|
On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due
This is implying that none of it was actually planned for HotS. Which it with most certainty was.
|
On March 04 2013 17:43 Qwertify wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due You should probably include at least a few specific examples of what you mean, otherwise I don't really know what you are talking about and have no real option to disagree or agree with you. BTW - from what I've read from people who have followed Destiny's transition away from SC2 more closely than I have, his move was largely motivated by financial issues, and LoL streamers get more viewers, and potentially can have 2x, 4x, 8x as many viewers than SC2 streamers.
unranked matches, improved battle.net, unproved battle.net community, improved chat, HotS is much more streamlined for the casual player etc
On March 04 2013 17:58 KvltMan wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due This is implying that none of it was actually planned for HotS. Which it with most certainty was.
It wasn't publicly released when destiny was talking about it
|
On March 04 2013 20:19 Hamboigahz wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2013 17:43 Qwertify wrote:On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due You should probably include at least a few specific examples of what you mean, otherwise I don't really know what you are talking about and have no real option to disagree or agree with you. BTW - from what I've read from people who have followed Destiny's transition away from SC2 more closely than I have, his move was largely motivated by financial issues, and LoL streamers get more viewers, and potentially can have 2x, 4x, 8x as many viewers than SC2 streamers. unranked matches, improved battle.net, unproved battle.net community, improved chat, HotS is much more streamlined for the casual player etc Show nested quote +On March 04 2013 17:58 KvltMan wrote:On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due This is implying that none of it was actually planned for HotS. Which it with most certainty was. It wasn't publicly released when destiny was talking about it
So does that mean that Destiny "called it" or brought about the decision to implent them?
|
On March 04 2013 20:36 KvltMan wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2013 20:19 Hamboigahz wrote:On March 04 2013 17:43 Qwertify wrote:On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due You should probably include at least a few specific examples of what you mean, otherwise I don't really know what you are talking about and have no real option to disagree or agree with you. BTW - from what I've read from people who have followed Destiny's transition away from SC2 more closely than I have, his move was largely motivated by financial issues, and LoL streamers get more viewers, and potentially can have 2x, 4x, 8x as many viewers than SC2 streamers. unranked matches, improved battle.net, unproved battle.net community, improved chat, HotS is much more streamlined for the casual player etc On March 04 2013 17:58 KvltMan wrote:On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due This is implying that none of it was actually planned for HotS. Which it with most certainty was. It wasn't publicly released when destiny was talking about it So does that mean that Destiny "called it" or brought about the decision to implent them?
It means that the problems he brought up sc2 was dismissed by the majority of the community as being ridiculous
and now everyone is riding blizzards dick for fixing the things everyone said wasn't a problem when they were brought up by Destiny
|
10k viewers, literally 1/3rd of the entire sc2 scene XD
|
On March 04 2013 17:58 thezanursic wrote:
How well is he doing nowadays with LoL?
Skill wise, he's still terrible and couldnt get out of silver (again) without duoing.
Viewer wise, seems like he's doing just fine.
|
On March 13 2013 09:22 Thermia wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2013 17:58 thezanursic wrote:
How well is he doing nowadays with LoL? Skill wise, he's still terrible and couldnt get out of silver (again) without duoing. Viewer wise, seems like he's doing just fine.
are you joking?
he's a diamond player which is hard as fuck to do. he's playing only adc though, and if he can't, he supports.
viewer wise he's better than when he last streamed WoL, he still has anywhere from 1,5k-6k viewers
|
On March 13 2013 09:47 damahammer wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 09:22 Thermia wrote:On March 04 2013 17:58 thezanursic wrote:
How well is he doing nowadays with LoL? Skill wise, he's still terrible and couldnt get out of silver (again) without duoing. Viewer wise, seems like he's doing just fine. are you joking? he's a diamond player which is hard as fuck to do. he's playing only adc though, and if he can't, he supports. viewer wise he's better than when he last streamed WoL, he still has anywhere from 1,5k-6k viewers
He got to diamond by cheesing the ladder with Draven pre-nerf BT, and duoing with high ranked players.
On March 13 2013 09:22 Thermia wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2013 17:58 thezanursic wrote:
How well is he doing nowadays with LoL? Skill wise, he's still terrible and couldnt get out of silver (again) without duoing. Viewer wise, seems like he's doing just fine.
Is accurate.
|
Everyone who watches a LoL stream thinks the person who's playing is terrible. I'd go so far as to describe it as human nature at this point. The average person sits there absorbing everything and then shits on the player for not noticing X or Y even though the player is the one playing and the viewer has all his mental faculties dedicated to just watching and criticizing.
Edit: Choosing Draven and buying items: confirmed to be a cheese
|
On March 13 2013 10:19 lolmlg wrote:
Everyone who watches a LoL stream thinks the person who's playing is terrible. I'd go so far as to describe it as human nature at this point. The average person sits there absorbing everything and then shits on the player for not noticing X or Y even though the player is the one playing and the viewer has all his mental faculties dedicated to just watching and criticizing.
Edit: Choosing Draven and buying items: confirmed to be a cheese
This is completely false. There are tons of excellent players, and watching a player play has nothing to do with perception of skill. Regularly feeding in Silver League does. League is just not Steven's forte; he isn't good at it.
