Edit- Beanie Wells placed on IR, pick up Ryan Williams for all your fantasy needs!
If you are in the TL FF league. You don't need to worry about this. I already took care of this for you all.
Edit - Beanie Wells has been Mr Glass since he came into the NFL. I had him on a team last year and it seemed like every time he came out of a game he was out for 2+ weeks. So when I saw the game I threw in the waiver request as fast as I could.
Would lean more to starting Gore. Jets defense is nothing like it once was. Sure KC sucks, but I imagine Phillip Rivers wants some numbers. Plus I would feel better seeing something this year first from Mathews. Either way, your team must be overly nice if you have to bench one of them.
On September 27 2012 06:37 Irave wrote: Honestly it was a call that could have gone either way. Since everyone wants the replacement refs out, its being played out to be huge. Every receiver considers that a catch, unless they play for the Packers. Every person who has played or coached defenses fault Jennings for not knocking it down. For every omg interception pick, you get pictures that show even more contention of the play being closer than it looks. + Show Spoiler +
As well more focus should be placed on the blown pi call, but as its been stated numerous times, its a ffa in the endzone on those plays.
Edit- Beanie Wells placed on IR, pick up Ryan Williams for all your fantasy needs!
Well batting it down isn't too reliable either because you get
or
>___>
I think someone mentioned this but people make too big of a deal of one play at the end of games deciding the outcome. If you really deserved to win, you wouldn't be in a position where one play at the end costs you the game. Think about it, if the Packers 2 point conversion earlier in the game had worked, Tate's TD would have only tied the game (unless Seattle was really ballsy and went for 2).
On September 27 2012 06:37 Irave wrote: Honestly it was a call that could have gone either way. Since everyone wants the replacement refs out, its being played out to be huge. Every receiver considers that a catch, unless they play for the Packers. Every person who has played or coached defenses fault Jennings for not knocking it down. For every omg interception pick, you get pictures that show even more contention of the play being closer than it looks. + Show Spoiler +
I think someone mentioned this but people make too big of a deal of one play at the end of games deciding the outcome. If you really deserved to win, you wouldn't be in a position where one play at the end costs you the game. Think about it, if the Packers 2 point conversion earlier in the game had worked, Tate's TD would have only tied the game (unless Seattle was really ballsy and went for 2).
that is a shitty argument. If they were down by x amount of points who knows how they would have played with the added pressure.
My point is that the Packers had 59 minutes and 52 seconds to win the game, it's dumb to dwell on the last play like the rest of the game didn't happen.
On September 27 2012 09:43 Ferrose wrote: My point is that the Packers had 59 minutes and 52 seconds to win the game, it's dumb to dwell on the last play like the rest of the game didn't happen.
you can do that for anything though. The point is, the game is where it was, and they were robbed. End of story. You can look at anything and nitpick, that gets us nowhere.
On September 27 2012 09:43 Ferrose wrote: My point is that the Packers had 59 minutes and 52 seconds to win the game, it's dumb to dwell on the last play like the rest of the game didn't happen.
you can do that for anything though. The point is, the game is where it was, and they were robbed. End of story. You can look at anything and nitpick, that gets us nowhere.
It's pointless to say teams that deserve to win would never been in the position to play from behind. In that world only teams that deserve to win, win by crushing their opponents if that was the NFL that be boring.
It doesn't matter what they did the first 59 minutes if they had no control over the last minute. They were robbed of a win and it was not their fault.
On September 27 2012 13:12 xDaunt wrote: Looks like we'll have regular refs back tomorrow night. Thank goodness. Now we get to watch the regular refs screw up. =)
But at least we'll know they know all the rules(probably), and mostly they can get the game moving much quicker then the replacement refs
Yeah honestly even more than the more notable issues the replacements were having the main reason I want them back is to just stop quarters from lasting an hour.
Yeah i found it funny week 1 when i could watch one game finish it and turn over to another game that started at the same time just to find the it's only half way though the 3rd quarter, i wonder if the large delays where the same crew or not.
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/K4i5W.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/662257264.png?key=1023575&Expires=1348696292&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIYVGSUJFNRFZBBTA&Signature=Y-nyUj5EyYuEKQCcbBEw11SU-00onweLAeoYLXFmpUrJIlE9I4peQCW4cIdkd4TMiOsEzjKLLQI4285chAukCJxsU4dlR3jF3mccWT~opS1Rb8I469Ja~P9ut~aklx8JcLhmoQfps4DFh9vn5A1QhiTpeP-zsMMRfTIZxxBX8i4_)
![[image loading]](http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0708/nfl_careyhochuli_580.jpg)
