• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 09:49
CET 15:49
KST 23:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - RO16 Preview3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational10SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)20Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 [Short Story] The Last GSL Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
Fantasy's Q&A video [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Esports Advertising Shap…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1523 users

Wikileaks - Page 45

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 43 44 45 46 47 70 Next
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
December 04 2010 19:09 GMT
#881
"In a free society, we are supposed to know the truth. In a society where truth becomes treason, we are in big trouble." ~ Ron Paul
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
VIB
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
Brazil3567 Posts
December 04 2010 20:41 GMT
#882
On December 04 2010 23:35 Aim Here wrote:

First, a US spy inside a right-wing German political party gets fired:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,732579,00.html

Then the Pakistani Army promises not to depose the civilian government again:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/04/pakistan-army-supports-government-wikileaks

That's two good, concrete, examples of the cable leaks making the world a better place, right there, in contrast to the hypothetical worries about people being endangered or diplomats not being able to do anything, or World War 3 breaking out.
In my humble opinion, the biggest win is that public opinion support for war keeps reducing after each leak from wikileaks. This is the most meaningful impact from the leaks imo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_public_opinion_on_the_war_in_Afghanistan#2010

On December 05 2010 03:46 Proto_Protoss wrote:
Oh no Wikileaks got shut down i wanted to read the leaks too :/

On December 05 2010 03:59 Wuffey wrote:
Free speech has a number: http://88.80.13.160

And an alternative URL on Switzerland too :D
http://wikileaks.ch/
Great people talk about ideas. Average people talk about things. Small people talk about other people.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
December 04 2010 22:45 GMT
#883

Talking about WikiLeaks on Facebook or Twitter could endanger your job prospects, a State Department official warned students at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs this week.

An email from SIPA's Office of Career Services went out Tuesday afternoon with a caution from the official, an alumnus of the school. Students who will be applying for jobs in the federal government could jeopardize their prospects by posting links to WikiLeaks online, or even by discussing the leaked documents on social networking sites, the official was quoted as saying.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Krigwin
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1130 Posts
December 04 2010 22:50 GMT
#884
Bwahahahah, thus the thought police are born.

"Talking about Wikileaks with your friends? NO JOB FOR YOU!"
KaiserJohan
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden1808 Posts
December 04 2010 22:57 GMT
#885
The US government is no better than china with their oppressive policies. Nations should stop sucking US titties and condemn disgusting censorship acts like this.

England will fight to the last American
The KY
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United Kingdom6252 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-04 23:10:09
December 04 2010 23:01 GMT
#886
Didn't the Pentagon say they are 'swiftly closing the gaps in US legislation' in order to make prosecuting Julian Assange legal?
In other words, after every legal adviser they asked said Assange had broken no law, they're just changing the law so that they can have him siezed and brought into US jurisdiction.

That sounds fair.

EDIT: At least Sarah Palin isn't in charge, seeing as she literally wants him dead and makes no secret of it. And she's not the only one.

Also, in that Q&A in the Guardian with Assange, a question came from a former UK diplomat who said that diplomacy cannot function without private communication, and would Assange accept the blame if the next international incident went unsolved because of this. Assange totally dodged the question, which is deeply disappointing.
Gummy
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States2180 Posts
December 04 2010 23:16 GMT
#887
On December 05 2010 08:01 The KY wrote:
Didn't the Pentagon say they are 'swiftly closing the gaps in US legislation' in order to make prosecuting Julian Assange legal?
In other words, after every legal adviser they asked said Assange had broken no law, they're just changing the law so that they can have him siezed and brought into US jurisdiction.

That sounds fair.

EDIT: At least Sarah Palin isn't in charge, seeing as she literally wants him dead and makes no secret of it. And she's not the only one.

Also, in that Q&A in the Guardian with Assange, a question came from a former UK diplomat who said that diplomacy cannot function without private communication, and would Assange accept the blame if the next international incident went unsolved because of this. Assange totally dodged the question, which is deeply disappointing.

