• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:08
CEST 11:08
KST 18:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic6Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [ASL19] Grand Finals NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 27680 users

Free Will and Religion - Page 3

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 47 48 49 Next All
Yes, this is a thread on TL that involves religion, but I hate to think that our policy should be to blindly close every such thread. Sam Harris is a writer whose books are both insightful and have sparked many good discussions in the past and as long as the thread doesn't derail I'd like to leave it open. This should be the basic premise for every such thread, no matter how high the odds of it derailing. In that light, these posts that just predict the downfall of this thread (whether it be pre-determined or not) are 1) Not contributing to the discussion 2) Backseat moderating 3) Annoying 4) Actually contributing towards derailing it. I'll keep 2 daying people for this.
radscorpion9
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada2252 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-05 13:26:15
March 05 2012 13:25 GMT
#41
On March 05 2012 22:10 paralleluniverse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2012 21:43 Skilledblob wrote:
is it my decision to move? yes it is, nothing could force me to lift my leg. Instead if I make the conscious decision to move my leg my brain will send out electric impulses that start the biochemic reactions that take place in my muscles so that I can move my leg.

There is no outer force or atomic movement involved here which I can not control. I move because I want to and not because an electron randomly decides to move down my spine into my leg.

so I think your point is invalid.


on the point of free will in religion. Take islam for example there is no consens in that religion if we have free will or not. Some say we do and some say we dont and based on that the texts are different. And the islam is based on the old testament, so it's not as convinient as you make it out jsut because some like to think that religion begins and ends with Christianity.


the only things that you have to do in life is eat, shit, sleep and die the rest is optional.

Your decision to move is caused by electrical signals between synapses in your brain, these electrical signals are caused by biochemical reactions, these biochemical reactions are caused by the motion of particles, the motion of these particles are dictated by the laws of physics.

At no point in the chain of actions is your will exerted.

Every action in this chain has a prior cause, and if we trace this back, we end up at the motion of particles, of which you have no conscious control over.


To be fair (I think) we don't really *know* how the brain works, but this is probably the best hypothesis so far. I just don't agree with viewing this as a fact until we actually know the details of what the electrical/chemical equivalent of a thought is, or can demonstrate it to a satisfactory degree.

The determinism-based view of the universe, while it seems consistent with our experimental knowledge, also runs into problems if you go back far enough. For instance, if time was created during the big bang, then how exactly could there have been a cause for it if there is no before and after? If there is some sort of higher-order determinism that works beyond time, then wouldn't it necessarily have to go backwards an infinite number of steps? Where would be the beginning of this? There must be something missing in the equation. Because I know the idea of a sudden beginning is just as perplexing as an infinite series of events.

Anyways maybe there's a level of order above that which is obvious to us. I know its vague and can sound like mystical nonsense, but fundamentally we should keep our options open. But for now I think the best view of life has to be determinism.
ooni
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Australia1498 Posts
March 05 2012 13:25 GMT
#42
Here is how I see it...

HERE WE GO
Imagine a machine that can predict the future by 100% or very close to it it should be considered 100%, let us say this machine exists and figures out the outcome by "pre-determined" data. IF (<- note the big if) a such machine was possible to build and one does the opposite, that person would have acquired "free will" (if one defines free will as changing the course of the future by a choice).

If you are going to argue, "you do not have all the data, the data of the last choice was not included..."; That does not matter since everything is supposely 'predetermined', the last choice should have been predicted by the data at that point.
If it cannot be predicted by the machine 2 possible futures exist depending on the person's choice

Well I believe humans or other animals with lessor intelligence is a crappier version of this machine. They can predict somewhat what will happen and act upon it, and has the free will to not to act upon it or act differently.
Hi!
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10668 Posts
March 05 2012 13:26 GMT
#43
On March 05 2012 22:12 Cirqueenflex wrote:
i have no free will, if i decide to do (or not to do) something it is a cumulation of my acquired experiences in life. That unfortunately does not relieve me of being responsible for what i do.


This does not contradict free will in the least?

You get input --> you process it --> you react.
Naturally you will pick the , to your knowledge, reaction which brings you the closest to your desired result.

This is not contradicting free will in the least? It's just not being a psychopath constantly rolling dice instead of acting accroding to his experiences or knowledge.
Timmsh
Profile Joined July 2011
Netherlands201 Posts
March 05 2012 13:27 GMT
#44
@ Knatt,
no because how you sayit now, the "predictor" is not included in the prediction.
This is not a good way to predict something in general.
So in your model of the universe, the 'model' and thereby all it's effects has to be included in the same model...
This cannot be done, and thus such a model cannot be made.
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-05 13:28:36
March 05 2012 13:28 GMT
#45
On March 05 2012 22:12 knatt wrote:
Are you telling me that I don't have control over my own actions? If what you say is true, then I would define it as "fate". I don't believe in fate, though I can't prove that it doesn't exist. But I'd rather think that the world is unpredictable because it's more fun that way.

