| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
Logo
United States7542 Posts
On May 07 2016 01:44 Nyan wrote: what? echo is total shit No way, in so many of these fights it would have given Slark a kill. Getting a 3 hit burst with Dark Pact is enough to kill a lot of supports right away instead of having them turn, disable, and survive (or force staff away). It's no good for a 6 slot or late game Slark, but if you're trying to win midgame fights against squishy targets or targets that will disable you it's a huge return on investment. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
|
Potassium
Poland59 Posts
 | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34171 Posts
what a team | ||
|
Procake
3803 Posts
| ||
|
GiveMeYourtTots
990 Posts
On May 07 2016 01:47 Procake wrote: Valve inviting 12 teams was beyond stupid... All the borderline teams should have been in the qualifier. Yes, I agree with this so much. I honestly think there should only be like three or four invites. | ||
|
Moobutt
United States1996 Posts
On May 07 2016 01:47 Procake wrote: Valve inviting 12 teams was beyond stupid... All the borderline teams should have been in the qualifier. I feel like 2 qualifier spots for EU and China would be better. But I really don't think America or SEA deserves two qualifier spots. | ||
|
bluzi
4703 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32740 Posts
On May 07 2016 01:47 Procake wrote: Valve inviting 12 teams was beyond stupid... All the borderline teams should have been in the qualifier. Top four to six of the previous Major is fine, but twelve is a commercial decision to drag in all the fan favorite teams so they're guaranteed an appearance, even if they don't deserve it or should have qualified. | ||
|
Moobutt
United States1996 Posts
| ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
On May 07 2016 01:47 Procake wrote: Valve inviting 12 teams was beyond stupid... All the borderline teams should have been in the qualifier. Sadly, the only way to keep 10 team EU qualifier was 12 invites with Alliance/OG/Navi invites. | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
On May 07 2016 01:56 Moobutt wrote: Top 4 from last Major get invited, 2 more teams are invited based on non-major performance. 10 qualifier slots allotted based on a region's dominance/relevance. So 3 Europe, 3 China, 2 America, 2 SEA. How do you propose measuring relevance/dominance? | ||
|
hfglgg
Germany5372 Posts
On May 07 2016 02:01 lolfail9001 wrote: How do you propose measuring relevance/dominance? finishs on international lans edit: On May 07 2016 01:54 PhoenixVoid wrote: Top four to six of the previous Major is fine, but twelve is a commercial decision to drag in all the fan favorite teams so they're guaranteed an appearance, even if they don't deserve it or should have qualified. i dont think its a commercial decision, valve doesnt really need that. its just pure laziness. with the short span between shanghai and manilla invites and that the tournaments that were played werent really stacked and had a lot of upcoming teams in it, the decision who to invite was a tiny bit harder. valve decided to invite anyone who will ever win anything even remotely international and just be done with it, no second thoughts wasted. i wonder what they do if there are two more tournament winners. | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
How exactly, once again? | ||
|
ref4
2933 Posts
whoever wins the LANS closest to a Major gets an invite or someting | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
On May 07 2016 02:06 ref4 wrote: whoever wins the LANS closest to a Major gets an invite or someting We talk about qualifier spot distribution, not invites. | ||
|
Moobutt
United States1996 Posts
On May 07 2016 02:01 lolfail9001 wrote: How do you propose measuring relevance/dominance? So, I'm totally spitballing... Top 4 previous major + 2 performance invites non-related to majors. 10 left Give every region an automatic 1 qualifier slot. 6 slots left. Then, look at previous major results for relevance/dominance. More I think about it, the less I'm sure it would work. Each region would need a different format for the different amount of Qualifier spots. | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
On May 07 2016 02:08 Moobutt wrote: So, I'm totally spitballing... Top 4 previous major + 2 performance invites non-related to majors. 10 left Give every region an automatic 1 qualifier slot. 6 slots left. Then, look at previous major results for relevance/dominance. More I think about it, the less I'm sure it would work. Each region would need a different format for the different amount of Qualifier spots. Once again, there is no precise version to measure relevance. The only viable one would be a wildcard, so something like top 4 + 2 performance + 2 qualifiers per region + 2 wildcards for 4 3rd places of qualifiers. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On May 07 2016 02:08 Moobutt wrote: So, I'm totally spitballing... Top 4 previous major + 2 performance invites non-related to majors. 10 left Give every region an automatic 1 qualifier slot. 6 slots left. Then, look at previous major results for relevance/dominance. More I think about it, the less I'm sure it would work. Each region would need a different format for the different amount of Qualifier spots. It could work, but they'd need a system to decide how to count results for each region. As it is, they look at results from the last six months for their invite, which in my opinion is too long of a time, and it's why they had to invite this many teams. | ||
|
FreakyDroid
Macedonia2616 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Code For Giants Cup
SC Evo League
TaeJa vs Cure
Rogue vs threepoint
ByuN vs Creator
MaNa vs Classic
Maestros of the Game
ShoWTimE vs Cham
GuMiho vs Ryung
Zoun vs Spirit
Rogue vs MaNa
[BSL 2025] Weekly
SC Evo League
Maestros of the Game
SHIN vs Creator
Astrea vs Lambo
Bunny vs SKillous
HeRoMaRinE vs TriGGeR
BSL Team Wars
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
BSL Team Wars
Team Dewalt vs Team Sziky
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
