• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:02
CEST 15:02
KST 22:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event5Serral wins EWC 202543Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9
Community News
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 193Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4
StarCraft 2
General
Rogue Talks: "Koreans could dominate again" uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025)
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays RSL Season 2 Qualifier Links and Dates
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups BW General Discussion Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM 2025 Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 700 users

Republican nominations - Page 370

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 368 369 370 371 372 575 Next
NotJumperer
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
United States1371 Posts
January 27 2012 04:45 GMT
#7381
--- Nuked ---
1Eris1
Profile Joined September 2010
United States5797 Posts
January 27 2012 04:45 GMT
#7382
On January 27 2012 13:38 Sufficiency wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 13:34 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:27 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:14 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:03 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
Sure it does. Not everybody thinks that Newt's resolutions are as ridiculous as you or I believe them to be.

And as much as I hate to admit that delivery plays a significant role in people's decision making, it certainly does.

It's precisely why I wish that Romney's vocal chords were somehow medically implanted into Dr. Paul.



Ehh, as he goes on (and deeper into "out there stuff") I'm honestly just struggling to understand how his support is that high. Even if Romney is one of the biggest flip-flopping candidates I've ever seen, his proposals at least aren't that, you know.+ Show Spoiler +
I don't want to say retarded



Oh and I know, unfortuneately I just overesitimate the average American's perception a lot. (Same for the liberals as well). It's freaking ridiculous. Someone can make the most retarded of claims, but as long as they bash X, or mention Y it comes off as good to a lot of people.


This is true, after watching every debate over the last few months (except the one tonight have to watch it later), I have to say my faith in American politics (what little I had) has been mostly flushed down the toilet. There are numerous times when candidates who I don't support at all say something intelligent and reasonable (a lota stuff hunstman said) and there is dead silence, then someone like Newt says something so utterly ridiculous that's its almost comical and he gets wild applause. To me it seems these debates are less about the issues and more about bashing the front runner, even the candidates gang up on whoever the front runner is at the time.

I guess the final point is people usually vote with their hearts and not their heads, they vote for who they like as a person. Obama will get a lot of votes again because, guess what? people like him as a person and who can blame them. No one really likes Mitt Romney as a person (maybe cuz they cant relate?) which is why hes had all these problems with conservatives.


Mmmm definetely. I just can't stand how stuck people are on some of their beliefs.

I was born in one of the Liberalist (is that a word?) cities in the US, but lately I've been finding myself drifting towards several major Conservative concepts...But then when I talk to my parents they use the word Republican as an insult.
And then of course on the opposite side of the spectrum...well some of these debates are enough.

Blah. I'll just continue my secret plan of becoming a trillionaire and then buying up several failing nation's debts and starting by own country.


Watching the debates I think your parents' opinions are well-deserved.



Haha oh I know, these debates are pretty awful. (Paul is good, but Romney and Gingrich remind me freshmen cheerleaders at my high school and Santorum just seems confused)

They're not the only Republicans though, and certainly not the best of them, or close to it. (why they're the nominees though, I'm befuddled)
Known Aliases: Tyragon, Valeric ~MSL Forever, SKT is truly the Superior KT!
1Eris1
Profile Joined September 2010
United States5797 Posts
January 27 2012 04:51 GMT
#7383
On January 27 2012 13:45 Jumperer wrote:
1Eris1 = anakin skywalker.



If I get to walk around in a sick black outfit and choke people with my mind I'll become an evangelical.
Known Aliases: Tyragon, Valeric ~MSL Forever, SKT is truly the Superior KT!
Raambo11
Profile Joined April 2011
United States828 Posts
January 27 2012 05:22 GMT
#7384
On January 27 2012 13:45 1Eris1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 13:38 Sufficiency wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:34 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:27 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:14 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:03 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
Sure it does. Not everybody thinks that Newt's resolutions are as ridiculous as you or I believe them to be.

And as much as I hate to admit that delivery plays a significant role in people's decision making, it certainly does.

It's precisely why I wish that Romney's vocal chords were somehow medically implanted into Dr. Paul.



Ehh, as he goes on (and deeper into "out there stuff") I'm honestly just struggling to understand how his support is that high. Even if Romney is one of the biggest flip-flopping candidates I've ever seen, his proposals at least aren't that, you know.+ Show Spoiler +
I don't want to say retarded



Oh and I know, unfortuneately I just overesitimate the average American's perception a lot. (Same for the liberals as well). It's freaking ridiculous. Someone can make the most retarded of claims, but as long as they bash X, or mention Y it comes off as good to a lot of people.


This is true, after watching every debate over the last few months (except the one tonight have to watch it later), I have to say my faith in American politics (what little I had) has been mostly flushed down the toilet. There are numerous times when candidates who I don't support at all say something intelligent and reasonable (a lota stuff hunstman said) and there is dead silence, then someone like Newt says something so utterly ridiculous that's its almost comical and he gets wild applause. To me it seems these debates are less about the issues and more about bashing the front runner, even the candidates gang up on whoever the front runner is at the time.

I guess the final point is people usually vote with their hearts and not their heads, they vote for who they like as a person. Obama will get a lot of votes again because, guess what? people like him as a person and who can blame them. No one really likes Mitt Romney as a person (maybe cuz they cant relate?) which is why hes had all these problems with conservatives.


