EPTRandom guy wins South Carolina Democratic Primary - Page 6
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Bowdz
United States202 Posts
| ||
|
Squeegy
Finland1166 Posts
Apparently, there's some guy giving him advice outside the camera. | ||
|
Chuiu
3470 Posts
| ||
|
Squeegy
Finland1166 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvin_Greene#Background | ||
|
Rinrun
Canada3509 Posts
Interesting, just a degree in Political Science? Means that my teacher can be voted in too, hes more qualified, hes got a Masters... | ||
|
red_b
United States1267 Posts
On June 13 2010 05:24 Rinrun wrote: I would like a Forrest Gump leading my... *thinks about it* ... as my friend. Interesting, just a degree in Political Science? Means that my teacher can be voted in too, hes more qualified, hes got a Masters... Sarah Palin has a bachelors in communications and she got to be governor of alaska (until she figured out there was like, actual work to be done). I mean, communications lololololol | ||
|
Yurebis
United States1452 Posts
| ||
|
Armathai
1023 Posts
from wikipedia However, one need not complete a term of service to receive an honorable discharge, provided the reason for involuntary discharge is not due to misconduct. For instance, a person rendered physically or psychologically incapable of performing assigned duties will normally have their service characterized as honorable, regardless of whether the condition or disability was incurred in the line of duty, provided they otherwise exceeded standards. very strange candidate, best political story in a while though. Gogo Forrest Gump#2 | ||
|
groms
Canada1017 Posts
On June 12 2010 05:28 StarBrift wrote: Gonna be interesting to see the theories on how this dude got into this position. I'm guessing it has something to do with the democrats having decided beforehand that they wanted to nominate a black guy (demographics and all that). Just looking at it from outside this seems like a bad joke. I mean I'm sure the guy is a perfectly pleasant man but he seems to have no qualification what so ever. Politicians clearly need qualifications... | ||
|
Toran7
United States160 Posts
| ||
|
UmmTheHobo
United States650 Posts
| ||
|
s_side
United States700 Posts
On June 12 2010 05:49 InTheFade wrote: South Carolina is still a joke. And take down that confederate flag, already! Have you spent a lot of time here, then?? Dum spiro spero | ||
|
ejac
United States1195 Posts
On June 13 2010 09:22 Toran7 wrote: I live in South Carolina. I voted for him. He is what the people need! How'd you hear about him out of curiosity? | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
Personally i'd rather have evil than stupid. I'll take Cheney over Palin any day of the week. At least evil works for someones good. | ||
|
Apex
United States7227 Posts
I can picture it now: Interviewer: "Mr. Greene any comments on how you somehow inexplicably managed to beat your Republican opponent?" Greene: "........." Interviewer: "Mr. Greene?" Greene: "I am happy." | ||
|
Melancholia
United States717 Posts
On June 13 2010 05:37 Yurebis wrote: I'd rather have clueless politicians than "qualified" ones, if any at all. Perhaps that way there would be less projects to fund, less money to be stolen. How'd we fall from the writers of the Federalist Papers to dimwits who assume governance is an impossible conundrum? | ||
|
mmp
United States2130 Posts
On June 13 2010 10:46 Melancholia wrote: How'd we fall from the writers of the Federalist Papers to dimwits who assume governance is an impossible conundrum? We don't know this guy's deal yet, but you can be certain that the average incumbent puts himself, his campaign supporters, and the party ahead of his constituents. Polls show that Americans are generally fed up with politics as usual, but they mysteriously refuse to hold incumbents responsible by voting them out of office - thus nodding to the cycle of corruption. | ||
|
neohero9
United States595 Posts
On June 13 2010 10:46 Melancholia wrote: How'd we fall from the writers of the Federalist Papers to dimwits who assume governance is an impossible conundrum? To be fair, I'm sure there were dimwits in those days as well. They just couldn't read, so they had no way of disseminating their views. Nowadays they'll just let anyone talk. Friendly jab, Yurebis  | ||
|
red_b
United States1267 Posts
On June 13 2010 10:46 Melancholia wrote: How'd we fall from the writers of the Federalist Papers to dimwits who assume governance is an impossible conundrum? Pretty sure the person you are looking for is Rupert Murdoch. | ||
|
Pufftrees
2449 Posts
| ||
| ||
