• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:10
CEST 19:10
KST 02:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism3Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?114Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!46
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) 2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? Pros React To: Calm's Big Brain Play Vs Mini New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! ASL22 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
2v2v2v2 Tournament [ASL22] Ro16 Group B [ASL22] Ro16 Group A [ASL22] Ro24 Group F
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
F* the Children and Get Off …
TrAiDoS
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7259 users

Shooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 114

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 112 113 114 115 116 503 Next
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP.

If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post.
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
June 05 2013 18:11 GMT
#2261
On June 06 2013 03:00 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 02:43 dAPhREAk wrote:
this seems relevant to your guy's discussion. zimmerman has filed a motion to exclude certain terms from being used at trial. the list of terms are:

"profiled"
"vigilante"
"self appointed neighborhood watch captain"
"wannabe cop"
"he got out of the car after the police (or dispatcher) told him not to"
"he confronted trayvon martin"

the motion in limine discusses the reasons for each (basically that they are factually inaccurate and disparaging).

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/limine_use_of_terms.pdf

this should be interesting because these terms have been used extensively (and inappropriately in my opinion) in this thread to discuss the issues in this case. lets see how the court rules on them.


Hmm... interesting stand to take for the defense.

I didn't know you were allowed to tell others how to evaluate evidence.

you're not allowed to say whatever you want. arguments have to be supported by admitted facts. the defense is arguing that such terms are not supported by facts, misrepresent facts and/or are otherwise prejudicial and misleading. the defense's argument for each term is delineated in the linked motion.
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
June 05 2013 18:18 GMT
#2262
On June 06 2013 03:11 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 03:00 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 02:43 dAPhREAk wrote:
this seems relevant to your guy's discussion. zimmerman has filed a motion to exclude certain terms from being used at trial. the list of terms are:

"profiled"
"vigilante"
"self appointed neighborhood watch captain"
"wannabe cop"
"he got out of the car after the police (or dispatcher) told him not to"
"he confronted trayvon martin"

the motion in limine discusses the reasons for each (basically that they are factually inaccurate and disparaging).

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/limine_use_of_terms.pdf

this should be interesting because these terms have been used extensively (and inappropriately in my opinion) in this thread to discuss the issues in this case. lets see how the court rules on them.


Hmm... interesting stand to take for the defense.

I didn't know you were allowed to tell others how to evaluate evidence.

you're not allowed to say whatever you want. arguments have to be supported by admitted facts. the defense is arguing that such terms are not supported by facts, misrepresent facts and/or are otherwise prejudicial and misleading. the defense's argument for each term is delineated in the linked motion.


I did read it.

Just as an example from the link:

They don't like the use of the word profiled because its deemed as racially charged even though that is exactly what Zimmerman did in his conversation with the dispatcher when he described Travyon as a drugged up criminal that looks suspicious.

They also say that there is no evidence that Zimmerman got our of the car--despite the fact that Zimmerman was sitting on the grass about two or more blocks away. They don't want them mentioning that Zimmerman got out of his car--despite the fact that they found him outside of the car when the police showed up.

Etc...

As I said, I didn't realize that you could inform the other side how to interpret evidence. That's new to me. If that's how law works then cool, just news to me.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
June 05 2013 18:27 GMT
#2263
On June 06 2013 03:18 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 03:11 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:00 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 02:43 dAPhREAk wrote:
this seems relevant to your guy's discussion. zimmerman has filed a motion to exclude certain terms from being used at trial. the list of terms are:

"profiled"
"vigilante"
"self appointed neighborhood watch captain"
"wannabe cop"
"he got out of the car after the police (or dispatcher) told him not to"
"he confronted trayvon martin"

the motion in limine discusses the reasons for each (basically that they are factually inaccurate and disparaging).

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/limine_use_of_terms.pdf

this should be interesting because these terms have been used extensively (and inappropriately in my opinion) in this thread to discuss the issues in this case. lets see how the court rules on them.


Hmm... interesting stand to take for the defense.

I didn't know you were allowed to tell others how to evaluate evidence.

you're not allowed to say whatever you want. arguments have to be supported by admitted facts. the defense is arguing that such terms are not supported by facts, misrepresent facts and/or are otherwise prejudicial and misleading. the defense's argument for each term is delineated in the linked motion.


I did read it.

Just as an example from the link:

They don't like the use of the word profiled because its deemed as racially charged even though that is exactly what Zimmerman did in his conversation with the dispatcher when he described Travyon as a drugged up criminal that looks suspicious.

They also say that there is no evidence that Zimmerman got our of the car--despite the fact that Zimmerman was sitting on the grass about two or more blocks away. They don't want them mentioning that Zimmerman got out of his car--despite the fact that they found him outside of the car when the police showed up.

Etc...

As I said, I didn't realize that you could inform the other side how to interpret evidence. That's new to me. If that's how law works then cool, just news to me.

your post just summed up why this motion is necessary.
BigFan
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
TLADT24920 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-05 19:21:28
June 05 2013 19:20 GMT
#2264
On June 06 2013 03:27 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 03:18 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:11 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:00 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 02:43 dAPhREAk wrote:
this seems relevant to your guy's discussion. zimmerman has filed a motion to exclude certain terms from being used at trial. the list of terms are:

"profiled"
"vigilante"
"self appointed neighborhood watch captain"
"wannabe cop"
"he got out of the car after the police (or dispatcher) told him not to"
"he confronted trayvon martin"

the motion in limine discusses the reasons for each (basically that they are factually inaccurate and disparaging).

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/limine_use_of_terms.pdf

this should be interesting because these terms have been used extensively (and inappropriately in my opinion) in this thread to discuss the issues in this case. lets see how the court rules on them.


Hmm... interesting stand to take for the defense.

I didn't know you were allowed to tell others how to evaluate evidence.

you're not allowed to say whatever you want. arguments have to be supported by admitted facts. the defense is arguing that such terms are not supported by facts, misrepresent facts and/or are otherwise prejudicial and misleading. the defense's argument for each term is delineated in the linked motion.


I did read it.

Just as an example from the link:

They don't like the use of the word profiled because its deemed as racially charged even though that is exactly what Zimmerman did in his conversation with the dispatcher when he described Travyon as a drugged up criminal that looks suspicious.

They also say that there is no evidence that Zimmerman got our of the car--despite the fact that Zimmerman was sitting on the grass about two or more blocks away. They don't want them mentioning that Zimmerman got out of his car--despite the fact that they found him outside of the car when the police showed up.