Ex post facto prosecution is explicitly prohibited in the constitution. What authorities can do is to legislate laws to prosecute future leaks.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There are three kinds of people in the world: those who can count and those who can't.
The KY
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United Kingdom6252 Posts
December 04 2010 23:21 GMT
#888
On December 05 2010 08:16 Gummy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 08:01 The KY wrote:
Didn't the Pentagon say they are 'swiftly closing the gaps in US legislation' in order to make prosecuting Julian Assange legal?
In other words, after every legal adviser they asked said Assange had broken no law, they're just changing the law so that they can have him siezed and brought into US jurisdiction.

That sounds fair.

EDIT: At least Sarah Palin isn't in charge, seeing as she literally wants him dead and makes no secret of it. And she's not the only one.

Also, in that Q&A in the Guardian with Assange, a question came from a former UK diplomat who said that diplomacy cannot function without private communication, and would Assange accept the blame if the next international incident went unsolved because of this. Assange totally dodged the question, which is deeply disappointing.

Ex post facto prosecution is explicitly prohibited in the constitution. What authorities can do is to legislate laws to prosecute future leaks.

The future leaks which are coming. But regardless, I read something about them being willing to do it anyway and fight the habeas corpus case later. But then again that could be some journo talking shite.
Shizuru~
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Malaysia1676 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-04 23:23:45
December 04 2010 23:23 GMT
#889
On December 05 2010 08:16 Gummy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 08:01 The KY wrote:
Didn't the Pentagon say they are 'swiftly closing the gaps in US legislation' in order to make prosecuting Julian Assange legal?
In other words, after every legal adviser they asked said Assange had broken no law, they're just changing the law so that they can have him siezed and brought into US jurisdiction.

That sounds fair.

EDIT: At least Sarah Palin isn't in charge, seeing as she literally wants him dead and makes no secret of it. And she's not the only one.

Also, in that Q&A in the Guardian with Assange, a question came from a former UK diplomat who said that diplomacy cannot function without private communication, and would Assange accept the blame if the next international incident went unsolved because of this. Assange totally dodged the question, which is deeply disappointing.

Ex post facto prosecution is explicitly prohibited in the constitution. What authorities can do is to legislate laws to prosecute future leaks.



that's assuming the US government actually gives a shit about their constitution...
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
December 04 2010 23:29 GMT
#890
On December 05 2010 08:23 Shizuru~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 08:16 Gummy wrote:
On December 05 2010 08:01 The KY wrote:
Didn't the Pentagon say they are 'swiftly closing the gaps in US legislation' in order to make prosecuting Julian Assange legal?
In other words, after every legal adviser they asked said Assange had broken no law, they're just changing the law so that they can have him siezed and brought into US jurisdiction.

That sounds fair.

EDIT: At least Sarah Palin isn't in charge, seeing as she literally wants him dead and makes no secret of it. And she's not the only one.

Also, in that Q&A in the Guardian with Assange, a question came from a former UK diplomat who said that diplomacy cannot function without private communication, and would Assange accept the blame if the next international incident went unsolved because of this. Assange totally dodged the question, which is deeply disappointing.

Ex post facto prosecution is explicitly prohibited in the constitution. What authorities can do is to legislate laws to prosecute future leaks.



that's assuming the US government actually gives a shit about their constitution...

It's still up to the courts to decide.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
rackdude
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States882 Posts
December 04 2010 23:41 GMT
#891
On December 05 2010 08:23 Shizuru~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 08:16 Gummy wrote:
On December 05 2010 08:01 The KY wrote:
Didn't the Pentagon say they are 'swiftly closing the gaps in US legislation' in order to make prosecuting Julian Assange legal?
In other words, after every legal adviser they asked said Assange had broken no law, they're just changing the law so that they can have him siezed and brought into US jurisdiction.

That sounds fair.

EDIT: At least Sarah Palin isn't in charge, seeing as she literally wants him dead and makes no secret of it. And she's not the only one.

Also, in that Q&A in the Guardian with Assange, a question came from a former UK diplomat who said that diplomacy cannot function without private communication, and would Assange accept the blame if the next international incident went unsolved because of this. Assange totally dodged the question, which is deeply disappointing.

Ex post facto prosecution is explicitly prohibited in the constitution. What authorities can do is to legislate laws to prosecute future leaks.



that's assuming the US government actually gives a shit about their constitution...


