaningful science.
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-07 22:57:04
April 07 2012 22:55 GMT
#28
On April 08 2012 07:47 gruff wrote:
\Most sane feminist argues against salary inquality in the same profession and not in the large group of men and women all profession included. It's not secret women sometimes get lower salary for doing the same kind of job, often rationalized with the possibility of them getting pregnant. Your and one of the poster earlier are strawmanning that issue a bit. I'm not saying I neccesarily argree with that point but at least address the real points.


No. Feminists often cite the bullshit statistic that women make 77 cents on the dollar compared to men. Where does that number come from? The unadjusted wage gap, which simply compares the median male income to the median female income with no adjusting whatsoever.

In reality, the US Department of Labor found that once you adjust for relevant factors, there is no statistically significant wage gap. Simply put, the wage gap is a bullshit myth that feminists use to justify their sexist policies.
GoTuNk!
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Chile4591 Posts
April 07 2012 22:56 GMT
#29
I hate this feminist bullshit. Not much of an issue here, but when asking for funding for some project to government there is a 5% scoring bias in projects towards those made by a female (not that are many tbh though)
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-07 23:07:21
April 07 2012 22:59 GMT
#30
On April 08 2012 07:53 Roe wrote:
This part actually makes a lot of sense. Although the one thing they do have is looks.


Women have far more privileges than merely looks. Here's a partial list of female privileges:

As a woman:
1. I have a much lower chance of being murdered than a man.
2. I have a much lower chance of being driven to successfully commit suicide than a man.
3. I have a lower chance of being a victim of a violent assault than a man.
4. I have probably been taught that it is acceptable to cry.
5. I will probably live longer than the average man.
6. Society probably won't see my overall worthiness as a person being exclusively tied to how high up in the hierarchy I rise.
7. I have a much better chance of being considered to be a worthy mate, even if I’m unemployed with little money, than a man.
8. I am given much greater latitude to form close, intimate friendships than a man is.
9. My chance of suffering a work-related injury or illness is significantly lower than a man’s.
10. My chance of being killed on the job is a tiny fraction of a man’s.
11. If I shy away from fights, it is unlikely that this will damage my status or call into question my worthiness as a sex partner.
12. If I lack the capacity for violence, this generally won't be seen as a damning personal deficiency.
13. If I was born in North America since WWII, my genitals were almost certainly not mutilated soon after birth, without anesthesia.
14. If I attempt to hug a friend in joy, it’s much less likely that my friend will wonder about my sexuality or pull away in unease.
15. If I seek a hug in solace from a close friend, I’ll have much less concern about how they will interpret it or whether my worthiness as a member of my gender will be called into question.
16. I generally am not compelled by the rules of my sex to wear emotional armor in interactions with most people.
17. I am frequently the emotional center of my family.
18. I am allowed to wear clothes that signify ‘vulnerability’, ‘playful openness’, and ’softness’.
19. I am allowed to BE vulnerable, playful, and soft without calling my worthiness as a human being into question.
20. If I interact with other people’s children, I do not have to worry much about the interaction being misinterpreted.
21. I have a much greater chance than a man does of having a sympathetic audience to discuss the unreasonableness of gender demands.
22. I am less likely to be shamed for being sexually inactive than a man.
23. From my late teens through menopause, it's easier for me to find a sex partner at my attractiveness level than for a man.
24. My role in my child’s life is generally seen as more important than the child’s father’s role.

On April 08 2012 07:53 Roe wrote:
The thing is conservatives love expanding groups to fit their agenda. They'll talk about feminist extremists that push for insane policies, and then when you say 'hey, maybe men do have an easier time in life' you're branded as supporting the insane policies. This is the case for feminism, as when you ask someone if they want equal opportunities for men and women, and no unjust discrimination against women, they'll assume that's feminism and say yes. Then conservatives talk about the reactionary ideas and brand the two together to make any decent conversation about the topic go out the window. So you're right, ideologies in the feminist debate have taken over any meaningful science.


I agree, there are plenty of ideologies on both sides of many debates, instead of actual science and logic.
Nevermind86
Profile Joined August 2009
Somalia429 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-07 23:06:38
April 07 2012 23:00 GMT
#31
My sister is a typical feminist. My father buys her a car, my father pays her education, my father pays her rent, my father pays her bills and somehow she calls herself an independent woman.

