In the end it looks like i won't use the array at all anyway and access every element by the id, so i can take the whole thing out in the end. It's a really strange concept for me though. But yes, i can move my function definitions to the top. The Big Programming Thread - Page 987
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Thread Rules 1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution. 2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20) 3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible. 4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks. | ||
|
Broetchenholer
Germany1947 Posts
In the end it looks like i won't use the array at all anyway and access every element by the id, so i can take the whole thing out in the end. It's a really strange concept for me though. But yes, i can move my function definitions to the top. | ||
|
shz
Germany2687 Posts
https://eslint.org/ - for a linter https://prettier.io/ - for formatting (also often finds bugs) | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
even though it's a pain in the ass to use with some websites, it's still awesome since there is no good alternative thanks acrofales | ||
|
Broetchenholer
Germany1947 Posts
var requestURL = 'http://localhost:3000/1835/bank'; var request = new XMLHttpRequest(); request.open('GET', requestURL); request.responseType = 'json'; request.send(); request.onload = function() { response = request.response; } Now, after trying to udnerstand why i couldn't get the response out of the local function scope, i realized that i did get it out but after the rest of my code had already executed. I can't build all my code from inside the function, so i need to let my code wait for this to finish or simply get it syncronously. But after reading up on callbacks and promises and await my head is spinning. I am not gonna understand this today. I have tried to sinply use syncronous communication, but this does only give me a string. Can someone give me a short piece of code that simply waits a set amount of time so that onload can do it's thing? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18132 Posts
| ||
|
shz
Germany2687 Posts
I'm not sure what the scope is of what you're building, but maybe it would be worth looking into a library/framework. Check React or Vue for example. There are tons of tutorials online / on YouTube which would make you way more productive than how you're doing it currently (imo). I think some people will yell at me, but what you are doing looks really painful and outdated. JS has come a long way and I'm not sure if it is really beneficial to build web apps like it's 2005 and learn outdated JS. React at least brings a lot of vanilla (up-to-date) JavaScript with it, I'm not sure about Vue. Though Vue might be easier for you. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
it seems that the IDs of the elements change order on a daily basis like, yesterday and element I wanted to click swapped xpath with a different element given how many hurdles they seem to present, im expecting this is an intentional thing. I think I'll need to search for elements via the actual text that would be outputted on the website and then click that element? Hopefully I am able to do this or it was all for naught! | ||
|
Broetchenholer
Germany1947 Posts
And now that i have 3 gets to ask for different data, for some reason only the last one actually gives back information, which makes even less sense... I guess i will have to stop, admit defeat and come back when i am capable of thinking again. Edit: Fetch seems to be able to get them all simultaneously. I still have no idea what this is doing and why it works better but i guess i'll take it. And it still does not seem to solve my first problem. Arrrgh. | ||
|
Silvanel
Poland4733 Posts
On January 12 2019 01:03 travis wrote: lol, so the website im trying to interact with via selenium seems to literally take anti-automation measures... it seems that the IDs of the elements change order on a daily basis like, yesterday and element I wanted to click swapped xpath with a different element given how many hurdles they seem to present, im expecting this is an intentional thing. I think I'll need to search for elements via the actual text that would be outputted on the website and then click that element? Hopefully I am able to do this or it was all for naught! This what i mentioned before when i commented on Selenium. If the element is loaded in random order [the xpath is changing] (this can be antiautomation measure but can also be caused by data being retrived from container type which doesnt care about order --->just accident). You should check if the elements do not have other distinctive capabilities (names, type, id etc.) if the site is well documented You should be able to target elements by different properties. If the properties are all the same (or no name etc. at all) it does not mean they are actively fighting automation it can be lousy programming. I have seen this before on the site that was SUPPOSED to be automated. PS. If the number of elements isnt too high You can attempt some loop with "try-except". PS 2.Active anti-automation usually means captcha and things like that. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