In the US you cannot just throw out the constitution. The government might be corrupt in many ways, but no one would dare to challenge the constitution, only interpretations of the constitution.
Sweet.
Gummy
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States2180 Posts
December 05 2010 00:07 GMT
#892
On December 05 2010 08:41 rackdude wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 08:23 Shizuru~ wrote:
On December 05 2010 08:16 Gummy wrote:
On December 05 2010 08:01 The KY wrote:
Didn't the Pentagon say they are 'swiftly closing the gaps in US legislation' in order to make prosecuting Julian Assange legal?
In other words, after every legal adviser they asked said Assange had broken no law, they're just changing the law so that they can have him siezed and brought into US jurisdiction.

That sounds fair.

EDIT: At least Sarah Palin isn't in charge, seeing as she literally wants him dead and makes no secret of it. And she's not the only one.

Also, in that Q&A in the Guardian with Assange, a question came from a former UK diplomat who said that diplomacy cannot function without private communication, and would Assange accept the blame if the next international incident went unsolved because of this. Assange totally dodged the question, which is deeply disappointing.

Ex post facto prosecution is explicitly prohibited in the constitution. What authorities can do is to legislate laws to prosecute future leaks.



that's assuming the US government actually gives a shit about their constitution...


In the US you cannot just throw out the constitution. The government might be corrupt in many ways, but no one would dare to challenge the constitution, only interpretations of the constitution.

Basically this.
As far as the constitution goes, the issue of ex post facto does not have any conflicting interpretations.
Article I, Section 9, Line 3:
"No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There are three kinds of people in the world: those who can count and those who can't.
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-05 01:12:45
December 05 2010 01:07 GMT
#893
There are reports of Wikileaks-related blogs being removed from Blogger (a Google service).


http://twitter.com/mikkohypponen

Mikko is the head of one of the biggest Internet Security Software companies F-secure. Hes got 10,000 followers and an extremely knowledgeable and well informed fellow.

Land of the Free my ass. Maybe you could hide behind the lies that "Wikileaks is endangering lives, which is why it is being censored", but random google blogs from supporters? That's straight out of the CPC playbook.

I think its clear that free speech only applies here if we're regurgitating television news pundits.
Too Busy to Troll!
Keniji
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Netherlands2569 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-05 01:40:46
December 05 2010 01:37 GMT
#894
edit: nvm
Offhand
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1869 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-05 01:49:46
December 05 2010 01:43 GMT
#895
If anyone's still debating as to whether or not wikileaks is having a real effect, check out headlines from yesterday.

Guardian

• The British military was criticised for failing to establish security in Sangin by the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, and the US commander of Nato troops, according to diplomatic cables.

• Rampant government corruption in Afghanistan is revealed by the cables, including an incident last year when the then vice-president, Ahmad Zia Massoud, was stopped and questioned in Dubai when he flew into the emirate with $52m in cash.


• Gordon Brown was written off as prime minister by the US embassy in London a year into his premiership. It concluded that an "abysmal track record" had left him lurching from "political disaster to disaster", according to cables released by WikiLeaks. He briefly earned some praise when he led the recapitalising of banks after the collapse of Lehman Brothers but within months his government was deemed a "sinking ship". Brown's international initiatives, from food summits to global disarmament and a UK national security council, were treated with indifference bordering on disdain by the Americans, according to US embassy cables.

• The Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, is erratic, emotional and prone to believing paranoid conspiracy theories, according to frustrated diplomats and foreign statesmen. He has also been accused by his own ministers of complicity in criminal activity, including ordering the physical intimidation of the top official in charge of leading negotiations with the Taliban.

• US diplomats have reported suspicions that Silvio Berlusconi could be "profiting personally and handsomely" from secret deals with the Russian prime minister, Vladimir Putin, according to cables released by WikiLeaks. They centre on allegations that the Italian leader has been promised a cut of huge energy contracts. Another memo quoted a friend of Berlusconi saying the Italian prime minister's fondness for partying had taken a physical and political toll on him.

• American officials dismissed British protests about secret US spy flights taking place from the UK's Cyprus airbase, amid concerns from Labour ministers, upset about rendition flights going on behind their backs, that the UK would be an unwitting accomplice to torture.

