"Something Deeply Wrong with Chemistry" - Page 2
Forum Index > General Forum |
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
| ||
naonao
United States847 Posts
| ||
Kyuukyuu
Canada6263 Posts
I literally see nothing wrong with this letter. | ||
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
It is called U.S. academia. I too lived the evenings and weekends life of a graduate student, and from there moved to a tenure track appointment at a fine public university. As an assistant professor, guess what? I worked evenings and weekends to develop a research program and achieve promotion and tenure. That was followed by an offer to be a department chair where, you guessed it, I worked weekends and evenings. Following that I accepted a position as dean at an excellent public university, and you know the rest, I worked weekends and evenings (plus state and national holidays). The U.S. university system may be the only remaining sector where our country holds global primacy. Is there a high personal cost? Yes. Is it stresssful and competitive? Yes. Do some very talented people get lost in the shuffle? Yes. But that is our system, it produces the finest research in biological and physical sciences in the world and it isn’t going to change. You want to join a law firm and try for partnership…get used to weekends and evenings. You want to be a successful small business person….get used to weekends and evenings. You want to be a successful farmer…get used to weekends and evenings. It isn’t “slavery” if people know the expectations in advance and make an informed choice. Stuff the hyperbole about slavery and livestock in graduate science education. If you want a graduate program with tea and sympathy try art history, where you will be spared the prospect of a job working weekends and evenings. In fact, spared the prospect of any job at all. | ||
Goobus
Hong Kong587 Posts
At least you get to do cool experiments with cool equipment instead of making pitch books and formatting powerpoint presentations. | ||
Badjas
Netherlands2038 Posts
If the professor really wants to get work done more quickly, the right way to go about it is to get more people. (Even though (s)he might not be in charge of the money side, but that's a separate issue.) However, I am not sure at what level (government or specific branch ruling etc) this is regulated for the academic field. Ethics don't depend on written law though. | ||
YejinYejin
United States1053 Posts
That's like 9 to 10 hours a day spent not working. So if you want to get a standard, healthy amount of sleep that is recommended by doctors, you literally do nothing but sleep, work, and eat? | ||
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
We work too much: http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=133833 :D | ||
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
I have a cousin who has a Ph.D in biology. He works probably closer to 40 hours/week instead of evenings/weekends but he's making roughly the same as me and I work 40 hours/week in corporate America. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15322 Posts
On July 23 2010 05:35 Goobus wrote: This is nothing compared to investment bankers, who work 80-120hrs/week year long, and only get 2 days vacation time per year. The pay comes down to $10/hr. I'm in business school, and all my friends who are investment bankers hate their lives. Even in wealth management, where I currently work, the interns work 100hrs/week. At least you get to do cool experiments with cool equipment instead of making pitch books and formatting powerpoint presentations. That's just silly, good lord. Why do people even do this? You don't even live a life, it doesn't seem worth it... | ||
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
Lol, it's sad, but what the letter says is the truth. TBH Most professors expect grad students to stay late or even spend the night in the lab if they have an experiment going. Uh, that part surely is to be expected, though I can't tell what circumstances you mean as everyone has multiple experiments going, normally speaking. That was a good comment. I find most labs (in biology) do not require evenings and weekends but anyone with ambition needs to do it to be competitive. Personally I've worked 7 days a week for the last 2 years in academic research and although sometimes it is stressful it is enjoyable. Even in the long hours a lot of it is fun, the challenges are fun, being competitive is fun... there is a lot of flexibility too, and interesting activities unique to the field (for example- just went to Kyoto this summer for a super fun trip/conference which was simultaneously an amazing trip + productive in learning and meeting people ^_^). It is hard to say if this letter is justified or not. It would really suck to be stuck in a lab doing boring research and demanding a lot of numbing labor...It could be justified but there are so many people who like to exaggerate. edit: http://www.carreira.ethz.ch/people/emc <-- Letter writer, seems he does good research and it is justified (most likely), but hurray for whining about academia/work :O | ||
Osmoses
Sweden5302 Posts
| ||
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
| ||
Sadist
United States7110 Posts
On July 23 2010 05:51 andrewlt wrote: I really don't understand why so many people want to go into academia. If I'm going to be working slave labor hours, at least it's going to be somewhere like law and medicine where I can basically semi-retire after 10 years working. Are there really that many people who view academia as exciting that they're willing to work crappy hours for crappy pay? I have a cousin who has a Ph.D in biology. He works probably closer to 40 hours/week instead of evenings/weekends but he's making roughly the same as me and I work 40 hours/week in corporate America. I agree with this. If was getting a PHD, its in medicine so I can get my own practice and make bank. | ||
Jayve
155 Posts
Would I get warned/banned for making a Breaking Bad pun? :s | ||
Easy772
374 Posts
| ||
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
On July 23 2010 06:43 Sadist wrote: I agree with this. If was getting a PHD, its in medicine so I can get my own practice and make bank. That's the thing. Most PhD students don't care about money. PhD students at top programs already outshined their peers in their undergrad and could easily make a killing starting their own company or working in wall street or something similar, but they'd rather do something intellectually fulfilling, you might call it a step up. | ||
Adeny
Norway1233 Posts
On July 23 2010 05:35 Goobus wrote: This is nothing compared to investment bankers, who work 80-120hrs/week year long, and only get 2 days vacation time per year. The pay comes down to $10/hr. I'm in business school, and all my friends who are investment bankers hate their lives. Even in wealth management, where I currently work, the interns work 100hrs/week. At least you get to do cool experiments with cool equipment instead of making pitch books and formatting powerpoint presentations. I don't believe you. 120 hrs/week leaves 6.8 hours a day. With travel to and from work, dinner etc. That leaves what, 5 hours to sleep a day? You've gotta be running that fancy sleep-schedule trick that lets you sleep 2 hours a day to keep up. | ||
Saracen
United States5139 Posts
| ||
Sadist
United States7110 Posts
On July 23 2010 06:49 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: That's the thing. Most PhD students don't care about money. PhD students at top programs already outshined their peers in their undergrad and could easily make a killing starting their own company or working in wall street or something similar, but they'd rather do something intellectually fulfilling, you might call it a step up. If you dont care about money quit bitching. I also doubt that most PHD students could start their own company. Some could sure, but I dont know if they have the personality type to do it (maybe something like CS you could because you fit in or whatever, but try being an ME or CE PhD and getting your own company as opposed to going to school) | ||
| ||