|
Personal attacks in this thread will draw a temp ban. |
On January 18 2011 10:31 ratMortar wrote:People who want to see replays of IdrA actually owning people should look up Artosis' channel on youtube. http://www.youtube.com/user/ArtosisTVThere's a bunch of really good games on there and it's cool 'cause Artosis mentions in an interview that he actually got these off IdrA's pc making them super exclusive.
Omg only ONE video for a 15 minutes long game. So awesome.
|
|
Already been posted on his facebook, don't remember seeing it on the TL though.
|
Brother Mack made another video for Idra? Bet your house on the Gracken, he can't lose now.
|
|
On January 18 2011 11:00 BasilPesto wrote:Praise Idra!
Release the Gracken is hung up behind him. and this is such an odd character to some into SCII, but i love him
edit: I just sent a friend request to IdrA's personal facebook by accident. it'd be super cool if he'd accept though lol
|
It's been a while since I watched a high quality casted game. I've been used to low quality commentaries by some casters (who you know too well). These casters like to split their games into 8 to 10 minutes parts, so they get more views.
Anyway, thanks for posting these replays, you made me feel like watching more casted games (thanks to said low quality casters, I stopped watching them). I'll re-subscribe to Artosis !
|
On January 18 2011 13:32 Starlos wrote: It's been a while since I watched a high quality casted game. I've been used to low quality commentaries by some casters (who you know too well). These casters like to split their games into 8 to 10 minutes parts, so they get more views.
I can't speak for every caster, but I remember Crota explaining once that he split videos for two reasons: 1. As a non-partner, you only have a 15 minute limit. 2. It could be awkward if part 1 of a video were15 minutes long, while part 2 werejust one minute long.
|
On January 18 2011 13:43 BasilPesto wrote:
I can't speak for every caster, but I remember Crota explaining once that he split videos for two reasons: 1. As a non-partner, you only have a 15 minute limit. 2. It could be awkward if part 1 of a video were15 minutes long, while part 2 werejust one minute long.
The casters I'm talking about are partners (at least I know one is). And yes, the number 2 sounds like a good one, but you could just make a 15 minutes part 2 where 13 minutes are blank, so nobody knows the length of the game.
|
On January 18 2011 13:43 BasilPesto wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2011 13:32 Starlos wrote: It's been a while since I watched a high quality casted game. I've been used to low quality commentaries by some casters (who you know too well). These casters like to split their games into 8 to 10 minutes parts, so they get more views. I can't speak for every caster, but I remember Crota explaining once that he split videos for two reasons: 1. As a non-partner, you only have a 15 minute limit. 2. It could be awkward if part 1 of a video were15 minutes long, while part 2 werejust one minute long.
i dont get why people take the video splitting so badly. if i were them heck yes i would split my videos to make more money. its really not that inconvenient to the viewers, and it can get me twice the views. it sounds greedy, but really its not like they are making you go through a lot of work to just click on part 2 of the video lol
|
On January 18 2011 13:47 FrankWalls wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2011 13:43 BasilPesto wrote:On January 18 2011 13:32 Starlos wrote: It's been a while since I watched a high quality casted game. I've been used to low quality commentaries by some casters (who you know too well). These casters like to split their games into 8 to 10 minutes parts, so they get more views. I can't speak for every caster, but I remember Crota explaining once that he split videos for two reasons: 1. As a non-partner, you only have a 15 minute limit. 2. It could be awkward if part 1 of a video were15 minutes long, while part 2 werejust one minute long. i dont get why people take the video splitting so badly. if i were them heck yes i would split my videos to make more money. its really not that inconvenient to the viewers, and it can get me twice the views. it sounds greedy, but really its not like they are making you go through a lot of work to just click on part 2 of the video lol
I don't know. Usually, when someone put a 30 minutes long video instead of 3 of 10 minutes, it's usually of good quality. Maybe I'm biased about it.
|
On January 18 2011 13:47 FrankWalls wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2011 13:43 BasilPesto wrote:On January 18 2011 13:32 Starlos wrote: It's been a while since I watched a high quality casted game. I've been used to low quality commentaries by some casters (who you know too well). These casters like to split their games into 8 to 10 minutes parts, so they get more views. I can't speak for every caster, but I remember Crota explaining once that he split videos for two reasons: 1. As a non-partner, you only have a 15 minute limit. 2. It could be awkward if part 1 of a video were15 minutes long, while part 2 werejust one minute long. i dont get why people take the video splitting so badly. if i were them heck yes i would split my videos to make more money. its really not that inconvenient to the viewers, and it can get me twice the views. it sounds greedy, but really its not like they are making you go through a lot of work to just click on part 2 of the video lol
I for one usually watch videos fullscreen from a couch behind my computer chair, and it is extremely annoying to have to get up every 6 minutes to click to the next vid, click through the different resolutions, and maximize because some youtube partner wants more views. Yes, it's not a lot of work, but it is obnoxious that people with the ability to upload more than 15 minutes do not do so just for the views.
