EPTofc, they did pre-ti4 too, during 6.81 etc
Dota Pit S3 - Page 119
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
ofc, they did pre-ti4 too, during 6.81 etc | ||
|
Mosoball
Finland686 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:42 Procake wrote: Isn't the comeback mechanic still in though? Just toned down. I can't remember much from TI3 era, how regular was snowballing from laning stage and comebacks in 6.78? It's really toned down. You have to remember the first comeback gold patch nerfed the killstreak gold that was the original comeback mechanic, and now that they took a lot away from the comeback mechanic and the killstreak gold is nerfed.. /E Btw it's lovely to see the splitpush (centered around a set of heroes strong this patch?) vs 5man stuff (centered ofc around certain strong heroes) again, instead of drafts around 2 heroes every game. | ||
|
BoesFX
1451 Posts
| ||
|
greebosnabble
255 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:42 Procake wrote: Isn't the comeback mechanic still in though? Just toned down. I can't remember much from TI3 era, how regular was snowballing from laning stage and comebacks in 6.78? I think the general consensus from pros is that the rubberband has very little effect in top tier matches (even in 6.83). | ||
|
Gevna
France2332 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:42 Procake wrote: Isn't the comeback mechanic still in though? Just toned down. I can't remember much from TI3 era, how regular was snowballing from laning stage and comebacks in 6.78? Well at TI3 you couldn't snowball as much as in 6.81 (and maybe 6.84) from the laning phase. Fast push and deathball strategies were not really common if I remember correctly. Anyway it's a bit too early to make sure calls about 6.84, but I'm a bit pessimistic. | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:44 greebosnabble wrote: I think the general consensus from pros is that the rubberband has very little effect in top tier matches (even in 6.83). huh? whyd u think icefrog nerfed them more all the pros I know agreed that it was still stupid, especially how it interacted with buyback | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:46 Sn0_Man wrote: huh? whyd u think icefrog nerfed them more all the pros I know agreed that it was still stupid, especially how it interacted with buyback Misery thought it was fine :3 | ||
|
Gevna
France2332 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:46 Sn0_Man wrote: huh? whyd u think icefrog nerfed them more all the pros I know agreed that it was still stupid, especially how it interacted with buyback Most western pros said something along those lines yeah, the only one I know who said that it wasn't that big of a deal was Iceiceice. | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34171 Posts
which is a big punishment for the team that actually tried to get ahead | ||
|
Procake
3803 Posts
Wasn't that n0tail, and I think he said people shouldn't complain about losing because of it, not that he liked it necessarily. | ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
 | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:49 Procake wrote: Wasn't that n0tail, and I think he said people shouldn't complain about losing because of it, not that he liked it necessarily. Nah I was watching him talk about it on stream. He literally was like "I dunno why people hated 6.83 meta so much. Yes I am serious. FHDH is paraphrasing me here but this is basically what I said." Also this midlane is sadistic as FUCK. | ||
|
Diavlo
Belgium2915 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:45 Gevna wrote: Well at TI3 you couldn't snowball as much as in 6.81 (and maybe 6.84) from the laning phase. Fast push and deathball strategies were not really common if I remember correctly. Anyway it's a bit too early to make sure calls about 6.84, but I'm a bit pessimistic. Fast push and deathball were not as common (tho LGD.int was successful only because of that) but laning was hugely important. Team Sigma was notorious for focusing on winning the lane and keeping the advantage the whole game, that's why they made Treant and OD popular picks at TI3. Soe thought it was fine, most thought it was bad, at least the XP part. | ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
| ||
|
Procake
3803 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:51 FHDH wrote: Nah I was watching him talk about it on stream. He literally was like "I dunno why people hated 6.83 meta so much. Yes I am serious. FHDH is paraphrasing me here but this is basically what I said." Also this midlane is sadistic as FUCK. Ah I see, thanks | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34171 Posts
| ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
| ||
|
spudde123
4814 Posts
On May 06 2015 00:46 Sn0_Man wrote: huh? whyd u think icefrog nerfed them more all the pros I know agreed that it was still stupid, especially how it interacted with buyback At least icex3 and a bunch of c9 players (bone7, n0tail, Misery) all talked like they didn't mind the patch. Misery even said last night on his stream that he thinks the patch was good for competitive games and wasn't at all figured out even near the end. Of course this doesn't mean they liked everything about it or that they hate the current one, but just that much of the whining came from elsewhere. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
| ||
