EPT[WPC] LAN - Group Stage - Page 22
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
beifru
2164 Posts
| ||
|
juff
Singapore4659 Posts
| ||
|
Kaizoku
Sweden96 Posts
Given that it is quite likely that the semi then is going to turnout 1A vs 1B (Moral final?). Preferable format would be highest seed in semis faces lowest seed from the opposite group in semis. Or am I missing something? just looked at liquidpedia briefly. I understand this tournament is stacked and no opponent is a cakewalk. | ||
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
| ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 26 2014 21:06 Kaizoku wrote: I was just looking at the playoff bracket. The fact that the winner of 1A vs 4B and 1B vs 4A is meeting in the semifinals is actually quite dumb. Makes me question is there really an advantage of winning the group? Given that it is quite likely that the semi then is going to turnout 1A vs 1B (Moral final?). Preferable format would be highest seed in semis faces lowest seed from the opposite group in semis. Or am I missing something? just looked at liquidpedia briefly. I understand this tournament is stacked and no opponent is a cakewalk. A are the 1-4 seeds while B are the 5-8 seeds. B1 would actually be the 5th seed, facing off against A4 who is the 4th seed. if you think about it as that, it makes a bit more sense. A4 should be favoured against B1. | ||
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
On May 26 2014 21:08 TanGeng wrote: Alliance is pretty good at this chinese dota thing... but western teams are always playing aggressive?! | ||
|
juff
Singapore4659 Posts
On May 26 2014 21:06 Kaizoku wrote: I was just looking at the playoff bracket. The fact that the winner of 1A vs 4B and 1B vs 4A is meeting in the semifinals is actually quite dumb. Makes me question is there really an advantage of winning the group? Given that it is quite likely that the semi then is going to turnout 1A vs 1B (Moral final?). Preferable format would be highest seed in semis faces lowest seed from the opposite group in semis. Or am I missing something? just looked at liquidpedia briefly. I understand this tournament is stacked and no opponent is a cakewalk. 1B is the 5th seed because of the way the groups were made | ||
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
| ||
|
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
On May 26 2014 21:09 opterown wrote: how's the game anyway, are iG winning or something or are alliance playing super passive iG's winning convincingly, both teams are playing passive. | ||
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
On May 26 2014 21:09 opterown wrote: how's the game anyway, are iG winning or something or are alliance playing super passive alliance is super passive. luna and ds with midas. ig is just waiting for the right opportunity to push highground (probably next rosh or next big item on am) | ||
|
Terrorbladder
2718 Posts
| ||
|
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
 | ||
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
On May 26 2014 21:13 Terrorbladder wrote: Why is Alliance trying to play such a passive game against AM i would say that they couldnt challenge ig from the moment they took the first rosh. im still questioning the midas pickup on bulldog...i think with mek they would have been able to challenge it | ||
|
beifru
2164 Posts
| ||
|
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
| ||
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
| ||
|
Terrorbladder
2718 Posts
| ||
|
Talron
Germany7651 Posts
| ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
| ||
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
On May 26 2014 21:19 Terrorbladder wrote: Why didn't they aggro tri against AM at the start? against enchantress? thats not so easy | ||
| ||