|
On January 18 2011 14:33 Thermia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2011 13:47 FrankWalls wrote:On January 18 2011 13:43 BasilPesto wrote:On January 18 2011 13:32 Starlos wrote: It's been a while since I watched a high quality casted game. I've been used to low quality commentaries by some casters (who you know too well). These casters like to split their games into 8 to 10 minutes parts, so they get more views. I can't speak for every caster, but I remember Crota explaining once that he split videos for two reasons: 1. As a non-partner, you only have a 15 minute limit. 2. It could be awkward if part 1 of a video were15 minutes long, while part 2 werejust one minute long. i dont get why people take the video splitting so badly. if i were them heck yes i would split my videos to make more money. its really not that inconvenient to the viewers, and it can get me twice the views. it sounds greedy, but really its not like they are making you go through a lot of work to just click on part 2 of the video lol I for one usually watch videos fullscreen from a couch behind my computer chair, and it is extremely annoying to have to get up every 6 minutes to click to the next vid, click through the different resolutions, and maximize because some youtube partner wants more views. Yes, it's not a lot of work, but it is obnoxious that people with the ability to upload more than 15 minutes do not do so just for the views.
Guess you haven't figured out how to make playlists on youtube, huh.
|
Guess not, but it's still more work on my part to do something that I don't need to because someone doesn't use a feature that they get the relatively rare privilege of using in order to get views.
More on topic for the Idra fan club, I'm hopeful he'll make it past Jinro (though its too bad the foreigners have to knock each other out this early), but unless Nada beats MKP, I think he'll have a rough time getting to the finals, let alone winning vs MVP or Nestea. GL Idra.
|
On January 18 2011 15:39 Thermia wrote: Guess not, but it's still more work on my part to do something that I don't need to because someone doesn't use a feature that they get the relatively rare privilege of using in order to get views.
More on topic for the Idra fan club, I'm hopeful he'll make it past Jinro (though its too bad the foreigners have to knock each other out this early), but unless Nada beats MKP, I think he'll have a rough time getting to the finals, let alone winning vs MVP or Nestea. GL Idra.
At least we're sure a foreigner will get past RO8. I would really REALLY be pleased if a foreigner (I don't care Jinro or IdrA) would win the GSL code S. Seriously, I would have an intense nerdgasm.
|
Even if he beats Jinro, there is still good players in the tournament. MVP looks like unstoppable.
|
On January 18 2011 16:50 Invoker wrote: Even if he beats Jinro, there is still good players in the tournament. MVP looks like unstoppable.
MC also looked unbeatable. But Jinro won using mech in TvP. Foreigner fighting !
|
On January 18 2011 16:50 Invoker wrote: Even if he beats Jinro, there is still good players in the tournament. MVP looks like unstoppable.
Yeah he's been playing super strong kinda hoping to see Idra vs MVP honestly last time Idra took a game off of him on steppes and hopefully the map pool would be similar to what Jinro/Idra have to make it more epic
|
On January 18 2011 15:39 Thermia wrote: Guess not, but it's still more work on my part to do something that I don't need to because someone doesn't use a feature that they get the relatively rare privilege of using in order to get views.
More on topic for the Idra fan club, I'm hopeful he'll make it past Jinro (though its too bad the foreigners have to knock each other out this early), but unless Nada beats MKP, I think he'll have a rough time getting to the finals, let alone winning vs MVP or Nestea. GL Idra.
You mean its inconvinient for you to make 2 extra mouseclicks to get to your FREE content?
Geeze..
|
On January 18 2011 20:15 ELA wrote:
You mean its inconvinient for you to make 2 extra mouseclicks to get to your FREE content?
Geeze..
Youtube makes people partners so they can upload more convenient stuff to the watchers, and drag them. Because it is a business, more people, more money, and more people will come if stuff is better. I am sure youtube representatives wouldnt be happy to know that they give partnership to people who only abuse it
|
|
|
|