EPTMan sentenced to life for possession of child porn - Page 8
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Darkalbino
Australia410 Posts
| ||
|
iNfeRnaL
Germany1908 Posts
Good judgement right there. | ||
|
Olinimm
1471 Posts
On November 06 2011 11:39 Candadar wrote: Pretty sure mods should edit into the OP that the guy ACTUALLY FUCKING MOLTESTED CHILDREN ._. No...read it again, it says if he did he would've received a lighter charge. Hence the outrage. | ||
|
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On November 06 2011 11:39 Candadar wrote: Pretty sure you should read more carefully. "Had Mr. Vilca actually molested a child..." (the words of the article linked in the OP) ≠ "Vilca actually molested a child".Pretty sure mods should edit into the OP that the guy ACTUALLY FUCKING MOLTESTED CHILDREN ._. | ||
|
snakeeyez
United States1231 Posts
| ||
|
Dknight
United States5223 Posts
| ||
|
Millitron
United States2611 Posts
I should also point out that life in prison for a pedophile is more like a death sentence. The one thing pretty much all convicts agree on, is that pedophiles are horrible. Its actually pretty common to put the pedophiles in solitary confinement for their own safety, because otherwise, the other prisoners will almost certainly try to kill them. | ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
| ||
|
Reptilia
Chile913 Posts
We are humans, we make mistakes, we are different. Some people like things others don't. This man likes something that happens to be, VERY illegal and immoral. Of course its not correct to posses something like that, or its excusable. He knows it's illegal, but as stated in the OP, he probably didn't think twice before doing it. I'd give him no more than 5 years so he learns the lesson. Any more than that is just injustice. On November 06 2011 10:11 Tremendous wrote: Execute the bastard! No need to waste a prison cell on scum like that ! yeah, because possession of child porn is much worse than people who kill or rape. | ||
|
Dark_Chill
Canada3353 Posts
On November 06 2011 11:14 Newbistic wrote: I wonder what rehab for pedophiles would even look like. Has anyone even tried to establish something like this? Is it possible? What an unfortunate fetish for someone to develop/be born with. This brings up an incredibly interesting point. How do you become a pedophile? I never really understood if you were born with it or if it just sort of happened for some reason. Like bestiality. How do these things develop? | ||
|
supervizor
Netherlands42 Posts
Dutch: Ik wil dit niet willen. Maar daar heb ik toch niks over te zeggen. Dat heeft een Duitse filosoof ooit gezegd, weet je: “de mens heeft de keuze, om al dan niet te doen, wat hij wilt”. Hij kan wel of niet doen wat hij wilt. Maar een mens kan niet willen wat hij wilt. Rough translation to English: I don’t want to want this. But I don’t have anything to say about it. A German philosopher once said, you know “man has the choice to do or not to do, what he want”. He can do or don’t what he wants. But a person cannot choice what he wants. | ||
|
Mortal
2943 Posts
| ||
|
butchji
Germany1531 Posts
On November 06 2011 11:34 RonNation wrote: child predators should be chemically castrated, there is no room for that behavior on this Earth How is this related to this article..? | ||
|
legendre20
United States316 Posts
On November 06 2011 10:20 Ozell wrote: Looks like some tea party members are playing Starcraft II lol. Yeah this is a joke. Child pornography is disgusting, but not worth a life time sentence. It's actually pretty funny that a justice system can be this inept. | ||
|
snakeeyez
United States1231 Posts
| ||
|
Cuce
Turkey1127 Posts
It's not impossbile to find and possess child porn without a conscious desicion. | ||
|
Snet
United States3573 Posts
I dunno, this is a very tricky subject. Regardless, this guy's "life sentence" is more of a death sentence when the inmates find out what he's in for. | ||
|
Draconizard
628 Posts
On November 06 2011 11:54 snakeeyez wrote: So this guy has a child porn picture on his computer. How do we know for a fact he downloaded that picture and some roomate, friend, or someone that hates him went on his computer and did that? So if I hated someone I go on his computer download a child porn picture and that dude is going to jail for 20 years plus for something he never even did. How would you even defend that? The ip address can never be linked to the actual physical person using it unless someone saw the person doing it or saw them somewhere to prove they were not there. I've never really understood that part of prosecuting internet related crimes either. Just because they can tie it to his computer, does that really prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was the one using it at the time? How can they be so certain, especially when the stakes are this high? | ||
|
Trizz
Netherlands1318 Posts
On November 06 2011 11:41 iNfeRnaL wrote: Yea, watching pictures of a child getting raped is way worse than actually raping a child. Good judgement right there. The child wasn't even getting raped, just naked pictures afaik. | ||
|
snakeeyez
United States1231 Posts
| ||
| ||