and yeah you are definitely right, it must be that they are loading them in a random order or something. this is probably why I am having so much trouble. there's no documentation because I doubt they want people to do this - you can have access to their API but it literally costs $1000. they would never use a captcha though, because it would drive their clients crazy. the try-except loop is a genius idea but I don't think it will work here because what's happened is that it's like a little tree that you can click and open up, and the ID switched to a different parent on the main part of the tree. so, it won't catch an exception instead it will work but it will open up the wrong part of the tree. I've looked for other distinct identifiers but there doesn't seem to be any. hmm but maybe I can just click by X/Y coordinate of the iframe it's in? worst case scenario | ||
|
Blitzkrieg0
United States13132 Posts
On January 12 2019 01:54 travis wrote: hmm but maybe I can just click by X/Y coordinate of the iframe it's in? worst case scenario Be careful hard coding things like that because it can break with different browsers or resolutions. If you're betting real money and it does something you don't want you could end up losing a lot of money as well. | ||
|
Lmui
Canada6216 Posts
Story: People were asked to apply a patch to fix an issue. The patch was applied and system broke resulting in a fairly big escalation/rollback/call. I checked the sha1sum that the patch is supposed to have vs what was used and it was different. Cause: A pre-release version of the patch was uploaded to content provider (Which contained a bug? or something). This was pretty much immediately taken down/reuploaded with the correct version. Content provider somehow served the old version from a cache or something. Solution: Re-downloaded it, ran checksums and they matched, and applied patch from rolled back version and it's fine now. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On January 11 2019 22:58 Broetchenholer wrote: Okay, next really stupid question. I am trying to get a JSON object from a get operation using XMLHttpRequest. This is my code: var requestURL = 'http://localhost:3000/1835/bank'; var request = new XMLHttpRequest(); request.open('GET', requestURL); request.responseType = 'json'; request.send(); request.onload = function() { response = request.response; } Now, after trying to udnerstand why i couldn't get the response out of the local function scope, i realized that i did get it out but after the rest of my code had already executed. I can't build all my code from inside the function, so i need to let my code wait for this to finish or simply get it syncronously. But after reading up on callbacks and promises and await my head is spinning. I am not gonna understand this today. I have tried to sinply use syncronous communication, but this does only give me a string. Can someone give me a short piece of code that simply waits a set amount of time so that onload can do it's thing? can't you do a while loop in your function, and actually read the json, and look for some sort of identifier in the json that would be the end of file? or some equivalent design although I have to imagine there is a way to simply call another function when it's done. im unfamiliar what callbacks are, maybe that's what that is. if you can't do that then man that sounds awful | ||
|
WarSame
Canada1950 Posts
get(something).then(print("this")); | ||
|
SC-Shield
Bulgaria832 Posts
| ||
|
Broetchenholer
Germany1947 Posts
Something like this: function buildSite() { fetch('http://localhost:3000/data1') .then(function(response) { return response.json(); }) .then(function() { fetch('http://localhost:3000/data2') .then(function(response) { return response.json(); }) .then(function(myJson) { fetch('http://localhost:3000/1835/stock') .then(function(response) { return response.json(); }) then(function(myJson) { doAllTheStuffWithMyData(); }); }); }); } It seems really inconvenient to me. I am probably not grasping the merits of async connections cause all this does is make the whole data import syncronous again, but waaaay more complicated. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18132 Posts
On January 12 2019 19:44 Broetchenholer wrote: I will probably, if i understand the concept somewhat correctly, cascade my fetchs now and let the last one then start the rest of the code. Something like this: function buildSite() { fetch('http://localhost:3000/data1') .then(function(response) { return response.json(); }) .then(function() { fetch('http://localhost:3000/data2') .then(function(response) { return response.json(); }) .then(function(myJson) { fetch('http://localhost:3000/1835/stock') .then(function(response) { return response.json(); }) then(function(myJson) { doAllTheStuffWithMyData(); }); }); }); } It seems really inconvenient to me. I am probably not grasping the merits of async connections cause all this does is make the whole data import syncronous again, but waaaay more complicated. You can use jQuery when. It'd be something like:
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17450 Posts
On January 12 2019 16:30 SC-Shield wrote: Do you guys think that C++ jobs are slightly/better paid than jobs for other languages? I think I will look for a new job but I don't think I understand market completely to negotiate my salary well enough. Advice is welcome. I don't think that. It all depends on your seniority and position you're applying for. | ||
|
Broetchenholer
Germany1947 Posts
On January 12 2019 19:57 Acrofales wrote: You can use jQuery when. It'd be something like:
That does look much cleaner, i will take a look into jQuery then, thanks. | ||
|
SC-Shield
Bulgaria832 Posts
On January 12 2019 20:03 Manit0u wrote: I don't think that. It all depends on your seniority and position you're applying for. Why not? I think most of us here would agree that C++ is one of the hardest programming languages because it's low level. Why would an equivalent position of a C++ one get the same salary unless employer cares just about profit (which could be the case if that's what you mean)? | ||
| ||