Etc...

As I said, I didn't realize that you could inform the other side how to interpret evidence. That's new to me. If that's how law works then cool, just news to me.

your post just summed up why this motion is necessary.

lol I think dAPhREAk means the bolded parts. This is quite interesting though. I didn't realize there are limitations to what can and can't be said but it makes sense. If something didn't happen but is constantly propagated through the courtroom, it can seriously affect the outcome of the trial and such.
Former BW EiC"Watch Bakemonogatari or I will kill you." -Toad, April 18th, 2017
ComaDose
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Canada10357 Posts
June 05 2013 19:45 GMT
#2265
On June 04 2013 02:45 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 03 2013 15:47 zbedlam wrote:
Man follows kid to house. Kid sees man following him, lets assume the kid attacks the man. Man shoots kid. You shouldn't be able to argue self defense if you are following someone with malicious intent (not too familiar with US legal system). If the evidence that ThievingMagpie said is legitimate then there is no question whether or not it was malicious.

[..]He asks why trayvon was doing and accused him of trying to rob some house beause he was an unfalimer black youth on pot in the middle of a rainstorm.

Thats all the intent and malice that zimmerman ever did. [...]

watch out it sounds like your trying to defend the zman but your actually calling him racist and making yourself look racist too.
BW pros training sc2 is like kiss making a dub step album.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 05 2013 20:07 GMT
#2266
Attorneys file motions to control/limit the language used in the court room at trial all of the time. For example, it is common for plaintiff's attorneys in personal injury actions to move courts to prohibit the use of the term "accident" when referring to the incident that injured the plaintiff.
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
June 05 2013 20:08 GMT
#2267
On June 06 2013 04:20 BigFan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 03:27 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:18 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:11 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:00 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 02:43 dAPhREAk wrote:
this seems relevant to your guy's discussion. zimmerman has filed a motion to exclude certain terms from being used at trial. the list of terms are:

"profiled"
"vigilante"
"self appointed neighborhood watch captain"
"wannabe cop"
"he got out of the car after the police (or dispatcher) told him not to"
"he confronted trayvon martin"

the motion in limine discusses the reasons for each (basically that they are factually inaccurate and disparaging).

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/limine_use_of_terms.pdf

this should be interesting because these terms have been used extensively (and inappropriately in my opinion) in this thread to discuss the issues in this case. lets see how the court rules on them.


Hmm... interesting stand to take for the defense.

I didn't know you were allowed to tell others how to evaluate evidence.

you're not allowed to say whatever you want. arguments have to be supported by admitted facts. the defense is arguing that such terms are not supported by facts, misrepresent facts and/or are otherwise prejudicial and misleading. the defense's argument for each term is delineated in the linked motion.


I did read it.

Just as an example from the link:

They don't like the use of the word profiled because its deemed as racially charged even though that is exactly what Zimmerman did in his conversation with the dispatcher when he described Travyon as a drugged up criminal that looks suspicious.

They also say that there is no evidence that Zimmerman got our of the car--despite the fact that Zimmerman was sitting on the grass about two or more blocks away. They don't want them mentioning that Zimmerman got out of his car--despite the fact that they found him outside of the car when the police showed up.

Etc...

As I said, I didn't realize that you could inform the other side how to interpret evidence. That's new to me. If that's how law works then cool, just news to me.

your post just summed up why this motion is necessary.

lol I think dAPhREAk means the bolded parts. This is quite interesting though. I didn't realize there are limitations to what can and can't be said but it makes sense. If something didn't happen but is constantly propagated through the courtroom, it can seriously affect the outcome of the trial and such.

even highly relevant and probative evidence can be excluded at trial under certain circumstances. for example, offers of settlement are relevant to whether the defendant in fact believes he/she/it is at fault for an accident, but courts routinely exclude evidence of settlement offers because they want to encourage pre-trial resolution of claims. post-accident remedial conduct (e.g., a recall of all food alleged to be toxic) is relevant to show that the defendant believes the claims are valid and wants to prevent future injuries, but courts may exclude such evidence of post-accident remedial conduct because they want to encourage such actions. there are also many other examples of probative/relevant evidence that is excluded.

the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

regardless, motions to exclude irrelevant/unduly prejudicial/etc. evidence are commonplace. i have seen cases with over 50 such motions in one case. people think that lawyers are allowed to say whatever they want at trial, but that is not the case. it is highly regulated and any slip ups could lead to an immediate mistrial, which nobody wants.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-05 20:23:09
June 05 2013 20:19 GMT
#2268
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

Does Florida have a special Rule 404? That limitation typically doesn't apply in most jurisdictions as far as I know. Defendants typically have free reign to offer evidence suggesting that their victims were aggressors based upon past behavior.

EDIT:

It doesn't look like Florida's Rule 404 is any different than the majority rule. See (1)(b)(1) below.

+ Show Spoiler +
90.404 Character evidence; when admissible.--
(1) CHARACTER EVIDENCE GENERALLY.--Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion, except:
(a) Character of accused.--Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait.
(b) Character of victim.--
1. Except as provided in s. 794.022, evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or
2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor.
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
June 05 2013 20:26 GMT
#2269
On June 06 2013 05:19 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

Does Florida have a special Rule 404? That limitation typically doesn't apply in most jurisdictions as far as I know. Defendants typically have free reign to offer evidence suggesting that their victims were aggressors based upon past behavior.

EDIT:

It doesn't look like Florida's Rule 404 is any different than the majority rule. See (1)(b)(1) below.

+ Show Spoiler +
90.404 Character evidence; when admissible.--
(1) CHARACTER EVIDENCE GENERALLY.--Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion, except:
(a) Character of accused.--Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait.
(b) Character of victim.--
1. Except as provided in s. 794.022, evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or
2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor.

there is a MIL on it. defense is trying to get around character evidence rule. gzlegalcase doesnt have the state's motion though.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052413_response_to_limine_tm.pdf
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 05 2013 20:29 GMT
#2270
On June 06 2013 05:26 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 05:19 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

Does Florida have a special Rule 404? That limitation typically doesn't apply in most jurisdictions as far as I know. Defendants typically have free reign to offer evidence suggesting that their victims were aggressors based upon past behavior.

EDIT:

It doesn't look like Florida's Rule 404 is any different than the majority rule. See (1)(b)(1) below.

