EPTOn November 05 2010 04:39 TurdFerguson wrote:
Ill play if its for mac...
Ill play if its for mac...
I'm hoping it's going to work as well under Wine as the original one. Should work for Mac this way too.
Guild Wars 2 - Page 24
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Manit0u
Poland17788 Posts
I'm hoping it's going to work as well under Wine as the original one. Should work for Mac this way too. | ||
|
NoobieOne
United States1183 Posts
| ||
|
NoUShutUp
United States172 Posts
| ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
The game has a ways to go before it comes out, that forum is simply to help pass the time. Updated memberlist. | ||
|
TymerA
Netherlands759 Posts
Just wondering one thing tho, is it eventually gonna be a closed guild? Would be a shame if everyone could join... wouldn't want to be the biggest guild on the server. Definitely the most decent but certainly not overpopulated ^.^ | ||
|
NoUShutUp
United States172 Posts
On November 05 2010 07:33 irninja wrote: You never actually "signed in" was the issue (topic called "sign in here"). Were not requiring anyone be active there, and frankly, if it were between that forum and TL.net, id want 99% of your time on Tl.net. The game has a ways to go before it comes out, that forum is simply to help pass the time. In regards to Mac/Linux, it will be supported on both. This has been answered repeatedly. Updated memberlist. I believe I did... and I just checked too. Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 5:12 pm | ||
|
Magnamus
United States23 Posts
| ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
I like the guild rules and policy. Just wondering one thing tho, is it eventually gonna be a closed guild? Would be a shame if everyone could join... wouldn't want to be the biggest guild on the server. Definitely the most decent but certainly not overpopulated ^.^ The current active memberlist is less than 75. In gw1 the max was 100. In that group as well you have those who do not wish to run PVP, and will be in a sub-guild with a similar name, connected by alliance chat for gear runs/instances/raids. I can forsee the time we will have to cut the guild recruitment, but so far, while populated, the guild is still accepting new TL members. | ||
|
sonGz
Australia2 Posts
| ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
 It hasnt changed except to add new players from recent weeks. And I still see your name lol.I guess your just overlooking it because of how often you see your own name. | ||
|
Awesomo
Netherlands206 Posts
Also: i read somewhere that there wouldn't be a dedicated healer profession, does that mean that the monk has been scrapped or reworked? | ||
|
r33k
Italy3402 Posts
On November 06 2010 07:21 Awesomo wrote: Cool, im a big fan of guild wars, when i pick up gw2 i´d love to play with you guys. Also: i read somewhere that there wouldn't be a dedicated healer profession, does that mean that the monk has been scrapped or reworked? Most likely not, since in gw1 Anet's full inspiration for the class was the Cleric of DnD only with an asian look/theme they will be back with even more lazers. Smiting could actually become a useful spec for the gw2 monk, but keep in mind that even in gw1 only half the monks were actually healers, prot specced monks can technically be classified as support characters and Anet is mostly playing with the fans, the class will most likely be the same. I'm also too lazy to look for it, but the weapons problem for the monk is bugging me: in gw2 there won't be any unarmed combat, and in the announced weapon pool there aren't too many classic monk weapons. | ||
|
PrideNeverDie
United States319 Posts
| ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
| ||
|
r33k
Italy3402 Posts
On November 06 2010 13:36 irninja wrote: I would consider the staff a classic monk-type weapon, as well as the mace. Wouldnt you? No, not really. Asian monks (dnd monks) are often seen wielding quarterstaffs but no maces, western clerics (dnd cleric) are pretty much always using maces, and staves are pretty uncommon on them. Again, the GW1 was more dnd inspired mechanics-wise than most people think. | ||
|
Meatban
United States9 Posts
| ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
On November 06 2010 13:59 Meatban wrote: They screwed the original game over pretty horrendously, using bandaid patches to fix complicated problems, very non-pragmatic answers to issues that needed better care. I completely agree with this. Even as i play now im findnig new bugs that you would think would have been fixed long ago. It doesnt change my stance and optimism for gw2 though, | ||
|
Cyrkulous
United States204 Posts
| ||
|
miniwheats
Canada187 Posts
On November 07 2010 12:05 Cyrkulous wrote:the game looks like it's going to be taken care of far better than the original. Probably going to cost more too in this age of DLC & $ for extra features edit* I am excited too though. Already designing a site for my future guild. | ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
On November 07 2010 12:21 miniwheats wrote: Probably going to cost more too in this age of DLC & $ for extra features edit* I am excited too though. Already designing a site for my future guild. We shall form alliances and crush all in our path. *raises beer*. edi* except if your on the opposing team, then I'll feel sorry for you, well take that back, no i wont. | ||
| ||
