[TV] HBO Game of Thrones - Page 384

On April 13 2012 22:25 Dr.Lettuce wrote:


Okok I missed the part about carrying the eggs... my bad.

Erm... I don't understand the second part. Yes, no one has seen dragons in centuries, so why would no one say anything? It's like me seeing a T-rex and thinking, oh that's mildly unusual. I'll just carry on with my day now.

Suspicious of what? Sorry I'm not following. Are you saying that they are suspicious of her and this is making them not say anything? I think that's pretty stupid... you don't have to approach her rudely. But you could just ask why she has a baby fucking dragon?

Unless some one explains this to me better or shows that I've clearly missed something this is striking me as a gaping hole in the story that hasn't really been thought out that well.

On April 13 2012 23:21 ZasZ. wrote:


Most of the khal left shortly before Drogo died. Those that remain are too weak and feeble to flee or are loyal to her. Dragons are probably pretty awe-inspiring for a somewhat primitive culture like the Dothraki (or any civilized culture for that matter). They also respect power, so the fact that she hatched three extinct killing machines is probably intriguing.

As for everyone else, they either don't know about her dragons yet, or won't believe what they're being told. This would be like somebody telling you that their friend saw a T-rex, would you believe it?

Her people knew that she was "blood of the dragon" and that she was carrying three dragon eggs. I don't think anyone expected them to hatch, but it can hardly be called suspicious.

On April 14 2012 00:18 ShloobeR wrote:


What have you been watching if you 'missed the part where she was carrying the eggs'... : p

Can't wait to see how the Starks, Lannisters and Baratheons will react when they find out about the dragons

The last time someone had a dragon they conquered the entirety of Westeros and ruled it for generations. Im pretty sure all of em will throw a tantrum and shit themselves if they show up on there shores.

On April 14 2012 03:58 DeepElemBlues wrote:


Dany still needs an army if she wants to invade Westeros, 3 dragons and her bloodriders can't cover the whole continent.

On April 14 2012 04:17 Gene wrote:
I feel the three dragons alone could do it, much less any dothraki she wants to have join her. What in westeros is going to stand up to dragons?

On April 14 2012 04:17 Gene wrote:
I feel the three dragons alone could do it, much less any dothraki she wants to have join her. What in westeros is going to stand up to dragons?

On April 14 2012 00:22 ZasZ. wrote:


Seriously...it's a fairly large plot element even prior to them hatching into dragons because they give her strength and Viserys reveals how greedy he is when he tries to steal them from her shortly before his death.

On April 14 2012 05:05 IRL_Sinister wrote:


They're too small, though. As stated in the show it will be several years before they can defend themselves, let alone Danerys.

On April 14 2012 06:57 p4NDemik wrote:
Why are all of you fussing about the dragons and why her remaining Khalisar isn't more suspicious of her? The dragons are nice but they aren't the main reason her people are so attached to her. She gave her speech that she would make those who harm them scream as they burned. She walked into a raging funeral pyre and came out unscathed. That alone would make for a compelling reason to follow this woman. The way they kneel, she might as well be a god to them, and the dragons their angels. I haven't read the books to get a true insight to how exactly they view her but I can only imagine it is this type of religious fervor that keeps them tied to her.

On April 14 2012 04:17 Gene wrote:
I feel the three dragons alone could do it, much less any dothraki she wants to have join her. What in westeros is going to stand up to dragons?