EPTA little disappointed about skills being gone though. They were fun to raise
Fallout 4! - Page 35
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
RagequitBM
Canada2270 Posts
A little disappointed about skills being gone though. They were fun to raise | ||
|
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
This whole thing SCREAMS "not Fallout by a long shot" all over! Seriously, it's like Call of Duty: Slightly Wasteland Edition. Like, watching it was painful as a fan of Fallouts.  | ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
Anyway I skipped most sandbox games, and choosen Fallout 4 to fill that spot. And like every sandbox game it will probably deliver in that regard and fail everywhere else. Why would one expect more from a sandbox title anyway. | ||
|
Coppermantis
United States845 Posts
That said, having essential characters like in Skyrim would make me angry. I don't know if that's the case, does anyone know? I've heard that the dog is immortal, which is kind of saddening. | ||
|
Laserist
Turkey4269 Posts
On November 06 2015 00:22 PhoenixVoid wrote: I know it was discussed to death but 1080p graphics of this trailer looks like a remnant of pre-skyrim era kind of graphics. | ||
|
Mistakes
United States1102 Posts
| ||
|
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
On November 06 2015 07:45 Coppermantis wrote: As long as solving problems non-violently is as valid a solution as doing so with violence, I'll be happy. That was what I loved most about, say, New Vegas compared to Skyrim - The quests had more outcomes than going to a place, killing a guy, getting an item, and returning. That and having long-term consequences to your actions. I'm definitely disappointed with some decisions thus far but this at least would make me a happy man. That said, having essential characters like in Skyrim would make me angry. I don't know if that's the case, does anyone know? I've heard that the dog is immortal, which is kind of saddening. I'm afraid you're in for some disappointment. New Vegas was made by Obsidian Entertainment, while Fallout (not-really) 4 is being developed by Bethesda. On November 06 2015 07:46 Mistakes wrote: Who's excited for the console-quality graphics?! I don't give a damn about graphic, but graphic/art style is important. Example: Dark Souls. Briliant art style, wonderful atmosphere of the world and kinda meh graphic technical wise. F4 looks like Rage 2 or CoD with slightly postapocalyptic edge, that doesn't bode well. | ||
|
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
On November 06 2015 03:04 Narw wrote: Uhm, the voice acting in that trailer, uhm. This is not good. at least it wasn't 50% craig sechler | ||
|
Coppermantis
United States845 Posts
On November 06 2015 07:48 OsaX Nymloth wrote: I'm afraid you're in for some disappointment. New Vegas was made by Obsidian Entertainment, while Fallout (not-really) 4 is being developed by Bethesda. I'm aware of that. And I don't quite care, to be honest. I really enjoyed Skyrim and Fallout 3, despite some of the bad parts. I also know that many people are pessimistic about it, but I'm keeping up hope that Bethesda was able to learn from some of their mistakes in Skyrim and 3. It looks like some of my complaints are still in there (like romance options being available to any gender for all characters, which is just lazy writing) but even if the gameplay is just Skyrim with guns I'll still play the shit out of it. Fallout 3, developed by Bethesda, had the same kind of non-violent, alternative solutions that I'm talking about, like all the ways you can deal with the Vampires in Meresti Train Station, or the quest with Roy and Tenpenny Tower. In RPGs, I love being able to leverage non-combat skills like Science, Medicine, Speech, and so on into special bonuses or better outcomes, so as long as I can do that I don't care what Bethesda do with the gameplay. I just wanna know if there'll be essential characters or not. | ||
|
m4ini
4215 Posts
On November 06 2015 07:46 Laserist wrote: I know it was discussed to death but 1080p graphics of this trailer looks like a remnant of pre-skyrim era kind of graphics. Your own fault if you play on console anyway. There's a reason as to why you never play good looking games on consoles if you can prevent it. PS4 is not powerful enough, and Xbone doesn't even manage 1080p in the first place on many games. The PC screenshots i saw are decent enough to not give me eyecancer. That's all i care for. edit: but one has to love the people bashing graphics of a trailer based of console footage. The weaker console at that. Well done. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On November 06 2015 07:08 FeyFey wrote: Dunno I watched it and would consider myself a fan of the series and didn't feel any pain. Didn't feel excited either, just confused about the institute comes to you thing. And well that there was a robot type of thingie that looked like they forgot that in the fallout universe certain things were never invented. Anyway I skipped most sandbox games, and choosen Fallout 4 to fill that spot. And like every sandbox game it will probably deliver in that regard and fail everywhere else. Why would one expect more from a sandbox title anyway. The human-like androids were established in canon during Fallout 3 since there was an entire quest devoted to one of them. Apparently, they're all only made at what used to be MIT in Boston, which I guess is why we never saw them on the west coast. | ||
|
Deathstar
9150 Posts
| ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
On November 06 2015 09:12 eviltomahawk wrote: The human-like androids were established in canon during Fallout 3 since there was an entire quest devoted to one of them. Apparently, they're all only made at what used to be MIT in Boston, which I guess is why we never saw them on the west coast. Aww I guess i missed that in Fallout3, I only had Vanilla Fallout 3 though. Thanks for pointing that out. | ||
|
Coppermantis
United States845 Posts
On November 06 2015 10:34 FeyFey wrote: Aww I guess i missed that in Fallout3, I only had Vanilla Fallout 3 though. Thanks for pointing that out. It is in vanilla F3. There's a quest in Rivet City pertaining to an android that escaped from the Commonwealth. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
calh
537 Posts
| ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
On November 06 2015 11:31 calh wrote: I don't mind the graphics or artistic direction, but the Hollywood tone of the trailer is bleh. Fallout is supposed to be bleak and witty in the face of the (post-)apocalypse, not laden with illusions of grandeur. Not sure what you mean with illusions of grandeur here but if youre talking about silly goofy fallout stuff, that's been in every fallout except 1. The one thing I actually really dislike about the art style is how the interface looks. Seriously what is up with besthesda and their 'minimalistic' interfaces. Skyrim's UI looked like shit, this looks like shit. How did we go from beautifully themed UI's like Oblivion's and Fallout 3/new Vegas to this? | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On November 06 2015 17:55 solidbebe wrote: Not sure what you mean with illusions of grandeur here but if youre talking about silly goofy fallout stuff, that's been in every fallout except 1. The one thing I actually really dislike about the art style is how the interface looks. Seriously what is up with besthesda and their 'minimalistic' interfaces. Skyrim's UI looked like shit, this looks like shit. How did we go from beautifully themed UI's like Oblivion's and Fallout 3/new Vegas to this? Oblivions interface was crap too lol. | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On November 05 2015 01:00 farvacola wrote: In a world full of games that hold players' hand throughout the entire experience, I cherish Fallout's embrace of uncompromising differentiation in difficulty across different areas. If you'd prefer a game that allows you to out-mechanic over-level content, then, like you said, you can always play an Elder Scrolls or ME game. Modern day fallout is an elder scrolls game with guns instead of bows. | ||
|
RusselPCMR
35 Posts
| ||
| ||
