• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:09
CEST 09:09
KST 16:09
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202532RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 572 users

If you're seeing this topic then another mass shooting hap…

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 530 531 532 533 534 891 Next
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action.
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
May 24 2013 21:33 GMT
#10621
On May 25 2013 05:28 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2013 11:52 Wegandi wrote:
Pretty much. They attempt to corner the moral high ground by acting like they're acting selflessly and in the interests of these poor people, but it's only a mask to hide their agenda which is almost always to give more power to the State and take it away from the individual.


Saying that the only reason people are in favour of state control of things is because they have a fetish for state control over individual control for unspecified reasons and not because they think it could be a good idea is fucking retarded. The vast majority of people believe things like armies should be state controlled rather than private because they think private armies would be bad for society for example, not because they have a hardon for state control.

Think of something you think should be state controlled. There must be something. Then think "why do I think that should be state controlled?". If the answer is anything other than "to increase the ability of the state to strip the freedoms of individuals as part of my long term game plan/conspiracy" then you have now gained understanding of how your political opponents think.


Yeah, let's not strawman people who think differently.

People with statist-leaning views rarely want to strip people of freedoms; they simply don't weigh freedom as highly as other things in their ideal society.
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
May 24 2013 22:09 GMT
#10622
Interesting analysis of entry-level "Liberator" 3D printed guns from the police commissioner in New South Wales, Australia:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0e6_1369399875


Ignoring the legality of printing the guns, anyone thinking about messing with this must be aware of the actual danger to the user, in addition to the danger to others. Because the manufacturing is not controlled for quality and safety standards in individual homes, the risk for failure is significant -- and the cheaper the printer that is used, the less reliable the device is.
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
May 24 2013 22:24 GMT
#10623
On May 25 2013 07:09 FallDownMarigold wrote:
Interesting analysis of entry-level "Liberator" 3D printed guns from the police commissioner in New South Wales, Australia:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0e6_1369399875


Ignoring the legality of printing the guns, anyone thinking about messing with this must be aware of the actual danger to the user, in addition to the danger to others. Because the manufacturing is not controlled for quality and safety standards in individual homes, the risk for failure is significant -- and the cheaper the printer that is used, the less reliable the device is.


It'll be some time to develop the technology required to print an effective firearm.

That said, the video is silly propaganda to discourage people from 3D-printing guns. They constructed handguns form weak plastic (I'm guessing ABS), so of course they can't handle much stress from live firing (that said, I believe the general online consensus is that they can handle at least a few shots provided you use the proper caliber and weak loads). In reality, 3D-printed guns will most likely move towards more durable materials as the technology develops.
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
May 24 2013 22:40 GMT
#10624
It's a bit of a stretch to call it silly propaganda... The point they make is clear: 1) It's illegal. 2) Ignoring legality, it's highly dangerous -- especially when lower grade materials and a lower quality printer is used, which are of course more common than better, more expensive ones (which will still have unpredictable failure rates given the lack of quality control in an individual's home).

They emphasize it being illegal because they're police. What I thought was more important, though, was that they clearly demonstrated it's not a safe device to use, period. Some people might not have considered that, so letting people know is a very good thing.
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
May 24 2013 22:47 GMT
#10625
On May 25 2013 07:40 FallDownMarigold wrote:
It's a bit of a stretch to call it silly propaganda... The point they make is clear: 1) It's illegal. 2) Ignoring legality, it's highly dangerous -- especially when lower grade materials and a lower quality printer is used, which are of course more common than better, more expensive ones (which will still have unpredictable failure rates given the lack of quality control in an individual's home).

They emphasize it being illegal because they're police. What I thought was more important, though, was that they clearly demonstrated it's not a safe device to use, period. Some people might not have considered that, so letting people know is a very good thing.


Don't get me wrong, I don't disagree with discouraging people from using 3D-printed guns.

The problem I have with it is that it's essentially a strawman which exaggerates the situation. It's not all that different from anti-drug programs targeted at children which tell them that trying weed once will destroy their lives. There's a pretty good trope for this called "Scare 'Em Straight.
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-25 00:43:16
May 25 2013 00:42 GMT
#10626
On May 25 2013 07:40 FallDownMarigold wrote:
It's a bit of a stretch to call it silly propaganda... The point they make is clear: 1) It's illegal. 2) Ignoring legality, it's highly dangerous -- especially when lower grade materials and a lower quality printer is used, which are of course more common than better, more expensive ones (which will still have unpredictable failure rates given the lack of quality control in an individual's home).

They emphasize it being illegal because they're police. What I thought was more important, though, was that they clearly demonstrated it's not a safe device to use, period. Some people might not have considered that, so letting people know is a very good thing.

There's no Federal law in the US against making your own firearms.