The world is unpredictable because there are trillions of trillions of what we believe are possible outcomes, based on trillions and trillions of variables. It is likely for this reason, it feels as if free will exists.

But, for all intents and purposes of living life, the universe works "as if" free will exists.
Zetter
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Germany629 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-05 13:29:40
March 05 2012 13:29 GMT
#46
This topic has been discussed to death so often, with the simple result that the human mind is not capable of answering the question of free will. Why create a thread about it?

It is an interesting topic nonetheless, I'm really looking forward to my lectures and seminars about it.

On March 05 2012 22:22 knatt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2012 22:17 CyDe wrote:
I suppose when you look at it that way, yes everything that you do and think is just chemical reacting with each other and causing you to perceive and react to everything there is. Slightly depressing thought, knowing that really you are pretty basic. With the most complex algorithm in the universe, it would probably be possible to predict everything happening in the future and thereby destroying free will.

That being said, I think the fact that we as humans have the ability to realize this is very significant and amazing.

Lets say that we predict what will happen. Like someone calculates that I will go for a vacation in Korea, but since someone told me, I chose not to go just to defy the logic. Then I broke the law of the universe?


The calculation would already be predetermined. Unless you're calculating with a quantum computer, I guess (you couldn't calculate such things with a digital computer anyways). Then you should have a real paradox.
Mendici sumus. Hoc est verum. | I don't mind straight people, as long as they act gay in public. | Es ist keine Tugend edel geboren werden, sondern sich edel machen | οἶδα οὐκ εἰδώς
radscorpion9
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada2252 Posts
March 05 2012 13:29 GMT
#47
On March 05 2012 22:25 ooni wrote:
Here is how I see it...

HERE WE GO
Imagine a machine that can predict the future by 100% or very close to it it should be considered 100%, let us say this machine exists and figures out the outcome by "pre-determined" data. IF (<- note the big if) a such machine was possible to build and one does the opposite, that person would have acquired "free will" (if one defines free will as changing the course of the future by a choice).

If you are going to argue, "you do not have all the data, the data of the last choice was not included..."; That does not matter since everything is supposely 'predetermined', the last choice should have been predicted by the data at that point.
If it cannot be predicted by the machine 2 possible futures exist depending on the person's choice

Well I believe humans or other animals with lessor intelligence is a crappier version of this machine. They can predict somewhat what will happen and act upon it, and has the free will to not to act upon it or act differently.


What if that machine told the person what kind of sandwich they would have the next morning. If everything is determined, would it be fair to say that the person will always have that sandwich? If the machine told me which sandwich I was going to eat, do I believe that I would be physically incapable of choosing otherwise? I was thinking of that a while ago. Not sure if its 100% logical.

(The reaction to hearing the data should have also been factored in, right?)
zalz
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Netherlands3704 Posts
March 05 2012 13:30 GMT
#48
On March 05 2012 22:28 paralleluniverse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2012 22:12 knatt wrote:
Are you telling me that I don't have control over my own actions? If what you say is true, then I would define it as "fate". I don't believe in fate, though I can't prove that it doesn't exist. But I'd rather think that the world is unpredictable because it's more fun that way.

The world is unpredictable because there are trillions of trillions of what we believe are possible outcomes, based on trillions and trillions of variables. It is likely for this reason, it feels as if free will exists.

But, for all intents and purposes of living life, the universe works "as if" free will exists.


It works a little like a computer. Computers cannot generate truly random numbers, but they can generate numbers in such a complex fashion that they become essentially random.

You could flip a coin, and if you had all the information in the universe, you could already know the outcome. But the universe is too complex.
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
March 05 2012 13:30 GMT
#49
To be fair (I think) we don't really *know* how the brain works


It's more than fair. Consciousness is not understood at all past descriptions of behavior and physical indicators, which is why people arguing against free will have to resort to simplistic reductionist arguments about physical processes in order to skip over that particular problem. They can't explain it, so they reduce it to a process that they can explain.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
Timmsh
Profile Joined July 2011
Netherlands201 Posts
March 05 2012 13:31 GMT
#50
@ Ooni, you forgot to include the machine itself in the predictions.
Then you cannot predict anything at all.
knatt
Profile Joined October 2008
Sweden21 Posts
March 05 2012 13:33 GMT
#51
On March 05 2012 22:27 Timmsh wrote:
@ Knatt,
no because how you sayit now, the "predictor" is not included in the prediction.
This is not a good way to predict something in general.
So in your model of the universe, the 'model' and thereby all it's effects has to be included in the same model...
This cannot be done, and thus such a model cannot be made.