+ Show Spoiler +
90.404 Character evidence; when admissible.--
(1) CHARACTER EVIDENCE GENERALLY.--Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion, except:
(a) Character of accused.--Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait.
(b) Character of victim.--
1. Except as provided in s. 794.022, evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or
2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor.

there is a MIL on it. defense is trying to get around character evidence rule. gzlegalcase doesnt have the state's motion though.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052413_response_to_limine_tm.pdf

Wow, that is an absolute dog shit response to a critical motion in limine. There is no recitation to any legal authority for why the evidence comes in.

Frankly, I think it is a pretty clear cut issue under 404. The evidence should come in.
BigFan
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
TLADT24920 Posts
June 05 2013 20:32 GMT
#2271
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 04:20 BigFan wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:27 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:18 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:11 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:00 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 02:43 dAPhREAk wrote:
this seems relevant to your guy's discussion. zimmerman has filed a motion to exclude certain terms from being used at trial. the list of terms are:

"profiled"
"vigilante"
"self appointed neighborhood watch captain"
"wannabe cop"
"he got out of the car after the police (or dispatcher) told him not to"
"he confronted trayvon martin"

the motion in limine discusses the reasons for each (basically that they are factually inaccurate and disparaging).

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/limine_use_of_terms.pdf

this should be interesting because these terms have been used extensively (and inappropriately in my opinion) in this thread to discuss the issues in this case. lets see how the court rules on them.


Hmm... interesting stand to take for the defense.

I didn't know you were allowed to tell others how to evaluate evidence.

you're not allowed to say whatever you want. arguments have to be supported by admitted facts. the defense is arguing that such terms are not supported by facts, misrepresent facts and/or are otherwise prejudicial and misleading. the defense's argument for each term is delineated in the linked motion.


I did read it.

Just as an example from the link:

They don't like the use of the word profiled because its deemed as racially charged even though that is exactly what Zimmerman did in his conversation with the dispatcher when he described Travyon as a drugged up criminal that looks suspicious.

They also say that there is no evidence that Zimmerman got our of the car--despite the fact that Zimmerman was sitting on the grass about two or more blocks away. They don't want them mentioning that Zimmerman got out of his car--despite the fact that they found him outside of the car when the police showed up.

Etc...

As I said, I didn't realize that you could inform the other side how to interpret evidence. That's new to me. If that's how law works then cool, just news to me.

your post just summed up why this motion is necessary.

lol I think dAPhREAk means the bolded parts. This is quite interesting though. I didn't realize there are limitations to what can and can't be said but it makes sense. If something didn't happen but is constantly propagated through the courtroom, it can seriously affect the outcome of the trial and such.

even highly relevant and probative evidence can be excluded at trial under certain circumstances. for example, offers of settlement are relevant to whether the defendant in fact believes he/she/it is at fault for an accident, but courts routinely exclude evidence of settlement offers because they want to encourage pre-trial resolution of claims. post-accident remedial conduct (e.g., a recall of all food alleged to be toxic) is relevant to show that the defendant believes the claims are valid and wants to prevent future injuries, but courts may exclude such evidence of post-accident remedial conduct because they want to encourage such actions. there are also many other examples of probative/relevant evidence that is excluded.

the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

regardless, motions to exclude irrelevant/unduly prejudicial/etc. evidence are commonplace. i have seen cases with over 50 such motions in one case. people think that lawyers are allowed to say whatever they want at trial, but that is not the case. it is highly regulated and any slip ups could lead to an immediate mistrial, which nobody wants.

interesting, fair enough. I figured that previous behaviour might be relevant to this case but I guess because someone is rude or acts badly before doesn't imply that they are a killer etc...
Former BW EiC"Watch Bakemonogatari or I will kill you." -Toad, April 18th, 2017
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 05 2013 20:38 GMT
#2272
On June 06 2013 05:32 BigFan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 04:20 BigFan wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:27 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:18 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:11 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 03:00 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On June 06 2013 02:43 dAPhREAk wrote:
this seems relevant to your guy's discussion. zimmerman has filed a motion to exclude certain terms from being used at trial. the list of terms are:

"profiled"
"vigilante"
"self appointed neighborhood watch captain"
"wannabe cop"
"he got out of the car after the police (or dispatcher) told him not to"
"he confronted trayvon martin"

the motion in limine discusses the reasons for each (basically that they are factually inaccurate and disparaging).

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/limine_use_of_terms.pdf

this should be interesting because these terms have been used extensively (and inappropriately in my opinion) in this thread to discuss the issues in this case. lets see how the court rules on them.


Hmm... interesting stand to take for the defense.

I didn't know you were allowed to tell others how to evaluate evidence.

you're not allowed to say whatever you want. arguments have to be supported by admitted facts. the defense is arguing that such terms are not supported by facts, misrepresent facts and/or are otherwise prejudicial and misleading. the defense's argument for each term is delineated in the linked motion.


I did read it.

Just as an example from the link:

They don't like the use of the word profiled because its deemed as racially charged even though that is exactly what Zimmerman did in his conversation with the dispatcher when he described Travyon as a drugged up criminal that looks suspicious.

They also say that there is no evidence that Zimmerman got our of the car--despite the fact that Zimmerman was sitting on the grass about two or more blocks away. They don't want them mentioning that Zimmerman got out of his car--despite the fact that they found him outside of the car when the police showed up.

Etc...

As I said, I didn't realize that you could inform the other side how to interpret evidence. That's new to me. If that's how law works then cool, just news to me.

your post just summed up why this motion is necessary.

lol I think dAPhREAk means the bolded parts. This is quite interesting though. I didn't realize there are limitations to what can and can't be said but it makes sense. If something didn't happen but is constantly propagated through the courtroom, it can seriously affect the outcome of the trial and such.

even highly relevant and probative evidence can be excluded at trial under certain circumstances. for example, offers of settlement are relevant to whether the defendant in fact believes he/she/it is at fault for an accident, but courts routinely exclude evidence of settlement offers because they want to encourage pre-trial resolution of claims. post-accident remedial conduct (e.g., a recall of all food alleged to be toxic) is relevant to show that the defendant believes the claims are valid and wants to prevent future injuries, but courts may exclude such evidence of post-accident remedial conduct because they want to encourage such actions. there are also many other examples of probative/relevant evidence that is excluded.

the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

regardless, motions to exclude irrelevant/unduly prejudicial/etc. evidence are commonplace. i have seen cases with over 50 such motions in one case. people think that lawyers are allowed to say whatever they want at trial, but that is not the case. it is highly regulated and any slip ups could lead to an immediate mistrial, which nobody wants.

interesting, fair enough. I figured that previous behaviour might be relevant to this case but I guess because someone is rude or acts badly before doesn't imply that they are a killer etc...

