EPTBattlefield 3 - Page 103
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
MurMiLLo
United States260 Posts
| ||
|
iinsom
Australia339 Posts
On September 28 2011 12:05 Torte de Lini wrote: Love, love love this game. Just wish I could the squad I want. This+1111111001000010101!! Annoying you cant make your own squad  | ||
|
Rad
United States935 Posts
This would be 100% acceptable if it was closed beta and it was months from launch, but I just don't see them fixing it in time for launch. Still though, I've already had some of the most amazingly fun teamwork experiences ever, so I'm willing to wait. Just hope it doesn't lose its community before it has a chance to becomes something amazing. | ||
|
Warlock40
601 Posts
Just played it on 360 today, the graphics dont really meet my high expecations. I cant get myself to like PC shooters though, using a mouse just feels too unrealistic. I envy those who can look past that and play the full game on PC. If you can afford the PC, play it on that with the controller. Problem solved. | ||
|
Soulfire
United States237 Posts
| ||
|
Soulfire
United States237 Posts
On September 28 2011 12:36 Rad wrote: Definitely has a ton of potential, but this has to be the glitchiest/buggiest/most unstable beta I've ever played. This would be 100% acceptable if it was closed beta and it was months from launch, but I just don't see them fixing it in time for launch. Still though, I've already had some of the most amazingly fun teamwork experiences ever, so I'm willing to wait. Just hope it doesn't lose its community before it has a chance to becomes something amazing. You must have not played many betas then - this one has run incredibly, incredibly smoothly for me compared to some others. Or maybe I just got lucky. EDIT: Oops, sorry for double post. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On September 28 2011 12:36 Rad wrote: Definitely has a ton of potential, but this has to be the glitchiest/buggiest/most unstable beta I've ever played. This would be 100% acceptable if it was closed beta and it was months from launch, but I just don't see them fixing it in time for launch. Still though, I've already had some of the most amazingly fun teamwork experiences ever, so I'm willing to wait. Just hope it doesn't lose its community before it has a chance to becomes something amazing. Do note the build we are playing on is a few behind the actual build. This is mainly a test for battle log and testing servers. Of course any bugs they want sent to them to but they said they probably fixed alot but there are always more to fix that they didn't see, etc. | ||
|
Lifter
United States126 Posts
The thing I hate most is the constant time outs and disconnects. I've lost so much xp from that... Oh well, it's been really fun and I love the shotgun. :D | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On September 28 2011 12:50 Soulfire wrote: You must have not played many betas then - this one has run incredibly, incredibly smoothly for me compared to some others. Or maybe I just got lucky. EDIT: Oops, sorry for double post. Yes, it is. Of the games I've tested in post-alpha. This is pretty fucking good. Graphic glitches are normal and so is clipping. The server disconnection is probably a huge huge issue. | ||
|
Lifter
United States126 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/z1NiV.jpg) Dice...what have you done to BF3??? Posted on reddit as well XD | ||
|
iinsom
Australia339 Posts
On September 28 2011 12:36 Rad wrote: Definitely has a ton of potential, but this has to be the glitchiest/buggiest/most unstable beta I've ever played. This would be 100% acceptable if it was closed beta and it was months from launch, but I just don't see them fixing it in time for launch. Still though, I've already had some of the most amazingly fun teamwork experiences ever, so I'm willing to wait. Just hope it doesn't lose its community before it has a chance to becomes something amazing. Thats the whole point of a beta, to work out and iron out the bugs that are present of lots of different OS and system types  So if you do experience a bug, let them know on the forums so they can fix it | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
SneakyAZN
United States200 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + The battlereport is def messed up since i was defending and using SVD http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/battlereport/show/30750/1/180300415/ | ||
GTR
51503 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
Reviving people feels actually pretty tough. In BFBC2 you'd just run and revive, now you have to actually slow down. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On September 28 2011 13:39 GTR wrote: does bf3 utilise quad cores or only two? just wondering if its viable to stream. it recommends a quad core so I imagine it utilizes them. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
soullogik
United States1171 Posts
On September 28 2011 11:40 IMSmooth wrote: Just played it on 360 today, the graphics dont really meet my high expecations. I cant get myself to like PC shooters though, using a mouse just feels too unrealistic. I envy those who can look past that and play the full game on PC. The gameplay however is so fun. I absolutely enjoyed myself. I am glad they made sniping harder than in BF:BC2. Cant wait till the 25th~!!! mouse = as much skill as you can put forth controller = making the game balanced for everyone, by having terrible controls | ||
|
iinsom
Australia339 Posts
On September 28 2011 13:39 Torte de Lini wrote: How do you activate it? Reviving people feels actually pretty tough. In BFBC2 you'd just run and revive, now you have to actually slow down. Its definitely different to BC2, thats for sure. And fk me i tried to kill people with the defibs in the 4 games i played last night, argh. BRING BACK DEFIB KILLS PLZ <3 | ||
|
skyllynt
6 Posts
On September 28 2011 13:39 GTR wrote: does bf3 utilise quad cores or only two? just wondering if its viable to stream. BF3 utilizes hyper-threading so I'm gonna assume 4 cores with 4 virtual cores. BF3 runs very poorly on dual-core. | ||
| ||
