EPTOn December 01 2011 06:54 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11732993
http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11732993
probably rammed the armorcane
EVE Corporation - Page 893
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
probably rammed the armorcane | ||
|
TurpinOS
Canada1223 Posts
(I really hate the fact that tornado's/ new bcs dont show as kills and losses yet) | ||
|
DiracMonopole
United States1555 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On December 01 2011 06:54 DefMatrixUltra wrote: http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11732993 Oh god, just a link to my loss makes me think somehow I'm doing it wrong. Am I doing it wrong? BR for that fight I guess... So I log in post-crucible (haven't been on in like 3-4 days) and I'm randomly in space in the middle of Great Wildlands. Well great... guess I should make my way back to sara. Find a random cane on a gate but local is at 16 so I jump through and hold to see if he follows. He follows, local is only at 4, so I'm game for a fight. Hit orbit and open up! Suddenly I'm at 1km................ Fucking patch reset EVERYTHING. Orbit is at 1km and so is keep at. Fuck my life. I Got him down to 20% but he had me webbed and scrammed. Sad times. Just lost a thrasher b/c I was too busy reading GA chat and not noticing the Ares burning at me at some absurd speed. | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11733644 | ||
|
Body_Shield
Canada3368 Posts
But it has made it, and I'm still stuck with the fucking thing. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19053 Posts
On December 01 2011 08:16 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Do these new T3 BCs either destroy the ability to nano against them without them or become the new ultimate nano ships? It seems like against an equal-sized fleet that is made up entirely of them, we wouldn't be able to do anything with our current drakes/canes/harbs/zealots because they end up having the range advantage without losing too much speed, and a lot more dps as well. We'd rape them. | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
Edit: In my defense they SAID they'd 1v1 me. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
Yea but how? They have a ton more damage and with more range don't they become the new ideal nano ship since they've got great speed just like other BCs in addition to the dps/range? The only drawbacks I can think of is that they cost about twice as much and have bad tracking. Is the tracking what ruins it? | ||
|
Zedd Althor
United States67 Posts
On that note, I was reading a random "the naga sucks cuz it doesn't have missiles" thread when i ran across this statement from a SpaceMonkey's Alliance member: "Nano drakes most annoying drakes. Seriously, hate those sons of bitches. Can't wait to pop them in a Naga fleet though." ~Zions Child I think he's referring to us  source https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=438226#post438226 | ||
|
Johnny Business
Sweden1251 Posts
| ||
tiaz
Sweden231 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On December 01 2011 08:54 Johnny Business wrote: They got no hp Yea but as long as you keep range, you can just warp out when focused like we do right? It seems like these change the meta-game of nano fleets edit: ya I asked on TS and they might have no HP but our current BCs will have no HP to them as well | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34491 Posts
oh nvm dota 2 key c u next year | ||
|
Valenius
United Kingdom1266 Posts
On December 01 2011 09:45 Firebolt145 wrote: Hey guys, I finally finished all my work, I can come back and start rocking shit up with my mach and helping mandini with our busi---- oh nvm dota 2 key c u next year I hate you. | ||
|
Mandini
United States1717 Posts
On December 01 2011 09:45 Firebolt145 wrote: Hey guys, I finally finished all my work, I can come back and start rocking shit up with my mach and helping mandini with our busi---- oh nvm dota 2 key c u next year Back to work, no dota for you. | ||
|
hagon
United Kingdom556 Posts
| ||
|
DefMatrixUltra
Canada1992 Posts
On December 01 2011 08:18 Risen wrote: Well that explains how the slicer was hitting me from 20km out... http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11733644 A Slicer's natural range is 20km (19.4km + 3.2km falloff). Care to explain your epiphany? | ||
| ||