As always, individual states may say otherwise.
Who called in the fleet?
Jormundr
Profile Joined July 2011
United States1678 Posts
May 25 2013 00:45 GMT
#10627
On May 25 2013 09:42 Millitron wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2013 07:40 FallDownMarigold wrote:
It's a bit of a stretch to call it silly propaganda... The point they make is clear: 1) It's illegal. 2) Ignoring legality, it's highly dangerous -- especially when lower grade materials and a lower quality printer is used, which are of course more common than better, more expensive ones (which will still have unpredictable failure rates given the lack of quality control in an individual's home).

They emphasize it being illegal because they're police. What I thought was more important, though, was that they clearly demonstrated it's not a safe device to use, period. Some people might not have considered that, so letting people know is a very good thing.

There's no Federal law in the US against making your own firearms.

As always, individual states may say otherwise.

They're talking about Australia.
Capitalism is beneficial for people who work harder than other people. Under capitalism the only way to make more money is to work harder then your competitors whether they be other companies or workers. ~ Vegetarian
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-25 00:55:39
May 25 2013 00:53 GMT
#10628
On May 25 2013 09:42 Millitron wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2013 07:40 FallDownMarigold wrote:
It's a bit of a stretch to call it silly propaganda... The point they make is clear: 1) It's illegal. 2) Ignoring legality, it's highly dangerous -- especially when lower grade materials and a lower quality printer is used, which are of course more common than better, more expensive ones (which will still have unpredictable failure rates given the lack of quality control in an individual's home).

They emphasize it being illegal because they're police. What I thought was more important, though, was that they clearly demonstrated it's not a safe device to use, period. Some people might not have considered that, so letting people know is a very good thing.

There's no Federal law in the US against making your own firearms.

As always, individual states may say otherwise.


Yes and there is also no New South Wales, Australia, in the US.


edit: Sorry, Jormundr already pointed this out. Didn't see his reply
norjoncal
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
89 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-25 00:54:45
May 25 2013 00:54 GMT
#10629
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
May 25 2013 01:26 GMT
#10630
On May 25 2013 09:45 Jormundr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2013 09:42 Millitron wrote:
On May 25 2013 07:40 FallDownMarigold wrote:
It's a bit of a stretch to call it silly propaganda... The point they make is clear: 1) It's illegal. 2) Ignoring legality, it's highly dangerous -- especially when lower grade materials and a lower quality printer is used, which are of course more common than better, more expensive ones (which will still have unpredictable failure rates given the lack of quality control in an individual's home).

They emphasize it being illegal because they're police. What I thought was more important, though, was that they clearly demonstrated it's not a safe device to use, period. Some people might not have considered that, so letting people know is a very good thing.

There's no Federal law in the US against making your own firearms.

As always, individual states may say otherwise.

They're talking about Australia.

I know, when I noticed I edited in "in the US".
Who called in the fleet?
Rollin
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia1552 Posts
June 04 2013 09:21 GMT
#10631
On May 25 2013 07:09 FallDownMarigold wrote:
Interesting analysis of entry-level "Liberator" 3D printed guns from the police commissioner in New South Wales, Australia:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0e6_1369399875


Ignoring the legality of printing the guns, anyone thinking about messing with this must be aware of the actual danger to the user, in addition to the danger to others. Because the manufacturing is not controlled for quality and safety standards in individual homes, the risk for failure is significant -- and the cheaper the printer that is used, the less reliable the device is.

This is very bad. I would hate to have some stupid arms race pollute our society too . The worst part is how completely untraceable and undetectable they are... airport security for example is becoming a lot less secure.
Throw off those chains of reason, and your prison disappears. | Check your posting frequency timeline: http://www.teamliquid.net/mytlnet/post_activity_img.php
Ettick
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States2434 Posts
June 04 2013 21:38 GMT
#10632
It's sort of funny how people took so much time to make a gun on a 3d printer when they could have just made one out of a brake line...
WeddingEpisode
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States356 Posts
June 04 2013 22:18 GMT
#10633
Yes we should be able to. The government's job isn't to interpret the value and worth of a law based on current trends.
If there were no risks in life, it'd be pointless and miserable.
There are going to be accidents and crimes done no matter what (unfortunately); so then compromising the agency of legislative and executive government as a response is the worst thing that can happen upon an already crummy situation. Compromising because they're acting as citizen, and not government when they reach down from the Capital to lend an inappropriate hand like that.
Still diamond
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-05 20:24:04
June 05 2013 20:21 GMT
#10634
On June 04 2013 18:21 Rollin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2013 07:09 FallDownMarigold wrote:
Interesting analysis of entry-level "Liberator" 3D printed guns from the police commissioner in New South Wales, Australia:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0e6_1369399875


Ignoring the legality of printing the guns, anyone thinking about messing with this must be aware of the actual danger to the user, in addition to the danger to others. Because the manufacturing is not controlled for quality and safety standards in individual homes, the risk for failure is significant -- and the cheaper the printer that is used, the less reliable the device is.

