• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:17
CEST 04:17
KST 11:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.162Rollback Netcode in Brood War925.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202624Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10
StarCraft 2
General
SCII needs to put more weight on strategy and tact Server Blocker How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? 5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 ESL Pro Tour for SC2 discontinued
Tourneys
$3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
Rollback Netcode in Brood War ASL22 General Discussion ASL FINALS HYPE VIDEO 2X [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos BW General Discussion
Tourneys
ASL 22 Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Semifinal A
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11326 users

Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure - Page 6

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 68 Next
Krigwin
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:44:13
November 10 2010 23:43 GMT
#101
On November 11 2010 08:36 ZapRoffo wrote:
I'm saying I don't agree with the idea of freedom of speech applied carte blanche.

...You do realize that definitively conflicts with the idea of "free", right? Do you know what freedom is?
pfods
Profile Joined September 2010
United States895 Posts
November 10 2010 23:44 GMT
#102
On November 11 2010 08:42 RaFeStaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:41 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:39 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


the point is, because they sell something does not mean they necessarily support or condone it, legally or personally.

I don't oppose the sale of this book (as disgusting as it is), its just that his metaphor was terrible.


you mean analogy, right?

and the analogy works fine. you're just a sensationalist and made assumptions about this book and it's intentions, and are now basing everything you say about it on those assumptions.




That analogy isn't remotely fucking close, stop being an idiot. Have you actually looked at the content? Did you see the above post? People like you make me sick. Stop trying to be a rebel and get a grip.


yes i have, jack ass. i too have an internet machine.


and fascist little pigs like you make me sick. pull the knotted brown shirt out of your ass and get a grip.
jHERO
Profile Joined August 2010
China167 Posts
November 10 2010 23:44 GMT
#103
i get it, this is a trap set by the FBI, they will record down who buy this book and keep an eye on them



LOLOLOL ... i hope they do
ZapRoffo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5544 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:47:12
November 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#104
On November 11 2010 08:37 Seide wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:32 ZapRoffo wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:27 CheezDip wrote:
Freedom of speech exists to protect unpopular ideas. Popular ideas don't need protection.

I don't understand why ideas that have no value beyond harming those in helpless positions (something that has been demonstrably shown and is accepted worldwide) should be protected?

Just because you cannot see the value beyond that is your own personal problem. Many others see value in having the general public informed about how criminals go about things.

There are varying opinions on this, theres no clear right or wrong as seen from this thread. Free speech is partly designed to protect matierial in the situation of moral grey area.


I believe in looking at it as a trade-off that we, reasonable people in a time of relative general political calm and lack of turmoil in western society, can evaluate. Is it worth standing up for the idea that we, as a society, might be suppressing the idea of pedophilia that will one day be revealed as a practice or idea that has value to everyone, when doing so might contribute to the harm of the helpless here and now?

My answer is that at this time it's not worth it.

OK then I don't agree with "free speech" if that's how you all want to interpret it. Living in society we sacrifice freedoms, that's a given no matter how much you want to deny it. I guess everyone is against freedom?
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion man
EchOne
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States2906 Posts
November 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#105
The same knowledge used to advance evil can also be used to thwart it. If a monitored sex offender actually attempts to use this knowledge to commit crimes, the officer(s) watching him can more ably preempt him when armed with this knowledge.
面白くない世の中, 面白くすればいいさ
_Darwin_
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2374 Posts
November 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#106
On November 11 2010 08:43 Krigwin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:36 ZapRoffo wrote:
I'm saying I don't agree with the idea of freedom of speech applied carte blanche.

...You do realize that definitively conflicts with the idea of "free", right? Do you know what freedom is?


I'm sorry to disappoint, but there are already limits on "free" speech. The prominent example is that you cannot yell "fire" in a crowded building.
I cant stop lactating
VIB
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
Brazil3567 Posts
November 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#107
On November 11 2010 07:53 mahnini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 07:37 VIB wrote:The book does exactly what you think it does. Teaches pedophiles how to love children and avoid getting caught.

did you read it? from the title and description it doesn't sound like that to me.

On November 11 2010 08:41 Krigwin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 07:37 VIB wrote:
There's a book selling online on Amazon.com that is creating a lot of polemic. "Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure" have already got over 600 one-star reviews. The book does exactly what you think it does. Teaches pedophiles how to love children and avoid getting caught.

Wait, what?

According to the description the book is apparently about how to make "situations", by which I assume the author means relationships and intercourse, between adults and children safer for the children. How does it teach the reader to avoid getting caught?