Courts always balance the probative value of evidence (ie how relevant it is) versus the risk of harm in admitting the evidence (confusion, delay, unfair prejudice, etc). Context is always critical. In criminal cases, the defendant typically is going to get the benefit of the doubt on these issues and have a much longer leash to present this kind of evidence. Parties in civil actions have a much harder time getting this evidence admitted.
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-05 20:57:16
June 05 2013 20:54 GMT
#2273
On June 06 2013 05:29 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 05:26 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:19 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

Does Florida have a special Rule 404? That limitation typically doesn't apply in most jurisdictions as far as I know. Defendants typically have free reign to offer evidence suggesting that their victims were aggressors based upon past behavior.

EDIT:

It doesn't look like Florida's Rule 404 is any different than the majority rule. See (1)(b)(1) below.

+ Show Spoiler +
90.404 Character evidence; when admissible.--
(1) CHARACTER EVIDENCE GENERALLY.--Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion, except:
(a) Character of accused.--Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait.
(b) Character of victim.--
1. Except as provided in s. 794.022, evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or
2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor.

there is a MIL on it. defense is trying to get around character evidence rule. gzlegalcase doesnt have the state's motion though.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052413_response_to_limine_tm.pdf

Wow, that is an absolute dog shit response to a critical motion in limine. There is no recitation to any legal authority for why the evidence comes in.

Frankly, I think it is a pretty clear cut issue under 404. The evidence should come in.

Nelson rules that Trayvon Martin's familiarity with guns, his marijuana use, and fights he may have been in cannot be brought up in Zimmerman's trial.

edit: i believe its in here, but its such a bad copy.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052813_court_minutes.pdf
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
June 05 2013 20:55 GMT
#2274
Trayvon Martin Shooting Fast Facts

Here's a look at what you need to know about the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in February 2012. Former neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman has been charged with second-degree murder and is scheduled to go on trial June 10, 2013.

Facts:
Trayvon Benjamin Martin, born February 5, 1995, was a 17-year-old African-American high school student who lived in Miami Gardens, Florida with his mother Sybrina Fulton. In February 2012, Martin was visting his father Tracy Martin in Sanford, Florida after receiving a ten-day suspension from Krop Senior High School. The suspension stemmed from the discovery of drug residue in Martin's book bag.

George Michael Zimmerman, born October 5, 1983, was a part-time student at Seminole State College and a neighborhood watch captain at the Retreat at Twin Lakes gated community in Sanford at the time of the shooting. He is married to Shellie (Dean) Zimmerman and is the son of Robert and Gladys Zimmerman.

Timeline:
February 26, 2012 - George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch captain in Sanford, Florida, calls 911 to report "a suspicious person" in the neighborhood. He is instructed not to get out of his SUV or approach the person. Zimmerman disregards the instructions. Moments later, neighbors report hearing gunfire. Zimmerman acknowledges that he shot Martin, claiming it was in self-defense. In a police report, Officer Timothy Smith writes that Zimmerman was bleeding from the nose and back of the head.

February 27, 2012 - Martin's father, Tracy Martin, files a missing persons report. Officers with the Sanford Police Department visit Tracy Martin. He is able to identify Trayvon Martin's body using a photo.

March 8, 2102 - Investigators receive a fax from the Altamonte Family Practice containing the medical records identifying the injuries sustained by Zimmerman on the night of the shooting: Open wound of scalp, without mention of complication; nasal bones, closed fracture; assault by other specified means.

March 12, 2012 - Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee says that Zimmerman has not been charged because there are no grounds to disprove his story of the events.

March 13, 2012 - Sanford Police Department's homicide detective Christopher Serino recommends Zimmerman be charged with manslaughter.
Zimmerman "failed to identify himself" as a concerned citizen or neighborhood watch member on two occasions that night. Serino reports that he thought Zimmerman's head injuries were "marginally consistent with a life-threatening episode, as described by him, during which neither a deadly weapon nor deadly force were deployed by Trayvon Martin."

March 14, 2012 - The case is turned over to the Florida State Attorney Norm Wolfinger.

March 15, 2012 - In a letter to the Orlando Sentinel, Robert Zimmerman, George Zimmerman's father, writes that George has been unfairly portrayed as a racist, and that George is Hispanic and grew up in a multiracial family.

March 16, 2012 - Authorities release seven 911 calls from the night of the shooting. In one of the 911 recordings, Zimmerman, against the advice of the 911 dispatcher, follows Martin. In one of the recordings, a voice screams "Help, help!" in the background, followed by the sound of a gunshot.

March 19, 2012 - The Justice Department and the FBI announce that they have launched an investigation into Martin's death.

March 20, 2012 - A lawyer for the Martin family, Benjamin Crump, holds a news conference, telling reporters that Trayvon was on the phone with his 16-year-old girlfriend at the time of the shooting. The girl, who wishes to remain anonymous, says she heard someone ask Martin what he was doing and heard Martin ask why the person was following him, according to Crump. The girl then got the impression that there was an altercation in which the earpiece fell out of Martin's ear and the connection went dead.

March 21, 2012 - CNN analyzes one of the tapes of Zimmerman's call to dispatch, in which he is purported to have used a racial slur against blacks. The results are inconclusive.

March 22, 2012 - A petition on Change.org calling for the arrest of Zimmerman, created by the parents of Trayvon Martin, surpasses 1.3 million people.

March 22, 2012 - Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee announces he is stepping down "temporarily" as head of the department, which has been criticized for its handling of the fatal shooting.

March 22, 2012 - Florida Gov. Rick Scott announces he is appointing Angela B. Corey of the 4th Judicial Circuit as state attorney in the investigation, replacing Norman Wolfinger, state attorney for Florida's 18th District, which includes Sanford.

March 23, 2012 - President Barack Obama speaks out publicly for the first time on the growing controversy over the shooting of Trayvon Martin, saying that the incident requires national "soul-searching."

March 24, 2012 - A handful of members from the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) offer a $10,000 reward for the "capture" of George Zimmerman.

March 26, 2012 - Exactly one month after Trayvon Martin's death, rallies take place in cities across the country, including Sanford, where the City Commission holds a town hall meeting on the incident and its aftermath. Martin's parents speak at the meeting.

