• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 04:41
CET 10:41
KST 18:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !2Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win2Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Did they add GM to 2v2? RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft2.fi 15th Anniversary Cup RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle [BSL21] RO8 Bracket & Prediction Contest BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO8 - Day 2 - Sunday 21:00 CET [ASL20] Grand Finals [BSL21] RO8 - Day 1 - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread PC Games Sales Thread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
How Sleep Deprivation Affect…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2079 users

Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure - Page 6

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 68 Next
Krigwin
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:44:13
November 10 2010 23:43 GMT
#101
On November 11 2010 08:36 ZapRoffo wrote:
I'm saying I don't agree with the idea of freedom of speech applied carte blanche.

...You do realize that definitively conflicts with the idea of "free", right? Do you know what freedom is?
pfods
Profile Joined September 2010
United States895 Posts
November 10 2010 23:44 GMT
#102
On November 11 2010 08:42 RaFeStaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:41 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:39 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


the point is, because they sell something does not mean they necessarily support or condone it, legally or personally.

I don't oppose the sale of this book (as disgusting as it is), its just that his metaphor was terrible.


you mean analogy, right?

and the analogy works fine. you're just a sensationalist and made assumptions about this book and it's intentions, and are now basing everything you say about it on those assumptions.




That analogy isn't remotely fucking close, stop being an idiot. Have you actually looked at the content? Did you see the above post? People like you make me sick. Stop trying to be a rebel and get a grip.


yes i have, jack ass. i too have an internet machine.


and fascist little pigs like you make me sick. pull the knotted brown shirt out of your ass and get a grip.
jHERO
Profile Joined August 2010
China167 Posts
November 10 2010 23:44 GMT
#103
i get it, this is a trap set by the FBI, they will record down who buy this book and keep an eye on them



LOLOLOL ... i hope they do
ZapRoffo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5544 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:47:12
November 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#104
On November 11 2010 08:37 Seide wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:32 ZapRoffo wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:27 CheezDip wrote:
Freedom of speech exists to protect unpopular ideas. Popular ideas don't need protection.

I don't understand why ideas that have no value beyond harming those in helpless positions (something that has been demonstrably shown and is accepted worldwide) should be protected?

Just because you cannot see the value beyond that is your own personal problem. Many others see value in having the general public informed about how criminals go about things.

There are varying opinions on this, theres no clear right or wrong as seen from this thread. Free speech is partly designed to protect matierial in the situation of moral grey area.


I believe in looking at it as a trade-off that we, reasonable people in a time of relative general political calm and lack of turmoil in western society, can evaluate. Is it worth standing up for the idea that we, as a society, might be suppressing the idea of pedophilia that will one day be revealed as a practice or idea that has value to everyone, when doing so might contribute to the harm of the helpless here and now?

My answer is that at this time it's not worth it.

OK then I don't agree with "free speech" if that's how you all want to interpret it. Living in society we sacrifice freedoms, that's a given no matter how much you want to deny it. I guess everyone is against freedom?
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion man
EchOne
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States2906 Posts
November 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#105
The same knowledge used to advance evil can also be used to thwart it. If a monitored sex offender actually attempts to use this knowledge to commit crimes, the officer(s) watching him can more ably preempt him when armed with this knowledge.
面白くない世の中, 面白くすればいいさ
_Darwin_
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2374 Posts
November 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#106
On November 11 2010 08:43 Krigwin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:36 ZapRoffo wrote:
I'm saying I don't agree with the idea of freedom of speech applied carte blanche.

...You do realize that definitively conflicts with the idea of "free", right? Do you know what freedom is?


I'm sorry to disappoint, but there are already limits on "free" speech. The prominent example is that you cannot yell "fire" in a crowded building.
I cant stop lactating
VIB
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
Brazil3567 Posts
November 10 2010 23:45 GMT
#107
On November 11 2010 07:53 mahnini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 07:37 VIB wrote:The book does exactly what you think it does. Teaches pedophiles how to love children and avoid getting caught.

did you read it? from the title and description it doesn't sound like that to me.

On November 11 2010 08:41 Krigwin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 07:37 VIB wrote:
There's a book selling online on Amazon.com that is creating a lot of polemic. "Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure" have already got over 600 one-star reviews. The book does exactly what you think it does. Teaches pedophiles how to love children and avoid getting caught.

Wait, what?

According to the description the book is apparently about how to make "situations", by which I assume the author means relationships and intercourse, between adults and children safer for the children. How does it teach the reader to avoid getting caught?

Read the book samples I updated the first post with.
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
[...]
[image loading]

http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/10/amazon-defends-pedophile-how-to-guide/
Great people talk about ideas. Average people talk about things. Small people talk about other people.
XeliN
Profile Joined June 2009
United Kingdom1755 Posts
November 10 2010 23:46 GMT
#108
Zap so your saying freedom of speech only applies to ideas that have potential to be universally valuable as well as not cause potential harm in the present?

a "fine" view to have, but I would advise taking the word "freedom" out of it.
Adonai bless
shwaffles
Profile Joined July 2010
United States117 Posts
November 10 2010 23:47 GMT
#109
On November 11 2010 08:44 pfods wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:42 RaFeStaR wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:41 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:39 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


the point is, because they sell something does not mean they necessarily support or condone it, legally or personally.

