EPTGodz: Nebula is just jealous because Bruno has more chest hair than he has head hair. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
[LR] The International II - 2012 - Page 512
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
Godz: Nebula is just jealous because Bruno has more chest hair than he has head hair. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL | ||
kjwcj
Australia1064 Posts
| ||
|
myrmidon2537
Philippines2188 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On September 02 2012 01:54 Takuna wrote: Only way to give winners finals winner an advantage without going retard would be, that losers winner would have to win 2 BO5s to win the grand final, that would be up to 10 games for the grand final, quite a lot... Perhaps Grand Finals with BO3 would be feasible in this case... Then have a single elimination bracket if you can't go all the way and are going to pussy out at the end, duh? Bo5s would be preferred but Bo3s might work, you can't do half-assed shit like this in a tournament this prestigeous. | ||
|
Implenia
Austria3846 Posts
On September 02 2012 01:55 kjwcj wrote: I really enjoyed Bruno's ensemble yesterday but the jacket he is wearing today..... He said on reddit he would bring more jackets. And he brought. | ||
|
cilinder007
Slovenia7251 Posts
On September 02 2012 01:54 Takuna wrote: Only way to give winners finals winner an advantage without going retard would be, that losers winner would have to win 2 BO5s to win the grand final, that would be up to 10 games for the grand final, quite a lot... Perhaps Grand Finals with BO3 would be feasible in this case... 2 bo5's is too many games.... I think the 1 game advantagee was good, dono why they changed it | ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
| ||
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
On September 02 2012 01:54 Poorlilrich wrote: No, I agree with you. What if say LGD beats iG in winner's final, then iG beats whoever in LB final. LGD are not rewarded at all for initially beating iG, it is not relevant to LGD if iG are better than whoever is in LB final. They deserve a one game advantage, screw whatever people think is exciting. There is a ton of money at stake here. LGD are awarded a spot in the finals.... | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
If they just let iG and LGD play a Bo5 for the finals because they were clearly the better team of each group, afterall the beat everyone else in a completelly fair enviroment, it would be a bad tournament. Worse, but more fair than even double elimination. Don`t pretend winning the WB finals is not better than losing it and having to play the LB finals. It clearly is, so it`s an advantage, even if it is smaller than starting 1-0. | ||
|
Hoosegow
United States139 Posts
| ||
|
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
 | ||
|
myrmidon2537
Philippines2188 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
Have you ever played in a tournament with money on the line and been in the finals ( Note I have multiple times) It's not an award, they earned it. When you go to the loser's bracket, it's not a punishment, it's "oh my god I'm so happy I have another chance and I'm not dead right away". When you go into the finals after BEATING YOUR OPPONENT ONCE you're not happy if it's going to be an even fight and your previous victory was flushed down the toilet. Saying it's tiring is ridiculous, what do you think about a tournament where the only disadvantage for losing is that you're forced to go for a 10 minute jog? (They should do this, screw losers bracket) | ||
|
Stancel
Singapore15360 Posts
sounds legit | ||
|
Poorlilrich
Australia262 Posts
A spot they deserved anyway... but at 0:0 against a team they beat? The have essentially no advantage to show for going undefeated all the way. | ||
|
8mmspikes
United States1704 Posts
| ||
|
zeo
Serbia6343 Posts
On September 02 2012 01:54 Poorlilrich wrote: No, I agree with you. What if say LGD beats iG in winner's final, then iG beats whoever in LB final. LGD are not rewarded at all for initially beating iG, it is not relevant to LGD if iG are better than whoever is in LB final. They deserve a one game advantage, screw whatever people think is exciting. There is a ton of money at stake here. But then iG has to beat the losers bracket winners in a best of 3... A bo3 and a bo5 are totally different beasts imo. Winning a bo3 should not = advantage in bo5 | ||
|
Krikan
Norway520 Posts
| ||
|
Implenia
Austria3846 Posts
On September 02 2012 01:58 Shikyo wrote: Have you ever played in a tournament with money on the line and been in the finals ( Note I have multiple times) It's not an award, they earned it. When you go to the loser's bracket, it's not a punishment, it's "oh my god I'm so happy I have another chance and I'm not dead right away". When you go into the finals after BEATING YOUR OPPONENT ONCE you're not happy if it's going to be an even fight and your previous victory was flushed down the toilet. Saying it's tiring is ridiculous, what do you think about a tournament where the only disadvantage for losing is that you're forced to go for a 10 minute jog? I'm not sure why are you going on such a long rant in the LR thread. Make separate post if you feel so strongly about it. People would like to watch games now. | ||
| ||