Mmmm definetely. I just can't stand how stuck people are on some of their beliefs.

I was born in one of the Liberalist (is that a word?) cities in the US, but lately I've been finding myself drifting towards several major Conservative concepts...But then when I talk to my parents they use the word Republican as an insult.
And then of course on the opposite side of the spectrum...well some of these debates are enough.

Blah. I'll just continue my secret plan of becoming a trillionaire and then buying up several failing nation's debts and starting by own country.


Watching the debates I think your parents' opinions are well-deserved.



Haha oh I know, these debates are pretty awful. (Paul is good, but Romney and Gingrich remind me freshmen cheerleaders at my high school and Santorum just seems confused)

They're not the only Republicans though, and certainly not the best of them, or close to it. (why they're the nominees though, I'm befuddled)


Honestly Paul is pretty terrible in the debates (prolly get flamed by the masses of TLers who support him), a lot of the time he goes off on tangents unrelated to the question, keeps repeating himself, and honestly I'm surprised he gets applause when he does. I'm not trying to bash Paul at all, my point is these debates are a (IMO) not the greatest medium by themselves for people to get to know the candidates. Yes oratory skills and the ability to exude confidence (Gingrich) may be important skills for a President, but their are certainly more important skills (IE ability to make decisions.
Sufficiency
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada23833 Posts
January 27 2012 05:24 GMT
#7385
On January 27 2012 13:45 1Eris1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 13:38 Sufficiency wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:34 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:27 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:14 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:03 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
Sure it does. Not everybody thinks that Newt's resolutions are as ridiculous as you or I believe them to be.

And as much as I hate to admit that delivery plays a significant role in people's decision making, it certainly does.

It's precisely why I wish that Romney's vocal chords were somehow medically implanted into Dr. Paul.



Ehh, as he goes on (and deeper into "out there stuff") I'm honestly just struggling to understand how his support is that high. Even if Romney is one of the biggest flip-flopping candidates I've ever seen, his proposals at least aren't that, you know.+ Show Spoiler +
I don't want to say retarded



Oh and I know, unfortuneately I just overesitimate the average American's perception a lot. (Same for the liberals as well). It's freaking ridiculous. Someone can make the most retarded of claims, but as long as they bash X, or mention Y it comes off as good to a lot of people.


This is true, after watching every debate over the last few months (except the one tonight have to watch it later), I have to say my faith in American politics (what little I had) has been mostly flushed down the toilet. There are numerous times when candidates who I don't support at all say something intelligent and reasonable (a lota stuff hunstman said) and there is dead silence, then someone like Newt says something so utterly ridiculous that's its almost comical and he gets wild applause. To me it seems these debates are less about the issues and more about bashing the front runner, even the candidates gang up on whoever the front runner is at the time.

I guess the final point is people usually vote with their hearts and not their heads, they vote for who they like as a person. Obama will get a lot of votes again because, guess what? people like him as a person and who can blame them. No one really likes Mitt Romney as a person (maybe cuz they cant relate?) which is why hes had all these problems with conservatives.


Mmmm definetely. I just can't stand how stuck people are on some of their beliefs.

I was born in one of the Liberalist (is that a word?) cities in the US, but lately I've been finding myself drifting towards several major Conservative concepts...But then when I talk to my parents they use the word Republican as an insult.
And then of course on the opposite side of the spectrum...well some of these debates are enough.

Blah. I'll just continue my secret plan of becoming a trillionaire and then buying up several failing nation's debts and starting by own country.


Watching the debates I think your parents' opinions are well-deserved.



Haha oh I know, these debates are pretty awful. (Paul is good, but Romney and Gingrich remind me freshmen cheerleaders at my high school and Santorum just seems confused)

They're not the only Republicans though, and certainly not the best of them, or close to it. (why they're the nominees though, I'm befuddled)


I don't think Paul is good. Does he act like a saint? Yes. But his approach to foreign policy is very naive.

This is not to say I support, say, Santorum's hawkish policies. But Paul has never held executive positions before and I don't think he is suitable.
https://twitter.com/SufficientStats
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-27 05:33:58
January 27 2012 05:25 GMT
#7386
On January 27 2012 14:22 Raambo11 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 13:45 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:38 Sufficiency wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:34 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:27 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:14 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:03 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
Sure it does. Not everybody thinks that Newt's resolutions are as ridiculous as you or I believe them to be.

And as much as I hate to admit that delivery plays a significant role in people's decision making, it certainly does.

It's precisely why I wish that Romney's vocal chords were somehow medically implanted into Dr. Paul.



Ehh, as he goes on (and deeper into "out there stuff") I'm honestly just struggling to understand how his support is that high. Even if Romney is one of the biggest flip-flopping candidates I've ever seen, his proposals at least aren't that, you know.+ Show Spoiler +
I don't want to say retarded



Oh and I know, unfortuneately I just overesitimate the average American's perception a lot. (Same for the liberals as well). It's freaking ridiculous. Someone can make the most retarded of claims, but as long as they bash X, or mention Y it comes off as good to a lot of people.