On March 13 2013 10:19 lolmlg wrote:Choosing Draven and buying items: confirmed to be a cheese.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Please know that juvenile tactics like that don't work in substitute of an actual response. Draven scales near double on autos with AD, so rushing pre-nerf BT on him was near the level of lane cheese because it was so abusive.
|
On March 13 2013 10:32 DemigodcelpH wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 10:19 lolmlg wrote:
Everyone who watches a LoL stream thinks the person who's playing is terrible. I'd go so far as to describe it as human nature at this point. The average person sits there absorbing everything and then shits on the player for not noticing X or Y even though the player is the one playing and the viewer has all his mental faculties dedicated to just watching and criticizing.
Edit: Choosing Draven and buying items: confirmed to be a cheese This is completely false. There are tons of excellent players, and watching a player play has nothing to do with perception of skill. Regularly feeding in Silver League does. League is just not Steven's forte; he isn't good at it. Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 10:19 lolmlg wrote:Choosing Draven and buying items: confirmed to be a cheese. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_manPlease know that juvenile tactics like that don't work in substitute of an actual response. Draven scales near double on autos with AD, so rushing pre-nerf BT on him was near the level of lane cheese because it was so abusive.
I like how you actually linked to the wikipedia article instead of saying something like, "nice straw-man."
|
Canada11381 Posts
On March 05 2013 09:56 Hamboigahz wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2013 20:36 KvltMan wrote:On March 04 2013 20:19 Hamboigahz wrote:On March 04 2013 17:43 Qwertify wrote:On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due You should probably include at least a few specific examples of what you mean, otherwise I don't really know what you are talking about and have no real option to disagree or agree with you. BTW - from what I've read from people who have followed Destiny's transition away from SC2 more closely than I have, his move was largely motivated by financial issues, and LoL streamers get more viewers, and potentially can have 2x, 4x, 8x as many viewers than SC2 streamers. unranked matches, improved battle.net, unproved battle.net community, improved chat, HotS is much more streamlined for the casual player etc On March 04 2013 17:58 KvltMan wrote:On March 04 2013 17:01 Hamboigahz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that pretty much every complaint that Destiny made about SC2:WoL has been fixed for HotS?
Everyone ranted so much about how 'wrong' Destiny was with his criticisms and now they praise blizzard for creating the things Destiny suggested before the information about HotS was released.
Why don't people give credit where it's due This is implying that none of it was actually planned for HotS. Which it with most certainty was. It wasn't publicly released when destiny was talking about it So does that mean that Destiny "called it" or brought about the decision to implent them? It means that the problems he brought up sc2 was dismissed by the majority of the community as being ridiculous and now everyone is riding blizzards dick for fixing the things everyone said wasn't a problem when they were brought up by Destiny
That's silly. There's been many of us that have been calling it Battlenet 0.2 for some time for many of these reasons and so did Destiny. But to say he was the lone figure at the time is some pretty sketchy memory at best.
|
I watch Destiny regularly and I like his stream but to be completely honest he kinda got carried to diamond in LoL. I mean when he's not duoing, he has trouble even carrying silver league games. Watch any other diamond player smurfing and they will only lose maybe 2 or 3 games all the way up to high plat. But I don't think anyone who watches his stream, expects top level performance from him. Most people (including me) watch him because he's a funny and entertaining person.
|
On March 13 2013 10:32 DemigodcelpH wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 10:19 lolmlg wrote:
Everyone who watches a LoL stream thinks the person who's playing is terrible. I'd go so far as to describe it as human nature at this point. The average person sits there absorbing everything and then shits on the player for not noticing X or Y even though the player is the one playing and the viewer has all his mental faculties dedicated to just watching and criticizing.
Edit: Choosing Draven and buying items: confirmed to be a cheese This is completely false. There are tons of excellent players, and watching a player play has nothing to do with perception of skill. Regularly feeding in Silver League does. League is just not Steven's forte; he isn't good at it. Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 10:19 lolmlg wrote:Choosing Draven and buying items: confirmed to be a cheese. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_manPlease know that juvenile tactics like that don't work in substitute of an actual response. Draven scales near double on autos with AD, so rushing pre-nerf BT on him was near the level of lane cheese because it was so abusive.
You sound like the type who gets mad at video games.
League of Legends is ten player game with two teams of five players. To single out one player for rushing one item and call it "cheese" because his Q has the potential to deal a lot of damage is so myopic it borders on absurd. Maybe you have bad memories of trying to lane against a Pantheon with five Black Cleavers. I feel bad for you son. But that's a completely different situation than what we're talking about, and that only lasted for a couple of days. Getting mad at people for building a Bloodthirster first as part of their build?
As for the rest of your post, stating "well my opinion is correct, I certainly don't do that" isn't a response.
On March 13 2013 11:09 kyriores wrote:
I watch Destiny regularly and I like his stream but to be completely honest he kinda got carried to diamond in LoL.
He solo-queued the highest elo portion of his climb into the old version of platinum. He got into the new diamond before PhantomLord, and PhantomLord duoed with him to get into it too. Kind of funny how that works.
|
10k viewers last night. ez.
Welcome back baby.
|
is destiny back to play SC2
|
^yes.... yes he is  . SC2 Destiny is back, and will watch again, rooting for this guy always
|
Kingfestor is back. RIP LoL fans.
In all seriousness he seems to be having more fun playing HotS right now compared to when I last saw him streaming LoL.
|
On March 15 2013 07:46 AnYvia wrote:
Kingfestor is back. RIP LoL fans.
In all seriousness he seems to be having more fun playing HotS right now compared to when I last saw him streaming LoL.
LoL is a depressing game. It doesn't surprise me that he's having more fun with HotS.
|
Is it surprising that he has more fun trying a new game as opposed to playing the same game for several hours a day?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