Tbh feminism seems a little bit like the racism between 'light' and 'blacker' african americans that Malcolm X describes. It wouldn't exist if they learned to appreciate themselves for what they are, Malcolm X says that any social group that doesn't appreciate itself there cannot progress, I don't know if it's entirely true but living in Latin america it seems true sometimes.
Interviewer: Many people hate you and would like to see you dead. How does that make you feel? Trevor Goodchild: Those people should get to know me a little better. Then they'd know I don't indulge in feelings.
gruff
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden2276 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-07 23:08:08
April 07 2012 23:07 GMT
#32
On April 08 2012 07:55 sunprince wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2012 07:47 gruff wrote:
\Most sane feminist argues against salary inquality in the same profession and not in the large group of men and women all profession included. It's not secret women sometimes get lower salary for doing the same kind of job, often rationalized with the possibility of them getting pregnant. Your and one of the poster earlier are strawmanning that issue a bit. I'm not saying I neccesarily argree with that point but at least address the real points.


No. Feminists often cite the bullshit statistic that women make 77 cents on the dollar compared to men. Where does that number come from? The unadjusted wage gap, which simply compares the median male income to the median female income with no adjusting whatsoever.

In reality, the US Department of Labor found that once you adjust for relevant factors, there is no statistically significant wage gap. Simply put, the wage gap is a bullshit myth that feminists use to justify their sexist policies.

Yes. As I said, I'm not arguing for or against but you are strawmanning the issue when you bring up wage equality across professions since that is not what most notable feminist get hung up about. Also I read the summary of that pdf and it's not as cut and dry as you make it out to be (it's certainly not the "simply put" you use to discount any counter arguement). It says the factors accont for the majority but not neccesarily all unequality. I agree that most feminist use bullshit stats though, but that doesn't neccesarily mean every point they are arguing is bullshit.
Morpheus.EU
Profile Joined January 2012
Netherlands26 Posts
April 07 2012 23:09 GMT
#33
In a perfect world, discrimination wouldn't exist. Neither to add people or to stop them. (Can't find proper wording) People would be chosen for a job based on the skill they have, not their race, gender, looks, sexuality etc. etc. But hey, even though this level of perfection is unreachable, we live in a society that's way worse than this. In some countries to one side (where people are being helped because of gender/sexuality/race etc. and in other countries to the other.
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-07 23:20:15
April 07 2012 23:18 GMT
#34
On April 08 2012 08:07 gruff wrote:
As I said, I'm not arguing for or against but you are strawmanning the issue when you bring up wage equality across professions since that is not what most notable feminist get hung up about.


Except I'm not strawmanning it. The bullshit I'm calling out is exactly what feminists get hung up about.

Take a look at the website for the National Committee on Pay Equity (NCPE), a major feminist policy organization. Notice the bullshit wage gap stat I mentioned in the first paragraph of their homepage?

On April 08 2012 08:07 gruff wrote:
Also I read the summary of that pdf and it's not as cut and dry as you make it out to be. It says the factors accont for the majority but not neccesarily all unequality.


The authors specifically note that the remaining inequality is most likely due to additional unadjusted factors such as work experience and job tenure (which we know can't possibly be small factors). The whole point is that the authors concluded "this study leads to the unambiguous conclusion that the differences in the compensation of men and women are the result of a multitude of factors and that the raw wage gap should not be used as the basis to justify corrective action."

They also reiterate my point that "the raw wage gap continues to be used in misleading ways to advance public policy agendas without fully explaining the reasons behind the gap," though they leave out the fact that it's feminists who are responsible for this.

On April 08 2012 08:07 gruff wrote:
I agree that most feminist use bullshit stats though, but that doesn't neccesarily mean every point they are arguing is bullshit.


No, but their overall ideology is flawed, toxic, and morally bankrupt. It's past time to leave it behind and embrace a scientific, rather than ideological, way of gender thinking that emphasizes true egalitarianism.
Conti
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany2516 Posts
April 07 2012 23:19 GMT
#35
There's reasonable criticism of feminism, and then there's just plain sexism. Some of the above clearly falls into the latter category. Hell, gender inequality was blatantly obvious for thousands of years up until 30-40 years ago. It should be equally obvious that such a short time is not enough to get rid of said gender inequality, even if we as as culture did make huge steps towards it. We're not quite there yet, though.