This is true, after watching every debate over the last few months (except the one tonight have to watch it later), I have to say my faith in American politics (what little I had) has been mostly flushed down the toilet. There are numerous times when candidates who I don't support at all say something intelligent and reasonable (a lota stuff hunstman said) and there is dead silence, then someone like Newt says something so utterly ridiculous that's its almost comical and he gets wild applause. To me it seems these debates are less about the issues and more about bashing the front runner, even the candidates gang up on whoever the front runner is at the time.

I guess the final point is people usually vote with their hearts and not their heads, they vote for who they like as a person. Obama will get a lot of votes again because, guess what? people like him as a person and who can blame them. No one really likes Mitt Romney as a person (maybe cuz they cant relate?) which is why hes had all these problems with conservatives.


Mmmm definetely. I just can't stand how stuck people are on some of their beliefs.

I was born in one of the Liberalist (is that a word?) cities in the US, but lately I've been finding myself drifting towards several major Conservative concepts...But then when I talk to my parents they use the word Republican as an insult.
And then of course on the opposite side of the spectrum...well some of these debates are enough.

Blah. I'll just continue my secret plan of becoming a trillionaire and then buying up several failing nation's debts and starting by own country.


Watching the debates I think your parents' opinions are well-deserved.



Haha oh I know, these debates are pretty awful. (Paul is good, but Romney and Gingrich remind me freshmen cheerleaders at my high school and Santorum just seems confused)

They're not the only Republicans though, and certainly not the best of them, or close to it. (why they're the nominees though, I'm befuddled)


Honestly Paul is pretty terrible in the debates (prolly get flamed by the masses of TLers who support him), a lot of the time he goes off on tangents unrelated to the question, keeps repeating himself, and honestly I'm surprised he gets applause when he does. I'm not trying to bash Paul at all, my point is these debates are a (IMO) not the greatest medium by themselves for people to get to know the candidates. Yes oratory skills and the ability to exude confidence (Gingrich) may be important skills for a President, but their are certainly more important skills (IE ability to make decisions.


Martyr less. No one likes an internet martyr.

No clue what you're getting at though, he's not as charismatic as the other three candidates but that's pretty obvious. Are you actually trying to say that's an important quality a politician should have? It's more of a means to the end of getting in office, if you're already in office it does you nothing.

If you actually think about what they're saying he's the only competent one who seems honest and isn't just trying to say whatever to get elected. He's also the most consistent in voting records, which combined with his unified structure of beliefs puts his ability to make decisions above them as well.
Klogon
Profile Blog Joined November 2002
MURICA15980 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-27 06:40:14
January 27 2012 06:28 GMT
#7387
As a fairly liberal guy, I'd have to say Romney absolutely demolishes in these debates but nobodies seems to realize it that it is kind of scary. As an Obama supporter, I would rather have Gingrich win because there is no way that guy is winning the general election, but I would not think it would be the end of the world if Romney got it and ended up winning the presidency as I think he's a very capable guy.

Ron Paul is just so funny. He's gotta stay in the race the whole way just for the entertainment and the real "moral" factor of being absolutely genuine.

And GGTemplar if you honestly believe being charismatic has nothing to do with leading the country, leading policy makers, directing the military, negotiating with foreign leaders, smoozing with powerful people all over the world for the national interest, etc, then I highly encourage you to think about it again. With good power of persuasion and people generally liking you, you can accomplish more with less. Washington is a battlefield and being a natural leader and likable person will go a long ways to getting shit done, but yes, its immeasurable and only one of many qualities of an effective leader.
Raambo11
Profile Joined April 2011
United States828 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-27 06:56:47
January 27 2012 06:37 GMT
#7388
On January 27 2012 14:25 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 14:22 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:45 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:38 Sufficiency wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:34 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:27 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:14 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:03 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
Sure it does. Not everybody thinks that Newt's resolutions are as ridiculous as you or I believe them to be.

And as much as I hate to admit that delivery plays a significant role in people's decision making, it certainly does.

It's precisely why I wish that Romney's vocal chords were somehow medically implanted into Dr. Paul.



Ehh, as he goes on (and deeper into "out there stuff") I'm honestly just struggling to understand how his support is that high. Even if Romney is one of the biggest flip-flopping candidates I've ever seen, his proposals at least aren't that, you know.+ Show Spoiler +
I don't want to say retarded



Oh and I know, unfortuneately I just overesitimate the average American's perception a lot. (Same for the liberals as well). It's freaking ridiculous. Someone can make the most retarded of claims, but as long as they bash X, or mention Y it comes off as good to a lot of people.


This is true, after watching every debate over the last few months (except the one tonight have to watch it later), I have to say my faith in American politics (what little I had) has been mostly flushed down the toilet. There are numerous times when candidates who I don't support at all say something intelligent and reasonable (a lota stuff hunstman said) and there is dead silence, then someone like Newt says something so utterly ridiculous that's its almost comical and he gets wild applause. To me it seems these debates are less about the issues and more about bashing the front runner, even the candidates gang up on whoever the front runner is at the time.