March 28, 2012 - Zimmerman's father, Robert, appears on television and says that Martin threatened to kill Zimmerman and then beat him so badly Zimmerman was forced to shoot.

March 29, 2012 - Zimmerman's brother, Robert Zimmerman Jr., appears on CNN and says medical records will prove that his brother was attacked and his nose was broken by Trayvon Martin before he fatally shot the teen.

April 2, 2012 - FBI agents interview Martin's girlfriend, the 16-year-old girl who, phone records show, was on the cell phone with him shortly before the fatal confrontation.

April 3, 2012 - Zimmerman's legal adviser, Craig Sonner, says that criminal defense lawyer Hal Uhrig will represent Zimmerman and that Sonner will serve as co-counsel if the case proceeds.

April 7-8, 2012 - George Zimmerman launches a website warning supporters about groups falsely claiming to be raising funds for his defense. The site includes a link through which donations can be made to pay for Zimmerman's lawyers and living expenses.

April 9, 2012 - Prosecutor Angela Corey announces that she will not present the case to a grand jury.

April 10, 2012 - Attorneys Hal Uhrig and Craig Sonner announce that they have lost contact with Zimmerman and no longer represent him.

April 11, 2012 - Zimmerman is charged with second-degree murder. His new lawyer, Mark O'Mara, tells CNN that Zimmerman has turned himself in.

April 18, 2012 - Seminole Circuit Court Judge Jessica Recksiedler, who was assigned to Zimmerman's case, approves a motion to disqualify herself from the criminal case because her husband works as a CNN legal analyst.

April 18, 2012 - It is announced that Seminole County Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester Jr. will take over George Zimmerman's case.

April 20, 2012 - Zimmerman's bond hearing is held. Judge Lester sets Zimmerman's bond at $150,000. During the hearing, Zimmerman apologizes to the family of Trayvon Martin for the loss of their son.

April 23, 2012 - Zimmerman is released on bail at 12:05 AM. Later in the day, Zimmerman enters a written not guilty plea and waves his right to appear at his arraignment.

May 8, 2012 - Judge Kenneth Lester accepts Zimmerman's written plea of not guilty.

May 15, 2012 - A medical report by George Zimmerman's family doctor, taken a day after the February 26 shooting, shows Zimmerman was diagnosed with a fractured nose, two black eyes and two lacerations on the back of his head.

June 1, 2012 - Judge Kenneth Lester Jr. revokes Zimmerman's bond and orders him to surrender within 48 hours after the prosecution argues that Zimmerman and his wife, Shellie, misrepresented their finances when Zimmerman's bond was originally set in April.

June 3, 2012 - At 1:45 PM, Zimmerman surrenders to authorities and is taken into custody at the John E. Polk Correctional Facility in Seminole County.

June 12, 2012 - George Zimmerman's wife Shellie is arrested and charged with perjury.

June 18, 2012 - Audio of six phone calls between Zimmerman and his wife Shellie are released, along with bank statements.

June 20, 2012 - Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee is officially fired.

June 25, 2012 - Zimmerman's attorney files a motion requesting a "reasonable bond" be set for Zimmerman's release from jail.

July 5, 2012 - The judge sets Zimmerman's bond at $1 million.

July 6, 2012 - Zimmerman is released from jail after posting the required 10% of the $1 million bond ($100,000).

July 13, 2012 - Zimmerman's legal team files a motion requesting Judge Lester step down from the case. The motion claims Zimmerman cannot get a fair trial because Lester used "gratuitous, disparaging" language in the previous week's bail order.

July 18, 2012 - Zimmerman, appearing on Fox News "Hannity" show, does his first television interview since the shooting. He says he would not do anything differently.

August 9, 2012 - A photo of Trayvon Martin's body and George Zimmerman's school records are mistakenly released by prosecutors. Special Prosecutor Angela Corey's office issues a statement asking reporters to "please disregard and do not use the information contained in the initial e-mail. It was inadvertently attached."

August 13, 2012 - George Zimmerman appeals Judge Lester's refusal to recuse himself with the Fifth District Court of Appeals.

August 29, 2012 - A Florida appeals court grants Zimmerman's request for a new judge, saying Judge Kenneth Lester's remarks in a bail order put Zimmerman in reasonable fear of a fair trial.

August 30, 2012 - Judge Debra Nelson is assigned to replace Judge Kenneth Lester in the case of George Zimmerman.

December 7, 2012 - Zimmerman sues NBC Universal for allegedly editing the 911 call he placed on the night of the tragic event. He states in the lawsuit that NBC unfairly made it appear that "Zimmerman was a racist, and that he was racially profiling Trayvon Martin".

February 9, 2013 - The Justice for Trayvon Martin Foundation hosts a "Day of Remembrance Community Peace Walk and Forum" in Miami. It takes place four days after what would have been Martin's 18th birthday.

March 5, 2013 - Trayvon Martin's girlfriend, known as Civilian Witness 8, who was on the phone with Martin the night of his death, admits that she lied under oath when she told court prosecutors that she was in the hospital on the day of Martin's funeral.

March 5, 2013 - Lawyer Mark O'Mara decides against seeking a pretrial Stand your Ground immunity hearing for George Zimmerman citing lack of preparation time.

April 5, 2013 - Martin's parents settle a wrongful-death claim against the homeowners association of the Florida subdivision where their son was killed.

April 30, 2013 - George Zimmerman waives his right to a "stand your ground" pretrial immunity hearing. Zimmerman's attorneys decide they will instead try this as a self-defense case. If Zimmerman had had a pretrial immunity hearing, a judge would have ruled whether his actions were protected under the "stand your ground" law. If the judge had ruled in favor of Zimmerman, it would have meant that no criminal or civil trial could proceed.

May 28, 2013 - Judge Debra Nelson rules on several motions brought by the defense. Nelson rules that Trayvon Martin's familiarity with guns, his marijuana use, and fights he may have been in cannot be brought up in Zimmerman's trial. She also denies a request to take the jury to the crime scene. Nelson, however, rules that jurors will remain anonymous and will be referred to by numbers only.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/05/us/trayvon-martin-shooting-fast-facts/
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 05 2013 20:56 GMT
#2275
On June 06 2013 05:54 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 05:29 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:26 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:19 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

Does Florida have a special Rule 404? That limitation typically doesn't apply in most jurisdictions as far as I know. Defendants typically have free reign to offer evidence suggesting that their victims were aggressors based upon past behavior.