I don't oppose the sale of this book (as disgusting as it is), its just that his metaphor was terrible.


you mean analogy, right?

and the analogy works fine. you're just a sensationalist and made assumptions about this book and it's intentions, and are now basing everything you say about it on those assumptions.




That analogy isn't remotely fucking close, stop being an idiot. Have you actually looked at the content? Did you see the above post? People like you make me sick. Stop trying to be a rebel and get a grip.


yes i have, jack ass. i too have an internet machine.


and fascist little pigs like you make me sick. pull the knotted brown shirt out of your ass and get a grip.

Wtf man... Getting all raged and everything, if you said something along the lines of "a book about constructing bombs" it would've been a good "analogy" (<- ty for this).
_Darwin_
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2374 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:48:16
November 10 2010 23:47 GMT
#110
On November 11 2010 08:45 EchOne wrote:
The same knowledge used to advance evil can also be used to thwart it. If a monitored sex offender actually attempts to use this knowledge to commit crimes, the officer(s) watching him can more ably preempt him when armed with this knowledge.


I'm not sure that an officer knowing that a latex finger coit is more fitting for an underage boy's penis than a regular condom will aid in arresting the rapist.
I cant stop lactating
RaFeStaR
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States161 Posts
November 10 2010 23:47 GMT
#111
On November 11 2010 08:44 pfods wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:42 RaFeStaR wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:41 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:39 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


the point is, because they sell something does not mean they necessarily support or condone it, legally or personally.

I don't oppose the sale of this book (as disgusting as it is), its just that his metaphor was terrible.


you mean analogy, right?

and the analogy works fine. you're just a sensationalist and made assumptions about this book and it's intentions, and are now basing everything you say about it on those assumptions.




That analogy isn't remotely fucking close, stop being an idiot. Have you actually looked at the content? Did you see the above post? People like you make me sick. Stop trying to be a rebel and get a grip.


yes i have, jack ass. i too have an internet machine.


and fascist little pigs like you make me sick. pull the knotted brown shirt out of your ass and get a grip.

Lol? If by fascist you mean a loving parent then sure, you got me! Get a clue~
ZaplinG
Profile Blog Joined February 2005
United States3818 Posts
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#112
Is there anything you CAN censor with the internet being so easily available? Seems like anything a potential pedo wants to learn about can find it somewhere on the internet.

So who cares whether or not this book exists. Stopping its production ultimately does nothing but publicize it more. We are in an age where censorship just isn't possible anymore.

Book might make for a funny gag gift though with Christmas coming up, who knows?
Don't believe the florist when he tells you that the roses are free
Sandrosuperstar
Profile Joined November 2009
Sweden525 Posts
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#113
On November 11 2010 08:36 StorkHwaiting wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


Selling guns and missiles and helicopters to Pakistan and African warlords doesn't hurt anyone either, right? It's good the US doesn't do anything like that. Not like rape, pedophilia, or child soldiers happens in those countries we're selling weapons to either! A bunch of people here getting all hot and bothered and disgusted with this book. I wonder how active they are in protesting the US propping up regimes that preserve cultures that are okay with all of the above crimes against humanity.


And this is a thing people mix up. A gun is not an opinion or a book. It's a gun. You kill people with it. And it is gennerally accepted that any human has a right to live and that killing eachother should be avoided as much as possible. You don't have a freedom to bare arms as a result of freedom of speech or freedom of living. >__>
I'm homo for Lomo, gay for GGplay, but at the end of the day I put my dong in Lee Jaedong
Phenny
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia1435 Posts
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#114
Is this book satirical or serious? Either way it shouldn't be censored (free speech and all) but if it's serious then that is pretty messed up.
ZapRoffo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5544 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:49:10
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#115
On November 11 2010 08:46 XeliN wrote:
Zap so your saying freedom of speech only applies to ideas that have potential to be universally valuable as well as not cause potential harm in the present?

a "fine" view to have, but I would advise taking the word "freedom" out of it.

I never said universally valuable, I just say can be construed in some way to have some value that reasonable people can recognize (very broad).
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion man
Firereaver
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
India1701 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-10 23:49:18
November 10 2010 23:48 GMT
#116
dp
"They drone drone drone , me win" - JangMinChul(Iron/oGsMC)
StorkHwaiting
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States3465 Posts
November 10 2010 23:49 GMT
#117
On November 11 2010 08:47 _Darwin_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:45 EchOne wrote:
The same knowledge used to advance evil can also be used to thwart it. If a monitored sex offender actually attempts to use this knowledge to commit crimes, the officer(s) watching him can more ably preempt him when armed with this knowledge.


