|
So guys I wanted to start a thread on people's favorite conquerors
I'm sure everyone knows at least one conqueror that they have read or heard about in games or other sources in a part of their lives that they found amazing such as conquering huge areas of land around the world by outsmarting the enemy ...etc
My Personal Favorite is Genghis Khan
![[image loading]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-DXrojDWUFk/Rs61p8s9NdI/AAAAAAAAAAU/xluBW2Lri5Y/s400/Genghis_Khan1.jpg)
Reason: Genghis Khan was the founder, Khan (ruler) and Khagan (emperor) of the Mongol Empire, which became the largest contiguous empire in history after his death...
So guys who's your favorite Conqueror?? state your reason why it can be from games,books etc..
|
|
|
![[image loading]](http://www.kavehfarrokh.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/colin-farrell-as-alexander.jpg)
he conquered half the world by the time he was 30. that's pretty badass.
|
Terranist is right, he is the best
|
Napoleon Bonaparte. Hands down
|
I agree with Genghis Khan. Simply put, he is a boss.
|
Bawler thread... Do the Borg count?
|
On March 01 2011 12:13 Retgery wrote: Bawler thread... Do the Borg count?
any
|
Arthas... that guy fucked some shit up in wow
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
|
|
|
Saladin, because that campaign was my favorite from aoe.
+ Show Spoiler +Salah ad-Din Al-Ayyubi, better known to his foes and to history simply as Saladin, is one of the great human figures in the cultural and military history of the Middle East. Saladin, a Kurdish Muslim born in Takrit in present day Iraq was both a spiritual and military leader. At the height of his power he ruled over Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Hejaz, and Yemen. Through political savvy and through devotion to his faith and country, he gained the unmatched respect of both his followers and adversaries, while at the same time capturing the most highly contested prize of the Middle Ages: The Holy Land.
Saladin is best known for finally expelling European Crusaders from Palestine, which had been besieged during several crusades and been under French control during the middle of the 12th century. He was devoted to recapturing the Holy Land. Like his European contemporaries, Saladin used religion as a justification for war, and inspired his followers, observers of Sunni Islam, to do the same. However, his motivation to drive the Europeans back was not motivated by ethnic hatred. In fact, he allowed any defeated Christian army to return home freely, and granted total amnesty to remaining Christian worshipers. This was in spite of the devastation done on Jerusalem by the Crusaders during their original takeover.
Saladin’s humanity did not go unnoticed. He was renowned for his personal character by seemingly any that met him. He had about him the chivalrous qualities of a knight. Chivalry was a venerable term and understood to embody all the knightly qualities of “humility, compassion, courtesy, devotion, mercy, purity, peace and endurance.” René Grousset, a Frenchman, wrote “It is equally true that his generosity, his piety, devoid of fanaticism, that flower of liberality and courtesy which had been the model of our old chroniclers, won him no less popularity in Frankish Syria than in the lands of Islam.”
He was definitely a conqueror not a general
|
Please look into the definition of general and conqueror
A general can be a high ranking commander in a army to lead a specific army to either defend their country etc
But a conqueror is someone who is victorious by force of arms
So I'm sure even you'll notice the difference
|
On March 01 2011 12:35 H2O Xplicit wrote:wow you must be pathetic... this thread is more on a more narrow topic of CONQUERORS not GENERALS! Generals can be involved in defending their own country and not taking on offensives on other countries to take the over.. I swear curs like you should not even post anything
Let's try to be civil shall we? He didn't insult your honor or anything ya know.
|
Jeez StarStruck, how does it feel to be called a cur?
Pretty hardcore insult.
But yeah i think most of what people would post here would go in the generals thread no?
@Terranist that movie was terrible 
edit: aw he edited it out, no fun
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Pretty sure mine is a legit example of a conqueror (or, well, at least he tried).
|
Napoleon without a doubt. Genius who changed modern history.
|
On March 01 2011 12:07 ilj.psa wrote: Napoleon Bonaparte. Hands down
Pretty much. Conquering SIBERIA doesn't begin to compare to conquering MOST OF WESTERN EUROPE, with an army that took on basically all the great world powers at once.
|
Poll: Greatest ConquerorAlexander the Great (47) 38% Genghis Khan (45) 36% Napoleon (24) 19% Cyrus the Great (5) 4% Emperor Qin (4) 3% 125 total votes Your vote: Greatest Conqueror (Vote): Napoleon (Vote): Genghis Khan (Vote): Emperor Qin (Vote): Alexander the Great (Vote): Cyrus the Great
|
Maximilian I. von Habsburg
![[image loading]](http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/1774/489pxalbrechtdrer084b.jpg) Bella gerant aliī, tū fēlix Austria nūbe Nam quae Mars aliīs, dat tibi regna Venus Let others wage war, but thou, O happy Austria, marry; for those kingdoms which Mars gives to others, Venus gives to thee. He laid the corner stone for austria as "The empire on which the sun never sets" under Emperor Karl V.
|
|
|
|
|
|