EDIT:

It doesn't look like Florida's Rule 404 is any different than the majority rule. See (1)(b)(1) below.

+ Show Spoiler +
90.404 Character evidence; when admissible.--
(1) CHARACTER EVIDENCE GENERALLY.--Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion, except:
(a) Character of accused.--Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait.
(b) Character of victim.--
1. Except as provided in s. 794.022, evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or
2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor.

there is a MIL on it. defense is trying to get around character evidence rule. gzlegalcase doesnt have the state's motion though.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052413_response_to_limine_tm.pdf

Wow, that is an absolute dog shit response to a critical motion in limine. There is no recitation to any legal authority for why the evidence comes in.

Frankly, I think it is a pretty clear cut issue under 404. The evidence should come in.

Nelson rules that Trayvon Martin's familiarity with guns, his marijuana use, and fights he may have been in cannot be brought up in Zimmerman's trial.

What was the basis? That they aren't evidence of a pertinent trait of a victim?
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
June 05 2013 20:58 GMT
#2276
On June 06 2013 05:56 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 05:54 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:29 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:26 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:19 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

Does Florida have a special Rule 404? That limitation typically doesn't apply in most jurisdictions as far as I know. Defendants typically have free reign to offer evidence suggesting that their victims were aggressors based upon past behavior.

EDIT:

It doesn't look like Florida's Rule 404 is any different than the majority rule. See (1)(b)(1) below.

+ Show Spoiler +
90.404 Character evidence; when admissible.--
(1) CHARACTER EVIDENCE GENERALLY.--Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion, except:
(a) Character of accused.--Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait.
(b) Character of victim.--
1. Except as provided in s. 794.022, evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or
2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor.

there is a MIL on it. defense is trying to get around character evidence rule. gzlegalcase doesnt have the state's motion though.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052413_response_to_limine_tm.pdf

Wow, that is an absolute dog shit response to a critical motion in limine. There is no recitation to any legal authority for why the evidence comes in.

Frankly, I think it is a pretty clear cut issue under 404. The evidence should come in.

Nelson rules that Trayvon Martin's familiarity with guns, his marijuana use, and fights he may have been in cannot be brought up in Zimmerman's trial.

What was the basis? That they aren't evidence of a pertinent trait of a victim?

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052813_court_minutes.pdf

typical minute order.
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
June 05 2013 21:00 GMT
#2277
it is kind of funny how many times the appellate court has reversed the trial court in this case.

Appeals court: Zimmerman defense can depose Trayvon Martin family attorney

The Fifth District Court of Appeal today ruled that Benjamin Crump, an attorney for Trayvon Martin’s family, must sit down and answer questions under oath by George Zimmerman’s attorneys.

In the just-released ruling, the court wrote that Zimmerman’s lawyers have a right to question Crump about his dealings with a woman who’s expected to be the state’s most important witness.

She’s a young Miami woman who was on the phone with Trayvon moments before he was shot.

Zimmerman’s attorneys had twice asked trial judge Debra S. Nelson to order Crump to sit down for a deposition, and twice she said no.

So defense attorneys went over her head, filing a writ with the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Daytona Beach.

It returned a unanimous five-page ruling this afternoon in Zimmerman’s favor.

Nelson was wrong, the court wrote, when she said Crump is protected by a work product privilege. He conducted a March 19, 2012, interview of the woman and made an audio recording while in the same room with two employees of ABC News.

The network broadcast portions of it shortly thereafter.

The appeals court said because that news crew was present during the recording, Crump had waived his work product privilege.

It also ruled that Crump deserves no protection, despite his claim of being opposing counsel, because he’s not. In this case he’d have to be a prosecutor to qualify.

Defense attorneys obtained a copy of the recording Crump made, but the appeals court described it as “incomplete and of very poor quality.”

It ruled that Zimmerman’s attorneys may question Crump but only on a very narrow set of things. They may ask him about the contents of the interview and about the circumstances surrounding it.

They may not, however, ask why he tracked her down or what methods he used to do that.

In a statement, Crump said “I am available to be deposed, and the trial should not be delayed in any possible way ....”

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2013-06-03/news/os-george-zimmerman-trial-crump-deposition_1_trayvon-martin-family-attorney-george-zimmerman-zimmerman-defense
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 05 2013 21:04 GMT
#2278
On June 06 2013 05:58 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2013 05:56 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:54 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:29 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:26 dAPhREAk wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:19 xDaunt wrote:
On June 06 2013 05:08 dAPhREAk wrote:
the most relevant one here though is likely the exclusion of trayvon's drug use/suspensions/guns/whatever other negative stuff he did before the incident. such character evidence (albeit relevant in most people's minds as to what actually happened) is normally excluded except under special circumstances in self defense cases unless the defendant was previously aware of such character (not the case here). same goes for zimmerman. the fact that he allegedly molested his family member, domestic violence, aggressive asshole at work, etc. should be excluded. none of it is relevant or probative of what happened on the actual date of the killing, and such evidence of bad character only serves to get people riled up and making decisions based on emotion rather than the cold hard facts (as considerably demonstrated in this thread).

Does Florida have a special Rule 404? That limitation typically doesn't apply in most jurisdictions as far as I know. Defendants typically have free reign to offer evidence suggesting that their victims were aggressors based upon past behavior.

EDIT:

It doesn't look like Florida's Rule 404 is any different than the majority rule. See (1)(b)(1) below.

+ Show Spoiler +
90.404 Character evidence; when admissible.--
(1) CHARACTER EVIDENCE GENERALLY.--Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion, except:
(a) Character of accused.--Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait.
(b) Character of victim.--
1. Except as provided in s. 794.022, evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or
2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor.

there is a MIL on it. defense is trying to get around character evidence rule. gzlegalcase doesnt have the state's motion though.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052413_response_to_limine_tm.pdf

Wow, that is an absolute dog shit response to a critical motion in limine. There is no recitation to any legal authority for why the evidence comes in.

Frankly, I think it is a pretty clear cut issue under 404. The evidence should come in.

Nelson rules that Trayvon Martin's familiarity with guns, his marijuana use, and fights he may have been in cannot be brought up in Zimmerman's trial.

What was the basis? That they aren't evidence of a pertinent trait of a victim?

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052813_court_minutes.pdf

typical minute order.