• The British Foreign Office misled parliament over the plight of thousands of islanders who were expelled from their Indian Ocean homeland – the British colony of Diego Garcia – to make way for a large US military base, according to secret US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks. It has privately admitted its latest plan to declare the islands the world's largest marine protection zone will end any chance of them being repatriated. Publicly ministers have claimed the proposed park would have no effect on the islanders' right of return.

• The cables reveal Washington's opinion on Gordon Brown's potential successors. David Miliband was deemed "too brainy", Alan Johnson had a "lack of killer instinct" and Harriet Harman was a "policy lightweight but an adept interparty operator".

• A scandal involving foreign contractors employed to train Afghan policemen who took drugs and paid for young "dancing boys" to entertain them in northern Afghanistan caused such panic that the interior minister begged the US embassy to try to "quash" the story, according a US embassy cable. The Afghan government feared the story, if published, would "endanger lives" and was particularly concerned that a video of the incident might be made public.

• The US military has been charging its allies a 15% handling fee on hundreds of millions of dollars being raised internationally to build up the Afghan army. Germany has threatened to cancel contributions, raising concerns that money is going to the US treasury.

• Iran is financing a range of Afghan religious and political leaders, grooming Afghan religious scholars, training Taliban militants and even seeking to influence MPs, according to cables from the US embassy in Kabul.

• The US has lost faith in the Mexican army's ability to win the country's drugs war, branding it slow, clumsy and no match for "sophisticated" narco-traffickers.

• The US is convinced that Ahmed Wali Karzai, the Afghan president's younger half-brother and a senior figure in Kandahar, is corrupt, according to embassy cables. He is described as dominating access to "economic resources, patronage and protection". Two of Hamid Karzai's brothers planned to ask for asylum in the US, while other family members stayed away and kept their money out of Afghanistan – so anxious were they that the Afghan president would lose last year's election.

• The Obama administration and Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, are determined to reject talks with Mullah Omar, the Taliban leader, and have consistently worked to split his movement, according to US diplomatic cables. Karzai has sometimes publicly floated the idea of dialogue with Omar and other top Taliban, but the cables show his private position is the opposite.


• Venezuela's Hugo Chávez and Colombia's Álvaro Uribe "almost came to blows" at a Latin America unity summit, according to a US memo, which described it as "the worst expression of banana republic discourse".

• A Kremlin campaign to airbrush Stalin's role in Russian history by dictating how academics write about the past is only half-hearted, US diplomats believe. They also feel there are enough Russians striving to remember the purge victims to combat any rewrite. The cable concerns the so-called "history wars", a nationalist campaign to defend Russia's honour.

• Turkmenistan's president, Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov, is "vain, suspicious, guarded, strict, very conservative", a "micro-manager" and "a practised liar", US diplomats say.

• Four months before his death the Nobel-prize winning writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn offered qualified praise for Vladimir Putin, arguing that he was doing a better job as Russia's leader than Boris Yeltsin or Mikhail Gorbachev. Solzhenitsyn was exiled from the Soviet Union in 1974 and returned to Russia 20 years later.

• Moldova's president offered a $10m (£6.4m) bribe to a political rival in a desperate bid to keep his defeated communist government in power, according to a secret US diplomatic cable.

New York Times

• Afghanistan emerges as a land where bribery, extortion and embezzlement are the norm. Describing the likely lineup of Afghanistan's new cabinet last January, the US embassy noted that the agriculture minister, Asif Rahimi, "appears to be the only minister that was confirmed about whom no allegations of bribery exist".

Der Spiegel

• Berlin was irritated by a 15% administration fee the US sought to charge Germany on a €50m donation made to a trust fund set up to improve the Afghan army. A top German diplomat complained the fee would be a tough sell to taxpayers.

• Mistrust between the US and the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, is very deep. Karzai is convinced the US has thrown its backing behind his rival Abdullah Abdullah.

• The close relationship between Italy's Silvio Berlusconi and Russia's Vladimir Putin is a source of unease for the US state department. The leaked cables contain allegations of personal business interests that both politicians deny.

• US diplomats are concerned about the growing power of Russian organised crime and believe it has contacts with the highest levels of government in Moscow.

Le Monde

• France is committed to staying the course in Afghanistan even though public opposition to the war and electoral considerations have weighed heavily on Nicolas Sarkozy. Amid concerns that the French president was trying to distance himself from the US to improve his popularity, Barack Obama was advised that a phone call to him could have a decisive impact. The US president was told: "Flattery would lead very far."