I guess the final point is people usually vote with their hearts and not their heads, they vote for who they like as a person. Obama will get a lot of votes again because, guess what? people like him as a person and who can blame them. No one really likes Mitt Romney as a person (maybe cuz they cant relate?) which is why hes had all these problems with conservatives.


Mmmm definetely. I just can't stand how stuck people are on some of their beliefs.

I was born in one of the Liberalist (is that a word?) cities in the US, but lately I've been finding myself drifting towards several major Conservative concepts...But then when I talk to my parents they use the word Republican as an insult.
And then of course on the opposite side of the spectrum...well some of these debates are enough.

Blah. I'll just continue my secret plan of becoming a trillionaire and then buying up several failing nation's debts and starting by own country.


Watching the debates I think your parents' opinions are well-deserved.



Haha oh I know, these debates are pretty awful. (Paul is good, but Romney and Gingrich remind me freshmen cheerleaders at my high school and Santorum just seems confused)

They're not the only Republicans though, and certainly not the best of them, or close to it. (why they're the nominees though, I'm befuddled)


Honestly Paul is pretty terrible in the debates (prolly get flamed by the masses of TLers who support him), a lot of the time he goes off on tangents unrelated to the question, keeps repeating himself, and honestly I'm surprised he gets applause when he does. I'm not trying to bash Paul at all, my point is these debates are a (IMO) not the greatest medium by themselves for people to get to know the candidates. Yes oratory skills and the ability to exude confidence (Gingrich) may be important skills for a President, but their are certainly more important skills (IE ability to make decisions.


Martyr less. No one likes an internet martyr.

No clue what you're getting at though, he's not as charismatic as the other three candidates but that's pretty obvious. Are you actually trying to say that's an important quality a politician should have? It's more of a means to the end of getting in office, if you're already in office it does you nothing.

If you actually think about what they're saying he's the only competent one who seems honest and isn't just trying to say whatever to get elected. He's also the most consistent in voting records, which combined with his unified structure of beliefs puts his ability to make decisions above them as well.


Yeah I figured this is what kind of response I would get, but no matter. If you read my post properly you would see that I am arguing that debates DO NOT BRING OUT THE QUALITIES A PRESIDENT SHOULD NEED> At the end of my post I said that yes being charismatic and charming and being a smooth talker helps you crush debates, but is not so useful when you are in the oval office. It is useful, their are just skills that are more important. So many Ron Paul supporters are so quick to defend him when anything negative is said. I didn't say anything about his policies, just that he is quite a bit worse on a stage then the rest of them.

Also watching the debate from today, its clear Romney's strategist want him to be more Newt like in his confidence and criticism of other candidates. Worked as expected, looks like Romney has Florida.
BobTheBuilder1377
Profile Joined August 2011
Somalia335 Posts
January 27 2012 07:40 GMT
#7389
On January 27 2012 14:24 Sufficiency wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 13:45 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:38 Sufficiency wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:34 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:27 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:14 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:03 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
Sure it does. Not everybody thinks that Newt's resolutions are as ridiculous as you or I believe them to be.

And as much as I hate to admit that delivery plays a significant role in people's decision making, it certainly does.

It's precisely why I wish that Romney's vocal chords were somehow medically implanted into Dr. Paul.



Ehh, as he goes on (and deeper into "out there stuff") I'm honestly just struggling to understand how his support is that high. Even if Romney is one of the biggest flip-flopping candidates I've ever seen, his proposals at least aren't that, you know.+ Show Spoiler +
I don't want to say retarded



Oh and I know, unfortuneately I just overesitimate the average American's perception a lot. (Same for the liberals as well). It's freaking ridiculous. Someone can make the most retarded of claims, but as long as they bash X, or mention Y it comes off as good to a lot of people.


This is true, after watching every debate over the last few months (except the one tonight have to watch it later), I have to say my faith in American politics (what little I had) has been mostly flushed down the toilet. There are numerous times when candidates who I don't support at all say something intelligent and reasonable (a lota stuff hunstman said) and there is dead silence, then someone like Newt says something so utterly ridiculous that's its almost comical and he gets wild applause. To me it seems these debates are less about the issues and more about bashing the front runner, even the candidates gang up on whoever the front runner is at the time.

I guess the final point is people usually vote with their hearts and not their heads, they vote for who they like as a person. Obama will get a lot of votes again because, guess what? people like him as a person and who can blame them. No one really likes Mitt Romney as a person (maybe cuz they cant relate?) which is why hes had all these problems with conservatives.


Mmmm definetely. I just can't stand how stuck people are on some of their beliefs.

I was born in one of the Liberalist (is that a word?) cities in the US, but lately I've been finding myself drifting towards several major Conservative concepts...But then when I talk to my parents they use the word Republican as an insult.
And then of course on the opposite side of the spectrum...well some of these debates are enough.

Blah. I'll just continue my secret plan of becoming a trillionaire and then buying up several failing nation's debts and starting by own country.


Watching the debates I think your parents' opinions are well-deserved.



Haha oh I know, these debates are pretty awful. (Paul is good, but Romney and Gingrich remind me freshmen cheerleaders at my high school and Santorum just seems confused)

They're not the only Republicans though, and certainly not the best of them, or close to it. (why they're the nominees though, I'm befuddled)


I don't think Paul is good. Does he act like a saint? Yes. But his approach to foreign policy is very naive.