This is very bad. I would hate to have some stupid arms race pollute our society too . The worst part is how completely untraceable and undetectable they are... airport security for example is becoming a lot less secure.


You say that as if airport security was effective in the first place...
theodorus12
Profile Joined June 2013
Switzerland129 Posts
June 07 2013 17:26 GMT
#10635
Yes they should be allowed. I'm Swiss and here pretty much every adult man has at least a rifle at home. We also have a huge gun culture. But look at our crime rate, it's very low and there are almost no shootings.
FliedLice
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Germany7494 Posts
June 09 2013 22:07 GMT
#10636
On June 05 2013 07:18 WeddingEpisode wrote:
Yes we should be able to. The government's job isn't to interpret the value and worth of a law based on current trends.
If there were no risks in life, it'd be pointless and miserable.
There are going to be accidents and crimes done no matter what (unfortunately); so then compromising the agency of legislative and executive government as a response is the worst thing that can happen upon an already crummy situation. Compromising because they're acting as citizen, and not government when they reach down from the Capital to lend an inappropriate hand like that.


"No risk, no fun" is now an argument against gun control?
Kevmeister @ Dota2
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
June 09 2013 22:25 GMT
#10637
On June 10 2013 07:07 FliedLice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 05 2013 07:18 WeddingEpisode wrote:
Yes we should be able to. The government's job isn't to interpret the value and worth of a law based on current trends.
If there were no risks in life, it'd be pointless and miserable.
There are going to be accidents and crimes done no matter what (unfortunately); so then compromising the agency of legislative and executive government as a response is the worst thing that can happen upon an already crummy situation. Compromising because they're acting as citizen, and not government when they reach down from the Capital to lend an inappropriate hand like that.


"No risk, no fun" is now an argument against gun control?


Pointless and miserable ≠ no fun.

Automobiles are an example of an extremely high risk technology that nevertheless benefits our quality of life.

It's not an argument against gun control, so much as it's pointing out that merely the existence of risk is insufficient to demonstrate that something should be banned. The real question is whether the harm is great enough to justify imposing restrictions on freedom, and if so, to what degree.
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
June 09 2013 22:38 GMT
#10638
It's great to mention automobiles in the context of gun control. Automobile use in the US serves as an excellent example of how implementing changes affecting the agent and environment of a public health problem leads to a greatly improved health outcome.

With changes to the automobile and the environment in which automobile death and injury occurred the numbers associated with automobile death and injury improved significantly.

Some day we will take similar steps toward firearms, once the politically motivated opposition and bipartisan squabbling over the issue dries up in the face of the facts.
acker
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2958 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-10 00:20:32
June 10 2013 00:06 GMT
#10639
On May 25 2013 07:40 FallDownMarigold wrote:
It's a bit of a stretch to call it silly propaganda... The point they make is clear: 1) It's illegal. 2) Ignoring legality, it's highly dangerous -- especially when lower grade materials and a lower quality printer is used, which are of course more common than better, more expensive ones (which will still have unpredictable failure rates given the lack of quality control in an individual's home).

They emphasize it being illegal because they're police. What I thought was more important, though, was that they clearly demonstrated it's not a safe device to use, period. Some people might not have considered that, so letting people know is a very good thing.

As you noted, the video is from Australian police; it is NOT illegal for Americans to manufacture firearms for personal use without a license (barring restrictions concerning machine guns, short-barreled rifles/shotguns, etc).

I'd also be interested to see how they went about testing these firearms. Standard firearms testing involves using a cartridge 30% more powerful than intended for said firearm design.

On June 10 2013 07:38 FallDownMarigold wrote:
It's great to mention automobiles in the context of gun control. Automobile use in the US serves as an excellent example of how implementing changes affecting the agent and environment of a public health problem leads to a greatly improved health outcome.

It should be noted that the restrictions and usage requirements for automobiles only apply when driving on public property (or other people's private property).

If you own enough land, you can drive whatever you want on it as long as it isn't powered by nukes or dead babies. Some rich people actually buy T-55s and drive them around their land.

On June 04 2013 18:21 Rollin wrote: our society too . The worst part is how completely untraceable and undetectable they are... airport security for example is becoming a lot less secure.

You could already make an "untraceable" gun before this video, for less money and less time.
Nimelrian
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany142 Posts
June 14 2013 00:35 GMT
#10640
I think a country should rethink it's policy about guns when this happens:

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/guns/toddlers-killed-more-americans-terrorists-did-year
Prev 1 530 531 532 533 534 891 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 52m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech73
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 2446
Zeus 697
ToSsGirL 269
Leta 97
Backho 76
Sacsri 46
ajuk12(nOOB) 25
NaDa 18
Dota 2
ODPixel188
XcaliburYe124
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K928
Other Games
summit1g6361
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1198
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH426
• Sammyuel 25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota257
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
2h 52m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 2h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.