I know that such a model cannot be made. But since it cannot be made then the future cannot be predicted, or atleast it cannot be understood because it would cause a paradox. Therefore I would like to think that free will exists.
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-05 13:36:10
March 05 2012 13:34 GMT
#52
On March 05 2012 22:25 radscorpion9 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2012 22:10 paralleluniverse wrote:
On March 05 2012 21:43 Skilledblob wrote:
is it my decision to move? yes it is, nothing could force me to lift my leg. Instead if I make the conscious decision to move my leg my brain will send out electric impulses that start the biochemic reactions that take place in my muscles so that I can move my leg.

There is no outer force or atomic movement involved here which I can not control. I move because I want to and not because an electron randomly decides to move down my spine into my leg.

so I think your point is invalid.


on the point of free will in religion. Take islam for example there is no consens in that religion if we have free will or not. Some say we do and some say we dont and based on that the texts are different. And the islam is based on the old testament, so it's not as convinient as you make it out jsut because some like to think that religion begins and ends with Christianity.


the only things that you have to do in life is eat, shit, sleep and die the rest is optional.

Your decision to move is caused by electrical signals between synapses in your brain, these electrical signals are caused by biochemical reactions, these biochemical reactions are caused by the motion of particles, the motion of these particles are dictated by the laws of physics.

At no point in the chain of actions is your will exerted.

Every action in this chain has a prior cause, and if we trace this back, we end up at the motion of particles, of which you have no conscious control over.


To be fair (I think) we don't really *know* how the brain works, but this is probably the best hypothesis so far. I just don't agree with viewing this as a fact until we actually know the details of what the electrical/chemical equivalent of a thought is, or can demonstrate it to a satisfactory degree.

The determinism-based view of the universe, while it seems consistent with our experimental knowledge, also runs into problems if you go back far enough. For instance, if time was created during the big bang, then how exactly could there have been a cause for it if there is no before and after? If there is some sort of higher-order determinism that works beyond time, then wouldn't it necessarily have to go backwards an infinite number of steps? Where would be the beginning of this? There must be something missing in the equation. Because I know the idea of a sudden beginning is just as perplexing as an infinite series of events.

Anyways maybe there's a level of order above that which is obvious to us. I know its vague and can sound like mystical nonsense, but fundamentally we should keep our options open. But for now I think the best view of life has to be determinism.

About the brain, are you suggesting that the brain is some special region of spacetime, whereby our usual understanding that all actions and motions are the aggregate of the motion of elementary particles, falls apart? This sounds like a extraordinary claim even when compared to the claim that free will does not exist.

As for the origin of the universe. It really isn't relevant to the question here, but there are theories whereby a universe can be spontaneously created where no space existed before.
CyDe
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States1010 Posts
March 05 2012 13:35 GMT
#53
On March 05 2012 22:22 knatt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2012 22:17 CyDe wrote:
I suppose when you look at it that way, yes everything that you do and think is just chemical reacting with each other and causing you to perceive and react to everything there is. Slightly depressing thought, knowing that really you are pretty basic. With the most complex algorithm in the universe, it would probably be possible to predict everything happening in the future and thereby destroying free will.

That being said, I think the fact that we as humans have the ability to realize this is very significant and amazing.

Lets say that we predict what will happen. Like someone calculates that I will go for a vacation in Korea, but since someone told me, I chose not to go just to defy the logic. Then I broke the law of the universe?


Yes, that would be a problem, but this algorithm is completely theoretical and even if it did exist a human would by no means be able to understand it.

And as many other people have mentioned, the act of knowing the future changes the future; ergo, as soon as you know the future, you don't.
youtube.com/GamingCyDe-- My totally abandoned youtube channel that I might revisit at some point
Pholon
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Netherlands6142 Posts
March 05 2012 13:36 GMT
#54
Do we have free will? Of course - after all, what other choice do we have...
Moderator@TLPholon // "I need a third hand to facepalm right now"
mrafaeldie12
Profile Joined July 2011
Brazil537 Posts
March 05 2012 13:36 GMT
#55
Aren't religious topics banned on TL?

