|
|
On April 30 2013 07:24 DefMatrixUltra wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 07:12 Body_Shield wrote:On April 30 2013 05:43 kollin wrote:Why is body such an evil communist?  Ice in highsec is quite similar to communism, with easy access for afk bots, and it's sold to everyone. Now, in low or null, it's difficult to access, and you have to commit resources to gain the ice with any regularity, and your enemy can attack and keep you starved of ice. Emdar and I stopped a ~100-man ice mining op by simply roaming into null looking for random kills. We stayed for ~30 minutes before a kitchen sink recon fleet came to kill us. If we were more sprelevant we could have kept them from mining ice permanently until they brought a full, organized force to take it back. Not being able to buy ice from high sec would certainly fuck some peoples' shit up - a change I would welcome.
Yet we continue to get CCP devs saying that they're looking for more ways for small groups to interfere with alliances yet they continue to ignore this option.
|
Interesting fact: Due to ice becoming like anoms, it is likely they will use the same mechanics as fw anom plexs. This would prevent suicide gankers from getting an accurate warpin on miners and stop -10sec status players from being able to gank them.
Additionally it is possible to constantly bump people to disrupt the amount of ice that is supplied. Basically because it is no longer an 'infinite' resource, things the disrupt ice miners are much much more relavent to the games ice supply.
I still have a problem with so much of the games ice supply being in hisec when ice products are predominently used outside of hisec. There should be ice in hisec, but 80% of the supply seems way too much, 30-40% would be much better as ice then becomes more of a player controlled resource and less of an npc controlled one under the safty of concord mechanics.
|
United States7481 Posts
On April 30 2013 14:20 Viceorvirtue wrote:
Interesting fact: Due to ice becoming like anoms, it is likely they will use the same mechanics as fw anom plexs. This would prevent suicide gankers from getting an accurate warpin on miners and stop -10sec status players from being able to gank them.
That's quite a conclusion. The vast majority of anoms are not like this, and I have to admit I assumed they'd be just like normal anoms are now, where you warp in to a spot and all the rats are there, not a gated plex. The fact that they use the word "anomaly" and not "complex" when describing the new ice locations reinforces this belief.
|
pretty sure they wont have gates
|
|
|
Its so ugly!!!! why destroy the apoc! nooooooooo
|
|
|
On May 01 2013 00:06 Body_Shield wrote:New Apoc Modelplate layout not bad
I... I actually think that looks pretty awesome. 8/10 would fly
|
|
|
Well since I won the last one I kinda have to go.
|
|
|
|
|
Lalalaland34491 Posts
Care to give us a translation summary?
|
Kwark I think your POS in assah just died
|
On May 02 2013 03:20 Firebolt145 wrote:
Care to give us a translation summary?
Well its just the regular "free capitalistic market, relations between people, metagaming aka scams and CSM". Its not very in-depth but it's cool that such a big mainstream media did it.
|
Looking to get rid of my link alt, what do you guys think I should get for it?
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Battousai_Uta
All specs to V, Fleet Command IV, level V orca, transport ships V, BC V all cruisers to V
|
Uber, give me your loot box
|
|
|
I was really hoping they wouldn't make a new tag. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