Yeah. Hopefully the judge took the time to at least explain herself during the hearing.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14203 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-06 22:23:54
June 06 2013 22:18 GMT
#2279
http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/06/05/zimmerman-hearing-prosecutor-violation-live-blog?hpt=hp_t2

If someone wants to read the proceedings of todays court hearing. It should be the last one before the trial. It'll pick up again tomarrow morning.

11:20 a.m. ET:

Kruidbos says there were 2958 photos in original report. In Kruidbos rreport, there were 4275 photos. Photos included Martin blowing smoke, pot, underaged naked fmales, clump of jewelry on bed.

He also says there were deleted text messages re a transaction for a firearm. The investigator said "it looks like they were selling a gun" and said they have to talk to Rionda.

11:51 a.m. ET: Kruidbos said Rionda told him they would only turn over the source file of Martin's phone to the defense.

A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
June 07 2013 00:54 GMT
#2280
On June 06 2013 05:55 dAPhREAk wrote:
Trayvon Martin Shooting Fast Facts

Show nested quote +
Here's a look at what you need to know about the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in February 2012. Former neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman has been charged with second-degree murder and is scheduled to go on trial June 10, 2013.

Facts:
Trayvon Benjamin Martin, born February 5, 1995, was a 17-year-old African-American high school student who lived in Miami Gardens, Florida with his mother Sybrina Fulton. In February 2012, Martin was visting his father Tracy Martin in Sanford, Florida after receiving a ten-day suspension from Krop Senior High School. The suspension stemmed from the discovery of drug residue in Martin's book bag.

George Michael Zimmerman, born October 5, 1983, was a part-time student at Seminole State College and a neighborhood watch captain at the Retreat at Twin Lakes gated community in Sanford at the time of the shooting. He is married to Shellie (Dean) Zimmerman and is the son of Robert and Gladys Zimmerman.

Timeline:
February 26, 2012 - George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch captain in Sanford, Florida, calls 911 to report "a suspicious person" in the neighborhood. He is instructed not to get out of his SUV or approach the person. Zimmerman disregards the instructions. Moments later, neighbors report hearing gunfire. Zimmerman acknowledges that he shot Martin, claiming it was in self-defense. In a police report, Officer Timothy Smith writes that Zimmerman was bleeding from the nose and back of the head.

February 27, 2012 - Martin's father, Tracy Martin, files a missing persons report. Officers with the Sanford Police Department visit Tracy Martin. He is able to identify Trayvon Martin's body using a photo.

March 8, 2102 - Investigators receive a fax from the Altamonte Family Practice containing the medical records identifying the injuries sustained by Zimmerman on the night of the shooting: Open wound of scalp, without mention of complication; nasal bones, closed fracture; assault by other specified means.

March 12, 2012 - Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee says that Zimmerman has not been charged because there are no grounds to disprove his story of the events.

March 13, 2012 - Sanford Police Department's homicide detective Christopher Serino recommends Zimmerman be charged with manslaughter.
Zimmerman "failed to identify himself" as a concerned citizen or neighborhood watch member on two occasions that night. Serino reports that he thought Zimmerman's head injuries were "marginally consistent with a life-threatening episode, as described by him, during which neither a deadly weapon nor deadly force were deployed by Trayvon Martin."

March 14, 2012 - The case is turned over to the Florida State Attorney Norm Wolfinger.

March 15, 2012 - In a letter to the Orlando Sentinel, Robert Zimmerman, George Zimmerman's father, writes that George has been unfairly portrayed as a racist, and that George is Hispanic and grew up in a multiracial family.

March 16, 2012 - Authorities release seven 911 calls from the night of the shooting. In one of the 911 recordings, Zimmerman, against the advice of the 911 dispatcher, follows Martin. In one of the recordings, a voice screams "Help, help!" in the background, followed by the sound of a gunshot.

March 19, 2012 - The Justice Department and the FBI announce that they have launched an investigation into Martin's death.

March 20, 2012 - A lawyer for the Martin family, Benjamin Crump, holds a news conference, telling reporters that Trayvon was on the phone with his 16-year-old girlfriend at the time of the shooting. The girl, who wishes to remain anonymous, says she heard someone ask Martin what he was doing and heard Martin ask why the person was following him, according to Crump. The girl then got the impression that there was an altercation in which the earpiece fell out of Martin's ear and the connection went dead.

March 21, 2012 - CNN analyzes one of the tapes of Zimmerman's call to dispatch, in which he is purported to have used a racial slur against blacks. The results are inconclusive.

March 22, 2012 - A petition on Change.org calling for the arrest of Zimmerman, created by the parents of Trayvon Martin, surpasses 1.3 million people.

March 22, 2012 - Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee announces he is stepping down "temporarily" as head of the department, which has been criticized for its handling of the fatal shooting.

March 22, 2012 - Florida Gov. Rick Scott announces he is appointing Angela B. Corey of the 4th Judicial Circuit as state attorney in the investigation, replacing Norman Wolfinger, state attorney for Florida's 18th District, which includes Sanford.

March 23, 2012 - President Barack Obama speaks out publicly for the first time on the growing controversy over the shooting of Trayvon Martin, saying that the incident requires national "soul-searching."

March 24, 2012 - A handful of members from the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) offer a $10,000 reward for the "capture" of George Zimmerman.

March 26, 2012 - Exactly one month after Trayvon Martin's death, rallies take place in cities across the country, including Sanford, where the City Commission holds a town hall meeting on the incident and its aftermath. Martin's parents speak at the meeting.

March 28, 2012 - Zimmerman's father, Robert, appears on television and says that Martin threatened to kill Zimmerman and then beat him so badly Zimmerman was forced to shoot.

March 29, 2012 - Zimmerman's brother, Robert Zimmerman Jr., appears on CNN and says medical records will prove that his brother was attacked and his nose was broken by Trayvon Martin before he fatally shot the teen.

April 2, 2012 - FBI agents interview Martin's girlfriend, the 16-year-old girl who, phone records show, was on the cell phone with him shortly before the fatal confrontation.

April 3, 2012 - Zimmerman's legal adviser, Craig Sonner, says that criminal defense lawyer Hal Uhrig will represent Zimmerman and that Sonner will serve as co-counsel if the case proceeds.

April 7-8, 2012 - George Zimmerman launches a website warning supporters about groups falsely claiming to be raising funds for his defense. The site includes a link through which donations can be made to pay for Zimmerman's lawyers and living expenses.

April 9, 2012 - Prosecutor Angela Corey announces that she will not present the case to a grand jury.

