EPT[Movie] The Hobbit Trilogy - Page 70
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
karpotoss
135 Posts
| ||
|
Kakaru2
198 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
TerribleTrioJon
United States57 Posts
On June 12 2013 05:04 Kakaru2 wrote: What glimpse of Beorn? Was he the wolf they were hiding behind the door? I remember him as a bear, not a wolf. Yup, Beorn does takes the form of a bear. From watching :39-41, it looks like a bear to me. | ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
 EDIT: To clarify, I think it will be an entertaining movie, but it doesn't seem very true to the book which I think is a damn shame. | ||
|
MaestroSC
United States2073 Posts
| ||
|
Nisyax
Netherlands756 Posts
On June 12 2013 04:46 karpotoss wrote: For some reason i didn't like the trailer, yet i absoluely adored first part. Smaug looked weird and i don't like adding this pseudo romantic interest for legolas. Peter Jackson has confirmed there will be no romantic connection to Legolas. (from wikipedia) Long wait until December | ||
|
Copymizer
Denmark2104 Posts
| ||
|
itkovian
United States1763 Posts
| ||
Falling
Canada11385 Posts
Very cool trailer though. Hardly seems a 'teaser.' More just show everything. *Not technically a monster film, but still. | ||
|
EpiK
Korea (South)5757 Posts
It would've been much cooler if they had just ended it with benedict cumberbatch saying something ominous and not shown the dragon | ||
|
S:klogW
Austria657 Posts
| ||
|
MrMedic
Canada452 Posts
| ||
|
Dakkas
2550 Posts
On June 12 2013 13:13 Falling wrote: Aren't they breaking one of the rules of monster films?* Don't reveal your monster in the trailer? Very cool trailer though. Hardly seems a 'teaser.' More just show everything. *Not technically a monster film, but still. It would work if the monster itself was meant to be a surprise however Smaug is about as generic as European dragons get, aside from his gemstone belly | ||
white_horse
1019 Posts
| ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
| ||
|
Vorenius
Denmark1979 Posts
On June 12 2013 21:06 -Archangel- wrote: First movie was pretty terrible (for a LotR movie), hopefully this one is better. I guess the upside is that after the first one, if the second is anywhere close to decent I'll be pleasently suprised  | ||
|
Mortal
2943 Posts
| ||
|
peidongyang
Canada2084 Posts
2:30 hours long but only felt like 1 hour of content | ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On June 13 2013 00:08 Mortal wrote: Yeah if the trailer is anything to go by, this awful cartoony style is here to stay. Sad considering the original trilogy against the first of the 3 in this series (the originals were pretty good, the first of these was fucking god-awful). The hobbit was originally a book for children. You can't make it more Lord of the Rings-esque if you want the movies to stay somewhat true to the book. It's always been a more light hearted story of crazy adventures and discoveries, kind of like a fairy tail. Comparing it to the Lord of the Rings which was intended to be a much more dramatic, deep, dark and heavy story is never going to work. | ||
| ||