Read the book samples I updated the first post with.
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
[...]
[image loading]

http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/10/amazon-defends-pedophile-how-to-guide/
Great people talk about ideas. Average people talk about things. Small people talk about other people.
XeliN
Profile Joined June 2009
United Kingdom1755 Posts
November 10 2010 23:46 GMT
#108
Zap so your saying freedom of speech only applies to ideas that have potential to be universally valuable as well as not cause potential harm in the present?

a "fine" view to have, but I would advise taking the word "freedom" out of it.
Adonai bless
shwaffles
Profile Joined July 2010
United States117 Posts
November 10 2010 23:47 GMT
#109
On November 11 2010 08:44 pfods wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:42 RaFeStaR wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:41 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:39 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


the point is, because they sell something does not mean they necessarily support or condone it, legally or personally.

I don't oppose the sale of this book (as disgusting as it is), its just that his metaphor was terrible.


you mean analogy, right?

and the analogy works fine. you're just a sensationalist and made assumptions about this book and it's intentions, and are now basing everything you say about it on those assumptions.




That analogy isn't remotely fucking close, stop being an idiot. Have you actually looked at the content? Did you see the above post? People like you make me sick. Stop trying to be a rebel and get a grip.


yes i have, jack ass. i too have an internet machine.


and fascist little pigs like you make me sick. pull the knotted brown shirt out of your ass and get a grip.

Wtf man... Getting all raged and everything, if you said something along the lines of "a book about constructing bombs" it would've been a good "analogy" (<- ty for this).
_Darwin_
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2374 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:48:16
November 10 2010 23:47 GMT
#110
On November 11 2010 08:45 EchOne wrote:
The same knowledge used to advance evil can also be used to thwart it. If a monitored sex offender actually attempts to use this knowledge to commit crimes, the officer(s) watching him can more ably preempt him when armed with this knowledge.


I'm not sure that an officer knowing that a latex finger coit is more fitting for an underage boy's penis than a regular condom will aid in arresting the rapist.
I cant stop lactating
RaFeStaR
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States161 Posts
November 10 2010 23:47 GMT
#111
On November 11 2010 08:44 pfods wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:42 RaFeStaR wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:41 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:39 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


the point is, because they sell something does not mean they necessarily support or condone it, legally or personally.

I don't oppose the sale of this book (as disgusting as it is), its just that his metaphor was terrible.


you mean analogy, right?

and the analogy works fine. you're just a sensationalist and made assumptions about this book and it's intentions, and are now basing everything you say about it on those assumptions.




That analogy isn't remotely fucking close, stop being an idiot. Have you actually looked at the content? Did you see the above post? People like you make me sick. Stop trying to be a rebel and get a grip.


yes i have, jack ass. i too have an internet machine.


and fascist little pigs like you make me sick. pull the knotted brown shirt out of your ass and get a grip.

Lol? If by fascist you mean a loving parent then sure, you got me! Get a clue~
ZaplinG
Profile Blog Joined February 2005
United States3818 Posts
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#112
Is there anything you CAN censor with the internet being so easily available? Seems like anything a potential pedo wants to learn about can find it somewhere on the internet.

So who cares whether or not this book exists. Stopping its production ultimately does nothing but publicize it more. We are in an age where censorship just isn't possible anymore.

Book might make for a funny gag gift though with Christmas coming up, who knows?
Don't believe the florist when he tells you that the roses are free
Sandrosuperstar
Profile Joined November 2009
Sweden525 Posts
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#113
On November 11 2010 08:36 StorkHwaiting wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


Selling guns and missiles and helicopters to Pakistan and African warlords doesn't hurt anyone either, right? It's good the US doesn't do anything like that. Not like rape, pedophilia, or child soldiers happens in those countries we're selling weapons to either! A bunch of people here getting all hot and bothered and disgusted with this book. I wonder how active they are in protesting the US propping up regimes that preserve cultures that are okay with all of the above crimes against humanity.


And this is a thing people mix up. A gun is not an opinion or a book. It's a gun. You kill people with it. And it is gennerally accepted that any human has a right to live and that killing eachother should be avoided as much as possible. You don't have a freedom to bare arms as a result of freedom of speech or freedom of living. >__>
I'm homo for Lomo, gay for GGplay, but at the end of the day I put my dong in Lee Jaedong
Phenny
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia1435 Posts
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#114
Is this book satirical or serious? Either way it shouldn't be censored (free speech and all) but if it's serious then that is pretty messed up.
ZapRoffo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5544 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:49:10
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#115
On November 11 2010 08:46 XeliN wrote:
Zap so your saying freedom of speech only applies to ideas that have potential to be universally valuable as well as not cause potential harm in the present?

a "fine" view to have, but I would advise taking the word "freedom" out of it.