April 10, 2012 - Attorneys Hal Uhrig and Craig Sonner announce that they have lost contact with Zimmerman and no longer represent him.

April 11, 2012 - Zimmerman is charged with second-degree murder. His new lawyer, Mark O'Mara, tells CNN that Zimmerman has turned himself in.

April 18, 2012 - Seminole Circuit Court Judge Jessica Recksiedler, who was assigned to Zimmerman's case, approves a motion to disqualify herself from the criminal case because her husband works as a CNN legal analyst.

April 18, 2012 - It is announced that Seminole County Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester Jr. will take over George Zimmerman's case.

April 20, 2012 - Zimmerman's bond hearing is held. Judge Lester sets Zimmerman's bond at $150,000. During the hearing, Zimmerman apologizes to the family of Trayvon Martin for the loss of their son.

April 23, 2012 - Zimmerman is released on bail at 12:05 AM. Later in the day, Zimmerman enters a written not guilty plea and waves his right to appear at his arraignment.

May 8, 2012 - Judge Kenneth Lester accepts Zimmerman's written plea of not guilty.

May 15, 2012 - A medical report by George Zimmerman's family doctor, taken a day after the February 26 shooting, shows Zimmerman was diagnosed with a fractured nose, two black eyes and two lacerations on the back of his head.

June 1, 2012 - Judge Kenneth Lester Jr. revokes Zimmerman's bond and orders him to surrender within 48 hours after the prosecution argues that Zimmerman and his wife, Shellie, misrepresented their finances when Zimmerman's bond was originally set in April.

June 3, 2012 - At 1:45 PM, Zimmerman surrenders to authorities and is taken into custody at the John E. Polk Correctional Facility in Seminole County.

June 12, 2012 - George Zimmerman's wife Shellie is arrested and charged with perjury.

June 18, 2012 - Audio of six phone calls between Zimmerman and his wife Shellie are released, along with bank statements.

June 20, 2012 - Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee is officially fired.

June 25, 2012 - Zimmerman's attorney files a motion requesting a "reasonable bond" be set for Zimmerman's release from jail.

July 5, 2012 - The judge sets Zimmerman's bond at $1 million.

July 6, 2012 - Zimmerman is released from jail after posting the required 10% of the $1 million bond ($100,000).

July 13, 2012 - Zimmerman's legal team files a motion requesting Judge Lester step down from the case. The motion claims Zimmerman cannot get a fair trial because Lester used "gratuitous, disparaging" language in the previous week's bail order.

July 18, 2012 - Zimmerman, appearing on Fox News "Hannity" show, does his first television interview since the shooting. He says he would not do anything differently.

August 9, 2012 - A photo of Trayvon Martin's body and George Zimmerman's school records are mistakenly released by prosecutors. Special Prosecutor Angela Corey's office issues a statement asking reporters to "please disregard and do not use the information contained in the initial e-mail. It was inadvertently attached."

August 13, 2012 - George Zimmerman appeals Judge Lester's refusal to recuse himself with the Fifth District Court of Appeals.

August 29, 2012 - A Florida appeals court grants Zimmerman's request for a new judge, saying Judge Kenneth Lester's remarks in a bail order put Zimmerman in reasonable fear of a fair trial.

August 30, 2012 - Judge Debra Nelson is assigned to replace Judge Kenneth Lester in the case of George Zimmerman.

December 7, 2012 - Zimmerman sues NBC Universal for allegedly editing the 911 call he placed on the night of the tragic event. He states in the lawsuit that NBC unfairly made it appear that "Zimmerman was a racist, and that he was racially profiling Trayvon Martin".

February 9, 2013 - The Justice for Trayvon Martin Foundation hosts a "Day of Remembrance Community Peace Walk and Forum" in Miami. It takes place four days after what would have been Martin's 18th birthday.

March 5, 2013 - Trayvon Martin's girlfriend, known as Civilian Witness 8, who was on the phone with Martin the night of his death, admits that she lied under oath when she told court prosecutors that she was in the hospital on the day of Martin's funeral.

March 5, 2013 - Lawyer Mark O'Mara decides against seeking a pretrial Stand your Ground immunity hearing for George Zimmerman citing lack of preparation time.

April 5, 2013 - Martin's parents settle a wrongful-death claim against the homeowners association of the Florida subdivision where their son was killed.

April 30, 2013 - George Zimmerman waives his right to a "stand your ground" pretrial immunity hearing. Zimmerman's attorneys decide they will instead try this as a self-defense case. If Zimmerman had had a pretrial immunity hearing, a judge would have ruled whether his actions were protected under the "stand your ground" law. If the judge had ruled in favor of Zimmerman, it would have meant that no criminal or civil trial could proceed.

May 28, 2013 - Judge Debra Nelson rules on several motions brought by the defense. Nelson rules that Trayvon Martin's familiarity with guns, his marijuana use, and fights he may have been in cannot be brought up in Zimmerman's trial. She also denies a request to take the jury to the crime scene. Nelson, however, rules that jurors will remain anonymous and will be referred to by numbers only.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/05/us/trayvon-martin-shooting-fast-facts/

I wish they'd have included the actual wording from the dispatcher. And the fact that a dispatcher's advice is not legally binding.
Who called in the fleet?
Prev 1 112 113 114 115 116 503 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 51m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Trap 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 33332
Calm 3984
EffOrt 938
Mini 608
Light 509
Larva 310
Soulkey 294
Rush 234
Stork 227
hero 119
[ Show more ]
Hyun 74
BRAT_OK 62
soO 46
Sharp 28
Terrorterran 28
Bale 25
HiyA 20
Aegong 19
Rock 19
Dota 2
qojqva5314
420jenkins979
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1101
x6flipin527
byalli0
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu172
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi1807
Beastyqt582
ceh9488
XaKoH 226
Hui .195
C9.Mang088
TKL 78
QueenE43
Trikslyr40
KnowMe31
FrodaN1
Organizations
Other Games
WardiTV347
BasetradeTV29
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile161
• Adnapsc2 1
• intothetv
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki5
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1903
League of Legends
• Nemesis2162
• TFBlade670
Other Games
• WagamamaTV331
• Shiphtur233
• imaqtpie51
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
6h 51m
Kung Fu Cup
17h 51m
Replay Cast
1d 6h
The PondCast
1d 16h
KCM Race Survival
1d 16h
Escore
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
4 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-02
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.