So, um, what does any of this have to do with the OP; anyhow?
nam nam
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden4672 Posts
April 07 2012 23:21 GMT
#36
On April 08 2012 08:19 Conti wrote:
There's reasonable criticism of feminism, and then there's just plain sexism. Some of the above clearly falls into the latter category. Hell, gender inequality was blatantly obvious for thousands of years up until 30-40 years ago. It should be equally obvious that such a short time is not enough to get rid of said gender inequality, even if we as as culture did make huge steps towards it. We're not quite there yet, though.

So, um, what does any of this have to do with the OP; anyhow?

If you watch the documentary you'll probably find out.
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
April 07 2012 23:22 GMT
#37
On April 08 2012 08:19 Conti wrote:
There's reasonable criticism of feminism, and then there's just plain sexism. Some of the above clearly falls into the latter category.


Prove it. Give me a specific example of the criticisms of feminism I've provided in this thread and how it's sexist.

On April 08 2012 08:19 Conti wrote:
So, um, what does any of this have to do with the OP; anyhow?


Who do you think is one of the main parties responsible for the brainwashing described by the documentary?
Rockztar
Profile Joined June 2011
Denmark210 Posts
April 07 2012 23:32 GMT
#38
On April 08 2012 06:21 sunprince wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2012 06:05 saynomore wrote:
On April 08 2012 06:00 sunprince wrote:
Considering that Norway is a feminist stronghold, I'm not surprised that social science there (particularly gender studies) is dominated by ideology rather than science.


I would not in any way say it is a feminist stronghold. But you can think what you will.


Reality begs to differ.

Hell, you require all companies to have at least 40% female board members, and shut down businesses which don't comply.

Of course, this runs counter to the feminist narrative of oppression and victimization, so they'll still insist that Norway is a horribly misogynistic patriarchy.

So because you've read a single artist in New York times you're suddenly an expert on the subject?
Gotta say man you come off as quite a bit ignorant. It gave me a good laugh though. :p
I don't think you understand Scandinavian culture in the slightest and should probably stop making comments on it.

User was temp banned for this post.
Conti
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany2516 Posts
April 07 2012 23:33 GMT
#39
On April 08 2012 08:22 sunprince wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2012 08:19 Conti wrote:
There's reasonable criticism of feminism, and then there's just plain sexism. Some of the above clearly falls into the latter category.


Prove it. Give me a specific example of the criticisms of feminism I've provided in this thread and how it's sexist.

Sure:

13. If I was born in North America since WWII, my genitals were almost certainly not mutilated soon after birth, without anesthesia.

Implying that male circumcision is some kind of "mutilation" is just dumb. Doing so in a list purportedly listing the things some women do not have to suffer is just fucking offensive, as female circumcision actually is mutilation and forced upon women in many countries in the world still.


Show nested quote +
On April 08 2012 08:19 Conti wrote:
So, um, what does any of this have to do with the OP; anyhow?


Who do you think is one of the main parties responsible for the brainwashing described by the documentary?

I haven't seen the entire documentary (have you?), but according to the titles of the episodes, gender inequality makes up 1/7th of the issue, not 100% as you seem to imply.
AutomatonOmega
Profile Joined February 2011
United States706 Posts
April 07 2012 23:35 GMT
#40
I'm going to watch the fuck out of this. Thanks for posting!
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Swiss Groups Day 2
SKillous vs MixuLIVE!
ShoWTimE vs MaNa
WardiTV892
TKL 112
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 444
TKL 112
BRAT_OK 95
RotterdaM 68
JuggernautJason53
MindelVK 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 22167
Sea 2998
Dewaltoss 103
Sacsri 60
Aegong 40
sas.Sziky 33
zelot 24
scan(afreeca) 20
GoRush 11
soO 11
[ Show more ]
yabsab 8
IntoTheRainbow 6
Dota 2
Gorgc7265
qojqva2796
capcasts229
League of Legends
Dendi1112
Counter-Strike
fl0m1108
flusha326
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King154
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu322
Other Games
FrodaN2816
ceh9681
Lowko355
elazer217
KnowMe163
ArmadaUGS109
Trikslyr58
QueenE48
kaitlyn37
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 15
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• iHatsuTV 4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis5552
• Jankos1490
• masondota2306
Other Games
• imaqtpie645
• Shiphtur317
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
6h 5m
RSL Revival
16h 5m
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
OSC
19h 5m
WardiTV European League
22h 5m
Scarlett vs Percival
Jumy vs ArT
YoungYakov vs Shameless
uThermal vs Fjant
Nicoract vs goblin
Harstem vs Gerald
FEL
22h 5m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 9h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 16h
RSL Revival
1d 16h
FEL
1d 22h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.