This is not to say I support, say, Santorum's hawkish policies. But Paul has never held executive positions before and I don't think he is suitable.


I don't think you understand the way our foreign policy is made out to be. The USA is known to use force on smaller countries in the name of democracy and killing "terrorists". When we go out using drones, people don't realize that there's always collateral damage and that creates more terrorists...
Sufficiency
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada23833 Posts
January 27 2012 08:50 GMT
#7390
Not all GOPers are dumb, right? Watch this guy:





I wonder what will happen if all everyone in GOP is like him.
https://twitter.com/SufficientStats
don_kyuhote
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
3006 Posts
January 27 2012 09:05 GMT
#7391
Sad that debates in Florida is over.
In which other state will they get to talk about Newt's grandiose Moon Colony project?
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
Terry Bogard
Profile Joined January 2012
36 Posts
January 27 2012 11:08 GMT
#7392
On January 27 2012 15:28 Klogon wrote:
As an Obama supporter, I would rather have Gingrich win because there is no way that guy is winning the general election, but I would not think it would be the end of the world if Romney got it and ended up winning the presidency as I think he's a very capable guy.


Care to provide any substance for your reasoning regarding Romney being capable?
Sufficiency
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada23833 Posts
January 27 2012 11:20 GMT
#7393
On January 27 2012 18:05 don_kyuhote wrote:
Sad that debates in Florida is over.
In which other state will they get to talk about Newt's grandiose Moon Colony project?


Texas, right? Texas has a big space program?
https://twitter.com/SufficientStats
tapk69
Profile Joined January 2011
Portugal264 Posts
January 27 2012 11:37 GMT
#7394
so Ron Paul has no chance?


You americans know you´re in trouble dont you ?
ja foste
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-27 11:41:26
January 27 2012 11:40 GMT
#7395
On January 27 2012 09:51 allecto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 07:58 paralleluniverse wrote:
On January 27 2012 07:52 Velr wrote:
The problem is... That ideology has lead us into this debt crisise in the first place.
There is never a "good" time to pay back debt.. Thats why most countries never did it and suddenly.. Oh shit, debt is out of control! (really sherlock? how come...).


The only country in crisis because of high debt is Greece.



You might want to look at other countries with high debt and the prospects for them borrowing in the future.

Portugal is paying 15% on 10 year money now. That is not sustainable.

Japan has over one QUADRILLION yen in public debt. That's over 200% of their GDP. Even though their interest rates are low on that debt, I think it takes something ridiculous like 40% of their government spending to just cover interest payments. Let that sit in your head for a second.

Portugal and other Eurozone countries (excluding Greece) are in crisis because of trade imbalances and a loss of competitiveness with Germany (see: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=114227&currentpage=55#1087), not because of debt. Their debt levels aren't even much higher than Germany.

Here's a table giving debt per % of GDP for all Eurozone countries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_European_Union#Economies_of_member_states

As you can see, countries in crisis like Spain have very low debt level. In fact, Spain ran surpluses (meaning debt was decreasing) before the crisis hit. The debt was not the cause of the Eurozone crisis for all countries except Greece.

And as you've pointed out, Japan's debt level is 200% of GDP and interest rates have over many years been very very low, about 1%. It's sustainable in the sense, that it's been sustained for like 20 years without signs of catastrophe.
Terry Bogard
Profile Joined January 2012
36 Posts
January 27 2012 13:34 GMT
#7396
Fantastic article regarding why evangelical Republicans support an adulterer (note that when Jesus forgives the woman caught in adultery, He tells her to go and sin no more, which Newt of course disregarded after his first affair):

+ Show Spoiler +
Why Evangelicals Don't Care When Rich White Conservatives Defile Marriage

Newt Gingrich’s win in the South Carolina primary looks like it may not be an outlier; Gingrich’s poll numbers are rising rapidly in Florida, and he has a good chance of beating Romney there as well. Gingrich is doing well in no small part because he has so much support amongst evangelical Christians; so much so that many evangelical leaders refused to go along with an attempt to unify the Christian right behind Santorum.

In South Carolina, evangelical Christians voted for Gingrich 2-to-1 over boring family man Mitt Romney. For anyone who takes seriously the notion that evangelical Christians actually care about things like family and fidelity, this support for Gingrich is baffling, since he has a history of serial adultery that he barely bothers to disavow. But a closer examination of the situation makes clear what’s going on: for the Republican base, “family values” don’t actually matter, but are just a gloss painted over what really motivates them: reactionary rage. They love Gingrich because he’s a flaming ball of rage they can wield against everyone they hate.

The sexual double standard is the most obvious way the us vs. them mentality works. There’s nothing the modern American conservative loves more than to decry our country's supposedly declining sexual morals. Once the Republicans swept state legislatures and the House of Representatives, punishing sexual freedom became their number one priority, which manifested in nearly 1,000 bills restricting reproductive rights in state legislatures and a bill attacking private insurance funding of abortion in the House. Eventually, House Republicans threatened to shut down the federal government in order to defund family planning clinics, basically because they’re in the business of providing contraception and STD prevention and treatment. All this while the base continues to push abstinence-only and reject gay marriage on the grounds that it’s not “traditional.” But when it comes to a serial adulterer like Gingrich, he gets a pass. After all, he’s one of theirs, and if you’re in the tribe, you get a lot more leeway.