I'm not sure that an officer knowing that a latex finger coit is more fitting for an underage boy's penis than a regular condom will aid in arresting the rapist.


If you catch a dude buying a box full of finger coits and hanging around the playground every day, I'd say that's a pretty good lead.
pfods
Profile Joined September 2010
United States895 Posts
November 10 2010 23:49 GMT
#118
On November 11 2010 08:47 RaFeStaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:44 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:42 RaFeStaR wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:41 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:39 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 pfods wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:32 shwaffles wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:28 pfods wrote:
i like everyone losing their collective shit over this. this book does not make people commit pedophilia, therefor it doesn't go against any law.

amazon also sells sex toys. does their cut of the dildo market make them aggressive gay apologists pushing for the homosexual agenda? of course not.

Expect that not not many gays are child-rapists or rapists in general, and selling sex toys to gays doesn't harm anyone.


the point is, because they sell something does not mean they necessarily support or condone it, legally or personally.

I don't oppose the sale of this book (as disgusting as it is), its just that his metaphor was terrible.


you mean analogy, right?

and the analogy works fine. you're just a sensationalist and made assumptions about this book and it's intentions, and are now basing everything you say about it on those assumptions.




That analogy isn't remotely fucking close, stop being an idiot. Have you actually looked at the content? Did you see the above post? People like you make me sick. Stop trying to be a rebel and get a grip.


yes i have, jack ass. i too have an internet machine.


and fascist little pigs like you make me sick. pull the knotted brown shirt out of your ass and get a grip.

Lol? If by fascist you mean a loving parent then sure, you got me! Get a clue~


no by fascist i mean someone who thinks they know what should and should not be censored based upon their little cry baby sensibilities. if you're worried about your child being raped, keep a better eye on them. this book certainly isn't going to be the cause.
Sandrosuperstar
Profile Joined November 2009
Sweden525 Posts
November 10 2010 23:50 GMT
#119
On November 11 2010 08:45 _Darwin_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:43 Krigwin wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 ZapRoffo wrote:
I'm saying I don't agree with the idea of freedom of speech applied carte blanche.

...You do realize that definitively conflicts with the idea of "free", right? Do you know what freedom is?


I'm sorry to disappoint, but there are already limits on "free" speech. The prominent example is that you cannot yell "fire" in a crowded building.


Life goes before freedom :D it's a walk of balance.
I'm homo for Lomo, gay for GGplay, but at the end of the day I put my dong in Lee Jaedong
emythrel
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United Kingdom2599 Posts
November 10 2010 23:50 GMT
#120
On November 11 2010 08:45 _Darwin_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2010 08:43 Krigwin wrote:
On November 11 2010 08:36 ZapRoffo wrote:
I'm saying I don't agree with the idea of freedom of speech applied carte blanche.

...You do realize that definitively conflicts with the idea of "free", right? Do you know what freedom is?


I'm sorry to disappoint, but there are already limits on "free" speech. The prominent example is that you cannot yell "fire" in a crowded building.


Yes because they made a law saying you couldn't. And saying Fire in a crowded building isn't what many would deem as free speech, it is deemed to be enciting panic and this against the law. Its only a free speech issue if the word fire was banned altogether, or becuase it is simply deemed offensive.

Next argument someone will make is you can't swear at police..... again thats not because you don't have the right to express those emotions, its because its deemed to be abuse and it is against the law to be abusive to a police officer, or infact its simply against the law to swear loudly and repeatedly in public period. That one is called disturbing the peace.
When there is nothing left to lose but your dignity, it is already gone.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 68 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 19m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 224
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 7499
Bisu 659
Shuttle 614
Jaedong 601
Zeus 199
EffOrt 190
Sharp 161
PianO 142
Yoon 113
Soma 111
[ Show more ]
Larva 107
actioN 93
Pusan 86
Mong 74
Killer 67
Dewaltoss 61
Rush 52
910 40
Shine 34
soO 31
Shinee 30
Noble 29
Trikslyr28
yabsab 27
Mind 25
NaDa 18
GoRush 14
Sacsri 13
Terrorterran 9
Dota 2
XcaliburYe278
League of Legends
C9.Mang0423
JimRising 417
Other Games
summit1g14575
ceh9445
Happy295
Fuzer 285
XaKoH 93
Mew2King66
Livibee40
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick497
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH133
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos990
Upcoming Events
WardiTV 2025
2h 19m
MaNa vs Gerald
TBD vs uThermal
TBD vs Shameless
TBD vs MaxPax
ByuN vs TBD
Spirit vs ShoWTimE
OSC
5h 19m
YoungYakov vs Mixu
ForJumy vs TBD
Percival vs TBD
Shameless vs TBD
The PondCast
1d
WardiTV 2025
1d 3h
Cure vs Creator
TBD vs Solar
WardiTV 2025
2 days
OSC
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
SC Evo League
3 days
Ladder Legends
3 days
BSL 21
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Ladder Legends
4 days
BSL 21
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Disclosure: This page contains affiliate marketing links that support TLnet.

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.