I never said universally valuable, I just say can be construed in some way to have some value that reasonable people can recognize (very broad).
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion man
Firereaver
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
India1701 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:49:18
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#116
dp
"They drone drone drone , me win" - JangMinChul(Iron/oGsMC)
StorkHwaiting
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States3465 Posts
November 10 2010 23:49 GMT
#117
On November 11 2010 08:47 _Darwin_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:45 EchOne wrote:
The same knowledge used to advance evil can also be used to thwart it. If a monitored sex offender actually attempts to use this knowledge to commit crimes, the officer(s) watching him can more ably preempt him when armed with this knowledge.


I'm not sure that an officer knowing that a latex finger coit is more fitting for an underage boy's penis than a regular condom will aid in arresting the rapist.


If you catch a dude buying a box full of finger coits and hanging around the playground every day, I'd say that's a pretty good lead.
pfods
Profile Joined September 2010
United States895 Posts
November 10 2010 23:49 GMT
#118
On November 11 2010 08:47 RaFeStaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:44 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:42 RaFeStaR wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:41 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:39 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


the point is, because they sell something does not mean they necessarily support or condone it, legally or personally.

I don't oppose the sale of this book (as disgusting as it is), its just that his metaphor was terrible.


you mean analogy, right?

and the analogy works fine. you're just a sensationalist and made assumptions about this book and it's intentions, and are now basing everything you say about it on those assumptions.




That analogy isn't remotely fucking close, stop being an idiot. Have you actually looked at the content? Did you see the above post? People like you make me sick. Stop trying to be a rebel and get a grip.


yes i have, jack ass. i too have an internet machine.


and fascist little pigs like you make me sick. pull the knotted brown shirt out of your ass and get a grip.

Lol? If by fascist you mean a loving parent then sure, you got me! Get a clue~


no by fascist i mean someone who thinks they know what should and should not be censored based upon their little cry baby sensibilities. if you're worried about your child being raped, keep a better eye on them. this book certainly isn't going to be the cause.
Sandrosuperstar
Profile Joined November 2009
Sweden525 Posts
November 10 2010 23:50 GMT
#119
On November 11 2010 08:45 _Darwin_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:43 Krigwin wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 ZapRoffo wrote:
I'm saying I don't agree with the idea of freedom of speech applied carte blanche.

...You do realize that definitively conflicts with the idea of "free", right? Do you know what freedom is?


I'm sorry to disappoint, but there are already limits on "free" speech. The prominent example is that you cannot yell "fire" in a crowded building.


Life goes before freedom :D it's a walk of balance.
I'm homo for Lomo, gay for GGplay, but at the end of the day I put my dong in Lee Jaedong
emythrel
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United Kingdom2599 Posts
November 10 2010 23:50 GMT
#120
On November 11 2010 08:45 _Darwin_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:43 Krigwin wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 ZapRoffo wrote:
I'm saying I don't agree with the idea of freedom of speech applied carte blanche.

...You do realize that definitively conflicts with the idea of "free", right? Do you know what freedom is?


I'm sorry to disappoint, but there are already limits on "free" speech. The prominent example is that you cannot yell "fire" in a crowded building.


Yes because they made a law saying you couldn't. And saying Fire in a crowded building isn't what many would deem as free speech, it is deemed to be enciting panic and this against the law. Its only a free speech issue if the word fire was banned altogether, or becuase it is simply deemed offensive.

Next argument someone will make is you can't swear at police..... again thats not because you don't have the right to express those emotions, its because its deemed to be abuse and it is against the law to be abusive to a police officer, or infact its simply against the law to swear loudly and repeatedly in public period. That one is called disturbing the peace.
When there is nothing left to lose but your dignity, it is already gone.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 68 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 162
ViBE156
ProTech122
SpeCial 26
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 3452
Artosis 610
NaDa 45
Aegong 44
NotJumperer 11
Terrorterran 7
Britney 0
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm215
PGG 43
febbydoto15
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Doublelift787
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1139
taco 313
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1042
AZ_Axe139
Other Games
summit1g6918
WinterStarcraft617
JimRising 532
PiGStarcraft421
C9.Mang0180
Livibee146
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick663
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH324
• davetesta18
• Letter148
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Shiphtur299
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
7h 43m
WardiTV Qualifier
8h 43m
Online Event
1d 8h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
BSL Open Qualifier
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
IPSL
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open Qualifier
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-14
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Disclosure: This page contains affiliate marketing links that support TLnet.

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.