• Iran is extending its influence in Afghanistan in the same way it did in Iraq. It has been supporting insurgent groups as well as financially backing politicians.


Wikileaks is causing a political shitstorm.

E: Bolded the better ones.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
December 05 2010 05:06 GMT
#896
Wow if blogs are being removed for mentioning Wikileaks then we have reached a whole new wave of BS/craziness.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
FindingPride
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1001 Posts
December 05 2010 05:36 GMT
#897
On December 05 2010 08:41 rackdude wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 08:23 Shizuru~ wrote:
On December 05 2010 08:16 Gummy wrote:
On December 05 2010 08:01 The KY wrote:
Didn't the Pentagon say they are 'swiftly closing the gaps in US legislation' in order to make prosecuting Julian Assange legal?
In other words, after every legal adviser they asked said Assange had broken no law, they're just changing the law so that they can have him siezed and brought into US jurisdiction.

That sounds fair.

EDIT: At least Sarah Palin isn't in charge, seeing as she literally wants him dead and makes no secret of it. And she's not the only one.

Also, in that Q&A in the Guardian with Assange, a question came from a former UK diplomat who said that diplomacy cannot function without private communication, and would Assange accept the blame if the next international incident went unsolved because of this. Assange totally dodged the question, which is deeply disappointing.

Ex post facto prosecution is explicitly prohibited in the constitution. What authorities can do is to legislate laws to prosecute future leaks.



that's assuming the US government actually gives a shit about their constitution...


In the US you cannot just throw out the constitution. The government might be corrupt in many ways, but no one would dare to challenge the constitution, only interpretations of the constitution.

Interpretations of the constitution.... lawyers are so god damn good at that.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66358 Posts
December 05 2010 05:42 GMT
#898
some REALLY exciting news:

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says they may soon release cables that make references to UFOs


http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/TechandScience/Story/STIStory_610718.html
POGGERS
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66358 Posts
December 05 2010 06:31 GMT
#899
Chinese officials led to google hacking

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Asia/Story/STIStory_610704.html
POGGERS
ShaperofDreams
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada2492 Posts
December 05 2010 06:37 GMT
#900
man i am so delighted right now! cant wait for new shit!
Bitches don't know about my overlord. FUCK OFF ALDARIS I HAVE ENOUGH PYLONS. My Balls are as smooth as Eggs.
Prev 1 43 44 45 46 47 70 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill #235
SteadfastSC153
iHatsuTV 11
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 153
Rex 115
Creator 67
MindelVK 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 12134
firebathero 3689
Shuttle 1240
Jaedong 1118
Horang2 602
Larva 529
EffOrt 493
BeSt 468
Mini 429
Hyuk 337
[ Show more ]
Zeus 164
Last 129
hero 126
Sharp 115
Soulkey 110
sorry 86
Hyun 67
Hm[arnc] 64
Mind 58
Sea.KH 57
Yoon 46
910 30
zelot 30
ToSsGirL 26
yabsab 24
Noble 23
ZergMaN 18
Shinee 17
Shine 14
scan(afreeca) 14
Terrorterran 13
Bale 9
ZZZero.O 4
eros_byul 1
Stormgate
BeoMulf46
Dota 2
qojqva2279
canceldota76
Dendi1
Counter-Strike
byalli481
edward165
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King39
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor308
Other Games
B2W.Neo2190
singsing2179
Hui .279
Sick162
crisheroes159
XaKoH 122
KnowMe36
QueenE0
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 15
• Kozan
• Laughngamez YouTube
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 40
• Michael_bg 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4406
League of Legends
• Jankos3497
• TFBlade1211
• Stunt508
Upcoming Events
BSL 21
11m
QiaoGege vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Mihu vs TBD
Replay Cast
9h 11m
Replay Cast
18h 11m
RongYI Cup
20h 11m
Maru vs Cyan
Solar vs Krystianer
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
21h 11m
BSL 21
1d
Replay Cast
1d 9h
Wardi Open
1d 23h
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W5
OSC Championship Season 13
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3
Tektek Cup #1
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025

Upcoming

Acropolis #4 - TS4
Escore Tournament S1: W6
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.