Nowhere is this more obvious than in the reaction to Marianne Gingrich sticking her head out, as she periodically does, to remind the world of what a terrible man her ex-husband is. This time she added the juicy detail that Newt basically demanded that he get to have both his wife and his mistress at the same time. It was a reminder that while this flagrant cheating was going on, Gingrich was repeatedly moralizing in public over President Clinton’s adultery. To this day, the GOP base still regards Clinton as some kind of perverted sex maniac. But Gingrich? Well, during the South Carolina debate when Marianne’s interview with ABC was brought up, the audience loudly booed the mere mention of her name. For the Republican base, Gingrich not only gets to cheat, he also gets to flaunt it in his wife’s face; but a Democrat like Clinton’s more secretive and brief affairs are unforgivable.

Gingrich doesn’t live by the strict sexual rules laid out by conservatives, because those rules are meant for other people. Sex is a weapon being used against all those classes of Americans they don’t like: non-white people, gays, non-Christians, liberals, Democrats, people who have to work for a living, poor people, Democratic politicians.

With rising levels of pious posing amongst Republicans, there has been some half-hearted attempts to pretend that they hold everyone to the same standards, which helped created the spectacle of Gov. Mark Sanford’s resignation. Gingrich represents a tossing-away of that feigned concern for fairness and a return to what conservatives really love best, a pedal-to-the-metal defense of straight white male privilege, especially that of wealthy white men. He’s the living id of the Republican Party: a spoiled brat who takes what he wants without apology, and then dresses down perceived inferiors for their supposed lack of morals and work ethic. You could easily imagine him drifting out of Tiffany’s, having bought wife number three fancy baubles with money generated from one of his direct mail schemes only to pause to lecture a homeless vet on how he deserved his fate because he didn’t sacrifice enough.

In the Republican worldview, sex is a luxury item to be reserved for the privileged, and everyone else who indulges deserves whatever horrible fate befalls them. In the world imagined by Gingrich and his fan base, rich people get to say they’re sorry and run for public office if they have sex out of wedlock; poor people should see their health decline because they have an STD but can’t afford to see a doctor to treat it. The wealthy can afford contraception and have all the sex they want, but if Republicans succeed in cutting off family planning subsidies, poor people will go without. If abortion is banned, wealthy women will be able to travel to get abortions or depend on discreet doctors, but the poor will simply be forced to have babies.

Of course, Republicans know better than anyone that simply giving into their worst instincts and promoting the career of someone like Newt Gingrich tends to turn off the moderates and swing voters they need to win elections. But it seems this year they don’t really care. Conservatives seem sick and tired of paying lip service to equality and family values, and instead are just enjoying the ride of cheering for the screw-you-I-got-mine guy. Will they wise up before it’s too late and Gingrich has the nomination? At this point, it’s hard to say.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9388 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-27 14:12:09
January 27 2012 14:10 GMT
#7397
On January 27 2012 20:40 paralleluniverse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 09:51 allecto wrote:
On January 27 2012 07:58 paralleluniverse wrote:
On January 27 2012 07:52 Velr wrote:
The problem is... That ideology has lead us into this debt crisise in the first place.
There is never a "good" time to pay back debt.. Thats why most countries never did it and suddenly.. Oh shit, debt is out of control! (really sherlock? how come...).


The only country in crisis because of high debt is Greece.



You might want to look at other countries with high debt and the prospects for them borrowing in the future.

Portugal is paying 15% on 10 year money now. That is not sustainable.

Japan has over one QUADRILLION yen in public debt. That's over 200% of their GDP. Even though their interest rates are low on that debt, I think it takes something ridiculous like 40% of their government spending to just cover interest payments. Let that sit in your head for a second.

Portugal and other Eurozone countries (excluding Greece) are in crisis because of trade imbalances and a loss of competitiveness with Germany (see: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=114227&currentpage=55#1087), not because of debt. Their debt levels aren't even much higher than Germany.

Here's a table giving debt per % of GDP for all Eurozone countries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_European_Union#Economies_of_member_states

As you can see, countries in crisis like Spain have very low debt level. In fact, Spain ran surpluses (meaning debt was decreasing) before the crisis hit. The debt was not the cause of the Eurozone crisis for all countries except Greece.

And as you've pointed out, Japan's debt level is 200% of GDP and interest rates have over many years been very very low, about 1%. It's sustainable in the sense, that it's been sustained for like 20 years without signs of catastrophe.


1) There isn't anything wrong about trade imbalances in it self.
2) However there could definitely be a problem if the competetiveness of a country isn't very high and the value of the currency is artifially high. This decreases the export of the country, and hence makes total production less. I guess this is what your implying?

I agree that we need to make a distinction between a economical crises and high level of debt/Gdp. its not nessarcily this high ratio that triggers or even causes a financial crises. You can have tons of malinvestments by private comapanies while government has a balanced budget. Hence we need to distinct the economy of the government and the economy of the private citizenz + private comapnies.

