EPTThe War-Z: MMO Zombie Survival - Page 37
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
| ||
|
gawk
Germany310 Posts
On January 11 2013 01:00 TheDraken wrote: it's because of your enjoyment of something in spite of the mentality and actions of the people who made it baffles the rest of us. you're happy to support people like sergey, and it only sends a message that they can shit on the community and be snake oil salesmen and people will still play the game. yes. the game should be DDOS'd. because you're not just ruining the quality of the industry for yourself. you're doing it to other people. EDIT: and after posting that i just read the post about them copy and pasting responses to ban appeals. even after that touching heartfelt email sergey sent out about how things would change... no they haven't. still the sleazy motherfucker he's always been and the ban appeal thing is just another thing to add to the stack. How will DDOS attacks improve the situation for anyone but the warz developers? Paying customers can't play the game and the devs can delay features because they have to take care of the DDOS. Should wol have been DDOSed at release because blizzard screwed people over with bnet 0.2? | ||
|
Obstikal
616 Posts
On January 12 2013 03:51 gawk wrote: How will DDOS attacks improve the situation for anyone but the warz developers? Paying customers can't play the game and the devs can delay features because they have to take care of the DDOS. Should wol have been DDOSed at release because blizzard screwed people over with bnet 0.2? You dont see the bigger picture man ! its not about enjoying the game or even the game itself. It's about the gaming community as a whole from sc2 to kittycat cupcake land. People shouldnt play(support) the game because of how bad their business practices are because if we do support(play) this game other people will start thinking its okay to get away with lying/deceitful practices to earn quick cash just because the game is enjoyable. EDIT: Also you cant really compare bnet2.0 to this because blizzard werent intentionally lying to everyone and trying to come up with cash grab schemes. Bnet2.0 may have failed on many promises and features but its not like they intentially made it shitty and did a quick release so people can buy it. Many company's fail to deliverer on promises or expectations but that doesnt make them bad. It's bad when a company deceives people, treats them like crap, pretend they care, and find ways to implement quick cash grabs, to name a few. On January 11 2013 15:18 deth2munkies wrote: Can we just close this thread? The game is basically dead. They have lost their name in a copyright claim, they lost their place on Steam, and they lost the respect of every gamer in existence...it's old news. Also this^^^^ x1000000 | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
How do you know this? | ||
|
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
Game journalism at its finest, right there. | ||
|
Kamikiri
United States1319 Posts
On January 18 2013 00:48 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote: Has anyone else read the horrific Game Informer review on this game? You know, the one that didn't mention a single one of the million controversies and used the fake screenshots in the review? The one that hyped up the game without mentioning a single flaw? Game journalism at its finest, right there. I haven't seen it but I don't know how you can review this game without first warning people about the hacking problems at the very least. Hackers in the game are extremely frustrating partnered with the fact that devs haven't really done a lot of what they said. | ||
|
acidstormy
United States191 Posts
No one cares, and no one will miss me. | ||
|
Renent
Canada302 Posts
On January 23 2013 13:21 acidstormy wrote: I quit. No one cares, and no one will miss me. Uh, you are talking about the game right? | ||
|
acidstormy
United States191 Posts
Lmao, yeah the game. I raged last night when i killed 2 guys in the postoffice @ clearview and got killed by zombies through a solid wall. My tears tasted sooo good. Anyways, this game is stupid and the community seems pretty stupid. The forums are full of people either bashing the new patch or cock-riders who are saying the patch is "good work, amazing job". I agree it probably is THE BEST patch up to date, but if you really looked past their wall of text in the update, it didn't add much to the game. The art was stepped up, but the gameplay is still bad and stagnant. I feel like the devs are stuck trying to make the game realistic, but it really is not remotely realistic. They just updated backpack weights today where a LG backpack's capacity is 20lb. Already fans are already hounding people speaking out against this decision. Fan defense over dev stupid ass change? Realism. You can judge how realistic this game is by this one statement: A large backpack fits in a small backpack. -__-\ Edit: I've always wanted to say this but i feel like there is limited sprint in the game to mask how small the map actually is. That is why i think vehicles will be so stupid in the game. You will be able to traverse from city to city super fast, and where would you even hide your damn car? All the tall pines and cluster of white trees are identical and provide no cover | ||
|
tokicheese
Canada739 Posts
On January 11 2013 04:18 Kamikiri wrote: Its doing nothing but hurting the people who actually play the game. If someone spent money on something they should be allowed to play it no matter what other peoples opinions are. There are a lot of people that like the game and just because you don't doesn't give other people the right to take that from them. Except people aren't being allowed like the people who got banned for no reason. The company who made the game is so fucking slimy it's hilarious that people defend them. Look at the list of removed features, the people who got banned and can't appeal, and the 200 other things. It goes back to Big Rig Racing so it's not a simple mistake... | ||
|
Kamikiri
United States1319 Posts
On January 24 2013 10:14 tokicheese wrote: Except people aren't being allowed like the people who got banned for no reason. The company who made the game is so fucking slimy it's hilarious that people defend them. Look at the list of removed features, the people who got banned and can't appeal, and the 200 other things. It goes back to Big Rig Racing so it's not a simple mistake... You replied to a couple week old post before this happened. I don't care about the game and I was simply saying if someone paid for something they should be able to use it, good or bad. I don't like the game, I don't care and I don't play it. My friend logged in earlier and said with the new changes to server hopping you literally can not go to safe settlements. You spawn outside Safe Zones in predetermined areas where people are just camping and killing people as they spawn in. | ||
|
Kamikiri
United States1319 Posts
Such a joke, how can you ban people who don't even play the game and claim they hack? Some of the devs said they don't even understand how hacking works, it is really pathetic how this game is being ran. Even with the ridiculous hacks on DayZ it is so much more enjoyable than that piece of shit game WarZ. WarZ at its current state is overrun with hackers everywhere, Spawn campers and safe zone campers. The new weight system is a joke, the new anti-server hopping system is a joke and the fact that they put items into the marketplace that you can ONLY get from GC. I can't believe I actually gave this game a fair chance, hope this game rots and anything the devs ever touch again rots. | ||
|
Conti
Germany2516 Posts
 | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11960 Posts
On January 24 2013 09:41 acidstormy wrote: I feel like the devs are stuck trying to make the game realistic, but it really is not remotely realistic. They just updated backpack weights today where a LG backpack's capacity is 20lb. Already fans are already hounding people speaking out against this decision. Fan defense over dev stupid ass change? Realism. You can judge how realistic this game is by this one statement: A large backpack fits in a small backpack. -__-\ Dunno, that is theoretically possible. If you can fold the backpack to a smaller size, or something. Not that this is relevant to basically anything, i just wanted to point it out | ||
|
Tun3
17 Posts
| ||
|
acidstormy
United States191 Posts
| ||
|
Kamikiri
United States1319 Posts
| ||
|
Nightsz
Canada398 Posts
| ||
|
Silentenigma
Turkey2037 Posts
| ||
|
Kamikiri
United States1319 Posts
On March 01 2013 11:10 Silentenigma wrote: How they can still sell this game? Its a zombie survival simulator of what it is like to die to hackers and spawn campers in a real life zombie apocalypse, very realistic. | ||
| ||