User was temp banned for this post.
"..it all comes thumbling down thumbling down thumblin down"
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
March 05 2012 13:37 GMT
#56
On March 05 2012 22:17 QuestSeekers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2012 21:37 paralleluniverse wrote:
As with everything in the universe, every thought and action made by a person is not a result of free will, it's a result of the laws of physics acting on particles.

The only reason theologians and religious people latch on to the completely unscientific notion of free will is to "explain" why bad things happen. If God is good, then why did he let the genocide in Rwanda happen? Why does he not intervene in the the mass-murder being conducted by the Syrian government, as we speak? Why is there evil in the world. Because God gave us free will, allegedly. This is then neatly tied into the Original Sin myth, whereby Eve exerted free will and chose to eat from the Garden of Eden, and this frivolous reason somehow necessitated that Jesus die on the cross.

Religions abuse this nonexistent notion of free will in an attempt to explain away the gaping flaws of the God hypothesis and the existence of evil.


The above is an anachronistic understanding of religion, theology, and theodicy.

If God exists, then why is there evil in the world?
Kupon3ss
Profile Joined May 2008
時の回廊10066 Posts
March 05 2012 13:37 GMT
#57
quantum mechanics
all particles at its most elemental degree have a certain amount of randomness in it, and the collective randomness makes it impossible to accurately capture the state of a system and use classical physics to predict future actions
When in doubt, just believe in yourself and press buttons
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
March 05 2012 13:38 GMT
#58
On March 05 2012 22:24 Geiko wrote:
Randomness is inherent to the modern theories (quantium physics etc...). As long as we don't understand what causes this randomness, anyone is free to call it "god's will" or anything, so I don't think you have a very good point.

If your thoughts and actions are determined by a random number generator, they would still not be free.

And there is no evidence of God.
GrayGhost
Profile Joined February 2011
United States72 Posts
March 05 2012 13:39 GMT
#59
you people think you're so smart.
Theta Chi
ooni
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Australia1498 Posts
March 05 2012 13:39 GMT
#60
On March 05 2012 22:29 radscorpion9 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2012 22:25 ooni wrote:
Here is how I see it...

HERE WE GO
Imagine a machine that can predict the future by 100% or very close to it it should be considered 100%, let us say this machine exists and figures out the outcome by "pre-determined" data. IF (<- note the big if) a such machine was possible to build and one does the opposite, that person would have acquired "free will" (if one defines free will as changing the course of the future by a choice).

If you are going to argue, "you do not have all the data, the data of the last choice was not included..."; That does not matter since everything is supposely 'predetermined', the last choice should have been predicted by the data at that point.
If it cannot be predicted by the machine 2 possible futures exist depending on the person's choice

Well I believe humans or other animals with lessor intelligence is a crappier version of this machine. They can predict somewhat what will happen and act upon it, and has the free will to not to act upon it or act differently.


What if that machine told the person what kind of sandwich they would have the next morning. If everything is determined, would it be fair to say that the person will always have that sandwich? If the machine told me which sandwich I was going to eat, do I believe that I would be physically incapable of choosing otherwise? I was thinking of that a while ago. Not sure if its 100% logical.

(The reaction to hearing the data should have also been factored in, right?)

No that's the thing, the person could choose otherwise, it is a possible scenario. Thus a machine that supposely determine the future (which is possible because everything is supposely "predetermined") is only one scenario, if it wants to be 100% correct it will need to produce 2, an alternative future depending on the choice the person makes.

The reaction after hearing the data is not a data that is required, since everything is predetermined, it should be obvious for the machine to figure out what the decision will be (that decision should be predetermined).
Hi!
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 47 48 49 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mcanning 149
ProTech80
Livibee 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2898
Sea 2148
EffOrt 421
actioN 357
Leta 104
Mini 72
sSak 70
ToSsGirL 60
ZerO 51
Soulkey 45
[ Show more ]
hero 42
Light 38
Sharp 34
Nal_rA 15
NaDa 11
HiyA 9
JYJ7
zelot 7
ivOry 5
Dota 2
XcaliburYe507
BananaSlamJamma472
Fuzer 205
League of Legends
JimRising 555
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1308
shoxiejesuss857
kennyS398
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor169
Other Games
C9.Mang0980
XBOCT463
Happy462
crisheroes351
Mew2King172
Lowko80
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream8164
Other Games
gamesdonequick658
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 197
lovetv 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Airneanach6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV107
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
22m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
52m
OSC
11h 52m
Replay Cast
14h 52m
OSC
14h 52m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 1h
OSC
1d 3h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 17h
SOOP
1d 23h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Cheesadelphia
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs TBD
TBD vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.