You point out that debt/Gdp isn't really a problem for most countries (if it just averages the historical rate). But thats not nessarcily true. The government can definitely go bankrupt if the interest rate coverage ratio gets to high.
Now you make the case that the economy of Japan is sustainable. What we see in Japan is that prices are decreasing and the interest rate are marginally postive giving a positive real interest rates, and leading to a relatively high saving rates. These savings are often used to bying Japanish goverment bonds.

From what I can derive from your logic, if the country buys it owns debt, it isn't a problem. However since we (I) made that disctincion between government and private people this very well could be a problem. If people can get a higher rate of return on foreign currencies they should (in theory) be buying other countries debt, and hence Jap. rates has to increase.

But lets assume theory is wrong and doesn't work for Japan. If you look at Japan from a demographic point of view. The average age is really high and less people have been born. Hence working population is expected to decrease, which means that (everything being equal) less people are going to buy government bonds, which will increase rates --> itnerest paid/GDP increases --> Japan could very well be the next Greece.

The thing is we have to remember. If a government doesn't have the production facility to be able to pay down its own debt, interest rates will eventually rise. It might take a long time, but for interest rates not to rise, it requires a constant inflow of money (which thanks to the central banks make this possible).
Aberu
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States968 Posts
January 27 2012 14:21 GMT
#7398
On January 27 2012 14:22 Raambo11 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 13:45 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:38 Sufficiency wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:34 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:27 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:14 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:03 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
Sure it does. Not everybody thinks that Newt's resolutions are as ridiculous as you or I believe them to be.

And as much as I hate to admit that delivery plays a significant role in people's decision making, it certainly does.

It's precisely why I wish that Romney's vocal chords were somehow medically implanted into Dr. Paul.



Ehh, as he goes on (and deeper into "out there stuff") I'm honestly just struggling to understand how his support is that high. Even if Romney is one of the biggest flip-flopping candidates I've ever seen, his proposals at least aren't that, you know.+ Show Spoiler +
I don't want to say retarded



Oh and I know, unfortuneately I just overesitimate the average American's perception a lot. (Same for the liberals as well). It's freaking ridiculous. Someone can make the most retarded of claims, but as long as they bash X, or mention Y it comes off as good to a lot of people.


This is true, after watching every debate over the last few months (except the one tonight have to watch it later), I have to say my faith in American politics (what little I had) has been mostly flushed down the toilet. There are numerous times when candidates who I don't support at all say something intelligent and reasonable (a lota stuff hunstman said) and there is dead silence, then someone like Newt says something so utterly ridiculous that's its almost comical and he gets wild applause. To me it seems these debates are less about the issues and more about bashing the front runner, even the candidates gang up on whoever the front runner is at the time.

I guess the final point is people usually vote with their hearts and not their heads, they vote for who they like as a person. Obama will get a lot of votes again because, guess what? people like him as a person and who can blame them. No one really likes Mitt Romney as a person (maybe cuz they cant relate?) which is why hes had all these problems with conservatives.


Mmmm definetely. I just can't stand how stuck people are on some of their beliefs.

I was born in one of the Liberalist (is that a word?) cities in the US, but lately I've been finding myself drifting towards several major Conservative concepts...But then when I talk to my parents they use the word Republican as an insult.
And then of course on the opposite side of the spectrum...well some of these debates are enough.

Blah. I'll just continue my secret plan of becoming a trillionaire and then buying up several failing nation's debts and starting by own country.


Watching the debates I think your parents' opinions are well-deserved.



Haha oh I know, these debates are pretty awful. (Paul is good, but Romney and Gingrich remind me freshmen cheerleaders at my high school and Santorum just seems confused)

They're not the only Republicans though, and certainly not the best of them, or close to it. (why they're the nominees though, I'm befuddled)


Honestly Paul is pretty terrible in the debates (prolly get flamed by the masses of TLers who support him), a lot of the time he goes off on tangents unrelated to the question, keeps repeating himself, and honestly I'm surprised he gets applause when he does. I'm not trying to bash Paul at all, my point is these debates are a (IMO) not the greatest medium by themselves for people to get to know the candidates. Yes oratory skills and the ability to exude confidence (Gingrich) may be important skills for a President, but their are certainly more important skills (IE ability to make decisions.


What sounds like tangents and talking about the same thing, are actually very relevant. They talk about an issue that would be fixed by a better economy almost everytime. He talks about how he will fix the economy to solve that problem. That's why it sounds like he is being repetitive, because that is repetitively the same way to fix a lot of the issues!
srsly
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42701 Posts
January 27 2012 14:31 GMT
#7399
On January 27 2012 13:34 1Eris1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 13:27 Raambo11 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:14 1Eris1 wrote:
On January 27 2012 13:03 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
Sure it does. Not everybody thinks that Newt's resolutions are as ridiculous as you or I believe them to be.

And as much as I hate to admit that delivery plays a significant role in people's decision making, it certainly does.

It's precisely why I wish that Romney's vocal chords were somehow medically implanted into Dr. Paul.



