| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
NOTE: This thread contains spoilers. Do not read the thread if you are not caught up. If a new episode has already officially aired, you are allowed to discuss what happened without posting in spoilers. | ||
|
Mikau
Netherlands1446 Posts
On March 06 2016 19:12 chrisolo wrote: I am quiet sure that pleading guilty was part of the deal and when he signed that deal, he practically said he was guilty in front of court. Part of the deal he made was that Gibbs wouldn't go after anybody else. You could argue not going after whatever his name is for perjury should or would be included. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46552 Posts
On March 07 2016 07:57 ZenithM wrote: Suits has been known to spend (almost) entire episodes on flashbacks from years ago. I could see the season starting when Mike comes out of jail, but being mostly flashbacks from his life in it, in relation to what he's going to do now. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the next season starts after prison ends and they just use flashbacks for the missed two years, but I'm not sure I'd be satisfied with that. I'd like to see Mike actually suffer a bit and atone for his sins. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46552 Posts
On March 07 2016 08:27 Mikau wrote: Part of the deal he made was that Gibbs wouldn't go after anybody else. You could argue not going after whatever his name is for perjury should or would be included. The final nuances of who can't be pursued- anyone at the firm vs just the name partners vs anyone at all including friends not at the firm- was privately clarified and so we don't know for sure if Donna/ Rachel or Jimmy/ Scottie or anyone else could be charged during the next season. I'm sure that his secret being out/ him pleading guilty won't fix much of anything though. Lawsuits are incoming, and there'll surely be more fraud drama. And Rachel drama since, well, it's Rachel. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/o8tDCnl.jpg) | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8932 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46552 Posts
On March 07 2016 09:28 evilfatsh1t wrote: inb4 logan sanders comes back and starts hitting on rachel again That actor keeps bouncing between Scorpion and Suits, and he plays a jackass in both shows. He's perfect for Rachel. | ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
PSL is donezo, seems like everyone left, lol. Wondering what will happen to Harvey / Jessica / Louis in next season, ehh. I hope they don't build next season around Mike sitting in prison, cause that would be dumb. | ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46552 Posts
| ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8932 Posts
On March 10 2016 17:12 739 wrote: IT HAD to end like this otherwise it'd be even more stupid ending if he was found not guilty and all behaved like nothing happened. PSL is donezo, seems like everyone left, lol. Wondering what will happen to Harvey / Jessica / Louis in next season, ehh. I hope they don't build next season around Mike sitting in prison, cause that would be dumb. it wouldnt be like nothing happened though. mike getting off might let him practice law as he pleases but pls is a dead firm now. the show could have continued with jessica, harvey, mike, louis etc trying to revive the firm and that would have been fun to watch. now the show is probably going to split the plot into pls reviving the firm + mike getting rekt in prison | ||
|
coverpunch
United States2093 Posts
On March 10 2016 17:13 icystorage wrote: It'll be "Jumpsuits" HEYO | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
 .They would really be shooting themselves in the foot by starting from scratch, and I think they're not about to throw away a successful formula just to take a chance at a prison show (which, just looking at this thread, few people want). But maybe the show is trying to distance itself from Mike, one of its 2 main characters, and will keep the prison stuff to a minimum. That's a whole other discussion then, more about Mike's fading importance. | ||
|
Beany
Netherlands396 Posts
The showrunner might have said they won't do a timeskip for the next seasons first episode. But he never stated they wouldn't do this in the second or third episode. My guess is that they'll show the first and maybe second episode his prisontime for a period and then do a timeskip. They might touch on the subject of building PSL up again the next season, but by the end of the season PSL will be the powerhouse they once were, for sure. | ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
| ||
|
Beany
Netherlands396 Posts
On March 11 2016 22:19 739 wrote: Well so what will happen to Mike once he gets out of prison? He can't practice law anyway so... ? He could get a degree inside prison. Though i don't think that's doable in 2 years sentence... | ||
|
714
30 Posts
This is why people think Americans are retarded. User was warned for this post | ||
|
Beany
Netherlands396 Posts
The whole problem is that a jury has an opinion about the case. On this matter; one guys opinion is very strong. He thinks that even though Mike didn't go to school, he functions as a real lawyer. He's so good at his job, that in this guys mind; he deserves to be aquited. He then goes above and beyond to get the rest of the jury behind him. And in the end he succeeds. I think that's the whole problem with this story. I don't know if this could happen in real life. But once you get the sympathy of a jury, you can do anything. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On March 11 2016 23:47 714 wrote: Actually what's fucking stupid is the jury. So everyone knows he didn't go to law school, which is what the whole case is about. Oh, but let's find him innocent on a technicality! This is why people think Americans are retarded. User was warned for this post No, the point was that you're innocent until PROVEN guilty. And the jury Harvey went to see said Anita Gibbs didn't have enough of a case, and you can't condemn a guy just because you somehow are convinced he did it. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46552 Posts
On March 12 2016 07:59 ZenithM wrote: No, the point was that you're innocent until PROVEN guilty. And the jury Harvey went to see said Anita Gibbs didn't have enough of a case, and you can't condemn a guy just because you somehow are convinced he did it. Agreed. The juror literally said to Harvey that Gibbs didn't make a convincing enough argument. | ||
|
Just_a_Moth
Canada1971 Posts
I have seen 12 Angry Men. | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Reynor vs Zoun
Neeb vs Rogue
FEL
Patches Events
AI Arena Tournament
FEL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