Ehh, as he goes on (and deeper into "out there stuff") I'm honestly just struggling to understand how his support is that high. Even if Romney is one of the biggest flip-flopping candidates I've ever seen, his proposals at least aren't that, you know.+ Show Spoiler +
I don't want to say retarded



Oh and I know, unfortuneately I just overesitimate the average American's perception a lot. (Same for the liberals as well). It's freaking ridiculous. Someone can make the most retarded of claims, but as long as they bash X, or mention Y it comes off as good to a lot of people.


This is true, after watching every debate over the last few months (except the one tonight have to watch it later), I have to say my faith in American politics (what little I had) has been mostly flushed down the toilet. There are numerous times when candidates who I don't support at all say something intelligent and reasonable (a lota stuff hunstman said) and there is dead silence, then someone like Newt says something so utterly ridiculous that's its almost comical and he gets wild applause. To me it seems these debates are less about the issues and more about bashing the front runner, even the candidates gang up on whoever the front runner is at the time.

I guess the final point is people usually vote with their hearts and not their heads, they vote for who they like as a person. Obama will get a lot of votes again because, guess what? people like him as a person and who can blame them. No one really likes Mitt Romney as a person (maybe cuz they cant relate?) which is why hes had all these problems with conservatives.


Mmmm definetely. I just can't stand how stuck people are on some of their beliefs.

I was born in one of the Liberalist

Firstly, you're trying to say liberalest. It still isn't a word but you're using the 'est' ending to indicate that it is the most of something, for example biggest or richest. I'm honestly surprised that you don't know this, it should be your mother tongue. The 'ist' ending indicates that a person is associated with the activity, for example a scientist who does science professionally, an arsonist who just does arson or a nationalist who subscribes to a nationalistic set of ideas.

Furthermore the capilisation of the L in liberal is hugely important. Liberalism is one of the founding principles of the United States and pretty much sums up all the things you were trying to say you support. Liberalism means freedom from interference, the right to property, freedom of speech and ideas, freedom from oppression, freedom of worship and all that stuff. You are a capital L Liberal, also known as a classical liberal.
I believe what you were trying to say about where you were born is that it was one of the most liberal areas. Here you mean liberal as the antithesis of the old established value system. Classical liberals believe all men and women are born equal, that the personal lives of people are their own business and not that of the state or church and all people have the same inalienable rights. This set them at odds with the established family values/religious groups on topics such as abortion, race, gay marriage, national language, prayer in schools and a host of others.
In a multi party system liberals, socialists, libertarians and conservatives would all have their own parties and their own distinct platorms but from the two party system emerged a strange union of socially conservative people (white Christian males) and economic Liberals while the social Liberals who subscribe to the exact same set of core beliefs as the economic ones, allied themselves with the more socialist party. Liberal became a term for the latter and the socialist ideas which are by definition the opposite of liberal became known as liberal.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44357 Posts
January 27 2012 14:36 GMT
#7400
On January 27 2012 17:50 Sufficiency wrote:
Not all GOPers are dumb, right? Watch this guy:


http://youtu.be/BMYBl2uzXEw


I wonder what will happen if all everyone in GOP is like him.


Very well-spoken indeed (but still falls short in actually establishing a proper logical argument against gay marriage in realistic contexts). He'll just confuse the hell out of many people and sound smart, which I suppose is better than sounding *obviously* stupid to the layman.

He reminds me of those fast-talking creationists and evangelists (Kent Hovind, Ray Comfort, William Lane Craig, etc) who debate against biologists or atheists using only their rhetoric (obviously something you might as well do if you're good with words) rather than rational arguments or facts. And then they get applauded because they sound interesting or smart to the common man (due to their eloquence), all the while the few people who actually know the logical fallacies and factual errors they've committed are banging their heads on their desks.

But I agree with you that it would be rather interesting if we had more political debates and discussions where fewer candidates sounded like bumbling idiots and more candidates at least were able to pretend to be intellectuals.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Prev 1 368 369 370 371 372 575 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
SC Evo League
12:00
#15
BRAT_OK 102
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
BRAT_OK 102
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 34751
Calm 8464
Rain 5995
Jaedong 2111
Horang2 1912
Flash 1749
EffOrt 948
BeSt 802
firebathero 801
Stork 537
[ Show more ]
ggaemo 343
Barracks 326
Zeus 316
ToSsGirL 208
Last 200
Soma 194
hero 177
Pusan 94
Aegong 75
Movie 56
Sharp 55
Killer 45
Sea.KH 32
[sc1f]eonzerg 30
yabsab 20
JYJ18
IntoTheRainbow 10
Shine 9
SilentControl 9
Stormgate
Lowko498
NightEnD64
Dota 2
Gorgc2723
qojqva2588
XcaliburYe603
Counter-Strike
zeus307
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor287
Other Games
singsing2141
B2W.Neo1323
DeMusliM458
RotterdaM261
Happy221
KnowMe174
SortOf115
Pyrionflax88
mouzStarbuck37
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 2
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta14
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV687
League of Legends
• Nemesis1504
• Jankos1298
Counter-Strike
• C_a_k_e 2075
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1h 58m
CSO Cup
2h 58m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
20h 58m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 1h
Wardi Open
1d 21h
RotterdaM Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Summer Champion…
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
Online Event
6 days
SC Evo League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.